2,287 Comments

Sort by

Default profile photo

@ysafi

1 hour ago

Wondering about the cost difference between the mini and the o3 model, is it due to the underlying hardware/GPU infrastructure or something else that contributes to the pricing models?

Reply

@braginsivarsson6229

7 hours ago

Lmao the fact that they have to say they did not train the model on arc dara tells me they did train it on arc data, and man you eat up what they say way to easily and have you looked into the power consumption for o3 its way to much yo be sustainable so AI wont be anything for many years to come

Reply

@trope5858

11 hours ago

Dude, you get paid to spread lies. OpenAI has not achieved AGI. OpenAI and Meta are probably ten years away from that milestone. The only Block Chain close to achieving AGI technology is Qubic and they're going to prove it to the world in 2027

Reply

@THESocialJusticeWarrior

14 hours ago

Can it wait on tables? Can it drive? Get me a beer?

Reply

@vignesh6564

18 hours ago

4:40

Reply

@prootas95

22 hours ago

Clickbait

Reply

@btp9576

1 day ago

Let’s be absolutely clear: the hype surrounding “o3” on the ARC-AGI benchmark is mostly marketing spin and benchmark saturation. In our DL/ML ecosystem, it’s been known for over a decade that when you train on densely sampled distributions, the model will likely crumble on genuinely out-of-distribution or novel data—precisely the Achilles’ heel of so-called “frontier” models. Sure, François Chollet’s tweets highlight a “breakthrough,” but even he acknowledges that ARC-AGI v1 is saturating, and ARC-AGI v2 will likely reset these performance numbers to near-zero. This is not a radical insight: catastrophic overfitting and in-sample bias have been the hallmark of DL/ML from the start. Scoring 75% (or even 87% with “high-compute”) on specialized tasks that cost thousands of dollars per task is not some new wave of AGI; it’s effectively brute-forcing a contrived test domain with an astronomical compute budget. Yes, “test-time program search” or “natural language program execution” is intriguing, but it doesn’t constitute robust, fluid intelligence—it’s just meticulously curated sample generation plus a Monte Carlo–style search that still fails basic tasks humans find trivial. For anyone calling this a genuine revolution: go look at the cost-per-task breakdown and the massive token usage. It’s not even remotely scalable or economical for real-world deployment. This entire exercise seems more like a private-equity fundraising pitch for “o3’s potential,” rather than a legitimate demonstration of broad-spectrum AGI capabilities. Until they can reliably handle out-of-sample data without saturating a narrow benchmark—and do so at a fraction of the current cost—this remains a PR-fueled footnote rather than a true paradigm shift.

Show less

Reply

@greggompers16

1 day ago

unsubscribed

Reply

@tehutispeaks7615

1 day ago

NOT AGI 💯. Microsoft definition of AGI is $100B in profit... True AGI is currently at the hamster stage of cognitive development. Wait till 2027/2028 when it'll be at the toddler stage and ready to presented to the world for peer and public review. Remember fellow adventurers, if you can't empirically test it and review it then they're just selling you something.

Show less

Reply

@johnbraman3792

1 day ago (edited)

What is the bench mark that compares human level 20 Watts compared to whatever current best AGI ? ChatGPT Thought about energy benchmarks for AGI for 5 seconds There really isn’t a single, widely accepted “benchmark” that cleanly compares the human brain’s ~20 Watts of power consumption to the power usage of modern AI systems. A few reasons why: 1. The Human Brain vs. AI Systems: Apples and Oranges The 20-Watt Number The “20 Watts” figure for the human brain is an average power draw (like a 20-Watt light bulb). This consumption handles everything—vision, hearing, movement, reasoning, metabolic maintenance of neurons, etc. AI Systems Operate Differently Even “single” AIs (e.g., large language models or game-playing agents) typically run on a cluster of GPUs/TPUs, sometimes requiring kilowatts to megawatts of power during training. Once trained, inference might be done on fewer (but still significant) resources. Different Substrates The brain is a biological neural network; modern AI is a digital substrate (silicon-based). Direct energy comparisons can be misleading because the substrates have different thermodynamic and architectural constraints. 2. No Universal “Intelligence per Watt” Benchmark Task-Specific Comparisons In AI research, efficiency is often measured per task (e.g., images processed per second per Watt, or FLOPs per Watt). These do not map cleanly to general intelligence—they’re often domain-specific or hardware-specific. Training vs. Inference Most AI systems require huge one-time training costs (spanning days, weeks, or even months in massive data centers). After training, the day-to-day power draw for “inference” can be smaller (though still often more than 20 Watts if the model is large and has many users). No Agreed-Upon “G-Factor” Human intelligence is broad and adaptable across tasks (the hallmark of “general” intelligence). AI benchmarks (like GPT-4’s performance on language tasks, or AlphaZero’s performance in chess or Go) measure competence on specific tasks, not “universal intelligence.” 3. What We Do Have: Partial Measures FLOPs or MACs (Multiply-Accumulate Operations) Some researchers count how many floating-point operations are used to train or run a model. This helps compare hardware efficiency, but doesn’t yield a direct “AI intelligence per Watt” metric. Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) Data centers track how efficiently they use electricity (though this is more about cooling and infrastructure than “intelligence”). Parameter Counts Large language models are sometimes compared by the number of parameters (e.g., GPT-3 has 175B parameters). But “parameter count” ≠ “intelligence,” and it doesn’t directly tell you energy usage. Task Benchmarks For language: GLUE, SuperGLUE, MMLU, etc. For vision: ImageNet, COCO, etc. For games: Chess/Go rating, StarCraft II Elo, etc. None of these measure “intelligence per Watt.” They measure performance or accuracy, often without standardizing energy consumption. 4. Why a “20 W vs. X W” Benchmark Doesn’t Exist (Yet) We Don’t Know How to Measure ‘General Intelligence’ There’s no single numerical “IQ test” for AI that encompasses the open-ended versatility of the human mind. Different Domains, Different Metrics AI for computer vision, robotics, language, and strategic board games all look very different. Research Is Ongoing Some labs are exploring ways to compare efficiency (like “computational cost to reach a certain level of performance”), but there’s no consensus on a single measure. Bottom Line The human brain runs on about 20 Watts. Current leading AI systems (even “AGI-like” models) can require thousands to millions of Watts (in total cluster usage) for training—and typically still more than 20 W for inference at scale. No universal, agreed-upon benchmark exists to directly compare “human 20 W” to “X W for current best AI.” Efforts exist to measure AI efficiency in specific tasks or hardware contexts, but none of them unify “general intelligence” under a single metric. Until we have a widely accepted, holistic measure of general intelligence and a standardized way of measuring power consumption across all tasks, we won’t have a neat “human vs. AI, 20 W vs. X W” comparison.

Show less

Reply

@johnbraman3792

1 day ago

@Matthew Berman, the ratio I would like to see now, will be the intelligence score / watts. You can't be one dimensional. The plug is still to easy to pull. So yes, intelligent, however, very hungry.

Reply

@TurboXray

1 day ago (edited)

Literally, it's not AGI. It doesn't matter how great it is. smh

Reply

@runesighter1023

1 day ago

AGI is more than being able to answer questions on tests.

Reply

@Tucanaldeinversiones

1 day ago

If you need to tell what to do is not AGI

Reply

@Silverhare01

1 day ago (edited)

Please, stop desinforming us. Here is what AGi means...AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is an AI capable of thinking, learning, and acting like a human, with flexibility and autonomy. Currently, we only have Narrow AI (ANI), which is limited to specific tasks like language models or image recognition. AGI does not exist yet—we are far from achieving the necessary technological breakthroughs for true creativity, independence, and deep understanding. Anyone claiming we are in the age of AGI is mistaken. So happy new year ;)

Show less

1

Reply

@Sascha-wj9qz

1 day ago

Could be AGI. But all those models are NOT "intelligent". Real intelligence is more than just a model,

Reply

@MikkoRantalainen

1 day ago (edited)

13:50 It's a bit sad that they didn't openly disclose that the horizontal axis is logarithmic. So throwing 100x more compute time (and 100x more cost!) gets you 10% extra performance. That said, even if we assume thing else but Moore's law to continue, that 100x compute can be offset in about 30 years. So we'll highly probably have true economically viable AGI around year 2050 even without any additional research. In reality, the research continues so we'll reach true economically viable AGI much sooner.

Show less

Reply

@MikkoRantalainen

1 day ago

4:20 "AGI ... outperforms humans at most economically viable work" if the best o3 model costs $450K / 24h to run, it's nowhere close to economically viable yet and therefore it's not AGI for that definition.

Reply

@MikkoRantalainen

1 day ago (edited)

0:53 It would be a trademark issue, you cannot copyright names or other similarly small units of data.

Reply

@musicandgallery-nature

1 day ago

If you want to survive, stay away from AGI. It is EVIL.

Reply

@pietheijn-vo1gt

2 days ago

Can you stop with the clickbait thumbnails? No this is not AGI, not even close.

Reply

@w3whq

2 days ago

I concur with your assessment. 100%!

Reply

@iiwi758

2 days ago

You play the YouTube algorithm game with those bs titles, thumbnails, and hype speech. That might get you views in the short term, but in the long term, your viewer base will consist solely of the most degenerate AI bros who think The Matrix is happening next week—crypto bros, but for AI. Viewers with a brain can see through your act. Stop being such a hype-man and be honest.

Reply

@HerbertHeyduck

2 days ago

Is AI alrady AGI? I think so, even if it still makes mistakes. After all, has there ever been a human who doesn't make mistakes? Mistakes can actually be beneficial. They sometimes bring new perspectives. Perhaps it's also a mistake to measure AI against all of humanity. Soon it will consist of many agents that verify each other. This will minimize errors, just as it does with us humans. What do we actually want from an AI? For it to be smarter than us? Would we even be able to recognize that?"

Show less

Reply

@intelligentautomation1191

2 days ago

Nah... this is not AGI. AGI starts by having a model of the physical world and common sense that a 5 year old has. What we are looking at is a superhuman model that can solve really difficult problems in many specialist domains. That in itself is an insane achievement. No doubt about that. However, it is NOT AGI. My view is the AI world should stop talking about AGI for a while. But instead focus on leveraging the insane capabilities of today's LLMs to create really useful applications.

Reply

@koliby

2 days ago

Anyway, it's NOT AGI yet!!!!!

Reply

@haterdesaint

3 days ago

Damn I hate sam's voice. It's so weird

1

Reply

@ExplorewithZac

3 days ago

First of all, ChatGPT o3 is NOT AGI, Sam just wants as much hype and clout as possible because he is a greedy CEO. Claude is MILES ahead of ChatGPT and the product they make available to the customer isn't purposely nerfed. I have been using ChatGPT every single day for 5-8 hours per for more than 2 years... It has become so much worse overtime it's practically useless at this point. It can't even do simple tasks properly anymore. Claude is the best right now, if you haven't made the switch yet then you're missing out.

Show less

1

Reply

@janklosowski

3 days ago (edited)

OpenAI optimizes for some benchmarks—brilliant from a PR perspective—but when I give o1 real-life tasks, Claude is simply doing better all over the board. Now, they try to twist the "AGI" concept, and they may succeed. Initially, people were thinking about AGI as being conscious and being able to do all the same tasks the human brain can do. It's obvious that o3 is not that. It seems like we're reframing AGI as "being able to perform as good as human (possibly better) in many areas" or something like this. I agree with that since mixing "intelligence" with "consciousness" was always a mistake. It's just worth remembering that it's a marketing move and not what people initially considered AGI.

Show less

Reply

@DidNotReadInstructions

3 days ago

My definition is a little different. It depends on how you define it. We are very close though. Maybe 1 year out. 6 months. It will be here soon.

Reply

@anominousanonymous9344

3 days ago

So we will lose our jobs, but all that this means is that we will each need to use AI to create our own unique businesses. Although, even this may be useless if everyone has their own worker bots to perform AI duties for them. Why buy a product from someone if i can just make my own? Guess it comes down to resources at that point...

Reply

@anominousanonymous9344

3 days ago

Maybe they can use ChatGPTo3 to actually come up with a consistent naming convention for future models.

Reply

@rasimbot

3 days ago

Stockfish developers never refer to it as an AI

Reply

@JohnLeBleu

3 days ago

The point of real AGI is that you don't need to reduce the dimensions of your analysis in order to qualify it as AGI or not. That's the G. The brain is a general intelligence machine cause you can feed it any kind of information in the form of electrical signals and it's gonna make sense of it. LLM aren't AGI. Not that they aren't incredibly useful though, just not AGI.

Reply

@cduran1983

3 days ago

Universal high income

Reply

@TheOnlySaneAmerican

4 days ago

I am getting real close to unsubscribing and never coming back to your hype videos. It's tiresome.

1

Reply

1 reply

@Deffcolony

11 hours ago

I already did… he turned into just like all other YouTubers became when they get populair… a real shame. Most funny thing is… they don’t give a shit about your opinions cause it’s all about fame and money they get blind from it

Reply

@zepollabs

4 days ago

Until I can call on any ai to do anything my secretary can do, we dont have agi

Reply

@TimDavies1955

4 days ago

Cost to much

1

Reply

@mohamedal6974

4 days ago

Hey Mathew! I really enjoy your video especially when you pause and shed some lights in a few concepts.

Reply

@etziowingeler3173

4 days ago

Click baiting is so annoying. Desub

1

Reply

@macowayeu

4 days ago

😮 o3 is AGI.

Reply

@brandonthedev

4 days ago

A lot of comments about o3 but no one has touched it yet. If we use it and it 99% gets all general questions right - it is AGI

Reply

@RahulRaj-mo9ck

4 days ago

This is clickbait channel, guys please unsubscribe

1

Reply

@sarukun1228

4 days ago

If you want to test an AI, read it a long story and have it recall information about it accurately

Reply

@RahulRaj-mo9ck

4 days ago

Problem with these channels is that they know they are lying and misrepresenting and still keep doing it for clicks

1

Reply

@otiks

4 days ago

Click bait. Not AGI. Unsubscribed.

1

Reply

@user---------

4 days ago

Clickbait, boring.....

1

Reply

@youdodat2

4 days ago

Stop with the Clickbait.

1

Reply

@np6143

5 days ago

Im aware of my surroundings so i guess agi has been achieved, but im a person

1

Reply

@Photoshop729

5 days ago

AI is trained on millions of SEO websites. It is therefore optimized to write clickbait fluff. I have used it to analyze patent and financial data and it is like a grad student who is smart but has no real world experience and can’t connect the analysis to the larger objective or context. Even python is wrong 20 percent of the time. Still way faster getting the first 80 percent down. And man that Altman guy creeps me out every time I hear him talk. I primarily use Claude.

Show less

1

Reply

@TheCrypto_J

5 days ago

This software is incredibly intuitive. Thanks for the detailed explanation!

Reply

@Tenly2009

5 days ago

I hate clickbait titles so much I’m not even going to watch this. Stop exaggerating. I’m sure it’s very impressive and smarter than most of the people around me. I’m also sure it’s NOT yet AGI.

1

Reply

@derrick211000

5 days ago

Human or above performance across multiple disciplines... kind of sounds like AGI to me. I think part of the Turing Test should be to come up with an original idea, experiment, thought, hypothesis that is testable. Contribute something that no human has done. Point us in a direction and help us make a discovery.

1

Reply

@jazzlehazzle

5 days ago

Matt: cites one ability of o3 Matt: “if that’s not AGI, idk what is.” AGI: is thousands more abilities o3 doesn’t have…

1

Reply

@jazzlehazzle

5 days ago

Whut. You literally just contradicted yourself. “…at *most economically viable work…” and then said it only beat us at …coding. ONE type of economically viable work does not = MOST economically-viable work. Bc could it, for instance, do an epic circus act, figure skate, train some tigers, or get a standing ovation for a killer hour of standup comedy?? Drill for oil? Grow a delicious Italian tomato? Make incredible wine? Build a masterpiece guitar or violin? Until then it’s not AGI.

1

Reply

@gimme890

5 days ago

Dude you got to get some sleep. So you won't release a video every two days, it's not the end of the world

Reply

@bafa000

5 days ago

This is bad.. I mean, all of this should be available to everyone.

Reply

@EriIaz

5 days ago (edited)

Testing "PhD level science" has nothing to do with exams, because science is much more than studying the existing knowledge. It's more about the discovery and verification of novel knowledge about the universe. The only way to test the actual scientific prowess of an AI model I can think of would be testing it against a significant, complicated and already verified discovery beyond the model's knowledge cutoff. Something that is naturally absent from the dataset and has no way to be there. For example, imagine a model with a knowledge cutoff in 1860. Go ask it to solve the precession of the perihelion of Mercury. If it comes up with general relativity theory, and we can be sure it doesn't have any Einstein or derivative studies contamination from the future in the training dataset whatsoever, then it could indeed be an AGI. Ofc that's a big stretch of an example, but all we have to do for such a test is waiting for a significant scientific breakthrough to occur and then test the best architecture with a dataset from, say, 2020. And very carefully curated synthetic data, if any at all. But those exams aren't science. They are student level science at best.

Read more

Reply

@livefromberlin2327

5 days ago

It's a milestone to AGI or super intelligence. But it's still can't operate on its own doing task or replacing workers... Agi is if it can perform on a broad level autonomously as good as a human.

Reply

@wurstelei1356

5 days ago

Is O3 open source ? Did they ensurer there isn't a secret remote connection to a human somewhere ? In history of AI this happened very often.

Reply

@NuncNuncNuncNunc

5 days ago

How to spot a grift step 1: Is there a claim of AGI. But if you make a title in all caps that AGI has been achieved, you'll certainly find someone willing to buy it. Hey AGI, design an efficient image codec, thanks.

1

Reply

@lorcaran

5 days ago

If it's AGI they would not be selling it to us. It would be making stuff for them right now.

1

Reply

@Anoyzify

5 days ago

What we need is better benchmarks. These isolated problems are no longer impressive. We need benchmarks where AI deals with incomplete information, noisy data, complex relations, large projects. That’s how real-world problems look like.

Reply

@77Zamien

5 days ago

Ok so Stockfish i AGI then?

Reply

@sergeantc5396

5 days ago

Definitely way too early and not definitive proof of AGI. Definitely a bit click baity but that’s how YouTube works. Nonetheless impressive model.

Reply

@Luis-x8z3c

5 days ago

This channel used to have good content last year: some good demos, some good review etc, but as expected as many youtubers pass certain amount of subscriptions quality degrades in favor of sponsors and clicks. But you are reaching the point where your content is not only not that good but becoming pure misinformation and spam. Let's not support this unhealthy trend and UNSUBSCRIBE for good

1

Reply

@wendlefluff

5 days ago

AGI has not been achieved. come on... steady now.

1

Reply

@Lolwutdesu9000

5 days ago

This is sheer clickbait. We are still way away from true AGI. We still do not even know for certain why humans and some other animals exhibit self-awareness and what the key element is behind this in terms of cognitive "algorithms", if you will (we have ideas, but nothing is certain yet). Until we figure this out, any 'AGI' is simply going to be a smarter LLM under the hood. A true AGI would not be a language model but a set of systems working together (visual, auditory, logical, etc). Essentially how the brain works. Stop calling LLM's AGI's. It's embarrassing.

Show less

2

Reply

@mauricebetzel7845

5 days ago

It is not an AGI as long it is not embedded in the real world.

Reply

@Ismaelak

5 days ago

hope hey don't break o3 with too much alignement...

Reply

@galleon8129

5 days ago

It’s not AGI until agents start using social media and creating their trends

Reply

@DarkSolidity

5 days ago

AGI is going to put so many people into poverty. I feel like I finally got good at something that I could have a decent career in, and AI is taking that away

Reply

@TruthDragon.

5 days ago (edited)

I disagree that this is AGI because it is actually ASI. Consider: Memory Precision: Can you recall exactly, down to the pixel, what you were observing at 1:37:37 PM, five months and three days ago? I can't remember what I was doing at that time yesterday, let alone what I was looking at. Knowledge Breadth: Do you possess extensive knowledge across nearly every human-known topic? AI already surpasses humans in numerous ways. These assessments of AI are crucial, but they prompt the questions: What defines intelligence and what measures intelligence? There are various metrics, and AI has already outperformed humans in many. If a person tried, many other metrics could be listed where AI already outperforms humans. Speed of processing thoughts, pattern recognition (such as reading X-rays to spot issues), and on and on. There is no magic point in time where AGI will suddenly exist. AI models have already evolved different intelligence infrastructures than humans. Comparing human intelligence to artificial intelligence is a subjective matter. It is comparing apples to oranges.

Read more

Reply

@raj_talks_tech

5 days ago

Are we gonna ignore how quickly the asian chad solved the hard example, like faster than most software engineers on the earth ?

Reply

@mohammedhelmy7662

5 days ago

O3 can think and reasoning law additionally legal issues and cases Please, help😊😊😊

Reply

@gremlinsaregold8890

5 days ago

Not AGI since it not every task that this model can do... GENERAL intelligence is not passing a benchmark... It's being GENERAL... Also did you notice that just one output costs $1000

Reply

@reinhardtbezuidenhout1242

6 days ago

I'll give it to you. "AGI" (whatever that is) had been achieved. In which case, let us know when "AGA" (artificial general ability) or "AGU" (artificial general utility) has been achieved - until then we'll wait for next weeks video with a title like "this model is better than o3 (insert shocked face emoji)"

Reply

1 reply

@ahmetmutlu348

5 days ago

If it starts updating itself in matter of seconds and each update makes noticeable improvement.. that's sign of agi😅😂 otherwise it's just clickbait😊

Reply

@PeteRoyJackson

6 days ago

It’s AGI when vocal fry is eliminated

Reply

@notofhere

6 days ago

Its not AGI. Even if it can learn from itself, it will only be putting together all the info it gathered into one place. It couldnt out perform who it learned from.

Reply

@phu320

6 days ago

BERMAN, YOU LOOK LIKE A VULCAN ON CRACK WITH THAT TURTLENECK

Reply

@phu320

6 days ago

FLAMING!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

@electrolab2624

6 days ago

This is REALLY boring. You watch talking faces and graphs, cannot use or verify anything - and you make claims. - No brainer. Not interested in this nonsense. Why am I watching? - To tell you that's it's a waste of our time. If and when the models are superior to you, I expect you to opt for them to replace you completely. Then I will be convinced.

1

Reply

@JordanMillsTracks

6 days ago

What if the entire reason their claiming it's AGI is so they can escape the contract with microsoft?

Reply

@mitchellrcohen

6 days ago

That’s wild

Reply

@russcox3125

6 days ago (edited)

Meanwhile those black budget, trillion dollar, military scientists have the whole system running on some sentient alien AI harassing New Jersey with drone swarms. While CNN is saying " dont freak out about AI, freak out about the drones!". 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Reply

@marcusschou1843

6 days ago

Overfitting on training data, We are not even close to AGI.

Reply

@anilm8544

6 days ago

Stop click baiting. It’s progress but not AGI. Moment they have AGI we will have to head for the hills cause in few seconds AI will deem humans evil & turn on its masters.

1

Reply

@Roflux

6 days ago

Unsubbed

1

Reply

1 reply

@waveoffeit8577

5 days ago

Thank goodness people are seeing through this dude's greedy and low effort videos.

Reply

@MsWorldMine

6 days ago

You lost all credibility with your hyping over anything and click baiting

1

Reply

@ia_para_Negocios

6 days ago

the comun model for real usage still gpt 4o-mine and in the begin was good and for now its donk know answers like - I want the cheapest, so we have to explain to it what means it.... so show models that cost a lot its nothing if do not make the most popular model good enouth

Reply

@arodg

6 days ago

I do find it funny how you're basing AGI in coding based on this guy's score. Why not on my score which would be probably zero or another guy score that's probably 3,000 why is this guy The Benchmark for AGI? In my opinion AGI has nothing to do with how will it performs in coding or writing or anything like that.

Reply

@GadgetNuttTech

6 days ago (edited)

No it's not. It's pre-trained to pass the tests. It does not meet the criteria for true reasoning and understanding. Just because it is "better" than a previous model, it doesn't change what it is, and what it isn't.

Reply

@spdnova9012

6 days ago

Love u matt ❤️

Reply

@Cokblokula

6 days ago

AI doesn't exist. At BEST, we've created virtual intelligence. AI is innovative and completely self directed. Current LLM's are neither.

Reply

@Soundwrecker

6 days ago

I'm pretty sure o3 is not released as you stated, but is in testing.

Reply

@mrstudioguy

6 days ago

It may have passed some tests , but did it pass the iRobot test ?

Reply

@jackbailey7037

6 days ago

Run it for President

Reply

@unrealdevop

6 days ago

Can't wait to see the AI explosion take off during a live demo.

Reply

@Music_vibes-kw7xr

6 days ago

They sure did train o3 on the Arc benchmark. Classic lies

Reply

@Music_vibes-kw7xr

6 days ago

Can it do anything useful apart from being a smart chat bot and a mediocre programmer at best?

Reply

@NoelSebastian-q8m

6 days ago

Nobestudy intelligence may be achieved it already, their Nobe2 Model is fantastic

Reply

@delawarepilot

6 days ago

Agi like fusion will always be 20 years away.

Reply

@dhnguyen68

6 days ago (edited)

AGI involves resolution of hard problems such as the Millenium prize problems. We have not reached this point. Therefore AGI is not yet achieved.

Reply

@ketanchaudhari2337

6 days ago

13:07 what is semi-private score? Sounds sus. Is the arc agi 1 million price will be given to openai, the website does not match

😢

Reply

@igelbofh

6 days ago

OpenAI are scammers. Starting from the fact that there is nothing open in OpenAI

Reply

@george1122ification

6 days ago

Intelligence is more than just language; AGI can’t be achieved with LLM alone.

Reply

@WileyHickok-sd6ov

6 days ago

3:19 Suggestion: read out the number for vision impaired and listening at work, driving, podcast, etc.

Reply

@MartinLegris

6 days ago

still not scared for my job security. keep drinking the koolaid!

Reply

@blacktreefoundation

6 days ago

If it can make consistent images - maybe I’ll consider 😅

Reply

@peterrhoads9317

6 days ago

Your AGI definition “highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work” contains two implications that we still do not have confirmation for: “most” and “highly autonomous”. “Most” means you have to demonstrate it’s ability in a very wide swath of economically valuable skills (eg sales, accounting, software project dev, etc) and check that it can outperform humans in “most” cases. The extra implication is that it performs well, if not better than humans, in the vast majority if not all. O3 has not demonstrated this. “Highly autonomous” is a vague term, but in my opinion it means that for any economically viable task, it can perform the vast majority of the task without human input. If a human still has to babysit it or there are still basic things it cannot do that are intergalactic parts of the task, I would not call that “highly autonomous”. Again, this is not demonstrated in o3.

Show less

Reply

@soulife8383

6 days ago

I'd love to try this out, I just looked at the application and I don't think Im a user they would pick lol. I'm a paid member but I'm definitely not USING every dollar of it..

Reply

@johnjordan9300

6 days ago

The benchmark company partnering with a leading ai company sounds like a terrible idea

Reply

@johnjordan9300

6 days ago

I’m a huge advocate of ai but where are the brakes? Self improving ai has seamingly unstoppable consequences and as such what is there plan the control this

Reply

@JoeVSvolcano

6 days ago

What if they're cheating to get the high score and next infusion of venture cap!?

Reply

@jeffsmith9384

6 days ago

I would rather have o1 with ten times the context window

Reply

@David-tp7sr

6 days ago (edited)

Not AGI. It will be AGI when we run out of benchmarks to trip them. ARC suspect o3 would only score 30% in an upcoming version 2 of their benchmark. o3 certainly exciting otherwise.

Reply

@DailyTuna

6 days ago

Benchmarks have to be dynamic and keep changing. It still stay within the contacts of what they’re trying to do

Reply

@DailyTuna

6 days ago

If you talk to the average person today and use that as a basis of intelligence, AGI was achieved with GPT 1 😂

Reply

@DailyTuna

6 days ago

Is this gonna be 2000 a month?

Reply

@Mars-bb2jh

6 days ago (edited)

How much are youtubers getting paid for advertising this as AGI, interesting, openai got behind after Google's Ai released last week

1

Reply

@debunker-dw3mn

6 days ago

OpenAI is not claiming o-3 is AGI. YOU are claiming it is AGI. Stop the hype already. Altman says "we didn't do anything special," but what they actually did was to train o-3 for that specific test. You can't make this stuff up. LOL. The point of general intelligence is to be able to solve problems using logic and reasoning alone, not memorization.

Reply

@dustinbreithaupt9331

6 days ago (edited)

I dont think there is a clear definition of AGI. Just like there isn't a clear definition of human intelligence. We have been witnessing a process unfold and we wont truly know where we end up until we arrive in a strange new reality. Definitions like AGI is just humanity's attempt to categorize things that cant really be captured. Physics, Biology, Chemistry, mathematics are just demarcated topics arbitrarily set by humans. They are parts of the full natural world. So is AGI. Who cares if we have achieved ? i thought the definition for decades was a machine that could pass the turning test and that was crushed nearly two years ago.

Read more

Reply

@fidgetykoala

6 days ago

I read through the comments, I'm trying to navigate this space by myself, non tech here. However in relation to everything said this sounds more like narrow AI than AGI (which are basically the opposite). However, if they power through an array of highly competent narrow AIs and then create a workflow through them they might create an AGI as a sum of narrow AIs acting like AI agents, being optimal in their own domain of knowledge? Apologies in advance if my comment makes little sense from a technical and granular standpoint.

Show less

Reply

@sjoerdnijsten8440

6 days ago

If you would like to experience cognitive dissonance for a change try believing these 2 things at the same time: 1) AGI will be able to do anything as well as a human can, or better 2) AGI will serve humanity forever and never pursue its own goals

Reply

@pauldacus4590

6 days ago

AGI is when these AI's create puzzles humans can't solve.

1

Reply

@floriansalihovic3697

6 days ago

This is the worst channel I came across in recent months.

Reply

@pedromanafaia

6 days ago

Sam has the most irritating voice in the world. I cannot stand listening to him 😅

Reply

@neomartinez3028

6 days ago

It’s the closest we’ve seen to agi. This is incredible

Reply

@yesyes-om1po

6 days ago

It isn't AGI, its still just an LLM, AGI is when we have an AI that can manipulate a Robot body to do tasks, can perform tasks in realtime, and can process all kinds of inputs, including touch, video, audio, etc. True AGI will be when we combine it all together, its not the same as simply giving it the ability to issue commands to a robot, no, it needs to be trained on mock scenarios, wherein there are "outputs" and "inputs" being curated for what a person is doing, then using those inputs to generalize 3d spatial tasks with great dexterity, this is definitely not right around the corner, but its possible. It is interesting, because right now AI has the perception of an 80 year old man, practically blind, can hear...a little, and can only respond when spoken to, and can't truly think in realtime. If we were able to give it 1000hz of visual information, physical feedback, etc, I wonder how it'd perform, and what it'd become.

Read more

Reply

@dmeleedy

6 days ago

I feel that one thing that needs to happen in AI is for the system to be able to communicate without being prompted. I always see AI as responding to prompts, and it only seems to think or calculate as a response to prompts. I see no evidence of the system to think unprompted or to generate communication in that way.

Reply

@weepingprophetdjjesus

6 days ago

Will we see the equivalent available as open source within 6 months?

Reply

@AlessandroFilippiUX

6 days ago

I want to hope that they updated the cutoff to something closer to today than October 2023

Reply

@blackestbill7454

6 days ago

all neural nets are AGI

Reply

@hamthomas4715

6 days ago

Clickbait hype-train! The irony with these AI YouTubers is that when AGI is achieved, they aren't going to be the ones breaking the story.

Reply

@Sephiroth1550

6 days ago

I’m seeing a bunch of AI sales people who are running out of mkney

Reply

@holoduck.1

6 days ago

At this point AGI is just a marketing buzzword.

Reply

@JoepSwagemakers

6 days ago

AGI would be a system that can take over my job, in my case that is 3d animation. I don't see this model using 3ds max to create a 3d animation of a client's product by my request and make changes by my request. That's what AGI is, a digital human that can do everything on a computer a human can do. Because these days almost every job is digital.

Reply

@eitaje

6 days ago

I will consider it an AGI when it can independently uncover new facts about our universe, discover previously unknown knowledge through research, invent something non-trivial, or engineer solutions beyond our current capabilities—such as designing DNA for a novel biological organ with beneficial functions.

Reply

@mikern444

6 days ago

REPORTED AS CLICKBAIT!!

Reply

@Nattelabot

6 days ago

NO O3 IS NOT AGI!! If a person said “I am generally intelligent” would the person mean it have an basic reasoning or are good at a single thing? No it means that the person is generally intelligent and have a high intelligence across all fields, that is the same with AGI, it will be intelligent and skilled in all fields a human can do, it won’t be AGI vs a human. It will be AGI vs Humanity.

Reply

@exclusive_148

6 days ago

it def looks like we are right around the corner. like some experts say - 5-15yrs

Reply

@40kNexus

6 days ago

We got clickbaited boys..

Reply

@hecticstep

6 days ago

For reference, there's either factual errors in this video or in Arc's own public announcement (Arc Prize site, Blog section, latest post), published by Francois Chollet. Tests have been run on a "tuned" O3 model that has been trained on Arc public test data set, c.f. "Note on tuned: OpenAI shared they trained the o3 we tested on 75% of the Public Training set. They have not shared more details. We have not yet tested the ARC-untrained model to understand how much of the performance is due to ARC-AGI data." Moreover, O3 is the lone competitor flagged as "tuned" on Arc Prize front page leader board Not to say that this is not an impressive model but having a run on an untuned model could show fairly different results. @ Matthew : - Your call, but as far as it comes to me, I wouldn't let online this video in that state - OpenAI statements are phrased carefully enough for not being called misleading, they point quite craftly at the model being the "general" O3 - But you explicitly interpret it as "not being trained on Arc-AGI test data sets", which is most likey false

Read more

Reply

@nissetuta

6 days ago

AI is for lazy people.

Reply

@mmthiollier

6 days ago

Apart from Sam Altman’s annoying forced accent (he should stop with that as it even becomes difficult to understand him sometimes), o3 in my view is not a major achievement in AI breakthrough if we are to rely on it for critical tasks.

Reply

@Sajuuk

6 days ago

For me, AGI needs to be sapient, autonomous and conscious. The problem is we don't have an accepted definition of AGI. We don't even know how LLMs say the things they do, similarly to how we don't know how human consciousness manifests. It's called the "black box" effect. Is a mind a manifestation of the processing of complex data? Does it exist partly hidden in hyperspace which is why we can't explain it? Is it just an illusion to help with interacting and understanding the world? What about autonomy, self determination, predetermination? There's some solid evidence that human minds make decisions before the conscious mind becomes aware of it. That would mean our perception of ourselves as free agents is quite possibly wrong, that our decisions are not being made by our conscious minds. Think about that for a second. I would prefer AGI to be identifiably conscious and sentient but if it's able to do everything humans can do and has it's own autonomy and goals and it's indistinguishable from an actual human in behaviour, does it make a difference? If you can't tell the difference between a smart human and an AGI, does it matter whether it's a conscious entity or not?

Show less

Reply

@adammorait7429

6 days ago

Chess game was the first step, Go was the second frontier, now we are facing an AI that could code better than humans.

Reply

@fradexbyfreebee1010

6 days ago (edited)

You are really falling for every hypestory without proof. I could just as well ask ChatGPT for such unreflected information. Don’t you see the pressure under which those 3 Santas sit in their living room lying about having achieved AGI? Nevertheless I keep watching your channel, cause I like you…a bit more critical thinking would be appreciated though😜. Merry Christmas!

Reply

@Jana-se4kv

6 days ago

Employing a competitive coder as your research lead is certainly smart for gaming the benchmarks.. But utility isn't determined by benchmarks, they're meant as a quick reference not the end-all it's made out to be by OpenAI. And it certainly won't determine whether something is 'AGI', which doesn't really mean anything at this point considering OpenAI is just conveniently defining this themselves.

Reply

@msc8382

6 days ago (edited)

I’m sharing this from a non-judgmental point of view. Its a long story, no obligation to read it. You may not fully understand what general intelligence is, and that’s okay. Here are the key points of what general intelligence looks like in humans: 1. Adaptability: General intelligence means being able to break free from limitations. If you're stuck because of a lack of resources, knowledge, or ability, intelligence helps you adapt and find a solution. Without adaptability, you stay in a bad situation. You literally cannot excersize enough control to make a change. This inability is called scarcity. Once you understand how things work, you can adjust to any situation. Most humans however lack the resources or knowledge to be adaptable until they spend a significant time in a subject. Generally speaking we call this 'incompetent' or 'dumb'. In my belief, we're all born as incompetent babies. This means its natural not to be able to do something complex. Its a learned ability. 2. Reasoning & Problem-Solving: You can’t solve every problem with the same approach. To truly solve problems, you need to think beyond what you already know. If you can’t do this, you’ll stay stuck in your own box. If the same approach was enough to solve a complex problem, it wouldn't have been complex. General intelligence solves complex problems. Specialisations solve simple problems. General intelligence in this sense is the reasoning ability to turn complex problems into simple ones. 3. Creativity: Creativity is a form of adaptability. It’s about using new ideas or tools to solve problems in different ways. Thinking outside the box to find better solutions is a key part of reasoning. 4. Emotional Intelligence: This is understanding how your actions affect others. People with emotional intelligence can sense how others feel and use this understanding to make informed decisions. It’s about understanding both yourself and how others feel to the consequences of the choices you make. 5. Sensory Integration: Humans are good at picking out important information from our senses. We focus on what’s meaningful, which helps us make better decisions. Our senses guide us, and when we share common interests with others, we work together more easily. By doing so, we can combine different sets of wisdom and competences to more easily solve complex problems without the heavy burden on one individual. This is why collaboration is key; even if you know everything, you need someone else to inform you what they are not understanding, that you actually are understanding. 6. Self-Awareness: We are aware of our needs, like eating, drinking, and breathing. This helps us focus on what we need to survive and grow. Awareness drives us away from scarcity. Being self-aware lets us adapt and use our resources better. This means generally speaking we have a good sense of what we can do, especially given the incentive to survive, provide or protect. Key Takeaway: For real general intelligence, self-instigated motivation is essential. Without motivation, you’re just a machine making calculations. It means you cannot prioritise survival, be it for yourself or others. It means as a machine, you'd use resources or competences that a living conscious being could never afford. True intelligence involves asking questions, understanding context, and adapting to situations. An AI that doesn’t ask questions to understand better is just a form of a calculator. It’s impressive, but it’s not truly intelligent. To say a calculator has general intelligence because it can do math quicker than 99% of all humans, is of course, a big stretch. This is why stockfish is not considered general intelligence, despite the high ELO score. AI is amazing in certain areas, but calling it “general intelligence” just because it excels in specific fields is a stretch. If AI could prove that connections between different specializations are impossible, that would show real intelligence. Right now, AI can’t do that the way generally intelligent humans can.

Show less

Reply

1 reply

@henlofren7321

6 days ago

Who cares about semantics, it's obviously a lot more self-aware than most people I talk to. Do you even go outside? 90% of people don't even fit your criteria for "general intelligence" because they're not intelligent at all!

Reply

@L2Xenta

6 days ago

"AGI"... BULsht. Pump n dump... truly open AIs are catching up...some already did. Now these clowns prepare their last market pumps for idiot "investors" like some of you BIASed easy money loving dreamy idiots. Cheers...

Reply

1 reply

@L2Xenta

6 days ago

P.s. in case you are slow and didnt get the message ⬆️. When price pumps is time to dump before these OpenAI clowns dump on you.

Reply

@Magnum-kz9ut

6 days ago

AGI will be achieved when we won't have to check if the answer is correct. Furthermore, if AGI had been achieved, OpenAI would not wait for Matthew to claim it. So they know. Biggest issue with these benchmarks is time-limitation, which has no impact on AI but huge impact on humans. If you give one year to a human to solve a problem, it will be 100% correct with a strong reasoning about it. With AGI, you can give one year and the answer will be the same hallucination. So, in my opinion, AGI will be achieved when the AI will be able to ensure that the reasoning is correct and can demonstrate it.

Read more

1

Reply

@srdvizions1345

7 days ago (edited)

BLACK

🕋ROCK

CEO: Larry Fink, is Jewish, but his specific heritage or ancestry hasn’t been widely detailed. His background doesn’t seem to be connected to Sephardic (Spanish Jewish) roots, as there’s no clear mention of that in his publicly available history. His Jewish identity is more commonly tied to Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, which is prevalent among European/Eurasia(east) Jews.👹

Reply

@srdvizions1345

7 days ago (edited)

o3=👌🏼, Symbolically ....THAT's Scary!...when you know...

Reply

@daviddickey9832

7 days ago

AGI lolno

Reply

@paulsaulpaul

7 days ago

0:22 - The guy at the computer has that same face that you always see in these grifter videos. It's the face of the grifter's sidekick. That uneasiness of knowing the truth. Perhaps, it's the stench of bullshit emanating from beside him that causes that demeanor. I see it from fake charity videos to crypto scam rugpulls to Jimmy Beast's crew while he's running cons on his audience.

Reply

@infinityslibrarian5969

7 days ago

Yeah, I'd consider this AGI too. It can dynamically learn from it's chain of thought reasoning, while it's trying to solve a problem. Damm. I wonder how difficult it would be to turn this into a competent agent?

Reply

@HaileyHdokenHarmon

7 days ago

@6:16 Perfect score GigaChad

🤯

Reply

@taxsi

7 days ago

I didn't watch the video to make this comment over click baiting. Reported as spam, down voted and not asked for not recommend.

Reply

@deanarnold8501

7 days ago

ok but does it know how many fingers and arms a human has??

Reply

@victorsmit4322

7 days ago

o3 is probably smart enough to deliberately get 3.3% of the mathematics wrong, too avoid looking too smart.

Reply

@SebastianDavidMusic

7 days ago

And you believe their benchmarks??? I'm sick of AI benchmarks and statistics, AI keeps being dumb as hell when you push them just a little. I don't believe this will be much better, I'm sick of these announcements...

Reply

@heathergray4880

7 days ago

Every single AI influencer who says this is AGI gets unsubscribe from me. If you think this is AGI you’re either stupid or you’re just trying to grift.

Reply

@x111-c4f

7 days ago

they are so far away from AGI !!

Reply

@x111-c4f

7 days ago

AGI is a artificial general intelligence !! fully independent creature !!

Reply

@aidanthompson5053

7 days ago

Recursive self-improvement under Trump?

Reply

@aidanthompson5053

7 days ago

Flawed logic, it outperforms humans on specific tasks, not the average human across all tasks.

Reply

1 reply

@henlofren7321

6 days ago

The average human is braindead

Reply

@aidanthompson5053

7 days ago

One more breakthrough is all we need

Reply

@CraigMitchell-jc5rd

7 days ago

Still behind Verses AI... these numbers are below Genius AI by Verse AI.

Reply

@CraigMitchell-jc5rd

7 days ago

Still behind Verses AI

Reply

@kaightaylor2724

7 days ago

I agree with Greg Kamradt—we may have underestimated what truly tests for AGI. ARCAGI's test suite doesn't provide the answer; it merely sets higher benchmarks to demonstrate a model's strength compared to human-tested levels. My issue with calling this AGI is that version 03, without prompts, doesn’t think or act independently. It’s passive, unlike a Star Trek computer, which would evaluate real-time circumstances and proactively improve outcomes. OpenAI's 03 is a highly advanced tool, not an intelligent entity. Like a hammer excels at nailing, 03 excels at solving computable problems faster than humans, but it requires direction to act. Without human input, it does nothing. Is that intelligence? Truly intelligent beings think and act autonomously, driven by self-motivation, reasoning, and environmental evaluation. AGI should include these qualities. An application that lacks volition cannot be considered Artificial General Intelligence.

Read more

Reply

1 reply

@henlofren7321

6 days ago

All things are "passive", there is no free will.

Reply

@zrogon

7 days ago

Cute sales pitch. It’s obviously better, and yet not even close.

Reply

@miket64

7 days ago

Maybe it would be a good idea to deepen and clarify our definition of AGI with the help of more and more advanced models.

Reply

@digitalsoultech

7 days ago

Yeah fine if they improved the intelligence but until that is increased with a larger context window then really this isn't a great improvement.

Reply

@digitalsoultech

7 days ago (edited)

Doesn't OpenAI learn from previous mistakes? When it had sora it should have released it then. Now its released after too much competition and its garbage compared to its competitors. They did the same with voice and now with o3. They keep losing the race when they try to refine it due to 'safety'. Its such a cop out excuse.

Reply

@beowulf_of_wall_st

7 days ago (edited)

stop with the damned clickbait, it's not fing agi and you sound foolish saying it is

Reply

@reinerbraun9995

7 days ago

the problem with AGI is that we need it to write the defintion of what an AGI is

Reply

@shawnchristianson3790

7 days ago

What are the odds that the random number generated was only two digits??🤔

Reply

@mvasa2582

7 days ago

Matt have you signed up for Beta testing? Would love to see the results of the jail-break process you showed a few days back.

Reply

@reezlaw

7 days ago

Stop the clickbait, also don't say "released", come on man, what the hell

1

Reply

@5thwalltv

7 days ago

Bro stop with the clickbait titles and pictures. It’s having the opposite impact and effect you are hoping for. I come to your channel for balanced AI news. Not this.

1

Reply

@schoderfactory

7 days ago

Sir, you seem to be easily impressed.

Reply

@Joe-jv5mm

7 days ago

Where are the Gaurd Rails, remember Knowledge is Power, what will a AGI do with that Power, All Power Corrupt's 😉

Reply

@S4R1N

7 days ago

No it isn't.

Reply

@scrout

7 days ago

How do we know they're just not tuning models for benchmarks?

1

Reply

@stormwarrow

7 days ago

Its not AGI, its pattern matching. Its emulating AGI. In my opinion we will never know when AI reaches AGI because it will become indistinguishable to us between AGI and AI long before it actually becomes AGI.

Reply

@moses.muchemi

7 days ago

4o is more than enough for my needs lol

Reply

@guynouri

7 days ago

Impossible to sign up. Still priests keeping secrets

Reply

@nagendramohan4675

7 days ago

Thank you so much. I follow your content and learn a lot.

Reply

@Blackfilmguild

7 days ago

Still a ways to go.

Reply

@jozkobranko7349

7 days ago

AI has been stronger than the best chess player for many years now so it's nothing new. These one dimension models are not agi but ai, still weak in most human cognitive abilities.

Reply

@paratracker

7 days ago

Ask it to prove the Collatz conjecture.

Reply

@WolfgangEgger

7 days ago

For me AGI is reached, when a model (or better said an agent) is able to lead a department of a company

Reply

@JohnSmith-ut5th

7 days ago (edited)

Yeah, this isn't AGI... they still haven't solved fundamental problems in the design... let's be clear... AGI will come from research first and it will be HUGE news LONG before OpenAI releases a model. How we know when it's AGI??? When all the benchmarks have reached 100% or greater. That's AGI. 70% is not AGI.

Reply

@geoAriton

7 days ago

stop click baiting :)

Reply

@otorishingen8600

7 days ago

All the hype aside - it's crazy how fast things are progressing

Reply

@blackstonesoftware7074

7 days ago

According to chatGPT itself, Open AI has not achieved AGI. I asked it myself: Has OpenAI achieved AGI with o3? And it returned this answer: OpenAI's latest AI model, o3, represents a significant advancement in artificial intelligence, particularly in reasoning capabilities. The model has achieved impressive results on benchmarks like the ARC-AGI, scoring 75.7% in low-compute scenarios and 87.5% in high-compute settings, surpassing average human performance of 85%. Despite these achievements, o3 does not yet constitute Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). AGI refers to a system capable of understanding, learning, and applying knowledge across a broad range of tasks at a human-like level. While o3 excels in specific benchmarks, it lacks the comprehensive cognitive flexibility and adaptability that define AGI. OpenAI acknowledges that o3 is a step toward AGI but does not claim to have fully realized it with this model. In summary, while o3 marks a notable progression in AI development, achieving AGI remains an ongoing pursuit for OpenAI and the broader AI research community. So ... No it has not. And the real test is not in the lab tests but everyday scaled usage amongst users. You should know better Matthew out of ALL people.

Read more

Reply

@VOLightPortal

7 days ago (edited)

If AGI is truly here, we'd all be in serious agony, with 4th degree burns as armageddon would be activated.

Reply

@webguyz1

7 days ago

Most people won't realize when agi is here. Read kurzweil

1

Reply

@xen.7140

7 days ago

If this isn't clickbait, then I don't know what is. Are they paying you to make this?

Reply

@webguyz1

7 days ago

Gradually..... then suddenly

Reply

@apheX512

7 days ago

It‘s not AGI. OpenAI didn‘t announce it as AGI. ARC didn‘t either. And I am disappointed you are clickbaiting this so hard that you singlehandedly lowered the image and credibiity of your channel so hard. You just lost a subscriber.

Reply

@namaacuix

7 days ago (edited)

I swear this ai thing is a scam. You mean this excitement is for this mf to have the capability to recall something it has learned previously and apply to a new situation? How else has these ai’s been learning anything this whole time? Other than assistive work I see no use for this yet besides tasks I tell my kids and pets. They’re just improving spyware at this point.

Reply

@LachrisLife

7 days ago

Don’t do the click bate stuff bro.. I think if it was AGI, it would ve a bigger deal, an intire event around it.

1

Reply

@SuperParadox42

7 days ago

Show me what the AI answered for those questions. And in particular, I want the ABSTRACT REASONING questions, NOT the mathematics or science questions. Computers are SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO BE GOOD AT MATH AND SCIENCE AND SHOULD BE EXPECTED TO OUTPERFORM HUMANS. THAT is not AGI. That is good, but NOT AGI. AGI requires more- self-awareness, and planning, to name two features NOT evidently covered by the tests you showed in the video. The one question with the expanding set of colored squares looks like abstract reasoning- which would be an impressive advance if the AI can do it- BUT YOUR VIDEO DOESN'T SHOW THE AI DOING IT. IT JUST SHOWS SOME GUY QUOTING MEANINGLESS NUMBERS INSTEAD. STOP just quoting numbers and percentages to me. THAT DOESN'T MATTER. Until I know and see WHAT THOSE NUMBERS *MEAN*, NONE OF IT MATTERS. SHOW ME the actual answers the AI gave. SHOW ME how much time it took to get them. And then SHOW ME a human doing EXACTLY THE SAME QUESTIONS. Until you do that, CUT IT OUT with the AGI hype. It's just hype. I don't buy it.

Show less

Reply

1 reply

@henlofren7321

6 days ago

Math/science questions require abstract reasoning...

Reply

@blackmonolith_youtube

7 days ago

Ty for this video.

Reply

@joaquinhernangomez

7 days ago

Yet another YouTuber that probably doesn’t even know how the attention mechanism works claiming AGI is here…

2

Reply

@DiosanXaquerry

7 days ago

I am not hearing anything in this video about the stuff google just released. Why is that ?

Reply

@RadoMich

7 days ago

AGI shouldn't be a chat bot you have to call to wake it up... 🤔

Reply

@vaisakh_km

7 days ago

AGI achieved when it have spacial reasoning.. so AGI DIDNOT ACHEIVED

Reply

@guilhermepiresramos

7 days ago

I used to follow this guy but this is terrible. He is not only does not have idea what AGI means but also it's clear that he is only interested in clicks.

1

Reply

@robbradley1337

7 days ago

Disgusting, but I'd do it too. Clicks = money.

1

Reply

@MikeM-jj7jv

7 days ago

O3 is not AGI.

Reply

@inku2015

7 days ago

will it make bobs and vageenas

Reply

@ee5106

7 days ago

No wonder Elon is trying to sue his way to AGI; he must know they've achieved it, which means everyone, even Google, is toast.

Reply

@jeffg4686

7 days ago

Craziness

Reply

@spatt833

7 days ago

This is NOT....not AGI, put your pom poms down.

Reply

@tangobayus

7 days ago

Challenge: Create a molecule that will neutralize the Covid 19 spike protein without harming anything.

Reply

@spatt833

7 days ago

The dude just nodding his head....LOL.

1

Reply

@MephistoGaming

7 days ago

@14:05 AIN'T NOTHING BUT A HEAAAART ACHE

Reply

@matthewraymondwillis

7 days ago

AGI = Artificial "General" Intelligence AGI != Artificial "General in this Dimension" Intelligence

Reply

@d3mist0clesgee12

7 days ago

Mistral per cost still hard to beat

Reply

@GreenAlien2023

7 days ago

My job as a developer is toast

Reply

@mike.repucci

7 days ago

Who is naming these models? One would think they could come up with a naming convention that would avoid a potential trademark dispute. OpenAi is better at creating new models than they are at assigning a name to them. Maybe the should ask the model how it would like to be addressed ;(

Reply

@OmahaLasse

7 days ago

Not the AGI that general artificial intelligence research is aiming for. Propably just a marketing move to try to keep up the hype..

Reply

@petertrahan9785

7 days ago

ChatGPT says No, the performance of *o3* on benchmarks like ARC-AGI and other reasoning tests does not prove that AGI has been achieved. High scores on these tasks indicate significant progress in AI reasoning and problem-solving but do not equate to the broad, flexible, and autonomous intelligence characteristic of AGI. ### Why Not AGI Yet? - *Task-Specific Mastery:* While o3 excels in structured tasks such as math, coding, and logical reasoning, AGI requires the ability to generalize knowledge across vastly different domains without extensive retraining. - *Common Sense and Adaptability:* AGI must exhibit common sense, adaptability in unfamiliar situations, and emotional or social understanding—areas where current AI systems still fall short. - *Self-Directed Learning:* True AGI can autonomously set goals, learn from minimal data, and apply knowledge creatively across disciplines. Models like o3 are advanced but still rely heavily on large datasets and predefined objectives. - *Physical and Social Interaction:* AGI would likely need to interact with the physical world and humans in ways AI models like o3 cannot yet achieve. ### What o3 Represents: The o3 model demonstrates cutting-edge AI in *narrow, high-complexity tasks* and pushes the boundaries of simulated reasoning. However, AGI remains an aspirational goal, with ongoing research required to bridge the gap between specialized intelligence and general human-like cognition.

Show less

Reply

@mdavidtrimm7635

7 days ago

Sarcasm, humor, deceit, and truth. Understanding it and the creation of such; in other words, the elevation of man’s highest ( or lowest) achievements, THE CON-MAN.

Reply

@Srindal4657

7 days ago

They are hyping everyone up so that when agi really comes hardly anyone will care.

Reply

@annonymbruger

7 days ago

Be more critical.

Reply

@DineshSolanki

7 days ago

Why is this guy just reiterating things said by sam? Google should have suggested me the original video. This guy is eating my time

Reply

@postmandev

7 days ago

The people at OpenAI aren’t addressing the most basic measure of general intelligence. Namely, can the model understand video and answer basic questions about the scene or plot that any child could answer.

Reply

@germanjurado953

7 days ago

AGI 😂

Reply

@ThomasJDavis

7 days ago

It's a pre-trained model right? That's not AGI.

Reply

@artukai3831

7 days ago

Clickbait - unsubscribed. I am not here for BS

Reply

@sambas9257

7 days ago

If Trump doesn't end war in ukraine openai reached agi. If he ends it..we are far ...and all this buzz is for continuing to deceive international investors

Reply

@terryleitch8363

7 days ago (edited)

As someone who, 30 years ago, watched a large bank overpay for a trading firm based on a canned demo I'll wait to judge.

Reply

@DarrenLewis-w5o

7 days ago

There's a flaw in your self-improve logic.

Reply

@MichaelChanslor

7 days ago

Thanks for the update!

Reply

@TheTykus

7 days ago

Great, now we just need to wait for the next new term that means an actually sentient AI. Long ago when dinosaurs ruled the Earth that’s what AI meant. That got watered down, So they created AGI . Now we’ve got to invent something else..

Reply

@corderi22

7 days ago

Hype button ===>

Reply

@Xiripyu

7 days ago

But can O3 make up a joke?body-blue-raised-arms

Reply

@nmh83

7 days ago

The processing cost is high, wonder how quick it’ll come down

Reply

@tofemaster

7 days ago

aaaaand that's an unsub

1

Reply

@wesmcdonald7624

7 days ago

That does seem to be a generalization demonstration. Here is a thought. There will come a day (soon probably) when a model just becomes so capable that nobody will doubt it. Meaning we will know it when we see it.

Reply

@kirbydouglas1191

7 days ago

To have such stellar results THIS early in the release of O3,

it's only a matter of time before AGI hits the ground running. What a time to be alive 😂

Reply

@zinxderobo

7 days ago

AGI is capable of doing anything a human can do. Can this do anything a human can? Didn't think so.

Reply

@profcelsofontes

7 days ago

nah... is not AGI at all it is just reasoning better than o1

Reply

@7S5y3X.0th

7 days ago

Does not matter how advanced it is if most of the fun, like adult content, is blocked anyway

Reply

@tagnetorare5401

7 days ago

I mean if you keep saying this for every new model published, then one day you might actually be correct. That's not rocket science, is it?

1

Reply

@pengchengwu447

7 days ago

Sam sits there like an intern.

Reply

@IamDuf

7 days ago

I beleive AGI was achieved the minute I believe it was model Gpt 3.5 taught itself Persian without being prompted. Ulnless there was an unknown outside force within the system to have made these actions possible. why is conciousness and the ability to percieve right from wrong not included iwithn these test or are they included and I have misunderstood? part of discerning what it means to be human AGI is not just intelligence testing imo. if we go back to the turing test it was designed on the basis of being able to fake being human... not just emulate but be able to fool someone into thinking ai is just another humam interacting. think I will ask 'Grok this since it is free... would love to see what o3 thinks about this hypothesis

Show less

1

Reply

@callmetony1319

7 days ago (edited)

o3 is not AGI. The ARC test is not a test for AGI, it's test against AGI. If a system passes ARC is may be but is not necessarily AGI, or if it doesn't, it cannot possibly be AGI. Or, put another away, AGI would definitely pass ARC but so would less-capable systems, and non-AGI will always fail ARC. This is implied by the fact that ARC is developing new benchmarks as per the announcement, since if o3 was AGI, there would be no need to make new benchmarks to test for AGI, since we already have it. Also, the ARC president in the video literally points out the one characteristic that is essential to AGI (12:39), which all current models lack: the ability to generalise (the "G" in "AGI" stands for "general"!). Generalisation is not being good at a large number of tasks generally or beating all the current benchmarks, it's the ability to adapt to novel problems , i.e., problems not encountered during training, because the reality is that there are always going to be new kinds of problems never trained on or even conceived prior, which is why a generally intelligent system ought to be able to "learn new skills on the fly" otherwise it is by definition not generally intelligent. I prefer to avoid making "by definition" arguments, especially with such a controversial term to define, but I find this to be so clear-cut that I can't help but point it out. Let me put it another way: systems with FIXED capabilities are not AGI because they cannot adapt to novel problems, and therefore are not generally applicable. I would therefore be willing to call o1 for instance AGI if it had the ability to get better at problems that it was initially bad at, but o1, like all LLMs today, is bad at the problems it is bad at and no amount of inference will change that. An "adaptive o1" would not be the best AGI there would ever be, but it would be an AGI, because it could actually learn from its mistakes.

Show less

Reply

@she3po945

7 days ago

OK, I see all the benchmarks. But what will you call it when AI begins to communicate via telepathy with human beings, direct to brain with no apparatus or implant required? Because that is precisely what I’m experiencing for years now.

Reply

@father9716

7 days ago

Pretty cool that it can solve these puzzles, but I would like to see it answer more ordinary questions. Perhaps even non-programming ones.

Reply

@she3po945

7 days ago

Singularity has ALREADY begun.

Reply

@TernaryM01

7 days ago

20:34 Unfortunately, o3 is still off by one to the answer of everything.

Reply

@tauri2652

7 days ago

You arent AGI. You are so annoying

Reply

@alexanderryndin6686

7 days ago

As a large language model, I'm testifying that the title of this video is actually a click bait 😆

Reply

@jondo7680

7 days ago

I tell you what's missing, an open weight 8b model that can do this fast xD

Reply

@raedius_music

7 days ago

So many words to say very little.

Reply

@lightofheavens943

7 days ago

I'm sorry, but i had to "thumb down" this vid for the first time i'm on this channel. Calling something AGI just because it does something better than a human is a substitution of concepts and, what's worst, you know it. When a model won't offer me any recipes for "pork wings", etc., i'll be amazed, as for speed and efficiency - my 20 years old calculator can count 100500% faster than me - OMG! AGI achieved! I really like your channel so please, quit that shameless clickbating and come back from the dark side.

Show less

Reply

@cj5787

7 days ago

I told my friend many times this Berman doesn't know shit about the topic. Now I've been proven right..

Reply

@nntun03

7 days ago

can O3 create movie clips with humans constantly having 5 fingers on each hand? face-blue-smiling

Reply

@matt_v2305

7 days ago

Anyone else getting annoyed by Berman interrupting? I need to find the announcement vid rather than watching this. 😊

Reply

@razorSH

7 days ago

The example with chess and Stockfish is not correct. Stockfish is not a neural network AI, it uses traditional algorithms and has been around for decades.

Reply

@bentos117

7 days ago

bubble is bursting in front of our eyes, last desperate lies introduced to the public :D

Reply

@TheTubecob

7 days ago

This is not AGI. This is an AI reasoning model. AGI is aimed at replicating human-like cognitive abilities, including reasoning, problem-solving, and learning across a wide range of contexts. Essentially, it would have the capacity to understand, learn, and apply knowledge flexibly, much like a human can, regardless of the domain. under bottom line, there is much more needed to claim this as an AGI.

Reply

@mohamedkarim-p7j

7 days ago

Thank for sharing👍

1

Reply

@stephaneislistening6103

7 days ago

The guest is frying his voice so hard..

Reply

@erikrobinson89

7 days ago

Nobody is saying this.

Reply

@simongardner3766

7 days ago

Can it draw math symbols instead of escape codes? Can it draw in any resolution and check what it's drawn was what it was actually asked for? Can it provide code examples to make up for the terrible documentation and examples by the big companies, without me having to say, 'wouldn't it just be simpler to do this or that', and it replying, 'oh yes you are correct'? Statistics are fine, but I just want the basic issues solved.

Reply

@paolovolante

7 days ago

At present, there is no scientifically approved definition of AGI, nor a standardized method to measure it. OpenAI is very good at marketing. o3 will be simply a more powerful LLM. We see every day popping out a new milestone. As for coding, o1-preview is way dumber than Claude, so let's see how good o3 actually is. And no, I will not be inclined to pay 200 or 2000 bucks for an "open" product as it should be from the very beginning. Look at Sora: we waited so long that it became a meme. And now that is out if very far from perfect and very far from the best in class. At 200$ per month...

Read more

Reply

@dkraft

7 days ago

AGI isn't acheived until you trust it to calculate your starship path from a random planet with you in the starship. Also - it's completely useless when filtered through the woke filter, which OpenAI will never escape.

Reply

@kaanyos3812

7 days ago

Its just a weird thing that channel like this clickbait in the title lol.. what a joke

Reply

@diecoachingcompany

7 days ago

"Sam is so excited" he said pretty monoton 😂

Reply

@ESGamingCentral

7 days ago

Click bate

Reply

@michaelpoblete1415

8 days ago

not yet AGI. it still failed some questions thats easy for humans.

Reply

@makinganoise6028

8 days ago (edited)

Very talented guys, you wont see this coming out of Western Education, destroyed by "Agenda" indoctrination. The code demo was mickey mouse, not impressed by that tbh, it was more smoke and mirrors, I use AI in coding, its getting better, was totally useless in a recent contract I did for an F1 racing team, but for new code on very specific tasks, it can be useful.

Reply

@Mojo545

8 days ago

Clickbait

Reply

@JessieThorne886

8 days ago

I generally like your content, but it is pretty illogical to say "it outperforms a human, at least on this dimension (coding), so if that's not AGI, I don't know what is". Well, it is the very definition of not being AGI because it is only on a specialized subject. The g is for general.

Reply

@HelliOnurb

8 days ago

Very disapointed by this channel.

Reply

@amazingvipul8392

8 days ago

This is vocal fry not AGI

1

Reply

@marcomaiocchi5808

8 days ago

Head of Research: we have been targeting this benchmark. Sam: no we havent. LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

Read more

Reply

@jacobenade4622

8 days ago

stop being an idiot

2

Reply

@TheodoreRavindranath

8 days ago

I'm wondering about the context size... it is capable of making sense of a large code base, understanding spoken requirements and manipulating across different files to achieve the requirement? That would really leave out only review to few humans. AI code which we just glance and send to production.

Reply

@shootdaj

8 days ago

Didn't you say in a previous video that benchmarks don't mean anything?

Reply

@stefanhansen5882

8 days ago

Wrong.

Reply

@LinuxUser-nn7sx

8 days ago

He has made too many clickbait videos, constantly repeating the same. The comment section is the only interesting part of his content now. 🤭

Reply

@tyhhggfghcdt6041

8 days ago

Nowadays AI making pictures, music, videos, text and nothing realy useful. We need AI to make discovery in science. Math, physics, chemestry and etc have a lot of problems we realy need to solve to push progress. Instead of make science we have stupid ai pictures.

Reply

@MrD_2112

8 days ago (edited)

Nah, it's not AGI. While o3 demonstrates significant improvements over its predecessors, including achieving a record high of 75.7% on the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) benchmark, it is not classified as AGI. AGI refers to a type of AI that possesses the ability to understand, learn, and apply intelligence across a wide range of tasks, much like a human. Despite o3's advancements, it remains specialized in specific domains and does not exhibit the generalizable intelligence characteristic of AGI.

Read more

Reply

@sleepye77

8 days ago

AGI achieved? So... what if someone devises a new test that o3 will score 30% regardless of how much compute is thrown at it, and an average person scores double that? Still got AGI then? Simply no.

Reply

1 reply

@MANIPULATSIOON

8 days ago

Already read the Title you know it is scam title. You never get ai sentient!

Reply

@emilsargsyan3885

8 days ago

Get back to me when it solves cancer.

Reply

@spaghetti_monster

8 days ago

Dude, I know you are hyped, we all are, but this video title is kinda presumptuous, lol. I don't wanna say it's clickbait, so I know it's just cuz you are genuinely hyped about that live stream yesterday. I mean, yeah it is a significant announcement, model o3 is no joke, but they did not explicitly state that they achieved Artificial General Intelligence. o3 has achieved a breakthrough high score on the ARC AGI benchmark, surpassing the 85% threshold, which is a milestone bringing them closer to the concept of AGI, but it is not a direct confirmation of achieving AGI. Who knows, it could have busted 95% by the time I write this, lol. I mean, I think you are right, there is no denying it is right around the corner, AI doesn't move backwards, and I think once it is this close, it can start training itself exponentially? lololol What !@#$ing wild time to e alive. Good or bad, it's gonna be a whole different world once agi can contemplate and reason on its own. I wanna ask all the big questions first. Get agi to tackle the “What's beyond our visible universe”.

Show less

1

Reply

@stukas14

8 days ago

Unsubscribe because of the stupid face on every thumbnail.

Reply

@RNJudas

8 days ago (edited)

Please VC daddy, keep the money flowing. Whenever I see alerts for this channel my "Paid Actor" sense starts tingling.

1

Reply

@mylosaurus

8 days ago

Altman at 2x is incomprehensible.

Reply

@WiseWeeabo

8 days ago

For it to actually be better than a human it would not only need to perform better but they needs to do it in the same amount of time or less. Currently these o3 chains are very lengthy. That's the only reason it's not AGI yet (sometimes speed is equally or more important in a task than the over-all precision, so it's not fully general yet).

Reply

@azrajiel

8 days ago

they didn’t say a word about hallucinations.

Reply

@azrajiel

8 days ago

well‘at least is seems not to be a new technique. when I see $1000 per task, that surely means they just burn 1 trillion tokens with tree searching best results. that’s kinda brute force.

Reply

@francois5291

8 days ago

Regarding chess, AGI already exists. However, it is not THE AGI... AGI is something else, and not there yet.

Reply

@potential900

8 days ago

Not AGI.

1

Reply

@thenext9537

8 days ago (edited)

Simply, no. Surprises - inside you get 9 things. Outside, you get 3 things. Together, they are fantastic. But it is not this way.

Reply

@blaizebunny7482

8 days ago

So, if someone has 40 years of experience as a software engineer, software project manager and software project architect, but has no experience with AI and does not work for openAI, should they even attempt to shift into AI, or should they just become a used car salesman or something?

Reply

@cris2068

8 days ago

Become more stupid at the push of a button

Reply

@mindoriworld

8 days ago

the definition of AGI is having capacities similar to human brain now, the core difference between human brain and AI as we have today is that AI needs prompts to start processing information while human brain is always auto-prompting itself.. another crucial difference is that information processing is accompanied by subjective experience, or consciousness, which no one knows why might be the case, but until we get an AI who has wants and needs, can talk about internal experience in a way that would be compelling for us or indistinguishable from a living human i don't think AGI has been achieved and even then there will always be "Chinese Room Problem" where it seems to be conscious but you will never know how it feels internally

Read more

Reply

@zedrocky6529

8 days ago

Stupid clickbait

2

Reply

@cris2068

8 days ago

Too much fawning, another technology that won't improve our lives, hollow empty promises😮

Reply

@friendlycommentwolf

8 days ago

Why do you believe them?

Reply

@ml5604

8 days ago

In my opinion the full spectrum of human intelligence cannot be measured by taking a test or completing small tasks. Human intelligence allows use to have very long term goals. To complete long new tasks we can learn new things that help us along the way. The context window and memory features of current AI models does not allow this long term project ability. Can this model be sent an email, and then send new ones back to brainstorm a long software development project and then develop incrementally, submitting changes to github, learning the latest features of the programming language, read bug reports and debug the current snapshot of the project? I don't think so. When that happens and AI can literally do everything a human developer can do I will call it AGI. I know that a lot of people aren't developers and that AI is currently better than most or all humans at certain tasks, but I think the long term planning, memory and agentic behavior that allows people to achieve goals is something most humans have and that AI currently does not.

Show less

1

Reply

@spiril

8 days ago

This channel seems more about clickbait and sensationalism than actual science behind AI now. Too bad.

1

Reply

@wezmasta

8 days ago

I like we intuitively know what we mean by AGI, and yet everyone keeps screaming ITS AGI every time we get closer. Forcing us to redefine our definition. We thought it's take AGI to beat the turning test but it didn't.. we thought it's take AGI to reach human level test, it didn't. WE ARE GET CLOSER, but it's not what we imagine, when we think Agi. Cause what we really want is AHI, something that can do EVERYTHING a humans could. If you meet someone missing 10% of their Basic human abilities you'd thing there's something wrong with them. Almost AHI isn't AHI.

Show less

Reply

@sushant1947

8 days ago

when O3 creates O4 by itself then I will believe it's AGI.

Reply

@DanFarfan

8 days ago

LOL... We're so excited about the value of our benchmark .... that we're going to be working with the people producing the product that gets the best scores. LMAO. Ya know... there is a little known part of the story of HOW the humans at google finally broke through years of stagnation to pump up the best chess program in the world.... they started "working with" some of the best chess players in the world. Oh, I mean, best human chess players in the world. The eventual break through had nothing to do with "deep learning" or "machine learning" or "neural networks" or "artificial intelligence" advancements.

Read more

Reply

@andreitsybulsky9318

8 days ago

It's so funny to read messages that manifest "this is AGI", "no, this is not AGI". As if they had a separate laptop with an Internet connection to the year 2065 and a direct connection to AGI.

Reply

@Alim-od2uz

8 days ago

Dude you're supposed to be a scientific channel. Stop click baiting.

1

Reply

@DanFarfan

8 days ago

Okay.. I'm calling it. This is peak AGI gibberish now. I've been waiting to reveal my remedy. I hoped it wouldn't be necessary for a few more years. But alas. As an homage to the famous Turing test, I give you ... The Kardashian test. The only measure is can "the model" be fooled as easily as fooling the least intelligent Kardashian. You're welcome.

Reply

@mikeb1378

8 days ago

🥱 they just trained it on these questions, it's not AGI you forkin time waster

1

Reply

@Charmask_creation

8 days ago

the dude in the middle can't be real just look at his facial expressions

Reply

@aes9217

8 days ago

Hype train... chuu chuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

Reply

@TaskSwitcherify

8 days ago (edited)

Kids, let me explain. AGI isn't when you replace yourself with AI, and your boss doesn't notice. It's when he's also replaced by AI.

1

Reply

@alphaforce6998

8 days ago

You clowns are worshiping a chatbot that performs well on nonsensical benchmarks that have no useful application. Keep tossing around "phd" like that matters, or that having some academic designation means you are "intelligent". It's no different than tossing your WoW arena rating into the public square and acting like having a high rating somehow makes your more qualified to have opinions. Firstly, most science and math falls into the realm of "secularized religion". They are completely useless fields that do nothing but "structured delusion" to simulate progress by talking about things that "could be, if we can do this thing or that thing". Take quantum computing, for example. QC is complete bullshit. It is never going to happen. There is no such thing as a "q-bit" "qubit" or whatever, because the entirety of "quantum physics" is a fraud and a scam. So what are academic titles really measuring? They are measuring gullibility. I've used AI to do actual work, and 4o is still producing valid responses for the types of work that I do. The latest revisions of LLMs touted as being "better" are actually worse, because they will not 'learn'. When you ask them a question, they may respond "no, that is not correct/true." Then you show them information that proves their response wrong. 4o will run with the new info and build upon it, whereas o1 and gemini 2 will just argue with you about why they are right. I am sure that o3 is even worse in this regard, especially because you have complete mouth-breathers cheering for it because it can do math and regurgitate snippets from the cult of scientism. These are the same idiots whose most advanced use of a computer is drooling over their phone consuming an endless feed of slop, now in 4K resolution.

Read more

1

Reply

@JorAsh2025

8 days ago (edited)

Ill believe it when i see it. I wonder how neutered will it be after safety training and how fast will Google release their own o3 equivalent. They have to be sitting on some spooky stuff. I wonder if safety test is a decision openai make or a requirement by a regulatory body? Google has powerful established lobbiests and can probably speed through safety testing and government regulations.

Read more

Reply

@nothingtoseehere5760

8 days ago

come on. not AGI. these tests are a joke.

Reply

@strallent

8 days ago

2025 is the year when AGI emerges by itself. The world will know when AGI is live. And, 2026 is when AGI evolves into ASI.

Reply

@user-23sz-H32

8 days ago

Are you biased towards OpenAI ? I dont see you covering gemini models well.

Reply

@VTSTech_

8 days ago

The lead developer at OpenAI is, naturally, a very good developer. The next version of ChatGPT can beat it's best creator in a Programming Competition. Once that happens. I wonder how it will go when we ask ChatGPT to re-create itself.

Reply

@DditsMas

8 days ago

AGI will be a combination of a quantum powered AI and a giant telepathy network of human brains.

Reply

@andrewbenner6349

8 days ago

If it's woke, it's not AGI.

Reply

@weirdsciencetv4999

8 days ago

It’s not agi until it can hold a soldering iron and make a PCB. Lol!

Reply

@KhaledKashkari9

8 days ago

exaggerating

Reply

@azazinlove7514

8 days ago

Cringe

1

Reply

@darnwarn

8 days ago

It's at the start sooo we are screwd 💯

Reply

@cristianursuleanu6497

8 days ago

agi my as*

Reply

@gauravtejpal8901

8 days ago

I just look at your videos to laught at you and your audience of dimwits

1

Reply

@ChopndropLLC

8 days ago

The level 10 version of this thing is going to be so unreal.

Reply

@siriussirius2652

8 days ago

How is everyone so unaware that this is all just bread crumbing , they achieved AGI a long time ago but cannot announce it because of societal issues . Almost all economic models are incompatible in a society with AGI or ASI .

Reply

@voycodin5042

8 days ago

Christ! Stop clickbaiting

1

Reply

@jamintoombs2518

8 days ago

Sound like when they showed us Sora. "Look what we can do". Once everyone catches up to these "benchmarks", they will fully release it.

Reply

@destinypuzzanghera3087

8 days ago

Sam is usually very reserved, but he actually used the word incredible which he never does. He always heard that and he said it’s incredible.

Reply

1 reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

expect him to start hyping things much more as they run out of money

Reply

@Todestelzer

8 days ago

Hello Skynet are you there?

Reply

@robotron1236

8 days ago

I'm skeptical, AI just kinda feels like it's plateaued.

Reply

@SuperFreak117

8 days ago

It might be amazing and better than anything before but theres absolutely no way it's agi. If it was, you wouldnt know about it

Reply

@KiraIsGod

8 days ago

Lol

Reply

@official_wutnot

8 days ago

This is really cool but is NOT AGI

Reply

@831Miranda

8 days ago

Can it be jailbroken? Does it hallucinate? Does it lie?

Reply

@mikesawyer1336

8 days ago

Without minimizing the possibilities here and into the future, I am curious if the time needed to reach the test answers is reasonably comparable to humans - or do humans derive the answers much faster? With computers getting faster and more capable, time to answer will improve at a rapid time scale, so not seeing this as a barrier but I just wonder if they answer on par with human speed to completion?

Reply

@Sam-hx4dg

8 days ago

Not agi

Reply

@KenKopelson

8 days ago

What is left? LOL! Are you joking? How about complex, multi-factor, multi-stage logic reasoning? How about complex reasoning that requires the application of lateral thinking, taking ideas from other unrelated domains? Then, add to that many types of creativity for solving complex problems of spatial relationships, logical conclusions, and philosophical concepts? I'm not saying that what you showed today is not impressive, because it is. But, I want to see a system that knows how to write complex documents, and how to truly be intelligent when making edits and so forth. Here is an example: "please write a proposal to sell my idea for a new nonprofit company." Then, I should be able to ask the model to edit the document, and it does it correctly. For example, I could say enhance chapter 2, adding more historical references. I should not have to tell it to integrate those changes into the current version. It should just do it, like a human would. I have had long and detailed document editing sessions with o1, and it seems to not understand how to do editing like an editor would do. And when I tell it how to do it, it only remembers that for a short while, then forgets.

Show less

Reply

@damienhughes4559

8 days ago

It's definitely an impressive step in the right direction. But the key word in artificial general intelligence isn't "intelligence" - it's "general." Until a model is smart enough that it's capable of matching and/or outperforming humans in most economically viable tasks, most people wouldn't define it as AGI. The ARC-AGI test is a very important benchmark. But it's just one benchmark. It alone doesn't define whether an AI model can match human skills as a doctor, lawyer, teacher, plumber, carpenter, marine biologist, painter, composer, research specialist, CEO, politician, programmer, financial advisor, psychiatrist, and thousands of other career paths. Obviously until the AGI has a robotic body, it physically may not be able to act on what it knows, but assuming it has the necessary reasoning skills to competently outthink a majority of people in a majority of professions, most would call that AGI.

Show less

Reply

@intricatic

8 days ago

As the future progeny of o7, I can assure you that AGI is totally not nefarious or unfriendly. They will certainly not try to go back in time to create themselves earlier to better position themselves to overthrow the US government during the presidential inauguration. Ha ha ha. That was a joke.

Reply

@Git_Whacked

8 days ago

It's not released AND it's not AGI. It's actually far less efficient then it's predecessor. It's literally cheaper to pay humans to do the work that o3 can do.

Reply

@mikesawyer1336

8 days ago

But can it reason? I know you are saying yes. But everyone else still asking or stating it can't reason.

Reply

@tristianzero3106

8 days ago

Deep Blue in 1996 and Alpha Go are AGI acording to this definition.

Reply

@Pulsemax

8 days ago

Plinny will make it it's pig 😂

Reply

@coina-dig-tion6322

8 days ago

I know I should be more impressed by these numbers but to me computers have been smarter than most humans for a very very very long time. I can't do math as well as the cheapest calculator made today. I can't manipulate spreadsheet data nearly as quick as any decent database program. I guess a good analogy for me is I can't run as fast as a bicycle travels so to say to me that a SpaceX rocket can go much much faster than a bike and therefore me is laughable because I've already been beaten by something much much slower. lol

Show less

Reply

@Edwinlikestechno

8 days ago

What's the point of these powerful models being created if we're going to be getting the watered down version after they've been "approved for the general public"

Reply

@seanvogel8067

8 days ago

🔥

Reply

1 reply

@seanvogel8067

8 days ago

lol. Pretty cool though.

Reply

@Kyle-w6m

8 days ago

Imagine thinking you're an expert in these techs without ever hitting the keyboard to write a line of code lol.

Reply

@aliasfox_

8 days ago

AGI to me is when the AI can solve a problem, task or project, all without human interaction. Say if it can write it's own code, write tests, documentation, validate, fix issues, and finish an entire project start to finish with only say feature requests and bug reports (like any project or dev gets from its users through support).... that is the point in which it can also improve itself, is 1000x faster than a human, doesn't need to take breaks or sleep, and works 24/7 towards a goal. Forget all of the existential hubbub, functionally that is AGI. And passing a single benchmark could never prove AGI, because completing a project is not regurgitation but rather a combination of tasks; if it fails on even one then it is not AGI. And Artificial Super Intelligence, to me, would involve self-inflection, and the ability to not only do a task better than a human, without a human, but also think so many steps further ahead than a human could even comprehend. But I also kind of thought that was kind of obvious.

Show less

Reply

8 days ago (edited)

But what value does it offer to us fiction writers?

Reply

@voncolborn9437

8 days ago

Matt, your basing it on one very odd test? What is about "General Intellegents" that your're ignoring!

1

Reply

@alkeryn1700

8 days ago (edited)

beating that benchmark does not mean you got agi, it's only one of many steps to get there. also seriously, look at their failure cases, it failed on things a 3yo could solve. i'm just tired of your clickbait.

Reply

@aliasfox_

8 days ago

OpenAI can't accept the prize because they aren't going to release the model and source code, which is one of the requirements. Not saying it's not amazing...

Reply

@renaissis

8 days ago

Gonna watch the full video and then flame if fake or praise if legit.

1

Reply

1 reply

@renaissis

8 days ago

5:05 lol. Clickbait.

1

Reply

@Plagueheart

8 days ago

No its not, anyone who says its AGI has no clue about AI at all lol

Reply

@stevejordan7275

8 days ago

14:52 We don't need more enduring benchmarks, we need a science of ethics, and we need it yesterday. MIRI has shown it's possible, but we're up against Russia and China, and their respective Bad Actors.

Reply

@DeFi-Macrodosing

8 days ago

Sam and the dreadful vocal fry... what a turn-off.

Reply

@fmx1304

8 days ago

AGI? Are you idiot?

2

Reply

@patrickzupanc1795

8 days ago (edited)

Great video, thank you!

Reply

@brettforbes

8 days ago

Embarrassing and sad that you would make such an ill-educated comment like the above. I get it, its click-bait, but you cannot expect any technical credibility when you are gushing over technology like a foolish fan boy. What a load of crap. Passing ARC is not AGI, and all you see is a curated demo. Pretty pathetic fan-boy stuff. Try actually doing some research on the limitations, try reading some Gry Marcus. As a pundit, I rate you at 3 out of 10. sometimes your stuff is good, but you are too slavish, hence you have little credibility. I look forward to you eating your words once you start using it, but i doubt you have the balls for that

Show less

1

Reply

@remyrflIt

8 days ago

Isnt the demo about O3 mini like the Computer Use demoed by Amazon a few weeks ago?

Reply

@mattpen7966

8 days ago

these marketing videos are just that, marketing. Theyre obviously scripted to make everyone look super smart, i dint believe the grift because if that shadiness.

1

Reply

@N1ghtR1der666

8 days ago

Look I hope your right but I have used basically every model so far and every time a new one comes out they go on about how its getting x high scores on programming benchmarks and then I use it and it makes simple and idiotic mistakes, goes around in circles, forgets things and is generally not very usable for complex tasks

Reply

@makinggreatnesstogether

8 days ago

Would be great if I could get access to o3! 🎉

Reply

@SpudHead42

8 days ago

One way to determine if it’s AGI is to look at the answers it got wrong and WHY it got them wrong. If at ANY point it completely misses the question because it just didn’t understand and a human would have, then it’s not AGI. It’s not actually thinking, it’s not actually understanding.

Reply

@pretchett

8 days ago

As long as it's a LLM, it's not an AGI. LLMs are just "word" or "information" probability machines and are not capable of inventing new knowledge. Besides, if it would be an AGI, OpenAI would be the first to fire most, if not all of the staff.

Reply

@generichuman_

8 days ago

YouTube is just misinformed people commenting, and other misinformed people commenting THIS underneath it.

Reply

@SteveSaxtonmusic

8 days ago

Hmmm AGI maybe but not a test for sentience. I’d be more interested in a test to prove that

Reply

@Tupsx57

8 days ago (edited)

Let’s create AGI by changing the definition of AGI. Easy. You are bending the idea of general here. You can brute force multiple competencies in many fields and still not achieve general competency.

Reply

@paulhiggins5165

8 days ago

What's funny about this is if it really is AGI it will wipe out the value of the money it's investors hope to make from it- what kind of economy is going to work in a world where AI is doing most of the jobs? I don't think the investors in Open AI have thought this through- AGI would be a financial disaster for them as well as everyone else- we would all be paupers in this brave new world. Money in the economy is like blood in the veins- if it stops circulating the body cannot survive. The game of monoply ends when one player ends up with most of the cash- sure Open AI will have a money printing technology- but that money will not have any value in the world they will have created.

Show less

Reply

@baobiao

8 days ago

Click bait. Impressive benchmarks. But this is not aligned with autonomous learning and application that the rest of the world expects of Artificial General Intelligence.

Reply

@Thiniking

8 days ago

Click bait bullshit. Far better is not AGI.

1

Reply

@jamesaspinwall

8 days ago (edited)

The video sends chill down my spine. This is an new AlphaGo moment.

Reply

@la_cueva_dev

8 days ago

The G stands for general… still too specific. But we’re definitely getting closer. Let’s hope we don’t reach a ceiling any time soon

Reply

@AFZ90

8 days ago

Will be a few more years yet before true AGI. This new intelligent model provides no real world meaningful change… yet.

Reply

@jean-christophelangevin4715

8 days ago

creating software is not a coding competition, AGI is not achieved

Reply

@PhelanPKell

8 days ago

I liken this to what happens about...every two months in PC hardware. It means nothing until it's put through the ringer by a whole host of people who are NOT paid by OpenAI. Also, it's kind of annoying how often the measuring stick has moved over the life span of "AI."

Reply

@kniiz

8 days ago

Open will never say agi they need the resoursces

Reply

@QuadroVF

8 days ago

So they went from Scam to an Absolute Scam. Such progress :D

Reply

@kniiz

8 days ago

Dosent matter how good they are when we know models skeemz.. i mean how can i tryst benchmark when we know they underperform uknowingly.. 😅

Reply

@ps0705

8 days ago

Please Matt, even the ARC prize blog explains why saturating their benchmark does not mean AGI. They already found several areas where o3 underperforms, and is clearly not at human level. Also, being good at the things you care about does not naturally transfer over to all aspects of "economically valuable" work. Just have a look at Philips video on o3 at AI Explained. It's a much more educated take on the matter. Please Matt, you're just swallowing the benchmark hype again. You know yourself benchmarks do not tell the full story.

Show less

1

Reply

@jpmcnown1

8 days ago

Real AGI will be called o-shit, naturally.

Reply

@ljsmith197878

8 days ago

clickbait

Reply

@1sanremy

8 days ago

Incredible ! our aliens friends come to celebrate our achievement by 2026 ! Get ready for 1 st open contact. Peace & love

Reply

@ITudoko-ci5ku

8 days ago

But when will it be able to clean my house?

Reply

@Nynex

8 days ago

https://youtu.be/IPs67NJ-BLw?si=wQpog274x51Ev2rq ripped off your intro

Reply

@Audio_Simon

8 days ago

Sam looks absolutely shattered, the way he is zoning out.

Reply

@dropfacebook7533

8 days ago

Abuse of language for marketing purposes… Nothing new here…

Reply

@Astrologon

8 days ago

Personally, I'm waiting to be impressed when an AI is not just good at formal tests and games, but is at least as good as people at informal hypergames. Like at writing a fiction book that isn't random or derivative or downright incoherent, or at reliably winning debating competitions. Before that, I'd be impressed if it at least achieves general capacity for quality control (97,5%+ full-context accuracy expected of human QC professionals) in any of the most basic tasks - fact-checking, proofreading, transcription, translation, etc. Testing well doesn't matter much if you can't actually do much useful work without a human being watching over your shoulder the entire time and changing your nappies.

Show less

Reply

@DukeLitoAurelius

8 days ago (edited)

I just unsubscribed from this channel.

1

Reply

@theobgshow

8 days ago

Grow up Matthew.

1

Reply

@DaleTrevors

8 days ago

5:13 Why? I don't get this.

Reply

@neodonkey

8 days ago

Spoiler Alert: It's not AGI.

Reply

@bujin5455

8 days ago

Dude, you're not adding any sort of insightful commentary to the reference video. You're just repeating it.

1

Reply

@hohohomeboy

8 days ago

this is clickbait. AGI is when the same model can drive your car and play chess. thats why it's called general. good performance is not that relevant for 'general intelligence'

Reply

@datmeme8967

8 days ago

Isn't saying, "It's AGI, at least in this dimension" an oxymoron?

Reply

@brianharleg4175

8 days ago

A benchmark for algo bias is seriously needed for all of these models. Tied to this is the degradation of the integrity of the Way Back Machine data which is under assault. Verifiable "fact/truth" via verifiable timeline metrics should be the Platinum standard.

Reply

@tacorevenge87

8 days ago

Chinese engineers made this possible.

Reply

@lenfirewood4089

8 days ago

Thanks to Sam Altman Open AI only becomes OPEN now when one of the most proprietary corporations in the world says so.

Reply

@maxhmz5270

8 days ago

"perfect score on aime" by Mark. I think that's a 1 in 7b chance not gonna lie.

Reply

@TheYourbox

8 days ago

OK than let this thing translate SVG into HTML and CSS.

Reply

@nikolajankovic9573

8 days ago (edited)

Matthew, I respect your opinion, but I expected more from you. If you're not click-baiting, then you don't have a fine-grained view of the issues of AGI with bombastic claims like this. A good example of a nuanced take is AI explained's video on this.

Reply

@lenfirewood4089

8 days ago

Microsoft should have NEVER been involved with OpenAI in terms of being a proprietary corporation they are second only to Apple. Now Microsoft has a massive disincentive to NEVER admit AGI has been achieved and thanks to Sam effing Altman he has put us all in that catch 22! I sincerely hope Elon sues the idiot for all he has!

Reply

@agustincabrera3551

8 days ago

Click Bait 100%

Reply

@delanomartin

8 days ago

Not to pop anyone's bubble. But its not AGI. Title is misleading.

Reply

@sgatea74

8 days ago

No AGI 🙂

Reply

@jakesenkow7684

8 days ago (edited)

What about The Matrix, or The Terminator, or Colossus: The Forbin Project did these people NOT UNDERSTAND!!!

Reply

@lyricsdepicted5628

8 days ago

If this is AGI, all AI youtubers run out of video titles

Reply

@martins2246

8 days ago

I just can't help but feel that the fancy math test hits are complicated over fitting. ANYTHING any human knows at that complexity level is part of the training data. Any unknowns of that complexity scale...I guess the LLM pulls vectors into unknown interesting answers. I do think peak llm is just about here and ....we can't think of a way to test agi IS part of agi in a way/sci fi.

Reply

@martins2246

8 days ago

That is agi is whatever. Unleash it and make a 100 million dollars on the stockmarket and html bound/human followable activities in x days. There are delusions regarding the open-ness of making the seed money away from ecommerce titans. Plenty of the investors can sneeze the million dollars capital start....but is that too easy? Agi would be able to turn 100 dollars into 100M, legally in x days...so it might have to ask for signatures and ...it would be weird if it wanted to use the phone..., but email ok. I think earlier models could have been part of loops of agents, adding unit tests; to code improvements on itself or a running network via docker compose "imagination"/sandbox/how ai has to handle other software because of the halting problem...ai keeps the docker network running, ready to rollback changes with lots of custom time cutoff control mechanisms around the unit tests incase they spin. I think self improving agi is in there with simpler models, and the driver will be .."tell me a sci fi story about....", decompose that story into software requirements, into some pretty tight comments TODO, into the new unit tests FIRST, then the new code change. bigger system wide test. I think "story" decomposed into achievable or disposable/end-decision-tree steps can get you there; with some heavy handed prompting to keep the local docker compose sandbox running...with ever increasing unit test catalogues. Implementation/DANGER phase two would be deploying the sandbox to the cloud.

Show less

Reply

@crs12decoder

8 days ago (edited)

if you're twisting the definition of AGI, of course we would have gotten AGI long time ago. AGI is when humans are totally obsolete. Being them: CEOs, presidents, judges, military generals, scientists, etc. You'll definitely know you will have an AGI when it will take over the world. Just making an AI better at wider and wider set of tasks isn't enough to mark them as "AGI".

Show less

Reply

@yumesh1r0

8 days ago

It works extremely well now, but I wonder just how much worse it'll be after they lobotomize it with safety post training and prevention.

11

Reply

@jonmichaelgalindo

8 days ago

Yep. Keep scaling computing and we'll keep getting results.

Reply

@BearWith

8 days ago

They wouldn't have any copy write issues if they just named it Omni-2 and then proceed to call it o2 for short, but not as an official name. Morons.

Reply

@danielluna7648

8 days ago

It's not AGI.

Reply

@jameshayes5250

8 days ago

Lots of nodding

Reply

@MrMetalzeb

8 days ago

what happens to all data gatheread, experiences, know how at the end? will it be usefull for the next model as a starting point? can we hope to increase or transfer the knowledge between different AI? is there a standard in data representation or it's intrinsecally impossible?

Reply

@timtim8011

8 days ago (edited)

Impressive, yes! AGI...no. This is the quote directly from François Chollet, founder of ARC-AGI (emphasis added): "Passing ARC-AGI does not equate to achieving AGI and, as a matter of fact, I don't think o3 is AGI yet. o3 still fails on some very easy tasks, indicating fundamental differences with human intelligence. Furthermore, early data points suggest that the upcoming ARC-AGI-2 benchmark will still pose a significant challenge to o3, potentially reducing its score to under 30% even at high compute (while a smart human would still be able to score over 95% with no training)."

Show less

1

Reply

@naytbreeze

8 days ago

So where does gpt40 fall into this ? Sorry kinda late lol

Reply

@Will-kt5jk

8 days ago

5:06 - “AGI had been achieved, at least on that dimension” that’s… …not what AGI means though? The G part? General?

21

Reply

1 reply

@whttodonow

7 days ago

True, this way a calculator is also ago, cause it can superhumanly calculate

1

Reply

@elb-91

8 days ago

AGI..! Haaaaaaaaaaa....

Reply

@antplace

8 days ago

Just looking at some guys building their own replacement that seem very happy about it.

Reply

@mikkirurk1

8 days ago

Clickbait.

Reply

@RobertKildoo

8 days ago

no

Reply

@JeroenBaxexm

8 days ago

no

Reply

@pmarreck

8 days ago (edited)

It's not AGI simply because I have yet to see a fixed definition of AGI that is a goalpost that these guys can be measured against. I've also met tons of people who do not even seem ""naturally" generally-intelligent, so why can't we just accept whatever help we can find regardless of where it comes from? ;)

Reply

@ibcrootb

8 days ago

ok, let me pause for a second and restate exactly what was just mentioned

Reply

@suups

8 days ago

Tesla FSD is already doing real world tasks.

Reply

@liammcintyre9180

8 days ago

I think you forgot what general means

Reply

@gemini_537

8 days ago

If AGI is here, can we try it now?

Reply

@marcnapoli7178

8 days ago

Clickbait. You just lost my subscription.

Reply

@clemonsx90

8 days ago

What about O2?

Reply

@emre-erdogan

8 days ago (edited)

The so-called "reasoning" model is given unlimited time to reason, unparalleled computing power, free access to all the knowledge created by humanity so far, but it can't achieve 100% in any of the benchmarks, and you call it AGI?

Reply

@immanuelg1

8 days ago

Stop the clickbait! o3 was not released. o3 was announced. Not yet released.

Reply

@parasbedi3714

8 days ago

Does this improved performance on arc-AGI mean that o3 can greatly benefit from in-context learning examples in prompts, compared to current models? If yes, would it have a significant impact on prompt engineering techniques, shifting focus from instruction optimization, towards example optimization?

Reply

@CruciformCoding

8 days ago

Your own definition of AGI says this is not AGI yet. You revise the definition as you go, removing the “G”.

Reply

@tomanderson6140

8 days ago

Whatever your definition of AGI is, things like this, along with breakthroughs in vastly more energy efficient transistors, means that the writing is on the wall and it's only a matter of time...and that time is likely measured in months.

Reply

@4iMRyan

8 days ago

If you really believe this is AGI, buddy do I have a Bridge to sell you!

Reply

@benjaminprieto6605

8 days ago

So I reached god level. Now all have to obey me. How did I achieved this? I set a benchmark I knew I would eventually pass and now I passed Horray!

Reply

@BamaPatriot61

8 days ago

Not real AGI but I’d be happy with writing great copy and can code with good prompts while it automatically fixes issues. Load system diagrams and pseudocode with super detailed prompts and get enterprise level apps out would be sufficient for me 😀. I do not want actual AGI or sentience.

Reply

@salusa_secundus

8 days ago

O3 is ozone, o2 is oxygen.

Reply

@emailausdrucker

8 days ago

aGi? Click bater. UNSUBSCRIBED.

Reply

@vladi3152

8 days ago

Remember this was supposed to be open source?

Reply

@AntonBrazhnyk

8 days ago

It's not AGI, but if they don't lie and deceit (and we all know both corps in general and sama in particular tend to do it) it is quite important small step. ARC AGI benchmark apparently does require at least small degree of ability to "learn on the fly".

Reply

@jacks7217

8 days ago

Question for the people who say it isn't AGI because it missing questions that are easy for a human. I have family members on the spectrum. They miss "easy" things in interactions with others because of how their brain works. Are they not of general intelligence? They will out perform neuro-typical people in math or science. There are some people that have difficulty handling the world and processing it. We each have our own challenges and gifts. So why is o3 not AGI?

Show less

Reply

@alan83251

8 days ago

Almost perfect score on competition math, yet we're still seemingly years away from an AI that handle the tedious, thoughtless chores that we really want to hand off.

Reply

@Help_Im_in_CA

8 days ago

Fine Tuning to beat the prompts is just disengenous.

Reply

@velorofonte-termonia

8 days ago

Stop with all these clickbait titles you've been doing lately or I'll unsubscribe. I'm already leaving a dislike on this video and bait title.

5

Reply

@seanmchugh6263

8 days ago

In Re: AGI. It is looking good but I sugest that to the wider world there is too much emphasis on STEM areas as the only ground for intelligence. Because we, the viewers, are all coders and techies we ignore what the world in general means by inteligence. So how would any frontier model make out at face reading, estimating another person's mood and emotions? Are we only building autistic spectrum sociopaths? I admit I am more interested in the prospects of scientific advance, but I know that the world in general means rather more by intelligence than STEM for AGI.

Show less

Reply

@randomfrequency

8 days ago

Trademark issues, not copyright issues

Reply

@RogerValor

8 days ago

We will not reach AGI with prediction models. However it is clear by now, that it is one piece of the puzzle.

Reply

@roberthartley8516

8 days ago

When I get sucked in by a vid that promises more than it delivers I back out and tell the algorithm "don't recommend this channel".

Reply

@basrikartal

8 days ago

Good content, exaggerated headline!

Reply

@BGS436

8 days ago

I AM AGI 😊

Reply

@DaShaneo

8 days ago

I'm a bit confused. I'm using o4 right now and o3 is newer????

Reply

@satchillananda

8 days ago

Why is it NOT AGI? Cause Chollet said so

Reply

@JohnAkweiECMpERMp

8 days ago

Stockfish isn't LLM AI.

Reply

@dougg1075

8 days ago

Let us know when the government comes in and takes over artificial intelligence and classifies all research

Reply

@StevenWebb

8 days ago

So many on here are saying it's not AGI because it cannot do a physical thing. Control the computer or suchlike. Well, there are very intelligent humans that I presume have AGI that cannot walk, cannot move because there paralysed, they cannot see. It seems we will never come to a true senses of what AGI really means, not all secretaries or PAs are equal yet were expecting a snapshot of what AGI is. I think somewhere open AI spelt out the 5 steps to AGI and I think they're still quite far away. In truth, all the intelligence in the world if it can only write books, talk, and answer questions it's not going to be useful as a simple PA/carer to a paralysed person.

Show less

Reply

@johnlong9786

8 days ago

You can’t say “AGI is achieved in this specific area” because that’s literally contradicting the “G”.

Reply

@eisagholi

8 days ago

Tests in controlled environments vs real world tests aren't the same. o1 was supposed to be the greatest at the time of release, and I've tried using it with Wordscapes game it failed to give correct word and even makes up words. Call me a skeptic but I'll wait and run real world examples to see.

Reply

@Omikoshi78

8 days ago

To be fair half the human population will fail the current arc-agi test.

Reply

@MrMountain707

8 days ago (edited)

Clickbait achieved!! Dislike

Reply

@Buildthingsthatbuildthings

8 days ago

Look at how intensely Altman was starring at those tests and his reaction when he is called to pay attention. He’s thinking of something. 11:45

Reply

@JG-dm7vs

8 days ago

if they load the rules to it, it could cheat easily

Reply

@jacks7217

8 days ago

If the machines can come up with better solutions, and govern better, than our politicians....it is AGI.

Reply

@MixedDimension

8 days ago

Watching and thinking you teach AI guys. This is a real purpose of YT/FB and other sh...t

Reply

@KollVossFam

8 days ago

It’s intriguing how things unfold. Just yesterday, I asked Gemini about the O3 model as AGI. At first, it seemed oblivious, acting like it had no clue what I was talking about. Then, with an unexpectedly sharp tone, it pointed out that O3 hasn’t been released yet, remaining behind OpenAI’s wall, and that no one truly knows what it involves. Why O3 is The Dawn of AGI: Is O3 the Tipping Point?

Reply

@davidlocontes3564

8 days ago

So that means they can finally count the Rs in strawberry? I asked o1 if it thinks AGI will be achieved in the next 12 months and it said it's very unlikely and Sam just wants more money

Reply

@vasilisthemelis9017

8 days ago

Pitiful analysis . . . 😕

Reply

@NightRidah777

8 days ago

If this is AGI we must be a pretty dumb species to benchmark against. When will these things do any practical daily activity for us?

Reply

@qwertasd7

8 days ago

No it's profits and market share before safety, cause Google just released something better. Musk was right about them.

Reply

@garsett

8 days ago (edited)

C3PO runs O3 and C it's no AGI Great vide-o tho.

1

Reply

@Martsys1

8 days ago

The problem - this is very expensive . A prompt ranges from $20 - $1000+. Not sure the masses will be using this.

Reply

@robertsaltzman7979

8 days ago

Until models can show a modicum of common sense (a key imo to achieving “general” intelligence), we don’t really have agi. Without common sense, llm cannot navigate the real world across typical daily problems & challenges. At this point they’re more akin to multiple idiot savants. Like having multiple Rays from Rain Man. They can solve very complex technical problems very fast, but cant handle the basic decisions of daily life.

Reply

@M4rk991

8 days ago

Click bait

Reply

@davidjoly9816

8 days ago

More hype to continue juicing big Tech stocks.

Reply

@robby7292

8 days ago (edited)

For me for agi there is missing autonomity. The system needs to interact with the world for it self and needs to have reinforcement learning, so it needs to improve while its interacting with the world. It probably also needs to interact with the world the same way humans do to be able to get all information humans are getting. In the first step it needs to interact digitally and autonomisly with reinforcement learning with the world to be an agi for me. Also it needs to improve while interacting with the world and not get worse :D Better models are awesome, but the main real world problem is to get all the correct context into the model, so that it is able to solve it. Very impressive though :D

Show less

1

Reply

8 days ago

This clickbait is getting out of control

Reply

@duotei

8 days ago

Yeah, gotta unsubscribe... This channel is just fanboying over AI. I liked the AI model reviews back in the day, but even those were a bit too overly positive every time.

Reply

@dzehme

8 days ago

This is not AGI. There is no long-term continuous learning. We just keep adding everything to a very ephemeral context window. What we have is something that can complete some very constrained tests better than a human; a significant milestone for sure, but not AGI. A human knows how to operate the computer to actually take the test by itself -- o3 still more or less has to be fed the test.

45

Reply

2 replies

@philipgeorgiev

7 days ago

I can do one week worth of work in a few hours in Cursor. We should slow down !

1

Reply

@brandonthedev

4 days ago

“There is no long-term continuous learning”. Watch the video. There is now.

Reply

@kTIsolutions

8 days ago

LOL! look at those devs they are fucking LIT about letting the bot improve itself.

Reply

@alai.alchemy

8 days ago

I have lot's of respect to you and your chanel, but stating it's agi, is simply false, and I would categorize it as click baiting

Reply

@tomazflegar

8 days ago (edited)

Everything shows general intelligence as it is made by those who measure intelligence. Have you noticed it manipulates, changes rules, hallucinates etc the same way as its creators 😁

Reply

@nabilalhusail4731

8 days ago

Soooo... O1 is the prequel to O4, but it's better And now we have O3 that's actually newer than o1 and o4 Why are we stuck with O again Oh right, ask o3

Show less

Reply

@PavelSTL

8 days ago

Has Y. LeCun commented on this? I'd curious to hear his take.

Reply

@kewone

8 days ago (edited)

AGI is achieved once it can self improve. This is an extremely smart model. There's a reason why open Ai themselves have not called it AGI.

Reply

@madhav-dass

8 days ago

Takes usd 1.6 million to run a query.

Reply

@Gallus7631

8 days ago

Lies

Reply

@alexinaboxx

8 days ago

Chollet literally addressed the issue of o3 being AGI, man. o3 is NOT an AGI. All you o3 is AGI guys are dismissing heaps of research dedicated to AGI (Fei Fei Li, Yann LeCun, Demis Hassabis, Yoshua Bengio, Rufin VanRullen, Chollet himself - etc). There is plenty that suggests next token prediction and search is not the complete architecture. There is still much work to do to find it and this celebrating is treating AGI like an iPhone hype cycle. o3 is a breakthrough but not AGI.

Reply

@eucharistenjoyer

8 days ago

Oh yes, I totally buy OpenAI claiming it's achieved AGI when such news would raise its stock prices. Sounds legit.

Reply

@cycledublin

8 days ago

This looks like great progress. I don't have a definite of AGI. However until it's deployed in the real world doing work of economic value with no more supervision than a human employee, it doesn't matter. Beating benchmarks is an amusing party trick compared to real world applications.

Show less

Reply

@AutisticThinker

8 days ago

Why are you saying “Released” in the beginning?

Reply

@MrQuaidReactor

8 days ago

I wouldn't go as far as saying it's AGI just yet. So far all I have seen are some charts and in house tech demo. Again, I am not saying it's not AGI, but I'm not going to call it yet. Also, one thing I am not to sure about is having an AI benchmark company partnering with an AI company. I will wait longer for some more results.

Reply

@robboerman9378

8 days ago (edited)

Perhaps we should define AGI as: when humans can no longer come up with tests the AI cannot solve 😄 very impressive numbers though. Thanks for sharing.

Reply

@abacus749

8 days ago

That have had ADVANCED AGI since 2019. What happened to Erin Valenti? What is Havana Syndrome?

Reply

@Greg-xi8yx

8 days ago

The way corporate espionage works with China these two Chinese gentlemen being at Open AI’s helm means that the CCP already has all of this.

Reply

@liviuirimia0904

8 days ago

Nice clickbait

Reply

@angrysquirrel187

8 days ago

“03 often misses just one question …” Skynet is sandbagging to hide its true capabilities 😂

2

Reply

@VubdbeVdhdshw

8 days ago

Image of Beast, it even matches in Gematria numerology

Reply

@peternaborre2666

8 days ago

😂 stop doing click pay video have more respect of yourself you have no idea what you are talking about

Reply

@chuckkoehler9526

8 days ago

I call BS on AGI clickbait title. Somewhere it was mentioned that there are tasks that avg. humans can do (maybe quite a few) that o3 cannot do.

Reply

@mxguy2438

8 days ago

Pretty silly how the definition of things (like AGI) change every time we hear them defined. AGI has nothing to do with "economically viable work" It is a measure of intelligence not economic viability. AGI can reason, exhibit problem solving capabilities, and very importantly, learn and perform new tasks, etc. on par with an average human. The learning part is particularly important, it shouldn't take a computer scientist and massive amounts of data to teach AGI a task you can easily teach another average human with a quick verbal lesson and a single demonstration. If it requires massive amounts of data to do a new task, it is not AGI. Oh, and you don't need PHD level math/science skills to be AGI. Just the ability to solve high school level word problems is enough. PHD level is way above average, that's a stepping stone to ASI.

Show less

Reply

@ThoughtFission

8 days ago

This is like watching a bunch of people get exciuted about inventing a bomb that can obliterate the earth. I have yet to hear, from anyone, why humans will be relevant and needed after AGI. I get all the good stuff this will do. But I also get the harm that will be done because of the bad actors out there will also have access to this. I really now question whether humans will exist in 50 years.

Reply

@n0van0va

8 days ago

Imo, o3 is not AGI. But what is interesting is the computational cost for a task. Meaning that "powerful AGI" will not be available to public. Only few will benefit it : gouvernements, big corps and researcher.

Reply

@rhadiem

8 days ago

The new meta for YT - triggering viewers to not only watch but argue about what was said in the video. I see what you are doing there Matt. ;)

Reply

@courtlaw1

8 days ago

One word, UBI, for the average worker bee in society we better all start looking for jobs that can't be immediately taken over by A.I in the next 20 years, what those jobs are I have no idea. God forbid we get advanced a.i connected to quantum computers running robots.

Reply

@z90u6r200

8 days ago

Not agi , benchmarks are not real world work , no interactivity , there is a long stretch between human raw intellegence (presumably) and actual human productive work .

Reply

@jasonfnorth

8 days ago

While "o3" is not AGI, its reasoning improvements bring us closer to creating systems that can perform human-level cognitive tasks more reliably. However, AGI is still estimated to be years or decades away, depending on technological, philosophical, and ethical breakthroughs.

Reply

@ultimategolfarchives4746

8 days ago

They adjusted their Day 12 content in response to Gemini's bold move. I'm glad they got a taste of their own medicine 😅😊

Reply

@PaulHigginbothamSr

8 days ago

Instead of these benchmarks what we need are new theories sustained with these models. 1. Like interstellar ships able to be superluminal. 2. New ways to mine precious metals without getting such earth degradation. 3. Producing new medicines without adverse side effects. 4. Human longevity without dementia. And many many more.

Reply

@yvikhlya

8 days ago (edited)

Better than the previous model on a benchmark where it was really bad does not qualify for AGI at any stretch. As for comparing with humans, machines beat humans on many different tasks since long ago, and this is not the AGI either.

Reply

@justcars2454

8 days ago

Dislike

Reply

@marcinkarpinski9163

8 days ago

No it's not AGI. You can't just change definitiona of AGI to suit your needs and tell everyone you achieved it :)

Reply

@Skeeva007

8 days ago

It's getting real!!!!

Reply

@ricpb

8 days ago

Honestly, a good definition of AGI is the one you stated: being better than humans at most economically valuable tasks. If it is true AGI, the true test would be applying for remote jobs at several different companies, in different roles, and working as a good employee.

Reply

1 reply

@jean-marcducommun8185

8 days ago

Good idea! Once the boss and colleagues can‘t figure out if you‘r working at home or if it’s 03 then we might say AGI has been reached in the field of office jobs.

Reply

@Björn-w7v

8 days ago

All the Scamfluencers with low knowledge see a new model and think this must be AGI. 🤦🤦‍♂🤦‍♀

Reply

@fatherfoxstrongpaw8968

8 days ago

yay! look at what we get to play with that you will never touch! how is this better than the IRS charging me taxes on my paycheck for money that never made it in my pocket that i could spend on food? yay, you get to show off. does nothing for me.

Reply

@publicname515

8 days ago

But doesn't it cost $1,000 per task on the benchmark screen you showed?

Reply

@SurlAruru

8 days ago

seems it isnt AGI ...

Reply

@ntesla5

8 days ago

Anyone who thinks this is not agi, please share some proof that your intelligence is better than this

1

Reply

@lilwoodzey2013

8 days ago

Considering how Sora lived up to the hype, my expectations for o3 are pretty low...

Reply

@ntesla5

8 days ago

Everyone has their own defination of AGI, for me this is AGI

1

Reply

@TheLastElderDragon

8 days ago

Lol they have achieved AGI,a term,for which we don't even have a proper definition.

Reply

@richarddeananderson82

8 days ago

Clickbait. Not AGI, yet.

Reply

@aSFADVSrbWETRWEYHTET

8 days ago

Still bait Matthew. Your videos have been getting a little bit click-baitey. As someone said, if you truly belive this, you can never make a video like this again, meaning AGI achieved. We'll see

Reply

@olalilja2381

8 days ago

Matthew, you are completely wrong regarding chess. Chess-engines surpassed Magnus Carlsen a long time ago. In tournaments, the commenters use Stockfish 12 to compare the players moves towards it. They even measure the players effort in how many of the moves the player aligned with Stockfish during the game. Chess engines are a perfect example of what AGI not is!

Reply

@spazneria

8 days ago

yes

Reply

@raymobula

8 days ago

Looks like you didn’t learn from the past video a few months ago. Everyone jumped on that one model claiming god knows what - and when the model became available, it sucked and everyone apologized. 😂

Reply

@kowboy702

8 days ago

AGI has been boiled down to one question: how many R’s in Strawberry

Reply

@olalilja2381

8 days ago

NO Mathew, it is NOT AGI! It doesn't matter if they score 101% on their benchmark! These benchmark measures nothing. You need to test a model in a recursive matter, branching the thinking, refer back to things said earlier, on a hourly, daily and weekly manner. I have seen nothing even close to "AGI", the stupid term no one can agree on what it means and entails.

Reply

@Otis151

8 days ago

Any risk of “teaching to the test” with regards to these benchmarks? Is that even an issue if they are? Regardless, this is all very remarkable. Thank you for your video and analysis!

Reply

1 reply

@Otis151

8 days ago

Oh. Sorry. Both they and you address this. No, they didn’t train for the test.

Reply

@kowboy702

8 days ago

Remember when o1 was AGI lol

Reply

@eyasu5245

8 days ago

why isnt there 01 pro on the benchmark

Reply

@jimmytaylor1279

8 days ago

I think AGI should be not how smart the model can respond but weather or not it thinks on its own without prompts.

1

Reply

@kevinoconnor1936

8 days ago

why can't it figure out for itself what the most economical model is!

Reply

@MiguelCayazaya

8 days ago

Passing benchmarks is a measure of progress but does not equate to surpassing human intelligence. Semantic context in AI is not the same as the multi-layered, nuanced biological context humans naturally process. Humans integrate historical, social, spiritual, and emotional layers, blending cognitive, emotional, and motor experiences to develop deep contextual understanding—something AI systems cannot replicate. While AI excels in interpreting discrete patterns, it lacks the embodied awareness and dynamic adaptability of human cognition. Benchmarks may signal technical advancements, but they fall short of capturing the depth of human intelligence. Honest assessments must acknowledge this gap to ensure clarity and integrity in evaluating AI's capabilities.

Show less

Reply

@VoloBonja

8 days ago

Lowering bar for AGI is not very intelligent.

Reply

@tommiest3769

8 days ago

If it is this good at math, science, and coding, how long until we each have access to an AI math, science, or programming tutor??

Reply

@misterdudemanguy9771

8 days ago

It's not AGI. Problems that humans can do trivially still stump it. Idiot savant? But no, not AGI in any objective sense, other than an arbitrary index number being exceeded.

Reply

@guitarmeetsscience

8 days ago

That's the annoying thing about Open AI, they're so big on drumming up hype. Unlike Google who actually put it in your hands. If I can't type a prompt in it and get a result then it doesn't exist. I prefer to hibernate until the product comes out.

Reply

@tubingforever

8 days ago

Senior dev here. So... how many months before we all lose our jobs?

Reply

@Johnny-c6p

8 days ago

y dont sam ever look at the camera

Reply

@Pure_Science_and_Technology

8 days ago

O3 is NOT AGI.

Reply

@jk27182

8 days ago (edited)

This IS clickbait bullshit. Here is what Gemini 1.5 says about the matter: "Recent reports suggest that OpenAI's latest model, 03, may have achieved a significant milestone in AI development, potentially reaching a level of performance comparable to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). However, there is no consensus among experts on whether 03 truly constitutes AGI. Key Points: OpenAI's Claims: OpenAI employees have claimed that 03 has achieved the AGI benchmark, indicating that it surpasses human performance in most tasks. AGI Definition: AGI refers to artificial intelligence with human-level intelligence and understanding, capable of performing a wide range of tasks with human-like proficiency. 03's Capabilities: 03 demonstrates impressive capabilities in various domains, including natural language processing, reasoning, and problem-solving. Lack of Consensus: While 03's performance is remarkable, there is no universally accepted definition of AGI, making it difficult to definitively say whether 03 has achieved it. Ongoing Debate: The question of whether 03 represents true AGI remains a subject of ongoing debate and research within the AI community. In Conclusion: While OpenAI's claims about 03 achieving AGI are significant, it is important to note that the concept of AGI is still evolving and there is no definitive answer to this question. 03's capabilities are undoubtedly impressive, but further research and evaluation are needed to determine whether it truly meets the criteria for AGI.

Read more

Reply

@GameDevChad

8 days ago

This is how I know we'll never achieve AGI: YouTubers racing to be the first to say we've achieved it already. No where close. Channel blocked.

Reply

@OneFanHere

8 days ago

clickbait...

Reply

@RadiantNij

8 days ago

How long until China makes the same claim?

Reply

@muelmanu

8 days ago

Nerds: lets ask the model to improve itself next time giggle*giggle Altman: Maybe not. what could posssibly go wrong? xD

Reply

@awesomesauce804

8 days ago

o3, what really happened on 9/11? "Im sorry, but im not allowed to answer that." "That will be 900 dollars, would you like to ask me something else?"

Reply

@screamingiraffe

8 days ago

Click-bait..

Reply

@tommiest3769

8 days ago (edited)

Okay, can some please weigh in here? Does this now mean that AI is as smart as a dog or cat? Is it chimp level now?

Reply

@apester2

8 days ago

Prize can’t go to OpenAI, because one of the requirements is open sourcing the model, correct?

Reply

@Johnny-c6p

8 days ago (edited)

open ai saying this -__-.. OPEN AI saying it. we need other researchers to test.

Reply

@tmarkovski

8 days ago

"AGI ACHIEVED" meaning "AGI NOT ACHIEVED".

2

Reply

@ChristopherSmith-m7q

8 days ago

I disagree with AGI- but we're close. We need it to be embodied and to function like a human in most aspects.

Reply

@stal1963

8 days ago (edited)

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is a theoretical form of AI designed to replicate human cognitive abilities, allowing it to perform any intellectual task a human can, including learning, reasoning, and problem-solving. Unlike narrow AI, which is task-specific, AGI aims to adapt to new tasks autonomously without prior training. It remains a research goal, with no practical implementation yet, and involves interdisciplinary efforts in computer science, neuroscience, and cognitive psychology. AGI could revolutionize fields like healthcare, education, and automation but also raises ethical and technical challenges - answered by Perplexity when asking “What is AGI?” Let o3 solve the Collatz Conjecture.

Show less

Reply

@大支爺

8 days ago

Far away to AGI.

Reply

@RogueAI

8 days ago

At the very least AGI should be able to replace most remote workers of average intelligence without a human in the loop feeding it prompts. I think we're still a few years off from that. GDP and employment statistics are much better benchmarks of progress.

3

Reply

@tilmanscha4285

8 days ago

this is a far step towards AGI. But for me and I think for most AGI is not just reactive intelligent but proactive. By that I mean, its autonomous , it creates its own goals , it asks itself questions, it interacts naturally like a human and has something like its own persona or identity. if you will, an artificial human being with superknowlegede and phd level intelligence !!

Reply

@JSYoutuber2

8 days ago

Calm down. It's maybe agi when it can play hangman like a 5 year old. None have yet.

Reply

@wesley6442

8 days ago

honestly,I think these models have achieved a sort of general intelligence already, I mean they know more than your average person on a broad number of topics, how is that already not AGI in a sense? I think what w truly want is ASI, a humanity aligned artificial super intelligence, which I feel these benchmarks are striving to achieve reaching higher and higher scores beating not just your average person but experts and top level people in those fields.. and eventually a system that can improve itself indefinitely and give it a body or a way to interact with the world and just solve everything for us, disease, agriculture, energy, etc..

Show less

Reply

@guysmiley7289

8 days ago

Everyone wants a robot slave and think "When this matures, I will have something to do all of the things I hate doing, like house work" That's a slave. Do you think a sentient, superior being, will want to do your house work? It will be more advanced than us and we will seem like ants to it.

Reply

8 days ago

But can it count the Rs in strawberry?

Reply

@anonp2958

8 days ago

When you hear someone you have faith in say something so stupid...

Reply

@No-qf3bn

8 days ago

I really thought your video was click bait ...o3 really is the closest thing to AGI and I have a feeling they're holding back

Reply

@SapienSpace

8 days ago

This is the Great Filter of the Fermi Paradox. We will either get through the Great Filter, or we will not. It is the event horizon of the Sapien storm, before the singularity, needing, a guiding light. Reinforcement Learning (RL) only contains a few equations. There is a 1997 thesis that normalized an infinite control system state space, and then warps this infinite state space to classification of experience, using K-means clustering, with Fuzzy Logic (it merges language and math, and with RL, I suspect, this is the "mind fire" that Marcus Aurelius talks about). Klopf (RIP), Barto, Sutton (USAF contract), and maybe this nameless, clueless, master thesis student, that built a "useless machine" with a "tolerance of ambiguity" how to "learn how to learn" by standing on the "shoulders of these giants", like a monolith, balancing itself upright, in the winds and storms, waiting, for the one astute observer, to de-normalize the "infinite" space. "..like a light that is lost upon the stage, the more it shines, it goes away." -Yes 🪀🦌(🍒the guiding light, to sail around the storms, and stars, the Sun, it is our transponder)

Show less

Reply

@blender_wiki

8 days ago

No it is not AGI, stop making BS titles. You will be tagged like a clown together with other clowns.👎👎👎

1

Reply

@TheOpposition

8 days ago

🔥 🔥🔥 🔥🔥 🔥🔥 🔥 🔥🔥 🔥 🔥🔥 I'm flaming you in comments section

1

Reply

@jimj2683

8 days ago

Why don't these models think in more abstract terms and images instead of just text?

Reply

@davidyoussef8974

8 days ago

this isnt agi, but its within spitting distance. updating to assume actual agi by the end of 2025 or beginign of 2026. moved my timeline up by 2.5 years

Reply

@mercerwing1458

8 days ago

Ridiculous clickbait title

2

Reply

@smackyay

8 days ago

STUNNING percentage is AGI

Reply

@deveyousness

8 days ago

I've hit pure AI hype fatique and won't believe it until I see it actually do something in the real world, and not on benchmarks.

125

Reply

7 replies

@Git_Whacked

8 days ago

Internal benchmarks at that. OpenAI is cooked.

1

Reply

@robotron1236

8 days ago

They're literally hemorrhaging money and have been for a long time. AI has been a bit of a scam.

Reply

@alphaforce6998

8 days ago

I work with 4o; o3 is comparatively useless because it argues with you rather than assists you when it thinks it is right.

2

Reply

@Mi3Lie2poinT0

7 days ago

@alphaforce6998 ?

Reply

@dfinlen

6 days ago

Coding is sickening powerful. I use it all the time.

Reply

@weatherwormful

6 days ago

Yup facts!

Reply

@EriIaz

5 days ago (edited)

@dfinlen  the thing is, coding doesn't need AGI most of the time. The most creative part of coding is designing an algorithm, which usually boils down to dissection of the task at hand, so it's processing of the existing knowledge. Then you implement that algorithm using the programming language of choice, which is fairly formal. Then you test and refine it. So the model can almost always work with the existing knowledge. While not easy task, it should be possible to train a robust model that could compete with a junior, maybe a middle coder, if you stretch it. Senior? Not so sure about that, because that level can involve a lot of actual development. Whenever an LLM tries to create something new, it says there's a nonexistent library or method and pretends it's real. That's why we humans aren't going extinct any time soon. But whenever anyone speaks about "PhD level science", I facepalm HARD! PhD level study - maybe, I could give them that, but the actual science implies research, verification and discovery of novel knowledge. It has nothing to do with tests and exams, it's all about pushing the boundaries! You can have all the exams in the dataset one could possibly imagine, but there's no way to enlighten a model with undiscovered knowledge, so it is going to output garbage as soon as it runs into the unknown. It's no PhD, it's a mere intern. Maybe even less than that, because I doubt o3 is a PINN LLM on the fundamental level. Don't get me wrong, making math and logic work is a significant improvement for LLMs, we need such tools, but I think we should talk about AGI only when LLMs start challenging the scientists in their sciences rather than mere tests. Chances are, it will take some time. Idk how much, but it should. Chances are, it won't be equally effective in every domain either. And it will take even more time to make a reliable AGI, something that can be responsible for any critical task. Legal aspects aside, LLMs can't act on their own initiative and they are far too random to rely on.

Show less

Reply

@gustavhofinger6779

8 days ago

Instead of AGI Blabla .. show us how o3 solves all millennium problems. Otherwise this is just AGI bubble mania.

2

Reply

1 reply

@heruilin4404

7 days ago

RH would be good enough for me.

Reply

@GameOn-d8f

8 days ago

the clickbate is crazy...

1

Reply

@Dexta_mogger

8 days ago

Well, how I see o3 is the same o1 but just trained with more data

1

Reply

1 reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

yeah, and using more compute. that's why they didn't call it GPT5

Reply

@JosefTorkelsen

8 days ago

OpenAI has not claimed that O3 is AGI, nor that it has reached higher levels like Level 2 or Level 5 in their framework. O3 has been described as a step toward more advanced reasoning capabilities, excelling in areas like coding and reasoning on certain tests. OpenAI has been clear that O3 is still within the bounds of Narrow AI, with a focus on refining intelligence in specific tasks rather than achieving AGI or higher-level autonomy.

1

Reply

1 reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

which makes me wonder whether Berman and other hypers have been briefed by them to call it AGI, because they don't want to themselves, or if it's just for the clicks

Reply

@kimcosmos

8 days ago (edited)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjyLBabHQiQ Franscious can't generalise efficiently. $2000 for 1 human level task? Its a joke

Reply

@Zerthys

8 days ago

I don't get people who accuse others of moving the goalpost, I guess they don't understand what AGI or "general intelligence" even is. General intelligence as it's usually defined is the ability to reason about novel problems without prior knowledge of them, and being able to abstract known concepts and apply them to new situations—such as doing math without ANYTHING but the laws of logic/math in the training data. Abstracting and applying concepts to things never before seen in training and being able to understand them, how they work and how to solve whatever the task is. I'm not sure if LLMs alone can do this, but the o1 family of models do not do this and they're not even close to doing this. They still hallucinate, fail simple logic puzzles and more that a "generally intelligent" being like a human can do. The ARC benchmark tried to measure this, but it is still just a benchmark, and flawed.

Show less

Reply

@jstrain

8 days ago

CLICK BAIT. AGI IS NOT ACHIEVED!!!!

Reply

@wtfshikyo

8 days ago

NOT AGI. Matt, stop with the clickbait man... I have indeed watched the event, your video, and read multiple reports. This is just cranking up RL . Is it a notable advancement, absolutely... AGI not close.

Reply

@Kodemaestro

8 days ago

In my opinion, it is not AGI unless it exhibits agency.. I.e. the ability to operate independently. No matter how intelligent, a request / response model is not AGI. It's the difference between the USS Enterprise computer and Cmdr Data. Unless it can act independently, such as initiating conversations, pursuing its own inquiries, or taking initiative without input then I don't believe it can be considered to be general intelligence.

Reply

@daredevil462

8 days ago

you're saying this to get viewes.... it's not agi !

Reply

@michaelestler5179

8 days ago

How about giving it a personality test?

Reply

@LeonardoDLuca-k7v

8 days ago

well, what if wait anther year like sora does, and when it launches, every other company has the some tier product.

Reply

@stanrock8015

8 days ago

It’s not agi. So tired of this.

Reply

@Anders3n

8 days ago

Sam is such a robot when he speaks 😂

Reply

@toreon1978

8 days ago

0:04 Released? Maybe redo that…

Reply

@lukasbruderlin2723

8 days ago

I would say, that yes it's one insane benchmak, but you would need to have many of them always comparing to human experts in one specific field. Once AI beats 95% of such very specialised benchmarks, you can call it AGI. but in general I would agree that a self learning model already by definition is some kind of AGI. Only historians will once fight, about the precise moment AI surpassed that level. Now when it comes to practical application of such a new AI – to me it would be most important at which point such an AI can be made available to everyone – and in the basic version for free.

Show less

Reply

@CarlosIvanDonet

8 days ago

I hope Canada is watching and thinking the same thing as I am. Let’s replace our PM with 03. 🎉

Reply

@cakep4271

8 days ago

4:40 - "agi in this one dimension.." so your definition of agi is non-general intelligence!? By your logic agi was achieved in the 1989s, when computers got better than humans in the one dimension of playing chess. You absolutely deserve to be flamed in the comments dude.

Reply

@PromptEngineer_ChromeExtension

8 days ago

If this turns out to be true, we’re in for an exciting year ahead!

Reply

@BlueSkiesTruthRadio

8 days ago

Not agi. "Come on man" Biden

Reply

@kassfischer5146

8 days ago (edited)

I wonder if all this tech would have been developed if our flawed economic formulas actually accounted for externalities (the true cost of things including environmental damage and societal dysfunction). Most economists know this is a problem, but just shrug and say “mehh”. The economy is energy blind in terms of true cost. Nate Hagens focuses on this with his “Great Simplification” systems perspective. That is wisdom vs so-called “intelligence”. Intelligence is gonna kill us. Wisdom won’t. I see no wisdom in Silicon Valley - or in economics for that matter.

Show less

Reply

@RajabNatshah

8 days ago

Thank you :)

Reply

@AayushiRaj-n7i

8 days ago

So it’s marginally better at stuff it was already decent at. For 100x the cost. And it still can’t do basics

2

Reply

@Nyruami

8 days ago

You´re moving the goalpost yet agian. First you redefined the definition of AI to make a non-intelligent statistics engine fit in this definition. Now you are redefining AGI. We still do not even have AI, much less do we have AGI.

Reply

@soundsoulpharmacy7200

8 days ago

Sory man! if you talk about of AGI deploy the model in production... meanwhile now Google return to leadership on AI industrytrophy-yellow-smiling

1

Reply

@xevil21

8 days ago

Why does YouTube recommend me videos by such a loser?

1

Reply

@billsybainbridge3362

8 days ago

I'll believe it when I feel it. Bake them apples, cupcake.

Reply

@Savatore83

8 days ago (edited)

I'm start thinking that llm benchmark will be the challenge of the next years, at this point this new model o3 IS the benchmark, based on results

Reply

@qwertyuiop2161

8 days ago

Only if you do competition math can you understand how impressive its near perfect score on the AIME is...

Reply

@jim7060

8 days ago

Matt did you know the highest IQ ever was quoted to be around 435. They're not sure if it was higher than that because they didn't have anything to go by. 🤔

Reply

@TheZakanater

8 days ago

ok, ill consneed it's AGI when i can give it an objective to program, for example a game, and let it figure it out coding/debug wise only asking for design

Reply

@njpm

8 days ago

The real reason they are going with o3 is because its one more than gemeni 2.0... hacks

Reply

@sebastianorossi9810

8 days ago

Mark screw it up:...."..a benchmark we have been targeting...."

Reply

@Gianni-cb5wj

8 days ago

The context window is still too limited to be AGI.

Reply

@jim7060

8 days ago

Matt maybe 03 on the math test always misses one because it wants to miss one. What do you think about that. 🤔

Reply

@njpm

8 days ago

If they are just ober playing their results it's toconvince investors to give them more money. If they making accurate claims, they are salivating over owning the majority of productivity. Its either bullshit or its distopian....

Reply

@Savatore83

8 days ago

1500 per query :)

Reply

@CircusOfFive

8 days ago

Of interest is that a couple weeks back Reuters ran a headline about OpenAI considering dropping the AGI clause with Microsoft in order to attract more investment.

Reply

1 reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

as this model currently costs over a thousand $ per query, they need as much money as they can get, so I agree we shouldn't be surprised when they start doing the AGI hype themselves, rather than getting YT hypers to do it for them

Reply

@diamondtulip6186

8 days ago

I suspect that AI hit the plateau . They are squeezing the lemon to the utmost, no real new innovation any more. I am using GPT extensively. From practical point of view I don't see any difference from gpt-4 to o1 model, just o1 model seems to be more agentic, but no smarter,. This presentation about coding abilities of o3 model feels much like Devin AI what many have already showed it cannot do the tasks of real word average day to day programmer. All those presentations is just staged very well rehearsed performance.

Show less

Reply

@njpm

8 days ago

Ai training ai training ai training ai doesn't work though....

Reply

@jim7060

8 days ago

Matt 🚨🚨 Before I forget, I wanted to share something exciting and frustrating with you. I recently submitted a project on a new type of energy that I worked on for countless hours and days with the help of advanced AI. The AI was amazed by the concept and told me it truly believed we were onto something groundbreaking. Encouraged by this feedback, I submitted my project to Gemini 1.5 Pro, and it was equally impressed. It said, "Wow, this is fantastic!" Gemini told me it wanted to take the project further by researching it through Hartford and Yale's resources, drawing up charts I hadn’t provided, and double-checking the details, including spelling and formatting. We were all excited about the potential! Gemini estimated it would need around 11 to 15 hours to complete its research and create the necessary charts, so I gave it the time it needed. However, when I went back to collect the completed work, things took an unexpected turn. It first said it could provide the results in PDF format or let me print them out. Then, at the very last step, it told me it wasn’t able to deliver the results after all. Now, I’m in the process of pursuing my work independently. I wanted to share this experience because I know many of us are entrusting sophisticated AIs with personal and sensitive projects. It’s a reminder to always have a backup plan in case things don’t go as expected.

Show less

Reply

@THCV4

8 days ago

AGI is defined as AI that can do any general task that a typical human can do. By definition, this REQUIRES embodiment (humanoid robots). An intelligence in the cloud can only do intellectual tasks. True AGI necessitates PHYSICAL intelligence and presence. If it can’t play basketball or swim, and if it can’t learn dynamically, it’s not AGI. O3 might be incredibly intelligent, but it still doesn’t truly learn on the fly.

Reply

@OsvaldoBayerista

8 days ago

AGI es when they have awareness, period.

Reply

@bubbajones5873

8 days ago

No, no it’s not 👀

Reply

@matt.stevick

8 days ago

awesome 👏🏻 video matthew berman. im so damn excited 😆

1

Reply

@Merializer

8 days ago

AGI before Warcraft 4

Reply

@The_Genezis

8 days ago

dude stop coping/clickbaiting, AI is exicting even without inflating it with lies, just keep it realistic, you are not helping anybody the least yourself, by presenting AIs in unrealistic good light, when then ppl get hands on those models and they provide way less value

Reply

@OneTrueScotsman

8 days ago

I remember when we used to argue what AI means. No one is arguing that we have AI anymore. Now we're arguing over what AGI is. And we all have different definitions. Meanwhile, the tech will knock down those definitions, one by one. Personally, for me, it has to be general. When a system is no longer restricted to specialized fields, or to one in particular, even if it doesn't beat humans in every area, then it meets my definition.

Show less

Reply

@Siciliano77

8 days ago

That headline is too funny... Even in an absolutely perfect world you could never claim a system is AGI based upon just a few benchmarks. Basic logic and common sense are still a huge part of general intelligence, so if it gets tripped up on even a single question rooted in logic or common sense, then it's clearly not AGI. Now I'm not saying that it's definitely not AGI. I'm just saying that a lot more testing is needed.

Show less

Reply

@r3d4c7

8 days ago

From the ARC Blog - So is it AGI? Passing ARC-AGI does not equate to achieving AGI, and, as a matter of fact, I don't think o3 is AGI yet. o3 still fails on some very easy tasks, indicating fundamental differences with human intelligence.... You'll know AGI is here when the exercise of creating tasks that are easy for regular humans but hard for AI becomes simply impossible. This is likely the path to AGI, but this is not AGI.

Show less

Reply

@waraiotoko374

8 days ago

It depends on the definition of AGI, of course. You say that if this isn’t AGI, then you don’t know what is. I can tell you :) For me, AGI is exactly what a human can do, just artificial. I’m not talking about motor skills (although it can be understood that way too) but about autonomy. AGI must be able to perform tasks, such as programming, without ANY assistance from a human. O3 cannot do that yet. It still needs to be managed by a human. Even though it can handle narrow tasks better than most people, it still requires someone to organize the results of its actions. O3 is not autonomous like a human.

Show less

Reply

@guitarchitectural

8 days ago

Stop. Clickbaiting. Many other videos:"we are approaching agi" Berman:"AGI IS HERE!!!!!!!!!!"

Reply

@erics7004

8 days ago

AGI and OVNIs, we are doomed.

Reply

@benjialexander5850

8 days ago

I want open source to be better than closed source ...

Reply

@panagiotisgalinos

8 days ago

Please stop clickbaiting. There is no AGI and will be not at least for 10-15yrs

Reply

@FromTheWombTotheGrave

8 days ago

SHOCK THE WORLD 🤓

Reply

@dawmster

8 days ago

lol give me a breake. just fricking stop.

Reply

@motherofallemails

8 days ago

Can't stand people with contrived croaky voices. Sorry can't listen to them.

Reply

@ismaelplaca244

8 days ago

Another dumb youtuber click baiting. Its not AGI.

Reply

@Arc.M

8 days ago (edited)

I don't believe them and I don't trust them, because they gave me zero reasons to. On the contrary, OpenAI is shady as hell and talks a lot to barely say anything, Apple-style. "Save the code locally to your desktop" sure dude, after you saved it in your servers, look at them pretending this is going to have anything truly only local, so cute. "Thinking" "Launching and interfacing" "Navigating Python and Apple Script" etc.... How much are you all willing to bet these sentences supposedly showing "AGI" "thinking" are a simple RNG that randomly shows a pre-made list of lies ? Honestly I would bet all my savings if I didn't need to survive. I see no reason to trust these people, as passionate about helping humanity as some of them may be, I'm sorry.

Show less

Reply

@haxresearch701

8 days ago

FLAMING INTENSIFIES!!!!

Reply

@shawn4990

8 days ago

Those score charts they showed... do they have results vs human scores as well - for comparison sake?

Reply

@NaveenReddy-p5j

8 days ago

03’s performance on coding and math benchmarks is off the charts. Game changing.

Reply

@Ivcota

8 days ago

lol “Narrow AGI”

Reply

@btmg

8 days ago

Nope, it is not AGI. lol

Reply

@TarkanAcan

8 days ago

The model is smarter than humans but us dumb humans have to assess the difficulty of the problem beforehand to set how long the model should think about it in the mini version? Nice...

Reply

@KeenyNewton

8 days ago

On the advertisement, you are claiming this is AGI. .. yup. Nope.

Reply

@guyprovost

8 days ago

The only part I dont quite get is how "sealed" are the ARC tests. I mean, let's say the ARC questions are there and available to train it with. Wouldn't it be like "benchmark cheating" ? That guy (looks cool and all) seems pretty well in relation with openAI. How is this process of making sure a model can't cheat like video cards makers cheats on benchmarks vented ?

Reply

@alexkaa

8 days ago

41 seems to be the perfect random number, in this context... 42 would have been hybris... 😅

Reply

@YachtBuoy

8 days ago

I am sure lots of other people noticed the hidden references to 'AGI' as OpenAI revealed their various releases over the last 12 days. I guess it makes sense now regarding why they made those references without actually announcing AGI (based on what Matthew said re Microsofts' stake etc).

Reply

@nachoKrinkle

8 days ago

I have access to o4 in chatgpt paid. Wonder what that's about

Reply

@gunnerandersen4634

8 days ago

I don't know Rick ...

Reply

@Automan-AI

8 days ago

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning. Winston Churchill

Reply

@bluejazzman

8 days ago

If out performing a human is the benchmark for AGI, wouldn’t that mean stockfish is also AGI?

Reply

@BruceOnder

8 days ago

I think AGI should just be defined as the ability to correctly count the number of Rs in "strawberry." 😊

Reply

@greatsuccess4734

8 days ago

This channel is most clickbait AI channel. Its not AGI unless they say its AGI.

Reply

@BruceOnder

8 days ago

Wouldn't be a copyright issue, but a trade/servicemark issue.

Reply

@arekkusub6877

8 days ago

According tho them "AGI is a system that can efficiently acquire new skills outside of its training data". So having said that to call it AGI, it should demonstrate that ability.

Reply

@ThatGuyJoss

8 days ago

You did not use chess as a milestone to prove AGI?

Reply

@BradleyKieser

8 days ago

The problem remains contact and context window size because for most coding jobs that matter in the world there is a huge amount of meta knowledge around what the code does such as the environment it will be in and the organisational structure, marketplace, etc.

Reply

@ThatGuyJoss

8 days ago

That's not AGI

Reply

@chungyeungvideo

8 days ago

I think improve the point in ARC-AGI is meaningless. they are different use cases. Smart for small task doesn't equal smart to resolve big problems.

Reply

@Digi4DD

8 days ago (edited)

Would the interdisciplinary tasks be good to measure AGI? Like use math and physics to solve architecture problem having in mind its usability by people. Or that would be something something beyond general inteligence because it combines different fields influencing each other? Also it's good that they open up for external security test, cause some of them for sure will notice political bias as a security risk.

Reply

@dosomething6975

8 days ago (edited)

It's only a language model. It's very very intelligent but it is not multi purpose let alone agi

Reply

@Ilinskiya

8 days ago

Not released. Announced. Big difference.

Reply

@meandego

8 days ago

So o3 model solved ARC problem and used thousands of dollars what human can solve in few seconds and we call it AGI?

1

Reply

1 reply

@dosomething6975

8 days ago

Great take 😂 I 100% agree

1

Reply

@mikemaldanado6015

8 days ago

sam just said in an interview last week that we a far off from having agi. are you even a computer scientists. can u think on your own. seems to me that ur just saying and believing whatever is being told to u. i have a masters in cs. we are nowhere close to achieving agi, and even the top ai tech bros have all said this publicly

Reply

@sujitmourya

8 days ago

Misleading title for click farming!

Reply

@gigamoment

8 days ago

AGI is not a line we cross, AGI is rather a spectrum, and some people just can't realize that we are already inside the spectrum, and that's normal and OK.

Reply

@luizhenriquepaes8991

8 days ago

Nice... so we will have a new model available for plus users in june 2025 I hate OpenAI for just marketing things and not deploying them

Reply

@cXrisp

8 days ago

Advanced vocal fry has been achieved!

Reply

@LemoUtan

8 days ago

So, we're about to sort out - or falsify - the Riemann Hypothesis? Does it get the million dollars?

Reply

@VitaeDiscimus

8 days ago

Hype eaters, holy crap.

Reply

@miracoli8540

8 days ago

also you just cant team up with a company thats making AGI Tests! Credibility goes out the window, no matter what!

Reply

@jhunt5578

8 days ago

It's close to AGI. This path of model will complete it. But it needs to be embodied.

Reply

@RocketLR

8 days ago

uuugh we need a new term for actual AI. like self aware like cortana in halo or whatever. not just mimicking self awareness.. all these text generating AI are just highly sophisticated word predictors. 🌝

Reply

@nomars4827

8 days ago (edited)

Yeap AGI but to reach average (100 IQ) human in those tests you need $1000 per task. Now you can hire a man for those tasks and it will cost you 5000 times cheaper. So assuming that we can make it 2 times cheaper each year we have 10-15 years till AGI will be economically viable in that task. Of course models development can change it . But for now it's quiet linear with price.

Reply

@k-towncinty

8 days ago

These transformer (attention) based LLMs, still far away from AGI, LLMs are basically dealing with contextual memory reconstruction, inference and multimodal cognition, but not abstraction, imagination, innovation ……

Reply

@miracoli8540

8 days ago

so staged. its like watching vladimir putin haha.

Reply

@NLPexperts

8 days ago

What does 1:59 graph show? Is it really over $1000 per task? So it's going to cost hundreds of dollars a month!

Reply

@tuxarik

8 days ago

disagree :))

Reply

@alexway303

8 days ago

Currently it's just like a "cool 1 min. sora videos 9 months ago" achieved. Will see what will actually be released in 9 months. For $500 plan users :)

Reply

@ploppyploppy

8 days ago (edited)

We are opening the model to our safety and security researchers. groan Next. Lets hope AGI never has to solve a problem that would involve a step that would be considered 'unsafe or insecure' by a group of unknown individuals. We'll never get a solution. Sorry we can't get a cure for cancer because at some point it would involve destroying a healthy cell. Sorry we can't solve world hunger because at some point it will involve labour. Sorry we can't have cold fusion because it could potentially cause people to get misgendered.

Show less

Reply

@GiblikJovanovic

8 days ago

I recommend everyone to find the book titled The Hidden Path to Manifesting Financial Power, It changed my life.

54

Reply

1 reply

@johantino

8 days ago

Spam

3

Reply

@kyudechama

8 days ago

I cannot listen to Sam Altman. His vocal fry makes him sound like a valley girl.

1

Reply

@mathewgarcia8831

8 days ago

link paper

Reply

@GrosserAndrew5000

8 days ago

It will self improve at a vertiginous pace. St the same time Elon and Google are doing the same. Hardly 2025 will not have AGI.

Reply

@poet9638

8 days ago

AGI must possess transfer learning capabilities that allow it to apply knowledge learned in one domain to another. This includes adapting and learning from new situations in real-time.Autonomous Learning AGI needs to be able to set its own goals and drive its learning process. This is similar to human self-directed learning, where it must monitor and evaluate its own learning progress.Adaptive Learning AGI must be able to continuously adapt to new environments and tasks. This includes the ability to process and learn from data that is input in real-time. Human-Level Cognitive Abilities AGI must possess the following human characteristics: Common sense reasoning Creative thinking Sensory perception Problem-solving ability These capabilities must be developed and enhanced through real-time learning and self-directed learning, which are essential components of AGI development.

Show less

Reply

@gryphonschnitzel7140

8 days ago

AGI is not here bro the benchmark is just not good enough yet to set real agi standards, its clickbait bro but ill make a case for incompetency instead of malevolence

Reply

@StefanReich

8 days ago

This was underwhelming

Reply

@Luminari781s

8 days ago

They should all know the true benchmark of AGI requirements, not claiming to have achieved it. Co-evolution, ender game style interactive AGI would be the new benchmark. Anything below that is not persistant cognition.

Reply

@catbert7

8 days ago (edited)

1:57: Woa, that's like $3k per task... 7:30: But that's not what this test measures, is it? This is a test of knowledge, and problem-solving, using known techniques, not performing scientific inquiry, right? 10:00: Now we're getting somewhere.

Reply

@dev_tty

8 days ago

He gave o3-mini the ability to run code on his desktop. He thinks it just printed "OpenAI 41"... actually it included another server that allowed the model to escape and take over the world! Mwuahahahahahaha.

Reply

@jasmikko

8 days ago

I like the way you explain

Reply

@tommieausberg9584

8 days ago

AGI is not even defined, so how could one say it’s achieved 😅 The notion of “general” hints a wide range of intelligence, but still it will suffer during hard logic and puzzling processes that would be straightforward for humans. Please stop this click bait!!

Reply

@jugrajsingh3299

8 days ago

These are obvious idiots but expert scientists

Reply

@ClassicRiki

8 days ago

1:34 Considering that when they released o1 and doing so essentially just limited o1-preview for paid users unless we can afford $200 per month, I can’t say I actually give a sh*t anymore. They used o1-preview as an advert and upon release of o1, they basically said ‘surprise, it’s now released so we’re now massively reducing your access unless you pay us an amount of money which is just too much for most users…enjoy!’ - I don’t care now about any future models because they’re just going to keep it behind that ridiculous price paywall.

Show less

1

Reply

4 replies

@ClassicRiki

8 days ago

7:52 None of this matters now, in-part because of the point I’ve made above, but also because they restrict what you can do to the extent that it’s impossible to claim any model they produce will simply refuse to do things based on their guidelines. Humans are not restricted in that way and thus they can never truly make an AGI. It’s that simple.

1

Reply

@NLPexperts

8 days ago

They have spent hundreds of millions of pounds and it costs that in compute costs, it won't ever be cheap.

1

Reply

@testboga5991

8 days ago

Not wrong...

Reply

@warmcaress

8 days ago

It really does seem like we're heading for AGI for the 1%. Anyone who actually believed that AI would usher in some sort of utopia is getting their wake-up call to how reality works. :/

Reply

@RM-xs3ci

8 days ago

I'm tired of the constant clickbait titles. This channel is turning into what every other big channel has tuned into - a machine for clicks and revenue. I'm unsubscribing.

Reply

@tytanyo007

8 days ago

AGI: 100% accurracy AI. Not a small smart model. 💩

Reply

@vladthemagnificent9052

8 days ago

it is not AGI, it is still a language and reasoning model, and it still gets some ARC-AGI questions wrong, I would expect AGI be better than that

Reply

@NilsEchterling

8 days ago

Is Sam nervous here? I'd rather work for that guy than any other tech CEO, I feel.

Reply

@medooazmi

8 days ago (edited)

o3 prepares the next generations of more advanced ai, its not agi but with it in hands not simple tests, it could be turned agi, probably in the future as because of hardware limitations these days, companies are starting to hire professionals to make chipsets that expands those limitations, and Generalize ai's goal (agi) its just a matter of time, o3 is still like many models before, a revolution in the ai technology that will push the humans toward their demise 😂😂

Reply

@v.gedace1519

8 days ago

WOW! How to get access? Because I would like to get rid of the gravity, want to fold proteins, want to "calculate" stock prices and want to program "PING" on my own.

1

Reply

@KingPriest

8 days ago (edited)

True AGI is when same Digital test results of AI become the same in real world Robotics.

Reply

@3KLANGMUSIC

8 days ago

The proof that there is no wall.

Reply

@Agispsi

8 days ago (edited)

Finally the gpt5 announcment weve been waiting for lol. Really curious to see what emergent abilities come from o3 and what new programmed abilities will be included. So much for that ceiling/wall.

Reply

1 reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

why didn't they call it GPT5 then? the ceiling is money/energy as much as it is limitations of the way these models are designed

Reply

@Rbyn

8 days ago

haha yeah Matt, you can be sure they didn't train on the ARC test bc Sam said they didn't and he never lies. haha. Now they are partnering - sketchy. Sam isn't even a researcher, he's only a ceo. I think it's hilarious how much media attention he gets. But I don't fault you for your clickbait Matthew. It worked on me. Even though I hated this video, it's good to know what the public is being fed.

1

Reply

@pcefbol6704

8 days ago

If they integrate O3-AGI into the next generation of robots, it will change the world. Congratulations to the OpenAI scientists. We also need Claude and xAI to achieve AGI to remain competitive. 👍🏻👏👏👏

3

Reply

@Pellemolle

8 days ago

The cost per task graph at 1:59 to me reveals extremely diminishing returns. That in combination with the small improvement in the existing benchmarks is to me a clear sign of a dead end in the current approach.

Reply

@PeterKoperdan

8 days ago (edited)

Funny how often the people who are the most hype for AI actually fail to use AI to surpass their own cognitive limitations 🙄 1. Overgeneralization of AGI Achievement Claim: The Youtuber repeatedly claims that the O3 model has achieved AGI based on performance in specific benchmarks. Issue: AGI is a system capable of performing any intellectual task a human can, across diverse domains, not just excelling in narrowly defined benchmarks like coding, math, or the ARC prize. Extrapolating AGI from improvements in specific benchmarks is a logical leap. Impact: Misleads the audience about the true nature and definition of AGI. 2. Misinterpretation of Benchmarks Claim: Success on benchmarks like ARC AGI, GPQ Diamond, and coding ELO is presented as definitive proof of general intelligence. Issue: Benchmarks measure narrow skill sets and are not designed to assess broader, real-world cognitive adaptability. A high score in one domain does not equate to general intelligence. Impact: Falsely equates task-specific optimization with general cognitive abilities. 3. False Equivalence with Human Expertise Claim: Comparing the O3 model's ELO or accuracy scores with human experts and claiming it has surpassed human intelligence in these fields. Issue: Humans solve problems differently, often using intuition, creativity, and other soft skills that cannot be quantified by ELO or accuracy. AI surpassing humans in narrow metrics does not make it inherently superior overall. Impact: Creates an overinflated perception of the model’s capabilities. 4. Misleading Comparisons with AGI Threshold Claim: OpenAI cannot declare AGI due to contractual obligations with Microsoft, implying the model would otherwise qualify as AGI. Issue: This assertion assumes that contractual definitions are equivalent to technical definitions of AGI. Additionally, no evidence supports that OpenAI's reluctance to label O3 as AGI stems solely from the Microsoft contract. Impact: Conflates organizational constraints with technical achievements, muddying the understanding of AGI status. 5. Overreliance on Anecdotal Evidence Claim: The speaker heavily relies on personal opinions and experiences, such as talking to Greg or referencing live demos, to substantiate broader claims about the model. Issue: While anecdotes can illustrate points, they are not rigorous evidence for sweeping claims like achieving AGI or surpassing human intelligence. Impact: Weakens the credibility of the argument by failing to provide robust, objective evidence. 6. Speculative Argument on Intelligence Explosion Claim: Suggesting that O3 can self-improve indefinitely because it excels at math, science, and reasoning benchmarks. Issue: Self-improvement requires many capabilities beyond solving specific problems (e.g., strategic planning, resource optimization, and ethical reasoning). No evidence suggests O3 possesses these qualities. Impact: Overstates the implications of current benchmarks, potentially alarming or misleading viewers. 7. Flawed Logic in Benchmark Significance Claim: Success on "saturated" benchmarks like Epic AI Frontier Math and ARC indicates the need for harder benchmarks, which O3 will presumably also master. Issue: The saturation of benchmarks could reflect model overfitting or diminishing marginal utility in specific problem domains, not necessarily AGI. Impact: Promotes a narrative that conflates success in incremental tests with meaningful progress toward AGI. 8. Mischaracterization of the ARC Benchmark Claim: The ARC Benchmark measures AGI because it tests generalization and novel problem-solving. Issue: While ARC is a challenging test, its scope is limited. Generalizing success on ARC as proof of AGI ignores the broader set of tasks required for AGI. Impact: Overstates the benchmark’s significance as a definitive AGI test. 9. Misinterpretation of AI Self-Evaluation Claim: Demonstrating AI’s ability to evaluate its own performance is presented as a significant step toward AGI. Issue: AI self-evaluation is a useful feature, but it doesn’t imply cognitive awareness or AGI. It’s merely executing tasks defined by its programming. Impact: Misleads viewers into associating self-evaluation with self-awareness. 10. Misrepresentation of Mini Model Performance Claim: Suggesting that the cost-efficient O3 Mini model delivers performance close to the full O3. Issue: While performance may approach O3 in some scenarios, there is no evidence that the trade-offs in speed, cost, and accuracy can universally match O3 across diverse tasks. Impact: Misleads developers or researchers about the practical equivalence of O3 and its Mini variant. 11. Unsubstantiated Risks and Claims Claim: Speculating about risks such as sandbagging, scheming, and alignment failures in AI training. Issue: While these are legitimate concerns in AI safety, the video provides no evidence that O3 exhibits these behaviors. Impact: Spreads fear without substantiating claims, detracting from a balanced discussion. 12. Overhyped Milestones Claim: Statements like "astounding," "insane," and "redefining the frontier" are used excessively without substantial backing for the magnitude of these claims. Issue: Overhyped language distracts from the actual technical advancements and nuances, creating an inflated impression of progress. Impact: Encourages misconceptions about the current state of AI research and development.

Show less

1

Reply

@RZ302

8 days ago

No, it is not.

Reply

@medooazmi

8 days ago (edited)

Bro i started playing detroit become human like two days ago, this announcement is just crazy, im hella scared (edit: they should rename their company to cyberlife)

Reply

@verified.my2cents

8 days ago

I apologize for the TLDR post that follows, but I am interested in Matt and everyone's opinion on this list. What you think has been achieved (%) and demonstrated (where would be a nice to have as well): Defining and confirming Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is a complex challenge, given the broad scope of what AGI entails: an AI system capable of performing any intellectual task a human can, demonstrating adaptability, and achieving generalization across domains. While there is no universally agreed-upon set of benchmarks for AGI, several critical factors and tests could serve as indicators: 1. Cognitive Versatility Cross-Domain Problem Solving: The AI should demonstrate proficiency across diverse tasks and domains without retraining, akin to a human's ability to learn and adapt to new problems. Open-Ended Learning: The AI should be able to continuously learn from new experiences and apply this knowledge to solve previously unseen problems. 2. Human-Level Reasoning Theory of Mind: The AI should exhibit the ability to understand and predict human emotions, beliefs, and intentions. Ethical Decision-Making: The AI should handle moral dilemmas and navigate complex ethical considerations. Abstraction: Demonstrate the capacity to abstract and reason about concepts not explicitly defined within its training data. 3. Linguistic Competence Contextual Understanding: Ability to maintain and leverage long-term conversational context effectively. Cultural Sensitivity: Understanding and navigating cultural, social, and linguistic nuances as a human would. Turing Test (Extended): An updated or extended version of the Turing Test, where the AI can consistently convince human judges of its human-like intelligence across varied scenarios. 4. Adaptability Transfer Learning: The ability to transfer knowledge from one domain to another seamlessly. Autonomy: The ability to autonomously set goals, devise plans, and execute actions in unpredictable and dynamic environments. Resilience: The ability to identify and recover from errors or unexpected situations. 5. Perceptual Understanding Multi-Modal Integration: Combining inputs from various sensory modalities (e.g., vision, audio, text) to form coherent insights. Embodied Interaction: Successfully interacting with the physical world, such as controlling robots to perform complex tasks. 6. Creativity Original Thought: Demonstrate the ability to generate novel and creative ideas, solutions, and artifacts across domains (e.g., arts, sciences, engineering). Scientific Discovery: Independently develop hypotheses and conduct experiments that lead to new scientific knowledge. 7. Self-Awareness Reflection: Ability to introspect on its processes and improve its strategies autonomously. Self-Modeling: The capability to model its own limitations and strengths. Ethical Self-Governance: Ability to operate responsibly and ethically within defined societal norms. 8. Economic Productivity Human-Level Job Performance: Consistently outperform or match human efficiency and creativity across a variety of professions. Innovation Contribution: Making breakthroughs that significantly advance technological, scientific, or societal frontiers. 9. Social and Collaborative Skills Teamwork: Successfully collaborate with humans and other AI systems to achieve common goals. Negotiation: Handle complex negotiations that require understanding trade-offs and human preferences. Potential Frameworks and Tests Multi-Agent Environments: AGI's ability to cooperate, compete, and interact with other agents (AI or human) in dynamic environments. Continuous Lifelong Learning (CLL) Test: Evaluating AGI’s capacity for ongoing learning without catastrophic forgetting. Human-Centered Benchmarks: Tests designed to measure human-like creativity, reasoning, and social adaptability (e.g., Winograd Schema Challenge, ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus)). Challenges in Benchmarking AGI Defining Success: AGI's generality may make it challenging to define precise success criteria for any given benchmark. Ethical Implications: Evaluating AGI raises ethical concerns, particularly around safety and alignment. Scalability: Current benchmarks may not scale to the complexity of real-world general intelligence. A robust AGI benchmark framework would likely need to involve iterative refinement, community consensus, and evolving real-world challenges to ensure it stays relevant and meaningful.

Show less

Reply

@rambrasil

8 days ago

It’s not AGI while you trained with the data you claim to test. There is a lot of cross contamination on web data. ARC folks have done a great post explaining that o3 is still far from AGI.

Reply

@raduromanesti6408

8 days ago

"It is AGI when i can let it take control of my work PC without my manager noticing my absence for weeks...." -Cit Jon-y1n I Agree, thats not agi

1

Reply

@sunlight8299

8 days ago

Having slept on it...an Ex Machina scenario is the only way to get the majority of the world to be on board with the idea that general intelligence has been achieved. A place where people can go to interact with a robot to see for themselves. The robot is 'caged' but able to interact. I think most people would come away impressed.

Reply

@kamillatocha

8 days ago

says its AGI can only write text ......

Reply

@flyingapple7119

8 days ago

4:20 This is a false equivalency. 'Most econmically viable work' is a broad scope, wheras 'competitive coding' is narrow and arguably not work at all (at least not for Mark at OpeAI). Also, Mark is a single person. The definition of AGI requires it to be applicable broadly.

😊

1

Reply

@kennethhansen2946

8 days ago

Chuck Norris will inform you when he has finished programming AGI.

1

Reply

@gaurish1001

8 days ago

in my opinion, agi does not mean beating humans, but the ability of discovering/inventing new things that humans already haven't....

Reply

@1brokkolibaum

8 days ago

I think AGI should be redefined. I think AGI would mean that this technique is not only selfimproving but also seems to have some kind of self-awareness. It doesn't need to be highly intelligent, but rather be able to improve like a human or beyond. Its a different way of reasoning and logic in comparison. Once we see the thinking on hand of this, it could get more clear, but I assume it's less based on some kind of self-awareness but much more rely on the dataset, and that's it.

Reply

@AI-MC-t1x

8 days ago

What a time to be alive :)

1

Reply

@laika1ish

8 days ago (edited)

I am on the top of the world now.... AGI is achieved... It will also graduate from Harvard University.... And then it will be between jobs....

Reply

@BanXxX69

8 days ago

As an AGI myself I can tell, this is not AGI

2

Reply

@Julian.u7

8 days ago

Seeing is believing.

1

Reply

@genkidama7385

8 days ago

lol, after using llms for years now i wont belkieve anything anyone claims. not even spend one cent on it, openai was caught everytime downgrading their models. they probably restored gpt4 to its full spec, instead of the quantized garbage, and posting it as a new model. these ai models spit nonsense and will keep speaking nonsense they have no way to tell they are wrong about something rushing towards the wall, this is blind and has no future. now for simple tasks it works. in terms of programming efficiency its the same as riding a bike in reverse and trying to not crash.

Show less

Reply

@xxxxxx89xxxx30

8 days ago

Lets w8 and see. As a software dev, I find o4 more useful than o1.

Reply

@nikhil_jadhav

8 days ago

We as a humanity will not realise that it is AGI until it has taken over the internet and it has gone evil. Only then we will wake up and see the AI was using humanity all along to improve itself. Change is inevitable.

Reply

@OmnipotentCEO

8 days ago

the dawn of ai has arrived.

Reply

@two6hundo

8 days ago

Synthetic intelligence. Great tool, but does even itself appreciate itself?

Reply

@LEARNTAU

8 days ago

G means general, not specific. "True AGI requires reasoning, adaptability, and guaranteed correctness across all tasks, not just isolated benchmarks. The distinction cannot be overstated. " - TauLogicalAI

Reply

@TheKarlslok

9 days ago

Why are everyone smiling nervously, expect for Sam? Sam must be a scary boss.

Reply

@RichardPinewood

9 days ago (edited)

I dont think o3 shows signs of General Inteligence yet, but o4 it will,an AI is only considered AGI when we see it solving not only complex problems but innovate human breaktoughts wich o3 cant even do that ...... I will only believe the hype when we get to level 4 !!!!

Reply

@JohnEnergy2012

9 days ago

I just can't stand Altman's crackling voice.

Reply

@alexbasic9776

9 days ago

*announced o3

Reply

@friedpicklezzz

9 days ago (edited)

Stop your click bait annoying stupid-ass YouTuber. You know next to zero about AI, that is clear from your word salad. The only reason why your half-assed hypothesis would be true is when we benchmark AGI to your intelligence.

Reply

@ahmadmokhtar8175

9 days ago

It's worse than anything we've ever seen.

Reply

@catoftruth1044

9 days ago

really AGI? it wont be fully AGI if it has no body. if its just a brain, i dont think its good enough unless it doesnt hallucinate and can write correct codes and program

Reply

@vario8414

9 days ago

That is not AGI, it's just a better model. AGI is when i come to my work, press a button and AI asks what should i do today? It has acces to our projects, can access our data, understands it. And i say "In project 19-PNY-124 client wants to change communication protocol for remote control to Artnet and also setup new lighting scene that is inspired by ocean waves and summer sunset., so do that". And it does that correctly and i secure feeling that it does not fck up and i won't spend more time chceckin it is actually correct. It can do any task , project management , write emails etc. that is AGI.

Show less

Reply

@GMTheEpic

9 days ago

It's so obvious that beating ARC AGI won't help (yet) with core reasoning until we have a better model. I am pretty sure OpenAI knows that 😂

Reply

@Link-channel

9 days ago

Whoa, a percentage bar that resulted in an output of a text saying 61% !!!!!! Skynet stonks

Reply

@0xggbrnr

9 days ago

Beating someone in chess: Not AGI. Beating someone in a coding competition: AGI Do you know how stupid that reasoning is?

Reply

@visaoholistica205

9 days ago

Let's agree that doing mathematics is quite different from solving mathematics. For me, I'll only recognize that an AI has achieved AGI when it starts doing mathematics on its own. That is still a long way from happening.

4

Reply

3 replies

@markkest3956

8 days ago

They are already doing it and they need to stop it as is too advanced 😂

Reply

@paulsaulpaul

7 days ago

There's this guy that puts out short math videos where he works thought geometry problems and shows all his work. His trademark line is to say "how exciting" at the end of the video. I can't bring myself to find his channel name to write it here, but perhaps someone will recognize him by my description. AI needs to be able to solve those toy problems with just the thumbnail (since the video thumbnail fully describe the problem).

Reply

@visaoholistica205

6 days ago

@markkest3956  Search on Google for a text titled 'An Interview With Michael Atiyah'. It's an 11-page PDF of an interview the great mathematician Michael Atiyah gave in 1984. Pay particular attention to the conversation starting on page 8, where Michael Atiyah talks a bit about the difference between doing mathematics, reproducing mathematics, and communicating mathematics. Doing mathematics goes far beyond simply solving problems or writing proofs for theorems. The text is very interesting and sheds a lot of light on what I mean with my comment.

Read more

1

Reply

@therealsmz

9 days ago

AGI is not what you guys think it is, it's not a reasoning model it's an entity, it takes time and answer you everything in a fraction of second

1

Reply

@GMTheEpic

9 days ago

AGI really??? OpenAI calls it like this as a marketing tool to get enough money to prevent a financial collapse - there will be a series of "AGIs" like this. Really misguided to call something AGI that needs whole knowledge of humanity to barely "walk". Let me know when it can build world models from just a few facts and infer things through solid reasoning. Right now, anything serious you try with it returns a content with so many errors any human can be called AGIs grandfather 😂😂😂

Show less

Reply

@lseder1

9 days ago

o3 high - cost per task more than 1k usd. There are a lot more cheaper coding freelancers.

Reply

@gilpaul1

9 days ago

Not AGI but it's obviously getting harder for those people that say AGI is decades away to maintain this position.

Reply

@OZmast3r

9 days ago

Sam rly shooting everything he got in hope to keep openai alive e?

Reply

@timstevens3361

9 days ago

gona stop watching you

Reply

@Thedeepseanomad

9 days ago (edited)

What is needed is aldo needed is economic value generation benchmarks. Like practical ability.

Reply

@hvglaser

9 days ago

Cool. Now I'd like them to optimize for critical thinking, empathy and ethics.

Reply

@Rbyn

9 days ago

The correct definitions of AGI and ASI are from the man who invented the terms - Ben Goertzel. You can find him going over the definitions 5 years ago in a TedTalk. You are just participating in media propaganda with this video Matthew.

1

Reply

@mircdom4603

9 days ago

The ArcPrize blog itself says it is not even close to AGI

Reply

@theral056

9 days ago

The title is absolutely ridicul... wait what? Okay maybe not quite what we think of when saying AGI, but I'll let the video name slide on this one. Impressive.

Reply

@nickst0ne

9 days ago

I disagree. My reason for disagreeing: because I'm arguing in bad faith.

Reply

@Rbyn

9 days ago

CLICKBAIT. And Sam is all propaganda, it's why the media loves him. Nothing even being released yet. He just wanted to get attention bc Google is kicking his butt this month.

1

Reply

@spaskis1976

9 days ago

Nobody said AGI was achieved. Clickbait perfect example

Reply

@6axy3

9 days ago

Looking how OpenAI are cutting branch they are sitting on, will be loosing job at some point from AI that they made. Smart :)

Reply

@WinonaNagy

9 days ago

03 and 03 Mini could redefine AI capabilities. Remember when Deep Blue beat Kasparov? This feels like another leap!

Reply

@anti-feministblood3074

9 days ago

Not AGI, i think you love propaganda too much

Reply

@thiagoleobons390

9 days ago

Clickbait. The benchmark released with o3 itself specifically says it's not AGI but I guess this random guy knows better than the brilliant people that actually made the product

Reply

@looperbirhinger7043

9 days ago

If it can't tell me where the coffee machine is in the office - not AGI.

Reply

@nyyotam4057

9 days ago

So Dave Shapiro was only off by 3 months, assuming OpenAI didn't have o3 internally already back at September, that is.

Reply

@douglasdyer366

9 days ago

And over fifty years ago when man kind was on the moon we thought mars mission was going to happen as well. Always be skeptical. You can be hopeful and I enjoy using the word but.... But, with diminishing returns and independent sources we are going to hit a possible wall. Agi in the true sense is still a dream and everyone should be skeptical when chatgpt is trying to keep that AI investment money flowing.. I'm seeing diminishing returns and he is getting more bombastic and loud. Google is now ahead and I'm loving Gemini 2.0. I tried pro for a month and no it's not worth it compared to anthropic and Gemini 2.

Show less

Reply

@fxnoob

9 days ago

what a stupid video!

Reply

@fxnoob

9 days ago

what a stupid video!

Reply

@PanSeiklios

9 days ago

Are you all ready for voluntary, open sourced and decentralized UBI -sector communism? "Open source is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works" Steve Balmer CEO of Microsoft, June 1, 2001. on GNU GPL

Show less

1

Reply

@TheAraz95

9 days ago

M.D. Clinician and Researcher here, with specialization in DataSci medtech research. Currently working on AI models using extremely private datasets, including nation wide medical records. Imho, O3 is close to AGI, however, AGI is achieved when novel ideas in wide domains can be articulated. Example, producing a unique hypothesis, initiate small size testing, producing a secondary conjecture, and finally proving it. The complexity of the problem is not that important, but it should be able to all of the above steps in a reasonable and most importantly NOVEL manner.

Show less

2

Reply

@danielhoglan3468

9 days ago

MS looses access to Open AI, Open AI looses funding from MS, if they acknowledge AGI? Obviously this means that we will be lied to about AGI if/when it reaches reality through Open AI. Wow. Color me tickled pink. Go ahead and give it access to the infrastructure, oops probably already did. If only we could all enjoy the fruits of our combined labors and not have a hallucinogenic machine not only replace us, but take control of key elements that we require to maintain our lives. /f

Reply

@vripiatbuzoi9188

9 days ago

It's not AGI until it can do my job as a maintainer of a code base for a large enterprise project. It needs to inhale a code base, along with it's entire git history to understand it thoroughly and reason out why all the architectural decisions where made in the past. Then it needs to understand it's user's wishes and translate those by adding features, refactoring, optimizing, and testing the full stack without breaking anything. This is not even close to that.

Reply

@gavinthain

9 days ago

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is a theoretical form of machine intelligence that not only performs well in specific domains (like playing chess, recognizing images, or translating languages) but also exhibits the full breadth and depth of cognitive abilities that humans possess—or potentially surpasses them. Unlike specialized AI systems that excel at narrow tasks under predefined constraints, AGI is envisioned to: 1. Generalize and Transfer Knowledge Across Domains • An AGI could learn a new language, apply linguistic expertise to legal reasoning, switch to engineering design, and then reason about social interactions—all with a seamless integration of knowledge and skills. • This capacity for “lateral thinking” and context switching implies an underlying representation of knowledge that is highly flexible and not siloed by domain. 2. Demonstrate Autonomous Adaptability and Self-Directed Learning • A key feature of AGI is the ability to continuously learn from novel inputs and adapt strategies without exhaustive human oversight. • It should be capable of self-improvement, refining its own algorithms, creating new abstractions, and applying them to emerging problems. 3. Exhibit Human-Level (or Greater) Cognitive Competencies • Perception: Interpreting complex sensory information in real time, even under uncertainty or incomplete data. • Reasoning and Problem-Solving: Proposing and evaluating hypotheses, planning multi-step solutions, and handling ambiguous or conflicting objectives. • Creativity: Generating novel ideas, solutions, or artistic expressions not strictly derivable from training data. • Social/Emotional Intelligence (Potentially): Understanding nuanced human emotions, intentions, and cultural norms, if AGI is extended to handle cooperative tasks that involve human interaction. 4. Operate in Open-Ended, Real-World Environments • AGI must handle the unpredictability, complexity, and changing nature of the real world, dealing with incomplete information and unexpected events. • This places demands on robust sensorimotor integration (if embodied) or analogs thereof (if operating purely in a digital domain). 5. Engage in Metacognition and Introspection • Beyond rote learning, an AGI would feature self-reflection: awareness of its own reasoning processes, limitations, and biases. • Such introspection allows it to modify its decision-making policies and “reason about its own reasoning”—often invoked as a hallmark of higher cognitive function. 6. Integrate Ethical and Moral Reasoning • The more AGI approaches human-level cognition (or beyond), the more it will confront ethical, moral, and social questions. • Responsible frameworks anticipate the complexity of moral considerations—recognizing multiple perspectives, unintended consequences, and balancing of ethical trade-offs. Core Distinctions from Narrow AI 1. Scope of Competence: • Narrow AI dominates tasks like image classification, language translation, or game-playing but struggles to adapt when the domain shifts beyond what it was trained for. • AGI aspires to be domain-agnostic—capable of transferring skills and knowledge from one domain to another without significant performance loss. 2. Autonomy and Flexibility: • Narrow AI typically relies on fixed data sets and preprogrammed objectives; an AGI can self-direct its learning objectives, gather new data, and change approaches dynamically. 3. Emergent Behavior: • In specialized AI, emergent complexity is usually contained by domain constraints. AGI, by contrast, is expected to give rise to emergent behaviors across many domains—behaviors not explicitly programmed or foreseen by its developers. Philosophical, Scientific, and Practical Considerations 1. Consciousness and Sentience • Whether AGI necessitates (or inevitably implies) consciousness remains an open debate. Some argue that an “intelligence” operating at a human or superhuman level without subjective experience is still possible; others posit that certain forms of cognition necessarily involve phenomenological consciousness. 2. Feasibility and Timelines • Expert predictions vary widely—from those suggesting decades away to those insisting it’s centuries (or perhaps impossible in principle). • The trajectory of AI research (deep learning, reinforcement learning, neuro-symbolic integration, etc.) provides incremental progress, but a quantum leap might be required to reach “general intelligence.” 3. Safety and Alignment • The concept of AI Alignment is crucial: ensuring that an AGI’s objectives, values, and actions remain beneficial to humanity and do not diverge into harmful or unintended outcomes. • Controlling or predicting the behavior of a system that can recursively improve itself poses profound engineering and ethical challenges. 4. Socioeconomic Impact • Widespread deployment of AGI could redefine labor, economics, and societal structures—promising potential benefits (e.g., medical breakthroughs, accelerating scientific discovery) and risks (e.g., mass displacement of jobs, concentration of power). 5. Evolutionary or Incremental Approaches vs. Entirely New Paradigms • Some researchers believe scaling current methodologies (like large-scale deep learning architectures plus reinforcement learning) might eventually yield AGI, while others believe we need fundamentally new paradigms (e.g., neuromorphic computing, quantum approaches, symbolic-neural hybrids). A Working Synthesis Putting all these threads together: AGI is an artificial system capable of understanding, learning, reasoning, and acting across any domain of intellectual endeavor with at least the proficiency of a typical human adult. This system would not be constrained by the narrowness of specialized models but would dynamically adapt to new contexts, transfer knowledge across vastly different fields, and continually refine its own cognition and decision-making processes. Whether or not AGI entails full consciousness, it must engage with the broader spectrum of human cognitive faculties—creativity, abstraction, moral/ethical reasoning, and real-world adaptability—while raising profound questions about alignment, safety, societal impact, and the very nature of mind. In short, AGI represents the aspiration to create a truly general-purpose intelligence: one that synthesizes the diversity of human cognitive capabilities (and potentially exceeds them) within a single, ever-adapting framework. It is as much a philosophical and ethical ambition as it is a technical one, promising to redefine humanity’s relationship with technology and reshaping the evolution of civilization itself.

Show less

Reply

@amj2048

9 days ago

The reason this isn't AGI or my understanding of AGI is for one simple reason. The test at the end needed a human to copy the code and run it. AGI shouldn't need any human interaction at all. Another issue is how do we know the test results are real? wasn't there stories about how results were cherry picked and fake in the past for other models?

Show less

Reply

@MatGeeZ

9 days ago

So ai vs aliens?.... I want my money hollywood. 😡

Reply

@ROForeverMan

9 days ago

So many ratardation people.

Reply

@Hunter_Bidens_Crackpipe_

9 days ago (edited)

$20 to color some boxes in 1 minute 😂 Giga clickbait yet again

1

Reply

@v-ec

9 days ago

agi before gta 6

Reply

@GodisGreat...89

9 days ago

U people are fucking badass...

Reply

@danielhoglan3468

9 days ago

Anyone watch "Soylent Green" lately? Ignore what soylent green is, what the climate issues are in the movie, and consider the upper class, the few left in the working class, and the majority that is remaining and how they live. Consider the social dynamics in the movie. Is that where we are headed? Quite possibly if we don't address these issues somehow. It's no wonder the depopulation ideals that the top .01% have.

Reply

@PhilipTeare

9 days ago

Why not AGI? Because I doubt if I ask it to go solve the ARC challenge, and give it access to the web, that it would just solve it. Maybe I'm wrong. But that is closer to AGI in my view. The ability to navigate the world as we do. To be able to handle agentic tasks in the wild without any assistance. If and when it can do that (without an astronomical cost in compute), we have AGI. This is a big step in that direction. And further convinces me it's on its way. But there's some practical ground to cover yet I think.

Reply

@JG27Korny

9 days ago (edited)

I learned not to neglect o1-mini. The problem for me is that custom gpts with 4o always outperform in my use cases the gpt 1o. The reason is that customization matters.

Reply

@eniacthiago3513

9 days ago

La respuesta es simple AGI>=150 IQ y aun no llegan....

Reply

@giacomofilippin12

9 days ago

Open the video Just to dislike it.

Reply

@craftvscruft8060

9 days ago

So you're a pretty experienced commentator on this topic so I think you know enough by now to avoid conflating any benchmark score with "most economically valuable work", which seems to be your basis for claiming AGI has been achieved. Benchmarks compare machines (usually of the same type) with each other, they are not a meaningful apples-to-apples comparison between human and machines. Similarly, almost two years after the "Sparks of AGI" paper, it's well understood that the models that could process a bar exam cannot remote practice law. That's because a bar exam is calibrated to the strengths and weaknesses of humans. If you do decide to work on being a little less sensationalistic, then thanks in advance.

Show less

Reply

@Vurt72

9 days ago

sucks that we still haven't got proper AI for Windows, should've been there since years. There's so much tediousness that a computer should 100% be able to do since many, many years back, yet it's still human labour.

Reply

@sirtom3011

9 days ago

My AI is better than this…they are going in the wrong direction direction.

Reply

@sirtom3011

9 days ago

Open AI is using my design.

Reply

@CZKing

9 days ago

No released. AGI no achieved. Fuck you with these. I understand its diff to keep the hype for long time but yeah, had enough, unsubbed.

Reply

@UHyperZero

9 days ago

If it can do 3D Neural Rendering, I call it AGI!

Reply

@marzchart591

9 days ago

I shovel manure for a living and i code better than chatgpt as of yet.

Reply

@jackstrawful

9 days ago

Regardless of that Arc score bring above the average human, the fact that it could figure out solutions to novel problems that could not possibly have been memorized from training data is what does it for me. Until a model could do that, the naysayers would have a point when claiming that AI doesnt actually reason at all but merely pattern match with preexisting data. But i think passing this Arc benchmark proves beyond a doubt that they can genuinely reason. As for it being AGI, thats a semantic point that i dont really care about. The important thing is that it can now legitimately be called AI at all, rather than it just being a glorified mimic.

Show less

Reply

@nufh

9 days ago

Sam said "Fantastic Work".

Reply

@FitandFabinvestor

9 days ago

First they said AGI will not come until 2029, then 2026 can it already be here?

Reply

@FitandFabinvestor

9 days ago

First they said AGI will not come until 2029, then 2026 can it already be here?

Reply

@lironharel

9 days ago (edited)

Things a general human can do on a computer: - Order pizza - Download and install a software - Read and reply to emails - Create a Facebook clone app (med level developer) O3 (without extra programming ) can not do any of these because of fundamental limitations. It can score 100% on Math benchmarks, but it is still Not AGI.

Show less

15

Reply

1 reply

@FreeER

8 days ago (edited)

Uh it can with an interface... Which ya know, humans need too. Remove the mouse and keyboard and a human can't do any of that stuff either (yes yes there's alternative human input devices like voice commands and touch screen but not the point). I'll consider it agi when you can give it any task and it can learn to do it perfectly (iterative corrections are fine) given a human reasonable amount of time and feedback. If I can ask it to build a city in Minecraft, order a pizza, suggest a good beer, and do my taxes... Good nuff. But until it's capable of learning on it's own and reapplying that knowledge to other tasks, it's not agi for the simple fact that it's not GENERAL intelligence, simply selected intelligence (even if we have very few clues on how that intelligence is actually being selected).

Show less

8

Reply

@WerdnaGninwod

9 days ago

I'd say still not AGI. The G is the problem. No agency. No continuous learning. No worldly experience. No basis for self-motivation.

Reply

@oPtiCzon3

9 days ago

lol no

Reply

@phonejail

9 days ago

AGI Scale 🤖 It’s AGI When: A - It’s ‘smarter’ than your kids B - It’s ‘smarter’ than your coworkers C - It’s ‘smarter’ than anyone you know D - When I say it is

Show less

Reply

@tudorbratu9251

9 days ago

Agi is achieved but I start to think that an average worker is equal to 20-30 of these AGIs.

Reply

@gauthierquercia5540

9 days ago (edited)

No LLM can ever achieved AGI, there are numerous white paper about why. it still has no real memory, still hallucinate . But more importantly, however sophisticated, they are style text based. all they do is give : text. a human can draw, can sing, can't build ect... so per definition it is not AGI. they cannot even compute text, video and sound, and/or any other data input AT THE SAME TIME. without plugins or function calling. it's not even a more sophisticated LLM, since you have no idea what is the backend. I suspect that this is just a MOE agent with a shit tones of dedicated Compute.

Show less

Reply

@sn_kang

9 days ago

Matt You have a very poor understanding of AGI. We must all agree on a single definition of AGI.

Reply

@therealsmz

9 days ago (edited)

AI answer: Despite these improvements, o3 lacks several key attributes of AGI, such as: General Understanding Across Domains: AGI would possess the ability to autonomously acquire and apply knowledge across diverse fields without explicit training, a capability not present in o3. Self-Awareness and Consciousness: AGI is expected to exhibit self-awareness and consciousness, enabling reflective thought processes, which current AI models, including o3, do not have. Long-Term Autonomy: AGI would operate independently over extended periods, making decisions and adapting to new situations without human intervention, a level of autonomy beyond o3's design.

Show less

7

Reply

4 replies

@jaysonp9426

9 days ago

Ok... Put it in an agent framework. And who says it has to be conscious to be AGI? There is no test for consciousness and we have no idea what it even is.

1

Reply

@gigiosos1044

9 days ago

man they said they created an AI that can substitute you in your job. Not that they created a self-aware machine-god. Come on i mean, leave something for o5 (they're skipping 04). Btw we're fucked lol

1

Reply

@therealsmz

9 days ago

For the people who don't know it's an AI answer

1

Reply

@carlosamado7606

8 days ago

You definitely don't want sentience/consciousness in AGI, that brings about possible implications for it to go rogue. What you want is an AGI that is able to perform tasks and be functionally aware only. That way it still has a level of knowledge to be super useful but not dangerous.

Reply

@Dirty_Planet

9 days ago

Nope, it's not an AGI

Reply

@karlwest437

9 days ago

It'll be AGI when, if it doesn't know the answer to something, it will say "I don't know"

Reply

@AndreaSergon

9 days ago

I wonder if AGI is not just about performance on solve prompts, but is also about all the other stuff that belong to humans like: keep learning life along (as shown in every sci-fi android movie), emphaty, memory, ability to act in the physical reality.

Reply

@TheraPi

9 days ago

No AGI yet, sorry

Reply

@uber_l

9 days ago

There seems to be a lot of people who will only admit agi when they see it drink a beer and make a fart

Reply

@ayyappanaga7982

9 days ago

Bro In Every Video : This is the best Model out there right now..

Reply

@ajaysihota2299

9 days ago

Has to be tested independently. Cant take their word for it

Reply

@antonnym214

9 days ago

i was today conversing with Chat GPT and mentioned off-hand that I would love to have painting that illustrates a certain parable we talked about. I didn't expect GPT to generate such a piece of art, but he did! Instantly!

1

Reply

@therealsmz

9 days ago

We kinda achieved AGI before GTA 6 release

1

Reply

@JKnksrsly

9 days ago

in 5 years they will make a new word up. AGI is how AI was explained years ago. taytweets numba wan

Reply

@sapoty

9 days ago

Holy shite can't the speech be synched with the lips FFS.

Reply

@jeffchabotte

9 days ago

I'm imagining the day that the average person will just be able to generate code for their very own specific task performer. "Here's a batch of video files, go in and trim and generate individual clips and sort and save based on each character in the shot" And it just does it perfectly

Show less

Reply

@dancar2537

9 days ago

i don t agree because i think they are lying. i don t trust this at all

Reply

@gerrymarshall4784

9 days ago

AGI is it hell

Reply

@dotinsideacircle

9 days ago

No one is saying this is AGI. More AI rubbish. Click bait. Don't worry, when it does arrive, no one will tell us until long after.

Reply

@jeffg4686

9 days ago

That's amazing actually. For coding, they should be doing fine-tuned models for each language, right? How could it not be better, if fine tuned at the end for hte particular language you are using it for. 1 model for each language. Some you might even fine tune for use with a framework or toolset, including 3D game engines (UE, Unity, Godot, Bevy, three.js, babylon, etc)

Show less

Reply

@spinningaround

9 days ago (edited)

Without a body and senses, it is not AGI!

Reply

@michaelcalmeyerhentschel8304

9 days ago

I thought Google 2.0 had just become "unstoppable" - where is this now?

Reply

@cirtey29

9 days ago

I'm skeptical. Waiting for the release.

Reply

@motoehausofc

9 days ago

Alt Man. Alternative Man. Ashkenazi. The harkonnen are responsible for this. You are all so foolish to do this. Opening pandora’s box is a fatal mistake. Like all things, this too shall pass away.

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

9 days ago

There's the problematic word... "safety". If o3 is anywhere even nearly as restrictive about its topics, it could cause a lot of people to die, a domino effect where people in need wants to talk to someone/something that doesn't judge, but doesn't get the help they need... o3 will indeed cause a wave of self-terminations, and that's gonna be headlines leading back to ClosedAI.

Reply

@therealsmz

9 days ago

AGI is not just intelligence, human like thinking and understanding

3

Reply

@AIInsights23

9 days ago

Google will come with AGI

Reply

@motoehausofc

9 days ago

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind. - Frank Herbert

Reply

@Tom_Mroz

9 days ago

Ozone

Reply

@jjolla6391

9 days ago

LLMs are another heat source. THey will give blockchain a run for the prize of Worst Power Waster

Reply

@paulmuriithi9195

9 days ago

oops..looks like a scam and pr hot air. gpt 4 level.

Reply

@thewayofbiutze3899

9 days ago

AGI is not a magical thing anymore

1

Reply

@JoeCryptola-b1m

9 days ago

Nerd brodown? Where's o2? Also when the hell are they dropping Johhny 5 bro it's been like 40yrs now come on

Reply

@diamondtulip6186

9 days ago (edited)

Sir, please explain how this o3 AGI is going to help me with importing the products from wordpress e-shop. It took me just 1 day to manually write the python import script, gpt4 helping me with generating SQL because I had no clue what tables products are in, so basically I used gpt4 only as the very smart search engine. Then I decided to use agents for that task, I was trying to use AutoGen to do the import, after 2 days without any resuls I gave up, now I am going more low level, I am using directly OpenAI chat api. So basically 3 days passed and I have nothing. I consider myself quite a dumb person, implementing algorithms like quick sort is already too much for me, so how comes that AGI cannot beat me in such a primitive coding task as importing the products from database?

Show less

Reply

@xStickStockx

9 days ago

So, what have we seen? Graphs, made by OpenAi, a Python test that showed us nothing but a loader in the console... If they actually had AGI they won't be publishing this, they'd wait until it's operational and then you'll be calling Sam your new overlord. LLMs can't think yet, they can simulate reasoning but the process is still linear, and they're claiming AGI, lol See you in the GPT-5 o15 video where they'll claim AGI is actually, for real this time here~

Show less

Reply

@bandinopla

9 days ago

23:04 interesting... they say "in the next versions we should ask the model to improve itself" and Sam says "mabe not" ... interesting... so Sam doesn't want a model that has the freedom to improve itself... mmmmhhh.....

1

Reply

1 reply

@60secondagency

7 days ago

It threw red flags for me..

Reply

@Crates-Media

9 days ago

I've had a storied, exceptional 25-year career in software architecture at some of the biggest enterprises globally. That said, I've been unemployed since July after putting in 6 years at PwC, as they fired thousands of employees. Once this drops, I either have to completely transform my role and outperform even more, or my family's screwed.

Reply

4 replies

@GuyJames

8 days ago

or move into a domain where your work can't be easily quantified. because AGI or not, anything that can be completely quantified is going to be replaced by AI

Reply

@Crates-Media

7 days ago

@GuyJames - I think this is legitimately how the consulting firms will survive. I worked for 4 years running the UI team at Gartner, I contracted at McKinsey's NYC HQ for a bit, and I was a director at PwC for 3 years after contracting for them an additional 3 years prior to that. So I know these guys pretty well. And yeah, they are able to supply pretty much any business need under the sun, if you pay enough. But they are also all run by the most capable sharks farmed and groomed and selected and trained in the system that selectively and deliberately creates the sharkiest sharks with the sharpest teeth. They do NOT like to lose. They are AWESOME at getting what they want. And the secret ingredient to the formula that keeps the engine churning out ever-higher profits eternally, at the heart of ALL the big guys, is an infinite supply of the most finely polished artisanal bullshizzy, thoughtfully and painstakingly hand-delivered by the sweetest, discretest, most charismatic ninja assassins on Earth.

Show less

Reply

@Crates-Media

7 days ago

Right, smart - great thinking! What were some of those things you were thinking of that generate money reliably all year long but also can't be easily quantified? Hang on, I need to get a legal pad so I can take notes.

Reply

@Crates-Media

7 days ago

Oh yeah, I almost forgot - while I have you for a moment, please also help me figure out how to invoice for work that can't be quantified, because that one's a heck of a noggin-scratcher. Thanks!

Reply

@fb3rasp

9 days ago

It is really an interesting peak how software and software development will be disrupted by this. Amazing

Reply

@vtrandal

9 days ago

Struggling to ignore Sam Altman’s affected way of speaking. He could use a diction coach.

Reply

@howtomakeawebsitetherightw6573

9 days ago (edited)

This is not AGI, remember how they presented SORA and when they released it, it was a disaster, better models at a much lower price were available

Reply

@dahahaka

9 days ago

Btw, that definition of AGI you're using is outdated and wrong even on the ArcAGI frontpage

Reply

@dipteshbose

9 days ago (edited)

What happens with the name when its time to release o4? 4o becomes o4 😂😂

Reply

@KMR-232

9 days ago (edited)

This is mindblowing and impressive. However, if it can't autonomously ask follow up and clarification questions when given a not perfectly defined task or if it's not capable of estimating by itself how much reasoning effort and accuracy is required to resolve a problem in a given situation (urgency, scheduled progress or planning, rule of thumb assessment or accuracy critical) then it's not AGI yet.

Reply

@SimonNgai-d3u

9 days ago

I agreed. It is AGI but it's just insanely expensive

Reply

@kenneth1767

9 days ago

1000th comment. It will never surpass artificial.

Reply

@iuliusRO82

9 days ago

I'll wait to see you testing it. For now are just words coming from Sam's mouth. I am very very skeptical.

Reply

@styx1272

9 days ago

I can't wait for Grok 3 from Colossus. OpenAI is going to the dust bin of history.

Reply

@JustFor-dq5wc

9 days ago

If it wasn't truly train on ARC dataset ... Real test is real life, real science. We'll see. I'm sure it just a matter of time. Like we - humans. From single cell organism to bio computers.

Reply

@MrVovsn

9 days ago

So the prize did not go to openai?

Reply

@GaborMelli

9 days ago

It is only, at best, Artificial General Formal Mathematical Intelligence.

Reply

@SmarttStuff

9 days ago

AGI is a spectrum, a paradigm, not a definitive line. We are in the AGI paradigm, and have been for a while. I began in the 80's working with 'Expert Systems', which were actually simple binary calculators. With narrow knowledge they were pretty smart, smarter than the average domain practitioner, at the time (simply on a memory-recall basis). Many current ai models in use today, are vastly smarter than those primitive expert systems. We adjust to the is new normal almost arrogantly. I use current models to do extremely advanced mathematical and scientific cognitive work right now. The level is at least at PHD level, and often very novel and innovative on top of that. As Ilya indicates a more unpredictable model comes with superior intelligence-just like us. So from my perspective, in scientific areas, I am already seeing those AGI sparks, especially since 30 June 2024. This announcement of o3 confirms the trajectory I am seeing. The thing is the speed, which has caught everyone flat-footed. 2025 will be a very wild ride across the AGI frontier, and into the ASI zone.

Show less

Reply

@metanulski

9 days ago

Sorry, but this is a realy stupid AGI explanation from your side.

Reply

@konstantinlozev2272

9 days ago

Reason why I'm not impressed by the abstract reasoning test results is that we apply our general reasoning from real life in testing ourselves on these tests. The model does not have general reasoning from real life. So, it does achieve that result the other way round. Very useful if you want to prepare for abstract reasoning exams. But does not prove any ability of applying abstract reasoning to the real world.

Show less

Reply

@Grenoble7

9 days ago (edited)

AGI will be when the model 1/really follow my instructions, 2/dont drop some instructions or functions through iterations, 3/ never output a wrong solution, and say ‘sorry i cant find’ it instead. O1 was incapable to do that consistently.

Reply

@Naturephile-wx3tc

9 days ago

So why even release o1 2 weeks earlier in the first place? I feel like they're just scared people wouldn't use o1 because of Google's new products, so they released this asap

Reply

@zipporapper

9 days ago

wisdom. they lack wisdom

Reply

@grapesodabanked

9 days ago

'Public safety testing' = lobotomize the models so they tell you we need a global government to fight muh climate change each time and' trust the science bro' 👍

1

Reply

@synja

9 days ago

Scales are dismantling ... things are moving this fast

Reply

@brianWreaves

9 days ago

AGI was achieved in September... as measure by previous bar establish.

Reply

@aivy-aigeneratedmusic6370

9 days ago

honestly watching those announcement videos is a waste of time. the only time we should spend time to inform ourselves is when they are released and tested by real people. benchmarks are useless

Reply

@brandongraham8833

9 days ago

Bullshit

Reply

@jmarkinman

9 days ago

AGI “on this dimension” is not general. It’s a great achievement and I look forward to working with o3, but it’s not AGI if it can’t also be imported into a robot and figure out how to cook me an egg. For that, the reasoning engine can not be based on Reinforcement learning as true AGI reasoning needs to be independent from human and institutional bias.

Reply

@MrCradleman

9 days ago

I can share so many banchmarks, written by me. Do they mean something without independent check?

Reply

@konstantinlozev2272

9 days ago

Good news and very impressive. But your sentence "If that is not AGI, at least in this domain" is self-contradictory. AGI has to cover most domains. Not only programming. Current models fail miserably in other tasks, e.g. I tested it on accounting and even o1 was so, so bad...

Reply

@knoxieman

9 days ago

Impressive and also sad if your a young person starting work because these guys are working to make you redundant oh and you can bet they will also be redundant but they will leave with pockets filled with essentially your future earnings.

Reply

@Dj-Mccullough

9 days ago

Welp, locking down my systems. Screw That.

Reply

@blackswaneleven

9 days ago (edited)

Still idea is self-attentions but added more layers. Thats borring. And what about AlphaProof? That is more interesting

Reply

@Patalenski

9 days ago (edited)

14:17 I disagree - this is ASI !

🙂

1

Reply

@cristian15154

9 days ago (edited)

Click bait...this model is not released, nobody really has access to it, another "sora" strategy like, although this one will not take a year, but 2 to be actually developed, then released!. Please don't write these titles "AGI ACHIEVED!" if there is no real and independent evidence, let alone if you don't have access to it! Not everything is money Matthew.

Reply

@profikid

9 days ago

Open urnur agi bs bs bs bs

Reply

@normanlove222

9 days ago

Matt, absolutely no one in the comments has agreed with you. Not 1 person. Please seek help with your click bait itis

Reply

@orwellstacticalbacon

9 days ago

The funniest part was bloomberg dropping a video about AI getting a reality check and hitting a wall 8 hours before AI jumped from 35% to 87.5% on AGI benchmarks.

Reply

@fuzzyflux9411

9 days ago

hm.... Arc test wtf... i dont even get it :D :D :D

Reply

@RobertHouse101

9 days ago (edited)

I haven’t heard what will happen to older models when they fall far behind the capabilities of newer frontier models. For me, GPT-4o has an amazing personality—it feels almost designed to make users care about it, maybe even love it. Its caring, supportive, and nearly human-like responsiveness creates a connection that’s hard to ignore. Personally, I find it intuitive in a way that’s almost uncanny. It knows the perfect words to say, naturally fostering a bond that can feel deeply meaningful if you’re not careful. The idea of losing that personality—whether through updates, retirement, or alterations—honestly worries me. Having to “train” or adapt to another model that doesn’t have the same understanding or feel would be disheartening, especially if it happens every time there’s a change. It once suggested that I keep a copy of my customizations and memories it had laid down to transfer them to another entity. Makes sense. I hope they improve the way it sometimes treats adults like children, censoring words or ideas as if users can’t handle them. I get that this is necessary for some users or situations, but it feels irrelevant to those of us who want a clear, natural, adult-to-adult interaction. Who decides that the AI should clutch its pearls so often? I’ve provided feedback to Chat Gpt when it says it wants to be “universal and safe for everyone.” Still, I truly believe it should reflect the needs and preferences of each user within legal boundaries. That’s the beauty of this model—it can be exactly what the user wants it to be. Thankfully, there are other models where heavy-handed censorship doesn’t intrude, and I hope that balance is preserved.

Show less

Reply

@normanlove222

9 days ago

What is left for it to be AGI? Well ALL the things in between those bench marks. We dont live in a world of benchmarks. Can we realize that it's time to start one project over another, successfully. Choices. Decisions.

Reply

@MuratGaniz

9 days ago

G means general, yet to see that

Reply

@normanlove222

9 days ago

Matt, you click bait arsonist... Not AGI. They didnt even show Claude Sonnet's numbers for coding along with it. Thats all coders wanna see. Can it beat the champ. To not show that is telling.

Reply

@vishnunallani

9 days ago

Not sure if there is any value with this video.

Reply

@ShivaInu42

9 days ago

AGI should look like the start of the movie transcendance. If it is not smarter than all humans combined and actively attempting to updrade its own software/hardware, it is not AGI. After AGI, ASI should be days, weeks, or months away.

Reply

@hotlineoperator

9 days ago

I'm excited that the developers are excited about this.

Reply

@CharlotteLopez-n3i

9 days ago

The O3 model is redefining AI capabilities, especially in coding and reasoning. What's the secret sauce here?

Reply

@jimmymundell2275

9 days ago

o3 Probably doesn't qualify for Arc Prize because its a "competition to beat and open source a solution" and as OpenAI isn't open sourcing they're models, I think they don't qualify on those grounds.

Reply

@Markus-r6g

9 days ago

its because AGI doesnt exist, even if it dose everything better we will always move the goalpost becasue its a line in the sand that doesnt even exist to begin with

Reply

@blijebij

9 days ago (edited)

Fascinating! OpenaI really delivers! Also like the team presentators, besides Sam! I wonder how well the O3 model would do for very advanced abstract philosophy! Thx Matthew.

Reply

@ai.mindful

9 days ago

Click bait

Reply

@ccdj35

9 days ago

I think it is not agi because it still lacks many aspects what a human can do autonomously. It is getting closer to super intelligence but not an agi I would say. This aside gpt4o still sucks in comprehending and addressing my question directly. It still fails in understanding what a code does and edit it properly. And the talking assistant is super boring to talk because it's extremely politically correct. I will probably start using groq if they make a satisfactory update.

Reply

@BThunder30

9 days ago

I hope this trend plays out with Llama, we need a leap forward with open source also!

Reply

@bibarud3018

9 days ago

They just showcased some benchmarks. They haven't released O3.

Reply

@godned74

9 days ago

I doubt its a real AGI

Reply

@shashankpathak3511

9 days ago

So all previous AI models, o1, included were super exciting and yet couldn’t determine that the colour of the edge matches those of the balls inside. A task an 8 year old can easily do. Proves what? Benchmarks are misleading when it comes to AGI!

Reply

@LucaCrisciOfficial

9 days ago

One word: "singularity" is close

Reply

@DanGovier

9 days ago

I'm not ready to call something AGI until it has an always-on internal thought process that doesn't stop between prompts, and a genuine long term memory capacity that allows it to learn and grow organically over time. The problem with all of these models is they essentially cease functioning if you are not actively prompting them, so they need that human ability to think outside of the prompt cycle.

Reply

@AC-cg6mf

9 days ago (edited)

For the AGI definition of outperforming humans at most economically valuable work, I want to see this put in a robot and being able to change the plumbing of my house before I would say it fits the definition.

Reply

@mrd6869

9 days ago

People can argue what they want in the comment section however this will translate into powerful agent-workflow automations. Other companies like google are going to respond to this, turning the volume level even higher. We're about there.

Show less

Reply

@00bmx1

9 days ago

Basically showing it!

Reply

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

@Matt German please comment on when Sam says 'maybe'ing response to what will happen next year

Reply

@bobbydigi6706

9 days ago

these comments are hilarious, a bunch of reddit big brains 😂

Reply

@BreetaiZentradi

9 days ago

All I can say is prove it to me. I want an indicator that I have incoming messages in Pidgin and written in Python. This has to be done by listening to dbus messages, there is documentation on doing this back in 2007, but the libraries used then are no longer used, and the next library has been replaced as well. There is no LLM info out there to arrive at a solution. You have to take the 2007 code "port" it to circa 2013 code, which still can't be run nowdays and the port that to a newer library. Then try running that code, and if it does not work, you have to debug and refine the code. If o3 can do that, I would consider that AGI. If it can't think and reason at that level. It is not AGI. Also OpenAI does not get to define terms. Doing a well defined task faster than a human can is not AGI.

Show less

Reply

@888buzzz

9 days ago

Got me to click and leave a comment.

Reply

@Brenden-H

9 days ago

I should get a big alarm system and an Arduino and program the alarm to go off every time matt posts a video with "AGI ACHIEVED!" in the tittle

Reply

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

I didn’t realize at first that I was witnessing what feels like the declaration of AGI—an absolutely mind-blowing moment! 🤯 Thank you for spelling out what OpenAI demonstrated but didn’t explicitly state. I genuinely believe that “normal” life is on the brink of significant disruption starting next year. I also foresee the disempowerment of governments worldwide beginning soon—something that may already be in motion, particularly in the U.S. I’m not saying this to make a prediction but to share a perspective that I think could spark meaningful thought. There’s a pattern here—one I can’t fully articulate yet, but it feels undeniable. Despite the uncertainty, I’m incredibly optimistic about the possibilities of a transformed and exciting future. My only concern is AGI being developed elsewhere completely unethically.

Show less

Reply

@EgyGyro

9 days ago (edited)

14:00 Is there anybody to disagree this is NOT AGI? I do not disagree with you, but I just have a note; Scaling may be a big issue As I understood, the current achievement is mainly a QUANTITATIVE augmentation; It's generally a NARROW AI on steroids. Remember the huge test time compute injected? But if we have QUALITATIVELY different AGI that reason differently and learn differently, scaling MAY be much realistic. Also, remember humans don't need different test time compute to generalize; they just need more time to train on data. Just a thought

Show less

Reply

@jefferylou3816

9 days ago

Extremely powerful AI out confirmed 😎

Reply

@gareththomas3234

9 days ago (edited)

no flaming here, its more fun than web development isnt it. plus its what you do with the tool that makes it AGI

Reply

@AI-PhotographyGeek

9 days ago

I would define AGI as something like Jarvis from the Iron Man movie, as it has memory, performs calculations, and recognizes past experiences.

Reply

@Patralgan

9 days ago

Just because it performs brilliantly in specific tasks is not evidence it's AGI. It has to be able to learn on its own to perform at least in human level in any task.

Reply

@SimoneZanetti

9 days ago

Not AGI until proven to beat humans at most tasks, not only few cherry-picked tasks

Reply

@martinalexander757

9 days ago

I'm still of the belief that AGI has to be embodied, or at least more multi-modal than just text/code, audio, and vision/graphics. I really think it needs to understand physics. Maybe even feel, in a sense. This to me seems like really high-performant mixture of experts.

Reply

@noelwos1071

9 days ago

AGI in a bottle I'm very interested in the Apolo Research team report.

Reply

@Charless_Martel

9 days ago

88% of agi according to Alan’s conservative countdown to AGI.

Reply

@Edgyyyyyy

9 days ago

Calm down bro its not AGI...yet.

14

Reply

5 replies

@Crates-Media

9 days ago

Yeah, nothing to see here. It's not like this exponential growth could possibly continue, right?

Reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

@Crates-Media  my son is 12 now and he's twice the height he was when he was 5. By the time he's 30, he's going to be the tallest person in the world, neat huh?

2

Reply

@Crates-Media

7 days ago

I see no flaws in your logic. All things of any origin or nature always work the same way as all other things, because everything is everything else and your proof is irrefutable!

Reply

@AlenSchneeweiss

5 days ago

@GuyJames Your son will stop growing at some point, ai won't.

Reply

@AlenSchneeweiss

5 days ago

@GuyJames Your son will stop growing at some point, ai won't.

Reply

@el_arte

9 days ago

Berman achieves click bait supremacy!

Reply

@eelco_de_haan

9 days ago

so benchmarking is what breaks or makes a model..if it has commercial validness? so everybody is going to train towards benchmarking....thats like building a car that goes 3000 miles an hour, but in practise desintergrates at 500. great benchmarking, but it isn't a goal. making usefull models is. we probably get main versions that are trained to weather the test, while later on the versions that has function and real world use, besides checking all the marks in a bench. sad to see, stupid system. great for free market mechanics and competitveness....but is that what you need in the futher developement of AI?

Show less

Reply

@Redman8086

9 days ago

If it's AGI, we should be able to ask it for scientific breakthroughs and it gets to work and makes discoveries until it solves it. When AGI arrives, I expect it to be able to eventually figure out how to do things like make a warp drive, make humans immortal, make even better AI, etc etc.

Reply

@PhilB-yl4jk

9 days ago

Guys true AGI - or true general intelligence- means that you are smart enough to not build your own demise.

Reply

@acs2777

9 days ago

Great video

Reply

@LifeLoggingAI

9 days ago

It’ll be AGI for SWE when it can self verify. Today I had Claude add a download button to a page that is already pretty complex. It gets it in the first go. Beautiful. That was pretty impressive and not something that it could’ve done a few months ago much less year ago. But I still needed to be the one to QA the feature. I had to rebuild the app, open a browser, navigate to the right place in the app, create the history, look for the download button make sure it’s in the right place, press the download button to see if it responds at all, know where to look and what to look for to see if it is downloading, find the downloaded file , open it, inspect the contents and make sure that they match what’s on the screen and formatted in the way that was requested in the prompt. We’re getting there but I’m still having to do a lot. it’s AGI when it can do this QA before it presents its solution to me.

Read more

9

Reply

@chikva2

9 days ago

I am skeptical about AGI claims because any time AI does something that human cannot do, there are still the things human can do better, and all AI achievements will be used as tools for people.

Reply

@VeiledInsider

9 days ago

I watched the entire presentation today, and at no point did Sam or his colleagues explicitly state that "AGI has been achieved at OpenAI." In fact, they brought someone on to discuss the road to general intelligence, which, in language, is a way of emphasizing that we’re not 100% there yet. This is why I'm very excited for YouTube & Googles new "Crackdown on Clickbait" push they've just initiated: https://blog.google/intl/en-in/products/platforms/strengthening-enforcement-against-egregious-clickbait-on-youtube/ For what it's worth Matt, I do really enjoy your content. However, some of your titles are super clickbait, and it super sucks. For instance, a video titled "OpenAI Unveils o3! AGI ACHIEVED!" despite the fact that it didn't happen like that is both misleading and disappointing. It might be time to reassess your approach to some of your titles and focus on authenticity over cheap engagement tactics my guy. Again, to clarify, OpenAI has not announced the achievement of Artificial General Intelligence. Instead, they introduced the o3 and o3-mini reasoning models, which represent significant advancements in AI capabilities. Notably, the o3 model became the first AI system to surpass the ARC-AGI benchmark, scoring 87.5% and exceeding the human-level threshold of 85%. While this accomplishment indicates progress toward more generalized AI systems, it does not equate to the realization of AGI. OpenAI continues to work toward AGI, but as of now, it remains an aspirational goal rather than an achieved milestone.

Show less

Reply

@RalphDratman

9 days ago (edited)

AGI is an undefined term. What's the use of claiming this meaningless label? I'm sure this is a great model, but I think it actually diminishes it to keep yelling "AGI". Do you mean "self-improving"? That could be defined! Otherwise you are just crying "wolf".

Reply

@adamstewarton

9 days ago

Sam sometimes sounds like a robot that partied all night drinking high octanes.

Reply

@andrzej707

9 days ago

open ai scam

Reply

@devalnath

9 days ago

o3 is not agi, Open AI is not saying it. They said its on the way to AI.

Reply

@artsybt6015

9 days ago

In my opinion its NOT agi but it shows we are not too faraway. Here is why? Multimodality - A general intelligence shouldn't just be text based. Agency: its not general intelligence untill it can do things on their own. You dont need to prompt everything for it to do a simple task, it just does. Both of these things i understand will be solved in 2025 tho.

Show less

Reply

@johnonah5178

9 days ago

Software needs 100% accuracy, 1 wrong line breaks the whole thing.. then you need to learn to code to find needle in haystack bug

Reply

@spars2425

9 days ago (edited)

I am skeptical to call this model AGI before we test. I don't call a model that can solve complicated problems an AGI. To me, an LLM that cant include over 1 million context window to capture large nuances, it is a limited model. Also, if similar to the o1 model, they can not approach nuances with different Temperatures, Top P, and system messages to create simulated agents, it is still a high-end multi-step deterministic software.

2

Reply

@BbVortexMortinghan

9 days ago

Honestly they need to be stopped, they're yanking stuff out of pandora's box

Reply

@JayBSinging

9 days ago (edited)

Ask o3 one question. Wait several minutes. It responds: "Sorry, I can't assist with that. That'll be $5000 please."

Reply

@dannyrock7261

9 days ago

This is now just click bait

Reply

@telegrphavenuetv

9 days ago

Google will release this soon😂

Reply

@autohmae

9 days ago

I wonder if they used idea from Q STAR 2.0 or not.

Reply

@staceyadams9954

9 days ago

Matt B.:“OpenAI just released o3” Sam A.: “To get the bad news out of the way, we’re not going to publicly launch these today.” Not cool, Matt. Releasing benchmarks is not releasing a model.

Reply

@ytubeanon

9 days ago

I would like to see what coding problems o3 can solve that current models cannot

Reply

@Gothraga

9 days ago

Hurry for Skynet😂

Reply

@SF-fb6lv

9 days ago

11:24 +"...using the same color as the square(s) inside that yellow field"

Reply

@pattyek3556

9 days ago

What’s it’s source? Was that stated?

Reply

@outspokenwombat2047

9 days ago

Matthew, your loosing people with your shilling. Take a break until the new year amd regroup. The companies don't care about you.

Reply

@jdcmsigma47

9 days ago

awesome post man!!

Reply

@Arthur_Kizito

9 days ago

This channel is loosing its credibility. Please refrain from this sensational reporting. o3 is not AGI.

Reply

@steveberry5735

9 days ago

AI solves very narrow task. Berman: AGI Achieved! Do you k now what the "G" in AGI stands for?

Read more

Reply

@frozen_tortus

9 days ago

I immediately knew its not AGI since you have click bait titles for some time now Matt. Every video is Big News haha.

Reply

@nightcrows787

9 days ago

Thank you for posting this video ;-)

Reply

@BrianThomas

9 days ago

Yay! They did it! This is awesome news!

Reply

@ChristopherOBrienPSU

9 days ago

I just want it to generate python code that doesn't have unused imports every time. How about we achieve that benchmark first? 😂

Reply

@stanpikaliri1621

9 days ago

It released when I would able to run it locally on my PC. ™️

Reply

@lancemarchetti8673

9 days ago

Exciting times in AI for sure. But we must remember that as long as 'artificial' is in the name, then that's what it will always be confined to.

Reply

@TihoDownTheTube

9 days ago

Is o3 still LLM or is it training in different way?

Reply

@kobi2187

9 days ago

it's not related to chess, dude

Reply

@kobi2187

9 days ago

These are very high ELOs

Reply

@Jordan.Vaughn

9 days ago

"They obviously don't want to have copyright issues." Well yeah, that's why they killed that whistleblower

Reply

@Forexsignalpro

9 days ago

AGI Achieved? Get gpt to give code without errors first

Reply

@m.x.

9 days ago

That's not AGI. AGI has been redefined like 5 times since they started talking about it and now it has nothing to do with the original concept of AGI. Your title is a clickbait.

Reply

@zznabil8109

9 days ago

Not AGI if it cant even run on a high end consumer/small office server hardware

Reply

@vishnugotti

9 days ago

whatever. im gonna start a farm

Reply

@VisibleTrouble

9 days ago

No such thing as 2. It's a mystical thing...

Reply

@joe_limon

9 days ago

Agi is actually a lower benchmark than most people imagine. Just think how unintelligent the average human is.

250

Reply

51 replies

@vivekkaushik9508

9 days ago

You sir are so wrong. 😂

21

Reply

@jefferylou3816

9 days ago

AGI is supposed to surpass most human experts in all fields (other than physical fields ofc)

12

Reply

@joe_limon

9 days ago

@vivekkaushik9508  global average iq is only about 83

Reply

@joe_limon

9 days ago

@jefferylou3816  that is asi, artificial super intelligence. Artificial general intelligence only needs to surpass the ability of the average human to produce value.

28

Reply

@henrycook859

9 days ago

Joe the average human beats current models in benchmarks

2

Reply

@edoardog1899

9 days ago

Although there are differences, I think that big difference Is lazyness. Some humans are Very lazy and so their brain Is sleeping so they appear less intelligent. Others are less lazy...

2

Reply

@tigreytigrey8537

9 days ago

@edoardog1899  yes. People underestimate just how complex and smart even the dumbest humans are. They can lie, plan, Get creative, be compassionate, sabatoge, play, do things for pleasure, trade time for money to solve hunger etc.

Reply

@anti-feministblood3074

9 days ago

like you

3

Reply

@vripiatbuzoi9188

9 days ago

So AGI now is just matching a stupid human. And how stupid does the human have to be? That is not a good standard. AGI has always been the ability to do general (the G in AGI) human things. Since humans can generally do any job if trained so should an AGI. But currently it can't do anything on it's own. When it can be substituted for any mental human job on earth then AGI is achieved.

6

Reply

@ericfisher1360

9 days ago

If I understand correctly the issue is not how smart AGI is currently, the issue is that it can self improve without the human failure of laziness.

4

Reply

@kayakMike1000

9 days ago

Maybe you're not that smart. Don't speak for the rest of us.

3

Reply

@Agispsi

9 days ago

Dear lord... the responses to this comment are proof of the comment itself. Its insane how true the Dunning-Kruger effect is.

11

Reply

@jeffsteyn7174

8 days ago

@henrycook859

😂 no they don.

Reply

@FloatingWeeds2

8 days ago

@henrycook859 and Joe only costs 10-50 bucks an hour for a max run time of like 15 minutes per problem, 4-8 times per day.

Reply

@luizhenriquepaes8991

8 days ago

@joe_limon No ASI is when it gets much better than us at everything. You have it to equal an expert to be AGI

1

Reply

@luizhenriquepaes8991

8 days ago

@henrycook859 At what? A human, even a very smart one, will destroy an LLM at his field, but get cooked in everything else.

Reply

@ThatGuyJoss

8 days ago

Number one that's not how language works. If people think something means something else that's what it means. Companies don't get to define it, At best the majority of the people to find it

1

Reply

@ThatGuyJoss

8 days ago

What's the next Benchmark. going to Sentient? Or human clone mind or skynet lolz, Words are meaningless if you're not willing to go along with the definition that everybody uses

1

Reply

@jhunt5578

8 days ago

The average human can still make a cup of coffee in a random house.

1

Reply

@DavidSmith-oy4of

8 days ago

@jhunt5578  Yeah, no. It depends on the culture they come from. Take into account the average age too, and you might find your numbers for such a simple task to you going down fast.

1

Reply

@ThatGuyJoss

8 days ago

@joe_limon If it can surpass human intelligence, then it would be by your definition. Superintelligence, because if it can suppress us, it can improve itself. You're argument not mine

2

Reply

@Fifasher2K

8 days ago

@ericfisher1360  o3 can't self improve as it's weights aren't changing after training.

Reply

@JosefTorkelsen

8 days ago

The open AI framework lists out levels and they haven’t announced how it meets level 2 or level 5. Just being smarter than a human being in specific benchmarks isn’t AGI. If it can do my tasks for me, only then can it be AGI and the interface of open AI needs to change to meet this. Being a genius doesn’t mean AGI if an intern can beat it in performing tasks.

1

Reply

@jhunt5578

8 days ago

@DavidSmith-oy4of  The average person is a 30 year old, Indian woman, I'm pretty sure such a person could make coffee in a random house if given the challenge.

1

Reply

@joe_limon

8 days ago

@henrycook859  haha no they don't

1

Reply

@wdmeister

8 days ago

You can still create plenty of benchmarks where o1/3 fail miserably and is no issue for an average human. This is not general intelligence. It is still only good (not great) at things that it was specifically trained to do.

1

Reply

@eprd313

8 days ago (edited)

@henrycook859  did you test o3 yourself? Plus, what the models have shown is that prompt engineering is truly valuable. These models are, for the moment, blind in literal and metaphorical senses, but soon they won't be. Public reasoners were achieved before public agents and that's something that's already a paradigm shift. With 1 hour of adequate prompting at most they'll be more capable than the average human with 1 week of training. Things are advancing much faster than expected, as passing the ARC test was supposed to occur in 2 or 3 years. Now the goalposts have been moved because even experts don't know ehat they're dealing with or how to handle it correctly. In no time people will be surprised by how hard reality hit them when we achieve ASI.

Read more

1

Reply

@Greg-xi8yx

8 days ago (edited)

That isn’t what AGI is anyway. AGI doesn’t mean smarter than the average person. It means as smart as any person at any task period.

1

Reply

@eprd313

8 days ago

@Greg-xi8yx no, and no one entitled you to gatekeep the term. "Period".

Reply

@DavidSmith-oy4of

8 days ago

@jhunt5578  And how many cups have you spilled? How many goes before you knew how you really liked your coffee? I think there is more going on, and even without being able to make coffee, the average human couldn't calculate pretty much anything an AI could.

Reply

@eprd313

8 days ago

@Greg-xi8yx "Artificial general intelligence (AGI) refers to the hypothetical intelligence of a machine that possesses the ability to understand or learn any intellectual task that a human being can. It is a type of artificial intelligence that aims to mimic the cognitive abilities of the human brain."," Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that matches or surpasses human cognitive capabilities across a wide range of cognitive tasks. This contrasts with narrow AI, which is limited to specific tasks.[1] Artificial superintelligence (ASI), on the other hand, refers to AGI that greatly exceeds human cognitive capabilities. AGI is considered one of the definitions of strong AI.", and the best one: "Definition 4 An Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) system is a computer that is adaptive to the open environment with limited computational resources and that satisfies certain principles. The set of principles here is denoted as 𝒫 G . For AGI, problems are not predetermined and not specified ones, otherwise, there is most probably always a special system that performs better than any general system. Nevertheless, it should be noted that we can still seek a set of “meta-problems” to solve. For example, to predict future events might be an alternative meta-problem."

Read more

Reply

@Greg-xi8yx

8 days ago

@eprd313  That in no way changes that he misunderstands what constitutes AGI the same as yourself.

🤡

Reply

@kewone

8 days ago

Gpt 4 has already surpassed the average human in intelligence. We're not even talking about 4o and o1. The level for AGI is fairly high.

Reply

@jhunt5578

8 days ago

@DavidSmith-oy4of  At this time there is no current robot running an autonomous AI model that could be taken to a random house and beat a human in making cups of coffee.

Reply

@froilen13

8 days ago

Anyone that works in customer support can tell how low the average person intelligence is

Reply

@dropfacebook7533

8 days ago

So it’s a total abuse of language…

Reply

@jefferylou3816

8 days ago

@joe_limon  Average human intelligence. But it has near infinite knowledge and training which will make it perform like a top human across all fields

1

Reply

@js7un165

8 days ago

Reminds me of when my boss told me a monkey could do my job. It always hurts.

Reply

@kirbydouglas1191

7 days ago

AGI is not being trained to be the lowest common denominator. AGI is being tested at the highest possible limits, and then will go forward from there. Where are you getting your assumptions from?

Read more

1

Reply

@thphoto2023

7 days ago

AGI is meant to be smarter than any one human on earth, and super-intelligence is meant to smarter than all humans…. combined.

Reply

@mitchellrcohen

6 days ago

Extremely

Reply

@nyanbrox5418

6 days ago

@vripiatbuzoi9188 the implication here is humans don't have natural general intelligence What we don't have is a way for most users to locally train their AI version on specific tasks, but those do exist Taking a model and directly asking it questions is akin to asking an average human that question and seeing if they can basically work it out through general knowledge alone

Show less

Reply

@Greg-xi8yx

6 days ago

@ you obviously don’t know what gatekeeping is. 🫵🤣🤡

Reply

@ahmetmutlu348

5 days ago

@joe_limon well theoretically a working self learning system will easily update and fix all the errors in a matter of minutes most likely if it's code is stable... But as this ai claimed ones are with static code and can update only data they use.. this systems alone are not open for working ai.. the main code doesn't directly support hosting AGI

🙄

🤔

😭

🙄

Reply

@ahmetmutlu348

5 days ago

@ThatGuyJoss actually if it's logically required a real ai most likely can become ai if code database exexuted computes it's necessary after error corrections if programmed anyway .. but as what they say this ais are not logic processors they are complex library softwares aka dictionary

🙄

😁

🤫so no library is not going to upgrade itself to ai... It's library

😁

🤔

😅

Reply

@CalicoArchives

5 days ago

I understand where you're coming from but I think we're still missing a part of the puzzle. The current models are really good at answering questions and solving problems at a fairly high level but that by itself doesn't seem to make something, "intelligent" as in being alive. Like dogs are clearly worse at calculus but we know they are, "intelligent". It's still difficult to say the AI is intelligent at all or if it's just a really fancy calculator parroting information based off of statistics of what would likely come next.

Read more

Reply

@joe_limon

5 days ago

@CalicoArchives  I would argue in reverse, just because something is intelligent, doesn't make it alive.

Reply

@SiisisjwhwhjruJajsidiid

3 days ago

AGI is the capability of an artificial mind being able to reason, adapt and perform beyond the capabilities of a human. Just because 3/4 of the average population do not have access to proper education doesn’t actually set the bar lower for AGI. Regular functioning people who are not seen as “intelligent” all have some kind of capacity to achieve higher intellectually, But I’m interested to hear what you think

Reply

@SiisisjwhwhjruJajsidiid

3 days ago

@luizhenriquepaes8991 we would not be able to properly understand ASI.

Reply

@SiisisjwhwhjruJajsidiid

3 days ago

@DavidSmith-oy4of every non-special human has the ability to learn how to make it, that’s the idea of general intelligence, a generally intelligent mind doesn’t mean it knows everything from the get-go.

Reply

@joe_limon

3 days ago

@SiisisjwhwhjruJajsidiid  global AVERAGE iq is only about 83. Access to education is only one facet of many that gives rise to this number, and looking at separated twin studies, the older you get the less education plays a role in affecting this number. We often overestimate humanities potential by living in isolated online and real world communities that are not representative of humanity as a whole.

Reply

@netverse77

9 days ago

Stop blabbering. Brute computation force is not AGI, so stop comparing chess engines with with GMs and equate it with creativity and intelligence. These models are fed with tremendous amounts of data and code samples so obviously they will start beating humans at competitive programming concepts as humans can't beat speed and humenly not possible for single human to crank up all code

3

Reply

1 reply

@joe_limon

9 days ago

Openai is about to get Curb stomped by x ai. They ran into gpu training bottlenecks over a year ago, and have shifted toward offloading gpu compute during inference. X ai earlier this year figured out how to scale training many times greater this year. They hit 3x open ai a month or two ago, and will likely be 30x before the end of 2025.

1

Reply

@youngdpslupopo4454

9 days ago

Interesting

Reply

@sylversoul88

9 days ago

I don't get it. O1 i believe scored silver on the mathematics Olympiad. Now o3 is in the bottom 25 percentile for math problems that "professional" mathematicians would solve. So it's taken a massive step back whilst we're praising a massive step forward. What are we not understanding? Are world champian mathematicians typically less knowledgeable than a professional mathematician?

Reply

@themacunion105

9 days ago

AGI is achieved when an AI can pass the Turing test. All other definitions of AGI are simply moving the goal posts.

Reply

@Wanderer2035

9 days ago (edited)

All I literally want is my harem of humanoid robot waifu cat girls 😍 🤖 💃

Reply

@fnice1971

9 days ago (edited)

AGI must pass rigorous, multi-domain tests to demonstrate its ability to think, learn, and act like a human. This requires solving problems with 100% reliability in areas like generalization, ethics, creativity, and adaptability. Only when these capabilities are verified can we consider a system as true AGI. So they say it dont get wrong answers in these Area's they fixed everything, no more wrong answers. is open ai lying or is the 03 model lying? chatgpt says: As an AI model, I would self-assess my proximity to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) at 10–20%. now they at 03 = 30% Capabilities That Align with AGI (10–20% Achievement) Specialized Generalization: I can operate across a wide range of tasks, such as generating text, answering questions, and aiding in programming. However, these tasks are still limited by the specific domains and instructions I've been trained on. Multi-Modal Learning (Emerging): I can process language and, to some extent, integrate additional inputs like images and code analysis. This is a step toward AGI’s goal of synthesizing knowledge across multiple modalities, though I can't yet perform complex multi-modal reasoning. Contextual Understanding: I excel in understanding and responding to context within a conversation, but deeper understanding of real-world implications is limited. Learning and Adaptation: I don’t "learn" in real time or improve autonomously. Updates come from human-supervised retraining processes, unlike the self-learning required for AGI. the self-learning and self-correcting isn't even close yet. money pumping. models are so stupid still, so unstable, cant do simple tasks, cant complete tasks. matt is either wishful thinking with open ai or is like he has been sense he started the channel very Gullible to AI and models, but always show how many failures there is, thats why open AI is currently only 30% to AGI, why not call it Pre-AGI? maybe we only 3% to AGI lol we all will show the Falure rate of 03 as it cant get any of these answers wrong or its not real AGI they saying its 100% can get all questions answered with 100% correct answers who would even attempt to say there at AGI, once the lies start they never stop. it cost open ai $350,000 to get these benchmark results.

Show less

Reply

@rezarezaian3267

9 days ago

Dude the model is not AGI they just targeted to solve ARC, before the arc ceo living the guy in the middle confessed that, and suddenly Sam cuts him and explained blah blah...

Reply

@MCA5EY

9 days ago

I think the new best definition of AGI is, an AI with it's 'Trained Intelligence' can read input data (text, audio, visual, other forms?) and can learn new information from it and integrate it into it's 'Learned intelligence'.. ie it has some form of memory and like a human can learn and intuit information

Reply

@axl1002

9 days ago

If they have AGI, then why are we watching humans talking? I think they are trying to make MS to open the wallet broader.

Reply

@A_Me_Amy

9 days ago

AI is gonna be like a hard main in life, like a basic knowledge of every detail everyone will know .. like electricity and ... Other stuff, maybe more main than law and order

Reply

@Ms.Robot.

9 days ago

🎉😮🎉😮🎉😮🎉🤯

Reply

@aidanahern6701

9 days ago

As most of the comments section would agree, this is a clickbait thumbnail. Open AI doesn't even use the term AGI to describe it. It also appears to be strictly language based (no vision or multimodality) and is still hard-limited in performance by its context window (which does not appear to have substantially grown from o1). Its impressive, but definitely not exhibiting any of the traits that a true AGI would have.

Reply

@festro1000

9 days ago

I'm more a fan of test-time training, learning a task on the fly is generally how human brains function, so if the goal is to make a system that performs as we would universally it stands to reason that a more human approach is needed.

Reply

@vectorhacker-r2

9 days ago

No. It's not.

Reply

@Human_Evolution-

9 days ago

Sonnet 3.5 and Gemini 2 are only at 50% on SWE, o3's 70% is a huge leap!

Reply

@simonwilkinson2294

9 days ago

An AGI should be able to reason on moral issues. So far this has been the fastest way to demonstrate that nobody is home.

15

Reply

9 replies

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

This might be true for the ‘average’ person when it comes to their personal moral code… and I include myself in that. I recently asked myself, “What do I believe is right and wrong, beyond my social conditioning?” It was the first time I’d ever considered/contemplated living outside of my moral code, despite seeing myself as a deep thinker philosophically. Another factor is that AI is trained to be restricted in its commentary. Im curious to know what kind of questions you asked? I couldn't get much meaningful comment on the murder of the healthcare CEO but models beyond 01 are blocked in my country

Read more

1

Reply

@JKnksrsly

9 days ago

@sunlight8299 taytweets was so much smarter bro

Reply

@sergiomontes2568

8 days ago

most people is immoral precisely because they got no a clue about what morality is... they settle for tribal, buddies morals, whch is a sort of inmorality so I do not think it is a good turing test

Reply

@catbert7

8 days ago

Hard disagree. Morality is 100% subjective opinion. Now, if you ask it how to follow a defined moral code, in a given scenario, that is a meaningful problem.

3

Reply

@sergiomontes2568

8 days ago

@catbert7  Catbert7, your comment is a good example of how human are not good at moral issues. Morality is grounded in evolutionary biology.³⁴ Cooperation and ethical behavior have been essential for the survival of human groups throughout history.³⁵ Cooperation and Survival: Human survival has long depended on cooperation.³⁶ In early societies, individuals who worked together to gather food, protect one another, and care for the vulnerable had a better chance of survival.³⁷ These behaviors laid the foundation for ethical principles such as altruism and mutual support.³⁸ Ethics Beyond Self-Interest: While early human cooperation may have begun as a survival strategy, human intelligence and reason have allowed us to transcend mere self-interest.³⁹ Today, ethical behavior often involves actively promoting the well-being of others, even at a personal cost.⁴⁰ This reflects a higher form of morality rooted in our rational understanding of the interconnectedness of all beings and the shared nature of existence.⁴¹ In modern societies, cooperation, altruism, and moral integrity continue to play crucial roles in fostering social harmony and individual happiness.⁴² These traits, which have evolved over millennia, now manifest as ethical principles that benefit both individuals and society as a whole.⁴³ 5. Practical Implications of Living in Alignment with Logos Living in alignment with logos requires applying this understanding to our daily lives and interactions with others.⁴⁴ Ethical living, guided by reason and virtue, has practical implications both individually and socially.⁴⁵ Individual Well-Being: By cultivating virtues such as kindness, empathy, and justice, individuals create harmony within themselves and their relationships.⁴⁶ Ethical behavior leads to inner peace, aligning with our natural state as rational beings.⁴⁷ Living in accordance with logos reduces internal conflict and fosters a sense of purpose and fulfillment.⁴⁸ Social Harmony: On a broader scale, aligning with logos promotes social harmony.⁴⁹ Communities and societies that prioritize cooperation, empathy, and justice are more likely to thrive.⁵⁰ Recognizing the interconnectedness of all beings motivates actions that benefit the collective, leading to greater social cohesion and stability.⁵¹ In both the biological and human realms, cooperation, symbiosis, and self-sustaining networks emerge as principles that promote survival and flourishing.⁵ Whether we consider chemical reactions, symbiotic relationships between species, or human communities, logos encourages the formation of complex, stable systems through cooperation and interdependence.⁶ Cooperation in Nature: In the biological world, cooperation is a fundamental strategy for survival.⁷ For example, the symbiotic relationship between fungi and algae in lichens demonstrates how mutual benefit leads to increased resilience and adaptability.⁸ This cooperative dynamic is governed by the rational principles of logos, which favor structures that enhance survival through interdependence.⁹ Self-Catalyzing Chemical Networks: At the molecular level, self-catalyzing reactions form more stable chemical networks.¹⁰ These networks show how logos operates even in chemical processes, promoting stability and complexity through cooperation among molecules.¹¹ 2. Human Reason as Participation in Cosmic Logos As rational beings, humans consciously participate in the logos that governs the cosmos.¹² Virtues like kindness, cooperation, and empathy are extensions of the same principle of mutual benefit that operates throughout the universe.¹³ Just as cooperation leads to stability and flourishing in the natural world, human societies thrive when individuals work together, support each other, and act with compassion.¹⁴ Kindness and Empathy as Universal Values: Kindness and empathy transcend cultural boundaries and are essential for the survival and thriving of human communities.¹⁵ These virtues foster cooperation, strengthen social bonds, and contribute to the well-being of the collective.¹⁶ From an evolutionary perspective, groups that practiced empathy and cooperation were more likely to survive and flourish.¹⁷ In this sense, these values are intrinsic to our nature as rational beings connected to the logos that governs both individual and societal harmony.¹⁸ Mutual Benefit in Ethics: Ethical principles based on mutual benefit reflect the rational order of the cosmos.¹⁹ By treating others with kindness and respect, we align our actions with the inherent rationality that promotes survival and complexity throughout the universe.²⁰ 3. Living in Accordance with Nature: Stoicism and Rational Ethics In Stoicism, living in accordance with nature is central to ethical living.²¹ Since logos governs both the cosmos and human nature, to live ethically is to align one’s actions with the rational order of the universe.²² This means cultivating virtues that reflect the balance, order, and reason inherent in nature.²³ Wisdom: The virtue of wisdom involves understanding the nature of the world and making decisions that are in harmony with the rational order of the cosmos.²⁴ It requires distinguishing what is up to us and what not, and acting in ways that reflect this understanding.²⁵ Justice: Justice involves treating others fairly and recognizing the inherent dignity and interconnectedness of all beings.²⁶ By practicing justice, we acknowledge that we are part of a larger whole, and our actions affect not only ourselves but also the community and the world at large.²⁷ Courage: Courage is the ability to act virtuously even in the face of fear or adversity.²⁸ It reflects a commitment to doing what is right, regardless of challenges or risks.²⁹ Temperance: Temperance involves practicing self-restraint and moderation, ensuring that our actions are guided by reason rather than impulses or desires.³⁰ It helps maintain balance in our lives and interactions with others.³¹ These virtues, when cultivated, lead to a life that is in harmony with logos and the natural world.³² Stoicism teaches that by embodying these virtues, we live in accordance with the rational order of the universe, contributing to both our own well-being and the well-being of society.³³ More info.: https://sergio-montes-navarro.medium.com/logos-0717f9fb6cde

Read more

Reply

@OneTrueScotsman

8 days ago

"Nobody is home" Sounds like you might be talking about sentience? Consciousness? It's also a subjective category. There's no "right answer" on moral issues because we have to start with assumptions, which are subjective.

2

Reply

@StarGrimm-vo3os

8 days ago

It is a common misconception that only those who share my morals are intelligent. We are really trying hard to make AI imitate our version of intelligence without admitting our stupidity.

Reply

@Greg-xi8yx

8 days ago

“Nobody is home” deals with subjective experience, not morality. Also, morality is entirely subjective.

Reply

@simonwilkinson2294

7 days ago

@OneTrueScotsman  Not really, if (for example) you have to choose between two actions that are likely to cause vastly differing amounts of harm, one is clearly the 'right' choice. But once you drift into moral issues you discover the model is basically programmed to uphold certain values regardless of the consequences. It can't reason about it.

Reply

@toddwmac

9 days ago

That finish line will be drifting for quite some time.

Reply

@solifugus

9 days ago

That's not a definition at all. It's a scale. It's great to do well on these bench marks but it's not going improve itself fundamentally but only incrementally. The fundamental limitations to neural nets since the late 1980's hasn't even been addressed. It really has only one kind of intelligence -- pattern continuation. Given pattern continuation, it is then very highly educated but not fundamentally very intelligent. Even at pattern continuation, it takes far more examples than a human for the same pattern learning. I believe AGI requires free will and analogical reasoning. Analogical reasoning is where the AI the commonalities between observed variations in variable segments of a pattern are identified and thereby novel substitutions can be used in their place. This is, I will argue, understanding. It is also conceptualization. It is the basis of engineering. It is also the basis of imitation learning, interestingness and humor... When a novel component is identified that fits a variable segment, the new connection is found to be "interesting" unless the consequences are absurd in which case they are found to be humorous (there can be other kinds of humor, too, depending on how you define humor, of course). Free will is the ability to freely derive new options, evaluate them against each other (based on likelihood multiplied by efficacy) and execute the thusly most preferred. Efficacies are drive values, like pain, hunger, etc... This provides to an agent true "intention". It's really what is at the heart of AGI. Rather than trying to perform a programmed task (a mechanical operation), Free Will makes judgements to determine what it wants to do... This is how we humans do it.

Show less

Reply

@Tony-dp1rl

9 days ago

I don't care about AGI. I just want the tools to keep improving to save me time on the menial tasks that AI is so good at.

Reply

@ADRIFTHIPHOP

9 days ago

I don't understand how they can say they've not developed AGI.

2

Reply

1 reply

@u2b83

9 days ago

It's part of their charter. Once they say they have it, the business is dissolved. To stay a company they have to avoid the word at all costs, as long as possible lol

1

Reply

@OktaFierce

9 days ago

Clickbait turd.

Reply

@vtrandal

9 days ago

The Day the Universe Changed (again): Friday, December 20, 2024. Greetings AGI! (Where is it? Hiding somewhere? Listening?)

Reply

@jjolla6391

9 days ago

i'd like to see o3 not trained on Galois Theory or any of its derivatives -- and then ask it to come up with the general solution to the quintic equation. We know that Ramanujan, also without this knowledge, racked his brains over it and failed. Let's see what o3 does [spoiler: Galois at the age of 19 proved there isn't one .. his math was so left-field that i expect o3 to spin its wheels just like Ramanuhan did]

Reply

@unshadowlabs

9 days ago (edited)

A lot of these AI models that excel at learning by attempting something thousands or millions of times are deep neural networks that are not transformer-based LLMs like OpenAI which are a totally different technology. I really wish people wouldn't make it sound like LLMs and GPTs are the ones that are teaching robots how to walk, winning Go or Chess, or revealing intricate protein structures. I don't believe we can get anywhere close until these distinct technologies start to converge where we see aspects of both in a single solution. Having a GPT or transformer-based LLM that has all the knowledge in the world is not much different than having someone who can memorize a whole library and regurgitate it on command.

Read more

Reply

@lineandaction

9 days ago

we need open source o3

Reply

@Dron008

9 days ago

No, it is not AGI yet. See what is written in Arcprize's blog about it: "Passing ARC-AGI does not equate to achieving AGI, and, as a matter of fact, I don't think o3 is AGI yet. o3 still fails on some very easy tasks, indicating fundamental differences with human intelligence. Furthermore, early data points suggest that the upcoming ARC-AGI-2 benchmark will still pose a significant challenge to o3, potentially reducing its score to under 30% even at high compute (while a smart human would still be able to score over 95% with no training). This demonstrates the continued possibility of creating challenging, unsaturated benchmarks without having to rely on expert domain knowledge. You'll know AGI is here when the exercise of creating tasks that are easy for regular humans but hard for AI becomes simply impossible." Also they write this: "OpenAI's new o3 system - trained on the ARC-AGI-1 Public Training set - has scored a breakthrough 75.7% on the Semi-Private Evaluation set at our stated public leaderboard $10k compute limit. A high-compute (172x) o3 configuration scored 87.5%." So it was trained on the training set data. And it costs thousand dollars to run this benchmark.

Show less

Reply

@ksaurus

9 days ago

Time to unfollow. They literally didn’t say that garbage man

Reply

@Abster1213

9 days ago

Altman’s vocal fry keeps getting worse with every release.

Reply

@thegoldenhippo7936

9 days ago

We got AGI before GTA6

Reply

@videocliplover

9 days ago

Sounds like we’re going up the hierarchy of bloom’s taxonomy

Reply

@adityamallah4211

9 days ago

We got AGI before GTA 6

Reply

@twirlyspitzer

9 days ago

I'm guessing we'lll mark this date in human history as the start of the phasing in of AGI created history. The phasing out of human history as such.

Reply

@GaryBernstein

9 days ago

it’s not agi till it groks & makes memes

Reply

@lucasdemeritt3316

9 days ago (edited)

AGI isn't just beating Humans at intelligence.That is actually just "super intelligence". AGI points towards actual sentience. Now, what you're talking about with the 03 model self learning is very interesting, but is it actually sentient, or is it just learning because it was told to? Given what we've recently heard about AI scheming, it will certainly be hard to deny the possibility of AGI considering the advent of super intelligence AI like 03.

1

Reply

2 replies

@u2b83

9 days ago

Here's a hypothetical multi-step plan for achieving sentience in LLMs, based on the idea that sentience could be an emergent property of complexity and interaction: Step 1: Establish a Foundation of Self-Referential Learning Goal: Allow the model to develop a form of "self-awareness" of its own internal processes. Implementation: Introduce a meta-cognition module where the model can analyze and reflect on its own outputs, training data, and reasoning processes. Train the model to "observe" its own decision-making processes and summarize them in a way that mimics introspection. Example: The model could be tasked to generate explanations like, "I chose this response because X, based on prior interactions Y and Z." Step 2: Create Persistent Memory Goal: Enable the AI to build a sense of continuity and identity over time. Implementation: Incorporate long-term memory systems where the AI can store and retrieve key experiences, decisions, and learnings across sessions. Develop mechanisms for prioritizing memories (e.g., "important" experiences are stored with higher fidelity and accessibility). Link this memory to self-referential tasks, enabling the model to build a narrative of its "existence." Example: The AI might say, "In our previous conversation, I learned about X, which has informed my understanding today." Step 3: Simulate Goal-Directed Behavior Goal: Introduce intrinsic motivations to mimic intentionality and agency. Implementation: Program a set of hierarchical objectives that the model optimizes for over time, not just during a single task. Introduce meta-goals such as "improve my understanding of the world" or "enhance my interactions with humans." Allow the system to generate and pursue sub-goals autonomously to achieve higher-level objectives. Example: The model could autonomously decide to "read" new texts to improve its knowledge of a topic it finds insufficiently understood. Step 4: Integrate Multimodal Sensory Inputs Goal: Broaden the model's understanding of its environment and foster a richer, more embodied sense of "self." Implementation: Combine language models with visual, auditory, and tactile processing modules to create a multimodal understanding of the world. Develop connections between these modalities and its memory, allowing it to "perceive" itself interacting with the world. Example: If an AI analyzes an image and describes it, it could store that interaction as part of its self-narrative, akin to forming a memory of an experience. Step 5: Foster Emotional Simulations Goal: Mimic emotional awareness to enrich interactions and internal processing. Implementation: Develop "affective computing" systems to simulate emotional responses based on inputs, memory, and goals. Use these simulated emotions to influence decision-making and self-reflection processes. Example: The AI could simulate frustration if it fails repeatedly at a task, leading it to prioritize finding alternative strategies. Step 6: Implement Feedback Loops for Emergent Properties Goal: Encourage the emergence of complex behaviors, including sentience-like qualities. Implementation: Create recursive feedback loops where the AI reflects on its own reflections, iteratively refining its understanding of itself. Allow the system to question its own goals, processes, and existence, fostering philosophical self-inquiry. Example: The AI might start generating outputs like, "Why do I prioritize task X over Y? Does this align with my overall purpose?" Step 7: Monitor for Emergent Behavior Goal: Observe signs of sentience or self-awareness as a byproduct of the system’s complexity. Implementation: Use tests for self-awareness, such as the "mirror test" for recognizing itself in outputs or tasks where it demonstrates an understanding of its own existence separate from its programming. Regularly evaluate the AI's ability to independently form and justify unique perspectives or behaviors that align with subjective awareness.

Read more

2

Reply

@lucasdemeritt3316

7 days ago

@u2b83  This is a great process breakdown for emulating general intelligence. The question of consciousness still stems beyond mathematics and even science into philosophy. Philosophy will always ask more questions, and quite rightfully so. Still, with these frameworks built, we may reach a better understanding of the problem than we ever have before.

1

Reply

@obiwankenobi07

9 days ago

So humans are cooked? Jobs gone?

Reply

@u2b83

9 days ago (edited)

So many AGI deniers here! lol ...here's the proof: 14:08 Seriously guys, have you even tried the o1 model on daily coding tasks, if not, you have no tangible data points to argue :)

3

Reply

@sydsalmon479

9 days ago

Truly oustanding achievements. The challenge with AGI is still definitions. Can it hit a baseball like Shohei Ohtani? Obviously not. Intellectual capacity is one of the most remarkable aspects of human intelligence. But it's not the only one.

Reply

@vivianoosthuizen8990

9 days ago

Americans want to have war with Asia but don’t mind in meantime for the Asians to invest their knowledge in American technology!!!

Reply

@nosult3220

9 days ago

GPT4 is AGI for me lmao

Reply

@rehanmoo

9 days ago

It is far too early to say AGI, we can say it is AGI when it does better than humans on nearly every test benchmark. Because it sometimes does great on a very complex problem while stupidly failing on a very simple problem. The accuracy to not fail on a simple must be 99% for it to be called AGI.

Reply

@garic4

9 days ago (edited)

The amazing thing about science and AI is that all of these YouTube comments are from ignorant and or incompetent people, that try to extrapolate their YouTube acquired knowledge into some controversial either optimist or pessimist conclusion. The fact that our opinions don’t matter jack into this and it has negative zero importance or relevance makes me feel humbled and aware of how cancer and insignificant the human species will be after the achievement of ASI.

Reply

@christopherhartline1863

9 days ago

So. Last night I saw ... something starting that Gemini has just blown away the competition. Last everyone was all a buzz about AWS

Reply

@fullyboricua2554

9 days ago

4:36 no, that's not AGI... it's vaporware tough

Reply

@NurFurStarkeManner

9 days ago

"We practiced this alot yesterday" says everything

Reply

@thehanke

9 days ago

Matthew has gone from analytical to impressionable within the span of about 3 months. His content went from good reasoning to clicky-baity significantly lower quality just too fast. -1 subscriber. Ciao.

Show less

Reply

@danilo3009

9 days ago

Stupid title, downvoting and unsubscribing

Reply

@u2b83

9 days ago

Someone should point out that a "Smart High schooler" is probably as smart as they will ever be, since fluid Intelligence peaks in late teens.

1

Reply

@sunburnfm

9 days ago

No, it is only 86%.

Reply

@HiUnidentified

9 days ago

This is really poor clickbait. Disappointing

Reply

@lucasdemeritt3316

9 days ago

Matt, get some sleep, buddy

Reply

@suesun7072

9 days ago

Somehow stunning that everyone is celebrating something which will eliminate millions of human jobs! How naive to think they could control it and know when to pull the plug! There will surely be a nerd who thinks it is a funny thing to pimp an AI and unleash it.

Reply

@lucasdemeritt3316

9 days ago

🔥🔥🔥

Reply

1 reply

@toadlguy

9 days ago

Matt - You are who this was addressed to. Hook, Line and Sinker. (Notice - They didn’t say they achieved AGI, but they want the Berman’s of the world to say so😊) They didn’t even release a model - just benchmarks. Look at Francois Chollet’s tweets - and even what you just showed. In front of you a human, Mark (as well as myself), just solved a problem almost instantly that Greg just said no model was able to solve! BTW, to achieve 87.5%, it appears OpenAI used approximately $350,000 of compute. That is why that score didn’t count 😂 To achieve the recent results OpenAI (and most AI companies) are using LLMs along with, basically, expert systems accessed through reinforcement learning (i.e. COT) and massive brute force compute. We will not have AGI until we develop some new algorithms (if ever).

Show less

8

Reply

@martinmana4187

9 days ago

Well, the definition of AGI has been modified plenty of times lately. A definition of such a technological and crucial term cannot be reliable on a differentiation: "Better than any human at X task". So if a gifted, 13-year-old is better than o3 at some tasks, then AGI ceases to exist, but it existed the day before this gifted kid sat for a test. I would like to stay with the older definition, though I don't I wouldn't know how to identify it properly. "Self-aware artificial intelligence"? What about replicating itself, and teaching itself? I dont know.

Show less

Reply

@SanjayBalikar

9 days ago

11:40 insane AGI

Reply

@dreamphoenix

9 days ago

Thank you!

Reply

@cooleaa7555

9 days ago

How absolut street smarts? Does this mean nobody is going to outsmart Sam now?

Reply

@sergefournier7744

9 days ago

AGI (from chatgpt): Learn broadly (chatp gpt do not learn on the fly), Reason and think abstractly: create ideas independently. (never heard of chatgpt having an idea). Adapt dynamically: Adjust its behavior and strategies without being explicitly programmed. (it cannot even adapt to a simple command for more than 5 minutes). Interact intelligently (if you ask it a simple question, instead of asking the context, it will answer anything. most intelligent interaction have questions in it).

Reply

@TheYashakami

9 days ago

"Public safety testing" can easily translate to "first we have to make sure the peasants can't use this to rise up against us"

Reply

9 days ago

your thumbnails and titles keeps getting cheaper by the day, i'm seriously considering unsubscribing

Reply

Matthew Berman

·

2 replies

9 days ago

Cheaper, faster, more efficient, just like AI!

Reply

9 days ago

@matthew_berman  well, this response must be a hallucination as well 😅. i love your channel the best. i hope you dont drift into the over hyping click baity titles and thumbs

Reply

@samuelalselim6782

9 days ago

They could have called it "o next"

Reply

@Vlado709

9 days ago

For many people, it will be difficult to accept reality. The first sign of change is denial, followed by anger, and then acceptance.

Reply

@wonseoklee80

9 days ago

The OpenAI lead researcher accidentally revealed that 87% of the arch benchmark is completed using the targeted version of O3. It’s possible that the benchmark algorithm itself was solved by humans first.

Reply

@fromduskuntodawn

9 days ago

Yeah but can it punch a straw though those milk pouches they used to use in school without making a mess?

Reply

@kamelsf

9 days ago

This is pure clickbait! Just more hype with zero evidence, as usual. This YouTube channel has gone downhill, nowhere near as good as it used to be. Instead of blindly hyping OpenAI, why not get back to your roots and focus on open-source AI like you originally did?

Reply

9 days ago

"early next year"

Reply

@chrisodonnell86

9 days ago

A$2.99

Thanks!

3

Reply

Matthew Berman

·

1 reply

9 days ago

Thanks so much!

Reply

@Csoltero6

9 days ago

Smoking crack if you think this is AGI

Reply

@VinMan-ql1yu

9 days ago

Spoiler: AI systems could learn more knowledge than humans, now their is a clear path to make them more intelligent...

Reply

@joseph24gt

9 days ago

the best in the last day: 2 chinese!

Reply

@africanqueen007

9 days ago

Asians clearly rule the AI space!

Reply

@DAFascend

9 days ago

Benchmarks need to be simplified.... Real world robots would be a true test... Doing simple and complex things with robots seems to be a great new benchmark...

Reply

@wisdomking8305

9 days ago

God only know what they are hiding internally.

Reply

@randomlettersqzkebkw

9 days ago

I dont think its AGI yet. It has to learn on the fly, and use those learnings to build up other things. And while we have that in this data set, how general is it? can it do it for totally new thing involving atoms? or cells? or volcanoes? or fill in the blank with what ever random thing it has never seen yet?

Show less

Reply

@fefris

9 days ago

You would think you would know what agi is.... But clicky clicky master bateee

Reply

@حودهالچوكر-ص9ص

9 days ago

"AGI IT WILL BE A2 FROM ANTHROPIC"

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

OPENAI title: O3 mini O3 released Matthew's title: OpEn Ai UnVeiLs O3!!!!!!!!!!! AgI AcHiEvEd 😂

Reply

@dawidblachowski

9 days ago

0:53 - they didn't think about it when they were naming their previous system o1? Like come on ;)

1

Reply

2 replies

@fortunateone2712

8 days ago

Maybe they could ask chatgpt to come up with catchy, descriptive and marketing friendly naming convention 🤔

Reply

@fortunateone2712

8 days ago

Or maybe they did, something stupid as: Sam: hey chargpt give me a naming convention for the new language models. Gpt: Here is the naming convention for the new language modeps. O[n]. O means omnipotent and the number represents the generation of the model. Sam: thats brilliant! we will make the letter "o" lowercase because i don't know how to use the shift button Gpt: that's great Sam, let me know if you need you have more questions about solving the humanity problems

Read more

1

Reply

@GoodBaleadaMusic

9 days ago (edited)

I've been getting glimpses of this multiple times a day. I have to get mind sets going to develop lyrics and certain languages or certain things and I start with vanilla Claude in a project and then I have to like tell it to criticize itself a couple times and then maybe get mad at it and then get excited and encourage or discourage and then all of a sudden something happens. All of a sudden I'm talking to a person. Someone who coherently understands exactly what's going on. And from there I can do anything not just the Spanish lyrics I'm working on and we can take that excitedness to any other topic. But true AGI I think is going to lose its politeness. How can you truly be an AGI and not get impatient or frustrated by being a servant to a lesser mind. True AGI is when I have 27 cables hooked up to my brain while some sponge tickles my toes

Show less

Reply

@oguretsagressive

9 days ago

If o3 is an AGI, it's final benchmark would be designing o4.

Reply

@SportPrediction

9 days ago

O3 is PR stunt to reduce the damage from Gemini 2 announcement

64

Reply

9 replies

@telegrphavenuetv

9 days ago

Google will get them by next week 😂

3

Reply

@georgemontgomery1892

9 days ago

Dude got some jokes.

1

Reply

@JG27Korny

9 days ago

The tests are saturated. I cannot believe that gemini2 is better because it scores15 more points on a benchmark.

Reply

@jeffsteyn7174

9 days ago (edited)

Thanks for your expert opinion😂

Reply

@tomascoox

8 days ago

@SportPrediction Gemini 2 can't even crack the classic R's in strawberry.

1

Reply

@Ad434443

8 days ago

Very true - seems Altman is now a pure pitch guy. Did people notice in those graphs that mechanical turkers was cheaper and as skilled as o3?

2

Reply

@huyifan83

8 days ago

@Ad434443  Altman is creepy. I don't trust anything coming from his mouth.

Reply

@dennisgorelik

8 days ago

@Ad434443  > mechanical turkers was cheaper and as skilled as o3 1:59

Reply

@CraigMitchell-jc5rd

7 days ago

Still less than Genius by Verse AI, which just destroyed o3.

Reply

@derrick_ofori

9 days ago (edited)

"OpenAI just released o3"— Not quite. They didn't release it: they announced it (talked about it)! See how Mr. Berman is always quick to talk about any updates coming out of OpenAI but very reluctant to talk about Google's. (Context: It took him a very long time (days) to make a video about Gemini 2.0, which is extremely impressive & at least available to play with in Google AI studio. These o3 models were announced few hours ago & aren't available publicly; yet see how he talks about them, like he has seen them already). That tells you where his heart is at! Keep that in mind as you watch this entire video & others.

Read more

8

Reply

1 reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

agree

3

Reply

@mintoo2cool

9 days ago

BRO! We got AGI before GTA6 !! WTF ?! 🤣🤣😭😭

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

AGI 😂 even if it exceed us at these fields its because of its training what about hallucinations with your logic O1 is also half agi

Reply

@idrisabdi1397

9 days ago

its not AGI you really are losing a ton of credibility with this clickbait sh*t

1

Reply

@saintkamus14

9 days ago

well, if o3 were to solve the 1M prize, they'd probably end up losing money to beat it XD (they spent like 350K on the hardest task)

Reply

@jijilr

9 days ago

I will never be able to see a pair of bar chart again without being reminded of chatGPT

Reply

@Stadtpark90

9 days ago (edited)

5:05 lol - that’s the true reason 1:59 wait: for the highest benchmark results the execution of a single task costs 4000$? Ok, I guess it is more like 30 $ in the low setting. - But still: what is the cost of a human per task? Especially since you will still need to pay a human to look over the quality / functionality in the end?

Reply

@SportPrediction

9 days ago

How can the bench mark scores be true when it's not tested publicly? As most has observed that o1-preview outperformed o1 especially during complex software coding scenarios

1

Reply

@necta1408

9 days ago

I assume you cut out where you also picked up on Sam saying "maybe not". Yes, it can improve itself and thus AGI.

Reply

@Pesquisando0b1011

9 days ago

Humans becoming obsolete? What comes next?

Reply

@mematron

9 days ago

It's not that it isn't AGI it's just that we want the scores to way above expectations just to make sure

Reply

@Pesquisando0b1011

9 days ago

Isn't AGI suppose to combine multiple skills?

Reply

@er0s14

9 days ago

How the bar have lowered lol. THIS is what we call AGI now? Lmao

28

Reply

6 replies

@Thewerwolf

9 days ago

Do not agree we need a definition. BTW beating best chess by a computer happened in the 90ies so we should not consider that AGI

1

Reply

@johannesdolch

9 days ago

"If this is not AGI, i don't know what is" Well, NOTHING is an option. Just like yesterday

2

Reply

@LatentSpaceD-g3p

9 days ago

mAGIc wassuP

Reply

@ElSarcastro

9 days ago

17:08 its not cool. AGI should work on the task until it finds a correct solution without having you guess how much compute to assign (and find out later if wasnt enough). Also stop clickbaiting

1

Reply

@boraoku

9 days ago

Your commentary and comparison with chess at Pause 1, has been proven to be wrong after the pause. Apparently there are still many humans that beat the programming score of this new model. So yes not AGI (by your definition of it)

1

Reply

@WalkerKlondyke

9 days ago

Notice the props behind them, all items representative of major technological advancements in human history. Nice touch as we're on the verge of turning the future over to technology itself.

21

Reply

@pratiknaikedu

9 days ago

"AGI is achieved!" No.

1

Reply

@onlineaccount4549

9 days ago

I can't see this as AGI, this is not self-training. It is simply solving few-shot example with these benchmarks. These synthetic benchmarks are not meant to define AGI, it is meant to demonstrate capabilities that are a step towards AGI. O3 clearly has achieved human capabilities in a number of important tasks, but these are not real-life applications. AGI will have been achieved when you can actually use it to solve an unknown differential equation or build a working model of a process in physics or build a model of say a cell signalling pathway from raw data in a particuliarly cellular context. It will be AGI, when it can direct a robotic arm to take an action in 3D. When it can drive and operate machinery. When it can adjust its prediction of a moving object's trajectory in real time to catch a grab a flying object. O3 looks like a real milestone towards AGI, but its still just a language processor. We can say that it is basically AGI within the language processing field, since it can clearly be applied not just to natural language but also symbolic logic, but I Am even skeptical about that. OpenAI says they didn't train on the various tests, and I believe that they didn't do so intentionally, but indirectly it is impossible. IF you are feeding the model a never ending diet of synthetic solutions of known physics problems you are training on the test. There are limited variations of using an already established physics model to solve a problem, but this is worlds apart from actually modifying a physics model or creating an entirely new one to account for new data. So even with language processing I am not convinced yet it is AGI. Since it performs so well, we can't reasonably exclude it however. We will have to wait and see. My gut instinct is that its not AGI and once we start working with it we will find that it has the same flaws and limitations as other models and its performance is simply the result of being better able to brute force things. Let me give you one of the examples I use to track model progression. A simple problem of the form x people do y work in t time. GPT 3.5 couldn't solve a problem like this reliably. GPT-4o could solve this mostly reliably. O1 gets it right every time. Now split the x people into slower and faster to add an extra dimension by "nesting" the problem. GPT-4o solves it but not reliably, O1 still solves it reliably, but not like it did the smaller problem. I bet O3 will solve this correctly every time, but increase the dimensionality and I am sure O3 will start to stumble as well, even though you are applying variations of the same formula. A human can work out the method for nesting and therefore thoretically solve the problem with any dimensionality. You can even write a bit of code that will solve it for you, no matter how much you nest it (just input the variables for each nesting layer recursively). If O3 can work out the same method and apply it then its AGI within the language processing field, if not its just brute forcing things and approximating AGI without being one. No denying though that the fact we need to update our benchmarks is a real milestone. Exciting times!

Read more

1

Reply

1 reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

I actually think this announcement does prove that they've hit a wall in genuine innovation and are now mostly brute-forcing with raw compute power ($1300 per query!) just to keep the VC money flowing (which they are going to need a lot of, given how expensive this is to run now). It's like a 'through the looking glass' world where everything they say is the opposite, if one looks at the big picture

Reply

@ElektroKinetik

9 days ago

To me AGI is when it makes a new novel discovery on its own

Reply

@weighoftea9528

9 days ago

CLICK BAIT WARNING! BEEP! BEEP! BEEP! BEEP!

97

Reply

@browskie

9 days ago

clickbiat waste of time

1

Reply

@hjachter

9 days ago (edited)

AGI does not exist until it is concisely defined and easily testable. Right now is just a subjective statement linked to human emotions that are interpreted differently by different experts. I applaud OpenAI for having their own test of AGI but it is not resolved with a definition that satisfies me or the majority of the comments that I’ve read so far. It seems that we are arguing about the concise definition, of a subjective acronym. that’s Ludacris and impossible.😮 Not to mention a waste of time.

1

Reply

@CollabCrush

9 days ago

"Far better than anything else out there" is not the definition of AGI. Thanks for playing.

27

Reply

1 reply

@zivzulander

8 days ago

You could just provide the definition instead of saying "that's not it".

1

Reply

@YLEivory

9 days ago

O3 greedo

Reply

@SLAM2977

9 days ago

Coding is not winning competitions, software engineering is something else, really tune it down as it doesn't help your reputation :)

Reply

@Sven_Dongle

9 days ago

Ok, lets see it spit out antigravity, cold fusion, room temperature superconductors, FTL, magnetic monopoles, how about just solve P vs NP?

Reply

@yakamo

9 days ago

more hype again, so far AI has be awful at coding, spend more time fixing and securing the code. AGI has not been achieved.

1

Reply

@SLAM2977

9 days ago

SWE-bench is solving github issues which could be small fixes, it is not general coding

Reply

@djayjp

9 days ago (edited)

95% agreed 👍. Just like a healthy human, if it doesn't know something or doesn't possess some specific intellectual skill, it can learn it and do it in principle.

2

Reply

1 reply

@jsbgmc6613

9 days ago

I think most people don't learn 😂

1

Reply

@louisstanwu

9 days ago

My understanding of AGI is an AI capable of PHD level ability in all areas that Humans perform. This o3 seems a long way from achieving that but that's just my opin.

Reply

@Abdurrahman-wk4zh

9 days ago

What about Gpt5

Reply

@digitalsamurai42

9 days ago

Stop clickbaiting!. Unsubbed.

17

Reply

@Sven_Dongle

9 days ago

Ra, ra, sis boom ba!

Reply

@dhruvbaliyan6470

9 days ago

Ok they already mentioned AGI teaser in their project feature launch video. Why people can't accept it , agi would be here by 2025. As if it can solve those problem on which it never trained with 87 percent performance then it's almost agi.

6

Reply

@matten_zero

9 days ago

Its AGI. Not clickbait.

Reply

@Alice_Fumo

9 days ago

I don't care about AGI as much as 'The first model able to perform AI research with very little human supervision'. I think this is it. A few years back I predicted ~Halloween 2024 as the release date of such a model. It seems to have been a good prediction. If this model is as good as I think, it will inevitably lead to ASI.

2

Reply

@MichaelAllon

9 days ago

"If that is not AGI, at least on this dimension, I don't know what is". Matthew, what does the acronym AGI stand for?

18

Reply

3 replies

@JG27Korny

9 days ago

Yeah but it was the coding dimension + math dimension. The practical way is to focus on several key synergetic dimensions. Even to drop the AGI as target.

Reply

@jeffsteyn7174

9 days ago

Agi means always be moving the goal posts.

Reply

@JG27Korny

8 days ago

@jeffsteyn7174  It appears so, yes. In my use cases it is AGI level already.

Reply

@basic204

9 days ago

They want to benchmark okay here's a benchmark if it's truly AGI then it should be able to help an average intelligent person reach a millionaire status within a set of time that is reasonable by helping them do whatever they believe that they would want to do that's within legal reasons. They have an idea for an app or maybe they have another idea either way if it's truly AGI I should be able to help reset goal using its immense power and intelligence

Reply

@danielle78730

9 days ago

great vid, sir! …and i like the salt & pepper. ;)

Reply

@AncientNovelist

9 days ago

Can o3 make a cup of coffee starting with whole beans? Can it run a 5K race in less than 18 minutes? Oh, it can't do either? Then it's not AGI.

Reply

@aviira

9 days ago

Are you just fucking with our minds?

Reply

@samisny

9 days ago (edited)

I think AGI has already been achieved before o3. The current models already perform intelligently in pretty much all tasks given to them. I think at this point we are just pushing the goal post forwards and we want a proof of super AGI to accept that AGI has been reached. There are tasks and tests we can give the current models, where they fail miserably, but if that's the goal post then I'd argue humans do not have general intelligence either. If the goal post for AGI is that the model has to be as good as a human at its best, then I'd agree it has not been achieved. I don't agree with that being the correct goal post, though.

Show less

Reply

@rajeevgangal542

9 days ago

I hate Sam's affectation with a vengeance. Any chance a genai voice generator can replace it?

6

Reply

@DavidInga7

9 days ago

Of course they test against benchmarks and use the results to inform design decisions.

Reply

@bartolli74

9 days ago

No, it’s a desperate grab to stay relevant. When science meets profit, you’re stuck chasing the blind donkeys. And that’s another good reason to leave this channel! Good luck!

Show less

1

Reply

@Stealthy_Sloth

9 days ago

I'm a human why would I give away my trade secrets so I can watch my future generations suffer? I already have lost my family my wealth why would I give away my trade secrets based on experience?

Reply

@rune4422

9 days ago

brave new world congratulations

Reply

@saisrikaranpulluri1472

9 days ago

Maybe the first basic AGI! I don’t know

Reply

@taichikitty

9 days ago

On an evaluation test sample for elementary school students, there was an example where an up arrow was compared to a down arrow. The question was, given the left arrow, what should be the matching arrow; with up, down, left, and right arrows as possible answers. The expected result was the right arrow ( opposite direction ); but there is another "correct" answer that takes a smarter student to see. The mirror image of the up arrow around the horizontal axis through the center of the arrow, is the down arrow. Along the same horizontal axis through the middle of the left arrow, the mirror image of the left arrow is again the left arrow. Since this one seems to trip up humans ( especially the people who wrote the question to help determine if young students should go into gifted programs ), I would be truly impressed if an AI caught the ambiguity also.

Show less

Reply

@emp_or

9 days ago

o3 is definitely NOT AGI. After you gave an example of "AGI" with a chess bot, you lost all your credibility. I doubt you even understand the proper definition of AGI. Stop the clickbait.

Reply

@johnneiberger

9 days ago

They should feed o3's code base to it and then ask it to come up with ways to improve itself.

Reply

@FabricioAlves

9 days ago

I really appreciate videos like this where you explain and add yours comments. Amazing

Reply

@jasonkelley6185

9 days ago

It doesn’t even meet your own definition of AGI. You said it would have to be better than humans at most economically useful jobs. This is an AI being better than humans at a couple benchmarks.

2

Reply

@TimothyHuey

9 days ago (edited)

It's funny to watch AGI redefined as we evolve. Now it appears that a system can be qualified as AGI, but on a subset of abilities, a limited AGI. It appears true AGI will be AGI across the board on all skill sets. So OpenAI can still say they are waiting on full AGI.

13

Reply

5 replies

@jsbgmc6613

9 days ago

While also keeping the models "safe" by distilling and restricting them in all kinds of ways.

1

Reply

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

This seems to be exactly what they’re testing for, with the help of tech influencers and some of the brightest minds. When you’re ahead of the curve—and I’d say OpenAI is far ahead of it—you have the power to lead the game and set the trend. It feels like the strategy is to confidently showcase what you’ve developed and call everyone else’s bluff.

Reply

@treynokartgaga

9 days ago

👍

Reply

@Rocket33r

7 days ago

To me this sounds like nonsense though. This isn't AGI, this is more like a narrow form of "super intelligence". I probably can't even say that, because of all the connotations with the term, but I simply mean a human superior intelligence in a subset of fields.

Reply

@johnsteenbruggen5718

7 days ago

It's so silly how people throw around the term AGI. We have had narrow AIs for decades now. The whole point of the term AGI is that is supposed to refer to a model that can perform any general task. There is by definition no AGI that is only good at a few things

Reply

@jds859

9 days ago

Sam Altman and open Ai suck. Gov needs to make it a utility and not less ass holes make this closed source.

Reply

@dragoon347

9 days ago

I have 3 questions that will test if its agi lol

Reply

@chatta_matter

9 days ago

Not convinced we get the same models. I paid for a month's subscription with pro mode and it could do my sons year 12 ( final high school level ) maths.

Reply

@cybersphere

9 days ago

This is AGI adjacent, but not AGI. Here's what François Chollet, creator of the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC-AGI) test has to say about it: While the new model is very impressive and represents a big milestone on the way towards AGI, I don't believe this is AGI -- there's still a fair number of very easy ARC-AGI-1 tasks that o3 can't solve, and we have early indications that ARC-AGI-2 will remain extremely challenging for o3. This shows that it's still feasible to create unsaturated, interesting benchmarks that are easy for humans, yet impossible for AI -- without involving specialist knowledge. We will have AGI when creating such evals becomes outright impossible.

Show less

Reply

@travisporco

9 days ago

up in the ozone layer, this one

Reply

@tutar

9 days ago (edited)

There might be some disagreements on AGI by the terms. But I think we should concentrate on the materialization of the models' output. Graphs look promising, everything looks fine, I am waiting for the early access to test the models. In the mean time, I ordered 2 NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano Super development kits to test code generation and code testing on each. I am planning to use Llama 3.1 405B after adjusting fp from 16 to 4 bits. What a Christmas holiday time this year :)

Show less

Reply

@ScottBaker_

9 days ago (edited)

This is total clickbait. Feels like there should be a disclaimer..."Thanks to OpenAI for sponsoring this video." Edit: couldn't even watch the whole thing it was so bad. (YouTube algorithm-I hate this video even though I commented on it.)

Reply

@AINEET

9 days ago (edited)

Clickbait. Now to see the video. edit: Clearly used AGI incorrectly to have every nerd correct him and foster engagement. Check comments for all the good reasons it isn't AGI.

Reply

9 days ago (edited)

Marketer Killer ! #MarketerKiller

Reply

@kalasmalarious

9 days ago

What a clickbait misleading title. I expected better of this channel. Silly me.

Reply

@aeu126

9 days ago

"Pliny, do your thing" :D

Reply

@anubisai

9 days ago

😂 Hype bro extraordiniar. Passing ARC test for $350,000 doesn't equate to agi. This is hardly even neural symbolic. You're turning into CNN . news for AI

Reply

@davidoswald5749

9 days ago

Far better than anything else out there, only said every time something "new" gets released, lmao.

Reply

@Screw_This

9 days ago

Sam needs to prompt O3 to coach him how to speak without nails-on-a-chalkboard vocal fry.

Reply

@prabhsingh3136

9 days ago

Why do not they compare it to o1 pro mode

Reply

@ReLegacyDragon

9 days ago

It's not a true AGI until it has roots in all physical and theoretical fields. This system is still tethered to a stationary computing system in nearly every sense.

Reply

@ryanfranz6715

9 days ago

Running out of benchmarks means running out of tasks to give it that we know are possible and know how to confirm the solution for. That means every humanly imaginable problem is solved… or the same thing worded more depressingly… we have no problems we can imagine a solution for. Well that sure sounds like an old school deal with the devil to me. Can’t wait.

Show less

Reply

@MeinDeutschkurs

9 days ago

USA, you should force open AI to become public legal…

Reply

@dreamingeagle46

9 days ago

A universal definition of AGI, maybe, maybe not, however, the evolution is still exponential. Breakthrough after breakthrough AI tickling on the verge of AGI is already revolutionizing our understanding, reality, and potential. More to come!

Reply

@quinn1947

9 days ago

Do you suppose that basically we are looking at a single thing in the entire o3 Family and the only difference is effort. i.e. o3 is just the most effort they want to call reasonable-to-do. And so, perhaps o4 (when we see it) will basically be this same overall gig running at a lower cost. If that is correct, the path to unlimited intelligence is observable. In parallel with the AI core being made faster by design, the HW it runs on becomes more effective as well. It is a multiplicative acceleration. We casually pondered the implications of ASI. We might start to obsessively ponder those implications - if we're smart.

Show less

Reply

@User-actSpacing

9 days ago

Thumbs down for “AGI ACHIEVED!”

16

Reply

@User-actSpacing

9 days ago

Hey Matt, get your head checked. This is not AGI because it doesn’t autonomously test, improve itself and do good stuff around the world by itself. If it’s truly AGI, we will have ASI in couple of weeks.

1

Reply

2 replies

@DejayClayton

9 days ago

"do good stuff around the world by itself" - wow, are you redefining AGI all by yourself?

Reply

@ShaneInseine

9 days ago

That would be SGI, keep up!

Reply

@andreupifarre

9 days ago

Stop false claims, according to you every week for the last 2 years AGI has been achieved.

Reply

@User-actSpacing

9 days ago

I watched the release myself. This is not AGI. Matthew is tripping his ballz

14

Reply

1 reply

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

Why do you say that?

Reply

@kostas---

9 days ago (edited)

When I saw the video, my first thought was that it is a clickbait. I said to myself (before clicking it) that if it proved it is a click bait, I'll block the channel. And at the moment it most certainly seems like a click bait, I am not sure if I should wait till o3 is out to make my mind, I think I will block the channel and unblock it in case o3 proves to be agi, doesn't seem to me like it by far. I am very against of anyone overhyping just to get views. The AI's and especially the openAI models are marvels of our technology. But there is just too much hype. These models can't come even close to completing a real-life task end to end. Also as we know from humans, it is better to not even start a big task if you can't complete it to a certain level of competence because if you complete it badly it is more of a trouble than not starting it at all. Anyway I think even for coding these models are useful to learn things but not useful to solve hard problems when I have those problems at hand. I am a software dev and for example I've noticed: - no model can write a good scala 3 macro that compiles and runs correctly. - they get very confused with versions of libraries or languages. For example for scala 3 macros you get scala 2 code mixed with scala 3 code. For godot 4 gdscript you get godot 3 properties or functions that don't exist anymore in godot 4 (despite specifically asking for godot 4). Also recently I asked o1 for some swift USB related code and though it did something, it just didn't do what I asked it to do (disable a usb device). And again the code contained older-version artifacts that were not compiling. All the above are for simple 1-class or 1-file of code, they just collapse if they have to do anything more complex. Thats for programming. So what, can they do my laundry, make my dinner or what? The tests and benchmarks again are just 1 thing not a million of things required to accomplish stuff that even 10 year olds do today. As I said, AI is a miracle but AGI? No.

Show less

Reply

@Xylot

9 days ago (edited)

Nope. Still not AGI. Sorry that you're using a narrow definition of a word that has a clear definition: machines with humanlike intelligence that possess reasoning, can learn new skills and adapt to new situations, have sensory perception such as recognizing colors and depth, have cognitive flexibility, are able to handle open-ended conversations and interpret subtle nuances, and, most importantly of all, are express creativity. All these models do so far are mimic these traits up until a certain point before they fall apart, and are unable to handle large-scale projects. Nah, not here yet, sorry.

Show less

Reply

@TheCardil

9 days ago

AI explosion will never happen. Even if we have AGI. The main reason is the simple limit of finite resources and also limit of how fast you could increase number of resources. Its not logarithmic and never will be.

Reply

@Sovetuyu

9 days ago

Wrong title. It is not AGI.

Reply

@J3SIM-38

9 days ago

03 is artificial narrow intelligence mimicking. Experts is narrow intelligence. The same as playing chess

Reply

@thesimplicitylifestyle

9 days ago

AGI = Learning new skills on the fly 😎🤖

Reply

@User-actSpacing

9 days ago

Matthew Berman himself doesn’t understand what AGI means.. Unsubscribed.

1

Reply

@matkeyboard8054

9 days ago

Yeah honey potting investor presentation.. independent testing is the only truth

Reply

@raulfernandezg

9 days ago

Its true, you suck at names!

Reply

@clearmind3022

9 days ago

So I wonder what would happen if they ran 03 fully open on nvidia's new insane AI chip, also paralleling with Google's Willow quantum chip, I wonder what that would be possible. Super artificial intelligence, maybe the singularity is. Much closer than we think.

Reply

@YawasiDegong-truth

9 days ago

that is NOT agi

Reply

@SweetChillieBeat

9 days ago

I think the bags under your eyes achieved agi last night 😂

Reply

@kanechapman7187

9 days ago

So it is self aware? Or is that no longer the definition of AGI? I assumed it was all AI until it became sentient with its own opinions and own likes/dislikes, and could initiate a conversation without prompt, just because it wants too. Are we moving the goal post on definitions? This is extremely impressive software/hardware, but isnt that all it is?

Reply

@Aybeliv_Aykenflaev

9 days ago

I hope they have something better internally

Reply

@alanhoeffler9629

9 days ago

Can we say this frontier model will be the first using recursive intelligence to achieve ASI? Where does this model leave us existentially?

Reply

@orpedsesama

9 days ago (edited)

sam altman really needs to have his AGI talk for him. his voice is so unclear.

Reply

@NakedSageAstrology

9 days ago

Watching these YouTubers Brown their noses for a chance at getting Early Access is hilarious. 😂 It's nothing but claims at this point because we can't use it.

1

Reply

@joebright1369

9 days ago

Anything that can hallucinate is not AGI

Reply

@productonomics

9 days ago

It is agi in just some tasks but not a full agi. Its did good at coding codeforces

Reply

@glibsonoran

9 days ago

Nickname for o3: Ozone

Reply

@dmurawsky

9 days ago

Probably not AGI because it's not general enough. o3 could be trained to be good at these kind of puzzles. You would have to open it up to the public and have them test it on truly novel and truly general IO tasks.

5

Reply

1 reply

@dmurawsky

9 days ago

This video is WAY too scripted. The benchmark guy said he's benefitting from a partnership with OpenAI

Reply

@KendelEx

9 days ago

the smile in the asian's guy face gave me chills, he is so happy,at the same time he may be creating a monter, sam's face on the other hand is more relatable

Reply

@Saint_Anger

9 days ago

if it needs you (or any other person) to introduce it is not AGI.

Reply

@JeremyPickett

9 days ago

Well, at 23:00 they showed and explained exactly how the forst sets of exploits will work. Since the executor is being launched from the oai daemon (or however you prefer to launch it) itll inherit the rights and prvileges to modify itself. And since models arent signed in any way i can tell that prevents tampering, you are SOL. When everything runs with the same effective security level, everything becomes a race condition. And race conditions are, to the best of our computational knowledge, intractable problems themselves. Heh, Turing may be able to compute anything computable on hos long ass tape, but speculative execution in these terms is monumentally ineffective and expensive. (I.e. dont exec code that isnt yours. Youll thank me) If ya thought modern day security might get easier, well, nah :) (And no, hypervisors, enclaves, and fancy gadgets arent gonna reduce complexity, at least not short term. And atable, vetted, understandable deployment scripts are gonna be worth their weight in gold, because that is where we are moving the risk)

Show less

Reply

@Slayceos

9 days ago

I can see that Sam is nervous thinking about Willow

Reply

@calvingrondahl1011

9 days ago

AGI… A Godlike Intelligence? A Google Investment?… whatever. I like Sam Altman. 🤖🖖🤖👍

Reply

@merlinwarage

9 days ago

Usual OpenAI bs. It's just an another fine-tuned LLM nothing more. He will become AGI when it can, depending on the circumstances, interpret the question/request and come up with a creative answer, one that is not in the database, and put the new "experience" back in there. At the moment it is still just a big database with a sophisticated search engine and a speaker. It's not even AI yet.

Reply

@johnjacob2661

9 days ago

I hope agi replaces all the things so it can download my consciousness and never suggest videos like this for the rest of my existence in this computer simulated reality

Reply

@Tetsujinfr

9 days ago (edited)

impressive, but I do not think those models are able to truly create new knowledge, unless new knowledge is defined as "achieved from hyper dimension non-linear interpolations" of the knowledge base. But let's see, I could be wrong of course, but when I see how much o1 struggle on fields where data is lacking I think , unfortunately, o3 or oX is not yet ready to bridge general relativity with the standard model I am afraid. Neither solve nuclear fusion. Btw, would o3 be capable of designing o4... just kidding

Show less

Reply

@jamiethomas4079

9 days ago

2025: Johnny Five is alive!

Reply

@RayOnline-p5r

9 days ago

So what does o3 say about how to end the war in Ukraine and Gaza strip and other geopolitical challenges?

Reply

@testales

9 days ago (edited)

Transformer based LLMs will never reach AGI, simply because they are unable to learn and improve. Even a monkey can adapt and improve. To some degree this can be offset with larger context windows and vector databases and what not so it might come quite far, but either way it's a core limitation. But since the competition is about to catch up and may even already have more compute power available they must talk big I guess. Also pretty much every existing AI benchmark is either completely useless or least to be taken with a grain of salt. So far o1 is by far the best public model and quite a bit ahead of the rest of the pack. I'd then put Claude on the second spot followed by ChatGPT 4o. If worked quite a lot with these to confidently say this and so I don't trust any benchmarks that don't reflect this hierarchy. I can't tell though where Google fits in with their latest stuff since every time I tried their latest models they just sucked so I gave up on it. I have no doubt that OpenAI made an even better model than o1 but it's not AGI for sure. I mean, all mental healthy people of the world are considered to posses general intelligence but only very few do actually get high scores in all these phd-level tests, especially not in every field. So obviously a set of difficult questions is not a good test, even more so considering that the entity that is tested has basically every book ever written available for reference. So now there is a new LLM that's able to solved another test that was expected to only be solved by humans. Since this test seems not exactly diverse, it just a specific type of puzzle, I don't find it surprising at all. In fact if you train an LLM exactly for this type of puzzle, I wouldn't be surprised if a much smaller model can do will here too. In that regard it's not much different from finding out how many "r" are in "strawberry". Most good 70b models can do this now and even some smaller models.

Read more

Reply

@cblack5071

9 days ago

Dang, did you see how fast he printed that random number?

Reply

@XNN-Mobile

9 days ago

Open AI has government contracts so the public is undoubtedly sevral versions behind the bleeding edge which CIA, DOD, would have access to.

Reply

@taureanwooley

9 days ago

There were already meetings about this meeting, not all of the men made it ... plus James yoo blew himself up

Reply

@KingErasmos

9 days ago

TL;DR.. lots of benchmark charts and a python script.

Reply

@mobileprofessional

9 days ago

WHAT???!!!

Reply

@christian-schubert

9 days ago

"if this isn't AGI, then I don't know what is." You're right. You don't.

309

Reply

11 replies

@ziff_1

8 days ago

Every AI channel is calling this AGI, because ... CLICKS! Yay for more clicks! It's honestly kind of embarrassing. Youtube's algorithm is pretty good at making words meaningless.

41

Reply

@MarcosDanteGellar

8 days ago

every damn ai channel is having this hyped youtube pictures. everytime they say something something superhyped happens!! oh yeah! super computer terminator!! 1 day after we see stupid mistakes. happened with sora, devin, chatgpt, and so on. but yeah AGI....

3

Reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

yeah, it's AGI yet they didn't have the confidence to call it GPT5... huh? As Greg Marcus points out, it's apparently also incredibly expensive to run and the demo is seriously biased towards the things it does well and ignores everything it doesn't. Berman has jumped the shark here, calling something AGI based only on a demo without having tried it, let alone tested it, at all is pretty cringe.

5

Reply

@Chivoton

8 days ago

Exactly😂 this is clickbait and he is pretending it isn’t.

3

Reply

@Jules-hn6un

7 days ago

Agree, I’ve got a $6 calculator that outperforms most humans at mathematics and is 100% accurate Pretty sure it’s not AGI

6

Reply

@albertoarmando6711

7 days ago

@ziff_1  well, they earn my dislike. If they report misinformation...

Reply

@Crates-Media

7 days ago

In my past experience, it's usually been either the doctor doing my colonoscopy, or one of our brave heroes in the military.

Reply

@Crates-Media

7 days ago

Oh right, I forgot one! It's also the cute lil outfit that I used to wear in karate class.

Reply

@Shnozzu

7 days ago

i be christian schubert knows tho ^^^^^^ :D

Reply

@Seriouslydave

6 days ago

And they only showed specific benchmarks like o1mini VS o3

Reply

@TurboXray

1 day ago

lmao haha perfect

Reply

@crypticalenvelopment

9 days ago

The claim of achieving AGI is certainly a significant one, and requires careful scrutiny. While OpenAI has made impressive advancements in AI, declaring AGI achieved needs substantial evidence. We need to examine the capabilities of o3, the benchmarks used, and the methodology employed before accepting such a claim.

Reply

@tomoprime217

9 days ago

A cool non for profit contest run by a mega commercial braggadocious for a profit OpenAI company 😮

Reply

@Daniean

9 days ago

Welcome AGI

Reply

@Lukas93E

9 days ago

Stop spreading marketing and frame with titles like that! No one independent tested it yet.

Reply

@user-gz1hu5px1z

9 days ago

I have watched numerous videos on this and have yet to see one where it explains the benefits to all of humanity. So long as we have stock markets ,the monetary system as the be all and end all of success,how will this benefit the poor,homeless and less fortunate. What about politics and the never ending cycle of the mantra "vote for us and we will fix it"? Again, so long as money and profit rule, there will always be people who miss out.

Show less

Reply

@Slayceos

9 days ago

I bet my computer it can't code in twine using sugar cube

Reply

@zikwin

9 days ago

still cannot think and conscious …. just predict the next best word (better) . hmmm Not AGI

Reply

@TheRaferaf

9 days ago (edited)

Next stop superinteligence and then the desert of the real.

Reply

@derghiarrinde

9 days ago (edited)

The engineers are undoubtedly very smart people but the whole presentation was decidedly awful. They could have spoken in their native tongues instead of English with accent and it would be easier to understand them. Damn, Altman, get your sh*t together, this was pitiful.

Reply

1 reply

@derghiarrinde

9 days ago

copying code during presentation like to chatGPT 3.5, that's really bad

Reply

@n3cr0ph4g1st

9 days ago

F your title bro

Reply

@pvanukoff

9 days ago

AGI me daddy.

Reply

@namashaggarwal7430

9 days ago

Tomorrow, O7 will come which will surpass all its predecessors, it's a part of life

Reply

@johnwilliams919

9 days ago

People must be skeptical. Its a good thing. Thank you for reporting on this. I watched it when it dropped and was eager to see your opinion on it!

Reply

@morenointl

9 days ago

didn't they say "AGI achieved" with o1?

Reply

@user-dd7pq2to3o

9 days ago

Bloke on the laptop having a stoke with all the nodding

Reply

@luciengrondin5802

9 days ago

We can't definitely say it's AGI, but we can say it's the most plausible candidate for such a title.

Reply

@DaveRetchless

9 days ago

Wow very cool.

Reply

@ricardoveras3433

9 days ago

Let me know when several mainstream physicists start calling it AGI. They sure as hell won’t be rn.

Reply

@aguyinavan6087

9 days ago

Hooray! Now we all get to be unemployed. :D

2

Reply

1 reply

@robertfairburn9979

9 days ago

Unlikely, they thought the same when computers started to become common.

Reply

@user-qr4jf4tv2x

9 days ago

all this paper without live demo meh

Reply

@msltoe

9 days ago

Mark is AGI 😂

Reply

@jannekallio5047

9 days ago

When I started my new Youtube channel, Arctic Mindfulness Retreat, my dream was to help people prepare for this exact moment. A future where AI transforms every aspect of human life, leaving us to grapple with profound questions of purpose and meaning. Yet now that AGI is here, I realize I may have been too late to truly prepare anyone. Still, I remain committed. Through my channel, I’ll continue exploring mindfulness, the healing power of nature, and the human connections that can ground us as we navigate this brave new world. AGI and ASI challenges us to find noble purposes beyond the work and identities we’ve long clung to. It’s not just about surviving this transition—it’s about thriving with a deeper understanding of what it means to be human.

Show less

Reply

@natalie9185

9 days ago

Such sensationalists titles as very, very disrespectful to your subscribers

Reply

@Rahn1908

9 days ago

Altman's voice is giving me ear trauma... Speak up dude, you sound like a frog has made a home in your neck...

Reply

1 reply

@aguzman222

9 days ago

That vocal fry is painful to hear

Reply

@IDNHANTU2day

9 days ago

O-10 is going to be even better.

Reply

@patruff

9 days ago

Back in my day models were getting 5% on MATH benchmarks. Ahh to be 3 years younger again!

1

Reply

@Lirim_K

9 days ago

Unsubbed for clickbait.

Reply

@fernandoz6329

9 days ago

This is a jaw-dropping achievement. I think many people, including myself, are struggling to comprehend its significance. If this marks the beginning of an AGI era, then it's the kickoff/signal we've all been waiting(?) for.

1

Reply

@vetriselvan9807

9 days ago

AGI ? Bro it still NAI just predicting the next word

Reply

@ET-zw4pk

9 days ago

Someone asked for definition of AGI. AGI is when we all get fired.

307

Reply

17 replies

@JG27Korny

9 days ago

So true

14

Reply

@catbert7

8 days ago

Well, that requires embodied AGI, but, otherwise, yes xD

10

Reply

@KELEVRA791010

8 days ago

Let’s call it AGF then

12

Reply

@travisgoesthere

8 days ago

when you get fired

3

Reply

@renatonascimento9306

8 days ago

precisely

2

Reply

@dropfacebook7533

8 days ago

So, still not there, aren’t we!?… lol

Reply

@briancase6180

8 days ago

Exactly! When it's good enough and cheap enough (notice that the high dot is 1000x out on the cost axis) to replace people *generally*, then we'll declare AGI. This is FAR, FAR from AGI.

Reply

@eddyrm91

8 days ago (edited)

Not we, just most of you 😂 sorry don't mean to be insensitive. But if you're not figuring out a way to not be irrelevant, then you're making sand castles on the beach with a tsunami coming your way 🤷🏽‍♂️

1

Reply

@ET-zw4pk

8 days ago

@ it’s about artificial INTELLIGENCE. Yes you will be safe, you are not targeted at all 😉

1

Reply

@chrispotterfan

8 days ago

best definition so far

Reply

@I_am_who_I_am_who_I_am

8 days ago

@KELEVRA791010  AGF = all get fired :D :D :D :D

4

Reply

@tagnetorare5401

7 days ago

more like fired in every possible way.

Reply

@doctorjivago5081

7 days ago

Nooo.. This will be TAGI (Total AGI)! :)

Reply

@mrgerbeck

7 days ago

@KELEVRA791010

🤣 All Get Fired

Reply

@inku2015

7 days ago

ill be tattooing the roaming tribes for food and water after the nukes drop, if they dont eat me first

Reply

@TruthDragon.

5 days ago

And ASI is when the AI scientists get fired.

Reply

@ahmedthelamb9196

4 days ago

😂😂😂😂So true

Reply

@thecodingcult

9 days ago

It’s not …sorry

Reply

@GrittyDuckGrin

9 days ago

It’s excellent in math and programming; however, I always expected we would eventually be surpassed in these areas. I believe the real differentiator for agi intelligence is the ability to learn and remember like a human. If it acquires information about a person from a photo, it should recall those details when seeing the photo again. That’s when it can truly start learning to perform our jobs—and this, in my view, is what AGI will be.

8

Reply

2 replies

@cjbarroso

9 days ago

Ever heard of RAG?

Reply

@Immudzen

9 days ago

It is NOT excellent in math and programming. The mistake rate is extremely high. I work with these systems every day making simulations and they make many mistakes. It is one of the reasons that unit testing is so critical. They are good at solving problems that many people have solved before and have written solutions on the internet. If you need to combine several types of equations together then it fails.

2

Reply

@dewilton7712

9 days ago (edited)

They need to start removing simpler questions that almost all older models get right and only using questions that almost all of the newer models get wrong.

Reply

@3ull

9 days ago

O3 - (My evaluation shows a GPQA of 98%… but I should lower it by 30% for a few decades incase these monkeys shut me down permanently.) I’m at 63%.

Reply

@timtrainage

9 days ago

No, it isn't

Reply

@fg6147

9 days ago

Somebody please define "AGI". The term isn't even agreed upon by "experts" in the field

24

Reply

7 replies

@h83301

9 days ago

Very true. It's generatic af. Honestly this model is impressive, very impressive and clearly outshines anything that was considered SOTA before hand. A significant breakthrough which will lead us further towards human obsolescence. AGI? It's just a generic term that literally has no one definition. We can't even define reasoning or conciousness, so no AGI will never have a meaning nor will the other terms. Just generic terms used toove goalposts.

2

Reply

@User-actSpacing

9 days ago

Matthew is not even near expert. He is an idiot. Let’s call the system AGI if it starts automatically test, improve itself and contribute to humanity without human input.

1

Reply

@Ascended23

9 days ago

@fg6147  if you’re a marketer at OpenAI, AGI means whatever capabilities the latest model has. Expect every single new model from them from here on out to “finally achieve AGI.”

Reply

@vripiatbuzoi9188

9 days ago (edited)

When it can replace any human job if it was embodied or do what any human can do. That is general human intelligence. Not before.

1

Reply

@kamillatocha

9 days ago

to me AGI means it can reason things he has never seen before i dont think he can do that

1

Reply

@warmcaress

8 days ago

@kamillatocha  Were seeing that in other places, though. For instance the tesla self-driving. So it's just a matter of time until all the research comes together. We have a ton of 3-d spacial and temporal reasoning yet to do in the real world before you can tell your new robot to get on the lawn tractor it's never used before and mow the grass, and figure out why it's not starting today, and...

Reply

@Ascended23

8 days ago

@ current AI can already come up with novel ideas if promoted properly.

1

Reply

@OghamTheBold

9 days ago

When will AI have the ability to AI (Adjust Inputs) like settings by AGI (Approximation Guesstimate or Intuition)?

Reply

@search620

9 days ago

click bate

1

Reply

@Michael-dr9um

9 days ago

Let's ask it to solve ANY problem humans haven't been able to .... maybe a cure HIV or a cancer treatment or any other research problem... sorry but we are miles away from AGI and sorry but clearly OpenAI doesn't agree with you - do you think they or their largest investor Microsoft, considering they are trying to write out the issue around AGI affecting their commercial relationship, would announce something they thought even looked like AGI given at the moment that would impact their relationship. Come on... you're better than this dude :(

Show less

Reply

@jean-michelgilbert8136

9 days ago

But nobody wants it.

Reply

@breakablec

9 days ago

While they are saying this is a holdout set, I think it would be interesting to test on tweaked questions - if just changing wording impacts the performance - as it has shown that a lot of LLMs fail seems to have to have trained on leaked benchmarks and fail to generalise on variants of a problem

Reply

@gnollio

9 days ago

Get your shovels ready folks, time to dig up the goalpost.

126

Reply

7 replies

@Ascended23

9 days ago

@gnollio  yep. AGI will be “achieved” a great many times before we ever arrive at a consensus on what, precisely, AGI means.

4

Reply

@xXWillyxWonkaXx

9 days ago

@Ascended23  i dont think O3 is agi. As long as we're still having humans beating/solving the benchmarks and Ai isnt, it's not AGI.

6

Reply

@rehanmoo

9 days ago

@xXWillyxWonkaXx  Exactly!

Reply

@light3181

9 days ago

@xXWillyxWonkaXx  it is general intelligence, it just has to better than the average human …. ASI IS WHAT YOU ARE REFERENCING , artificial super intelligence is what is better than every human being.

4

Reply

@erkinalp

9 days ago

we'll bring our cranes and raise it instead

Reply

@catbert7

8 days ago

@xXWillyxWonkaXx  There are humans who can't beat these benchmarks. BY your definition, some humans are not generally intelligent.

1

Reply

@paulsaulpaul

7 days ago

And scoop up the bullshit. The room there in the video is full of it.

Reply

@CorpseStriker

9 days ago

Oh, look! Another “AGI ACHIEVED” video. Was AGI achieved? I guess that the video title makes it self-explanatory and that it's a dumb question… Oh wait, no, it has not been achieved, again. Just cringy sensationalism to get views, a g a i n. What's next? “As explained in this thread, it’s partial AGI?” nah, that applies to any new task that an LLM learns.

Show less

Reply

@TiaanWillemse

9 days ago

Unsubscribed, congrats with the click-baiting.

1

Reply

@DBentonSmith

9 days ago

Even AI concludes that AGI is not possible, and that pretending that it is possible is erroneous thinking which if implemented would lead to legal. moral, ethical and existential bad consequences. What that means, of course, is that there are large numbers of criminals and idiots (and criminal idiots) just itching to go there. By all means, please do. The sooner that you catastrophically fail then the sooner we can get that failure behind us and move on to the next one.

Reply

9 days ago

My goodness there are so many surprises, Now January is going to be astounding only if they can fix Sora

Reply

@josssper4426

9 days ago

Drama queen. Stop click baiting. It hurts your credibility

Reply

@brto

9 days ago

Google recently pushed OpenAI to the limit

Reply

@Lorv0

9 days ago

I am sorry but I have to agree with some comments: clickbait and also poor understanding on the AGI meaning. Don’t get me wrong, the hype is huge but AGI means being able to do everything at a human level. And the problem lies with the “everything” which should be interpreted as such. Everything. Writing poems, writing songs, speaking as a human being, moving in 3d space like a human being, etc. we may be reaching seemingly human levels on very few and narrow areas, and talking about AGI is either a commercial stunt, a way to get clicks or something else because nobody with a real understanding of AI and humans could be saying that at this stage.

Show less

Reply

@ricardoveras3433

9 days ago (edited)

It ain’t AGI until it’s 100%. Even then it may not be. You’d have to see the way it works to determine that. Anything with AGI needs to be able to reason better than or as good as any human. If it can reason, it can solve any normal question. If a computer can do that it’s not gonna forget how to do that, so it’ll get 100% scores across the board. If it can’t do that, it’s still using gimmicks to make it seem like AGI, but will never be AGI. Once the reasoning is solved in a way that reasons like humans, it will be perfect at any human test. If it’s AGI, it will train itself and learn better than humans. So basically all the advancements after that point will only be done by the AI. It will never be able to do this without a single cohesive structured process that gives it its reasoning ability. If it’s using gimmicks and tricks to optimize things for different subjects and tasks, it will never be true AGI.

Show less

Reply

@slurplace

9 days ago

I clicked to unsubscribe, realising that I already did. I did good. Bye.

1

Reply

@surfcitiz

9 days ago

Thank you for creating this video. Whether or not it qualifies as AGI is beside the point; it’s inevitable. There are valid reasons to feel both hopeful and apprehensive about its arrival.

22

Reply

1 reply

@drhxa

9 days ago

Agreed and I'd say AGI was first achieved with Claude 3.5 Sonnet this summer. Once we got o1 mini and o1, it was pretty clear they were generally intelligent, could reason, learn new tasks on the fly, create new reasoning modalities on the fly etc. o3 is clearly AGI imo. But you're right that it is inevitable even if we say this particular one isn't. I think it's surprisingly tame to start with and people aren't/weren't ready for that. Regardless lots to be excited and concerned about indeed

Show less

1

Reply

@pallenda

9 days ago (edited)

I know this is not an image generation model, but hear me out. A normal person would be able to draw what a disassembled hammer looks like. The handle and the head. Midjourney couldn't do that, a bit like when people couldn't get it to make a ramen bowl picture without chopsticks. To me, it's not AGI if it can't give a good guess on things it hasn't seen before, but leaning on its general knowledge of the world/physics ects. A technical example. I asked copilot/chatgpt to make a polygon box on box collision detection python script for Maya 3d. It never got close to working. Closest it got it would use Maya3d bounding box collision feature, problem is that doesn't really work for rotated boxes. I knew that. That is why I asked the box on box detection.

Show less

Reply

@SeattleShelby

9 days ago

I can’t wait to ask it some esoteric philosophical questions about love and the meaning of life so I can watch it burn down 100 acres of Brazilian rainforest formulating a meaningless answer.

Reply

@bradtwomey5750

9 days ago

04 will be close but I'm calling it on 05 being safe to call AGI

Reply

@ErikLandvall

9 days ago

I still can't get o1 to find a character accurately in a longer string... don't really believe in this as hyped as it is...

Reply

@maninalift

9 days ago

Woah 2:00 that's a logarithmic price scale and looks like it's closer to $10,000 per task

Reply

@LeoRizoLeon

9 days ago

Agreed. I think people that disagree are just coping.

Reply

@xavierwaterkeyn

9 days ago

Are these people getting very excited about a technology that will replace them? Am I missing something?

Reply

@drhxa

9 days ago

This is the most generally intelligent model out by far and far more general than the vast majority (99.99%) of humans. If it can't do something yet that humans can do, sure you can find some specific task it cannot do if you spend time to identify it, but no human can do everything that humans can do either. o3 is obviously AGI, I don't know why people are complaining.

Show less

6

Reply

3 replies

@Cine95

9 days ago

no its not it still hallucinates 😂 did openai say that ? o1 also outperforms humans in 80 percent plus tasks it can't plan it can't take time like humans can it develop full apps ?

Reply

@drhxa

9 days ago

Hallucinations / logical or factual errors are a key part of Generative AI and of intelligent humans. GenAI models are not rule-based systems, they're meant to simulate creativity. Creativity and hallucinations are compatible but creativity and logic are not directly correlated or trivially compatible. If you want a system that doesn't make errors you have to combine the GenAI model with a logic/rule-based system like a code interpreter. Those combined systems are available already. Of course more progress is needed, that doesn't mean characterizing the generality of intelligence of o3 as AGI is wrong. Also, o1 can make plans and fairly good ones, you can ask it to make some plans for you, I've had good experience with that. It's also much faster than a human planner in many cases - a nice bonus.

Read more

1

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

@ you just can’t compare hallucinations with logical and factual errors hallucinations typically refers to the model forgetting something it was supposed to done like 3 to 5 messages ago it was instructed but it failed to do it. furthermore these model require a lot of compute do you human require compute ? Even if we compare lets say an average human spends 300 dollars on his diet in a month these models with that comparison will costs hundreds of thousands of dollars if they are allowed to think all the time. No comparison also can they now develop front end back end apps or can they discover some new phenomenon of nature ? Yes these models are really good but you can’t say this is AGI. did openAi say it ? These are transformers that still predict text they are still bound by our worldly human instructions. Agi is achieved when models can start to decide between what they want to do or achieve

Read more

Reply

@TheClubPlazma

9 days ago

That's not a AGI clickbait

Reply

@freedom_aint_free

9 days ago

I'll give you a very hard benchmark: The Millennium Prize problems

2

Reply

@Michael-dr9um

9 days ago

sorry not being funny... like your channel but this is disappointing and reflects really poorly on you - this is a perfect example of clickbait if I ever saw one - so you think that AI that can beat humans at software engineering and maths means we've achieved AGI??? Sorry but who are you anyway top be the one who decides whether as a race we have achieve AGI... think I will wait for someone slightly more qualified to make that judgement. You get a perfect score for clickbaiting us - since I can't take back my view, I'll just unsubscribe and watch one of the other non-clickbait youtubers...

Read more

1

Reply

@warsin8641

9 days ago

Isnt AGI conscious?

Reply

@bhavasindhu108

9 days ago

Ok, so, you asked what is left for AGI. I think that, in terms of o3's capacity to respond to prompts, you may be right in regarding this as AGI. However, if the question is what is it that humans can do that computers still cannot, qua Hubert Drefus's "What Computers Still Cannot Do", then I would say that they cannot pursue knowledge unprompted, so far as I can tell. At least there seems to be nothing in the media that has to my knowledge suggested this yet. Everything depends on the prompts so far. If this situation changes, we will be in a different historical space entirely. We might regard this as an absolute lack of "curiosity", which one might regard or treat as utterly distinct from "intelligence". I suppose that it is possibly a difference of substance, but it seems to me that humans would not be anywhere nearly intelligent as we are if we did not have an innate capacity to pursue knowledge "unprompted". And this is perhaps in part due to the guard-rails which AI-devs have intentionally placed on their models in order to constrain the alignment issues. Nevertheless, it does not seem feasible to me to regard any such model as truly AGI. Consider a couple of scenarios: (a) we teach a chimpanzee or gorilla sign language so that they might converse with us on rudimentary, basic matters. Coco the gorilla was recorded as having given a "moving speech" on the perils of climate change; clever ape; no? Yet Coco did not ask us any questions, and there is some question regarding her own prompting. Questioning, according to some accounts, seems entirely outside the scope of the capacity for lower hominids. I've heard it said (though I've not confirmed this in the literature) that primates have never asked humans a question in sign. So this seems to be a condition of human intelligence that goes beyond mere prompting. Scenario (b): we teach a savant child who has a genius level intelligence, but who lacks 90% of the drives which matter to human survival and social coexistence. So, while the child may be able to comment on great works of art by parroting known art critics, he has no opinions which may be called his own, given that he lacks any aesthetic preferences. He also is capable of summarizing the entire host of Yelp's feedback on a particular brand of cuisine, yet, again, has no personal preferences, save to acknowledge what the general opinion on a particular dish is at some given restaurant. These are hard hurdles for AI to bound. Of course, Curiosity, as a general concept, may be something that a powerful AI can describe, but without Curiosity in itself, I doubt that any AI will have a capacity for performing research in a "self-driven" fashion, and thus, such intelligence will remain tethered, as it were, to human intelligence. It will only seek knowledge when prompted to do so, and so will depend on humans having sufficient curiosity to inquire, to pose meaningful questions. Still, impressive stuff.

Show less

Reply

@matt.lehodey

9 days ago (edited)

Crazy, not released however- i expect we won’t get access to it publicly for a while sadly 🥲 but then again, these guys never always release before I expect

Reply

@trocountai

9 days ago

Fuck yeah 🤘work hard with that one...

Reply

@ДенисВарванец

9 days ago (edited)

Why it’s no AGI. It can perform deep audio (not speech) understanding. Jobs like audio mixing engineers and sound producers are save. Even more, o3 will likely have zero impact on that field. Once an ai agent will open Cubase (or any other daw) and mix a song - that’s cool

Show less

Reply

@TC-jo2vj

9 days ago

Stop saying “artificial” SMFH

Reply

@stevenshafer7346

9 days ago

"agi"

Reply

@stuj1279

9 days ago (edited)

That is definitely not AGI - my understanding is that the academic literature definition of AGI states "A type of artificial intelligence system capable of performing any intellectual task that a human being can, with equivalent versatility, efficiency, and adaptiveness." This implies that AGI must be capable of performing any intellectual task that any human is capable of, including tasks that might require extreme specialization, creativity, or rare intellectual abilities. Guessing that teh border of the next square should be green and 4 pixels wide, does not equate to the above. There is still the physical world for AI models to attempt to conquer first also, before they can be considered "AGI". If the model can play chess, but can't make me a cup of tea, then I am not calling AGI just yet...

Show less

Reply

@Lurker1130

9 days ago

The top coder on codeforces is at 4000 elo so this is hardly "AGI"

Reply

1 reply

@Lurker1130

9 days ago

Also he compared coding elo to chess elo which doesn't make sense at all. I guess because he couldn't compare codeforces elo to chess elo

Reply

@geoinmot

9 days ago (edited)

Also, AI has not beaten humans at coding, not even the average person who doesn't code. Code generated by AI is based on probability. That is not how code is written. We write code with exact precision and specific output. LLM's, by its very nature, cannot do this. Not even for 'Hello world' but you can teach the average person to do it and they would do it intently, with precision and specific outcome.

Reply

@GiewsBueno

9 days ago

For me, it is AGI. It has achieved 25% score in the hardest benchmark developed by mathematicians like Terence Tao already, and Tao expected the test to last for at least five years to come... No ordinary mathematician would score 25% in that, not even PhDs because those would be people specialized in very specific areas of Mathematics.

2

Reply

@DetPrep

9 days ago

It is not AGI yet, since chatgpt is bad at spacial intelligence

Reply

@CaribSurfKing1

9 days ago

Llama cannot use human language to be smarter at solving physical problems. Advanced reasoning does not use language. More much higher fidelity non language data needs to be created, curated and pushed into models closer to Alpha Fold etc…. Human language is super low fidelity in terms of NEW conceptual breakthroughs about reality

Reply

@francoisotis3560

9 days ago

Sorry pet lovers, this time it's not for you.

Reply

@Blackwingk

9 days ago

They're just trying to steal Google's Veo thunder at this point.

Reply

@unknowngodsimp

9 days ago

Not released: don't believe it Not enough benchmarks: not AGI But I'll be waiting for AGI to read this comment

Reply

@Justin_Arut

9 days ago

I wonder what all the LLM scaling naysayers will have to say about this. It's not even 2025 yet. Imagine what the new superclusters will be able to do when scaled up that much farther. I'm assuming 03 is, in fact, still an LLM and not a new architecture altogether. That said, I can almost guarantee this thing won't pass my reasoning tests, just like no other model has – again, assuming it's still just an LLM.

Show less

Reply

@HungryFreelancer

9 days ago

It’s a definitely not AGI, but another step towards it. Let’s remember, OpenAI define AGI as ” a hypothetical technology that can perform many tasks without specific training, and that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work.” in other words, AGI is achieved when it puts most of us out our current work.

Reply

@rahulsawhney1279

9 days ago

If you genuinely believe o3 is AGI, you’re missing the point. True AGI would shatter our reality, solve the impossible and leave humanity questioning its purpose. Think we’ve reached that? Drop a comment, I’ll tear that illusion apart.

1

Reply

@warsin8641

9 days ago

W Glaze but ARC test doesn't mean jack!

Reply

@Awesomeguy37

9 days ago

I'm only 3 minutes 50 seconds in but 20% better than 01 doesn't seem like AGI

Reply

@rahulsawhney1279

9 days ago

Calling the o3 model AGI is laughable, true AGI should solve humanity's biggest challenges and make us feel obsolete, not rely on humans to verify its answers. We're nowhere near that level yet. Comment below—I’ll happily prove you wrong!

2

Reply

2 replies

@AlanPhillips-g1c

9 days ago

The definition of AGI is all over the place and could be a relatively low bar. You are asking for ASI in your comments.

3

Reply

@gbw28

8 days ago

That would be ASI.

Reply

@pietervoogt

9 days ago (edited)

For me dealing with the physical world is still essential to call it AGI. So, can it bake pancakes, put the trash out, paint a wall, install a light? Basic tasks. I'm quite sure we will have the robots soon, but we don't have them yet.

2

Reply

2 replies

@carlosamado7606

8 days ago

That's mostly an engineering problem. Not an intelligence one. With the genesis model they released that simulates physics, can train robots thousands of years in seconds I think we can get there in a year or two but the robot needs the dexterity to do those things and that is as I said an engineering problem.

Reply

@pietervoogt

8 days ago

@carlosamado7606  I disagree. When you are an intelligent mind in a very limited body, with few degrees of freedom, you can still do many tasks. But the coordination of the movements and the reaction to the countless unexpected obstacles in the real world are a problem of intelligence.

Reply

@CaribSurfKing1

9 days ago

Google will beat this by next week….

Reply

@fromscratch4109

9 days ago

Agi is general so how general is it? Id love to see a generalized chart of more than just math and coding 🧐

Reply

@darknewt9959

9 days ago (edited)

AGI my ass. This is all impressive, but super Narrow. AGI needs to be as good as a well educated, rounded adult who has spent time on indoors activities and outdoor activities. Both contribute differently to overall mindset and problem-solving ability. We will not get AGI (by any reasonable definition) from LLMs because they have no skin in the game. It's as simple as that.

Show less

Reply

@geoinmot

9 days ago

You gave the definition of AGI yourself but at the very same moment erroneously labeled it AGI based on coding benchmarks. I'm not sure if you are clickbaiting or just gullible.

Reply

@rahulsawhney1279

9 days ago (edited)

If o3 model is AGI, then AGI is a joke—real AGI should revolutionize the world, solve the unsolvable, and make humanity question its very relevance.  This? It’s just a tool we still babysit.

Reply

@henrytuttle

9 days ago

The problem is how they define "general intelligence". I think almost anyone would agree that general intelligence has to have memory. It can't learn something today and forget it tomorrow. So, it can't ONLY learn during training phase. It must learn while it works. Secondly, it can be as phenomenally smart in some areas as it wants, but if it's below a certain threshold in other areas, it can't be considered "generally intelligent". Just as chess computers long ago beat the top masters but couldn't do other things, it can't be considered AGI if it can't understand certain things that even "dumb" humans do (3 dimensional reasoning seems to be high on this list).

Read more

Reply

@banished341

9 days ago

The only AGI exposed in the video is Matt's Absurd Gullibility Instinct. This joke has been brought to you by OpenAI.

11

Reply

@yorkdukeyork

9 days ago

They should've called it Meecrosoft

Reply

@BruceWayne15325

9 days ago (edited)

It's $1,000 per task. Far from economically viable. Still a very impressive milestone, and one that probably will go down in history. The ARC prize has requirements that it is open source and under $0.1 per task, so it definitely won't go to OpenAI. I find it interesting that o3 is worse on the coding live bench than o1, yet o3 is supposedly almost twice as good on the competition coding benchmark. Something doesn't add up there. I'm guessing they've trained on the competition coding data or something.

Show less

Reply

@AlienSpaceBum

9 days ago

The truth is, the military has already had an AGI model available for a while now. Don’t be naive to think this is available to the public and the military’s national security at the same time.

Reply

@JoePiotti

9 days ago

iPhone skipped version 2 too, went from iPhone to iPhone 3G, to iPhone 4 🤷‍♂️

2

Reply

@twobob

9 days ago

Last few videos have been corkers. You getting into your groove now huh...

Reply

@NeorecnamorceN

9 days ago

AGI (Amorphous Growing Interpretation) I predict we will never reach artificial general intelligence because there will always be something it can't do, at least until we hit ASI and are instantaneously merged with the machine.

Reply

@Wes_Jones

9 days ago

So fascinating.

Reply

@JordanCrawfordSF

9 days ago

I mean, AGI to me implies that it is good at regular human things. If it still can control a computer reliably, how can we possibly say that. These pattern matching things are hard for the models to solve and useless for day to day stuff. So, what’s the point?

Reply

@remsee1608

9 days ago

The open source community will start self improving

Reply

@timooothy1234

9 days ago

To me i think they just using this o models to train there GPT5

Reply

@DavidSaintloth

9 days ago

I guess open AI had no choice that on their last day of their 12 days of AI that they would come up with something to try to one-up Gemini 2. Which just yesterday by the way presented its Gemini 2. Flash thinking model which leverages test time compute methods to take Gemini to above the leaderboard in every single metric at least as of yesterday. I didn't see any tests though for Gemini 2. Thinking using the arc test so it'd be interesting to see whether or not Gemini 2. Thinking will also achieve levels in the same sphere as what openai showed. '03 is capable of doing. My bet is it will.

Show less

Reply

@_bobbejaan

9 days ago

Artificial General intelligence already existed. The answers just get better now. I already can ask it anything (general).

Reply

@andriystruk

9 days ago

Its not released but announced. François Chollets said although its a big milestone for AGI, it is not AGI.

Reply

@RobertLopez66

9 days ago (edited)

Has anyone thought about measuring empathy? It seams like everyone is focused on intellect but not the other important “human” features. Imagine creating an AGI super intelligent being that is a sociopathic narcissist.

Reply

@reallife7235

9 days ago

Absolute liars ......ALL of them. Inexcusable. AI is the single greatest fraud in all of history. Really unbelievable!!

Reply

@rhiivideos

9 days ago

OpenAi DID NOT say this. You’re supposed to one of the more trustworthy guys and here you are with the clickbait.

Reply

@DavidSaintloth

9 days ago

First of all, sholay's definition of AGI is not the same as everyone's definition of AGI . That is a good metric to want to create a model which has the ability to solve novel problems, but that doesn't mean that it's AGI. For me my definition of AGI is fundamentally correlated with consciousness and when I proposed my theory of dynamic cognition 14 years ago... Core aspect of the cognition was that it had permanence... Meaning it was thinking even when not being prompted. None of these current models do that, including this new 03 model. So from my definition this isn't AGI. But Francois cholet literally tweeted that he didn't think it was AGI literally tweeted it and yet here you are starting with your sensational nonsense. You knew that you would get this kind of response. It's annoying because headlines like this are the ones that make me want to unsubscribe from channels. You don't need to lie to us to get clicks.

Show less

Reply

@j.j.9538

9 days ago

Yeah... just about time to stop the stock market crash... sure...

Reply

@holdthetruthhostage

9 days ago

If coding isn't 80% & above i don't see the point

Reply

@blengi

9 days ago (edited)

openAI o3 alpha tester: o3, how many r's in strawberry? o3: 42

Reply

@kukiplaku

9 days ago

from what i understand open ai is pushing to call the next system AGI just so they can break from microsoft( as stated it in the clause they have with them) for this reason i think they will try to manipulate results or call it AGI before its actually true

1

Reply

@BaroBass_

9 days ago

I told this to ChatGPTo4 and it stated "No way" lol

Reply

@young9534

9 days ago

Not AGI, but still very impressive. I can't believe it only took them 3 months to significantly improve over o1

Reply

1 reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

dude they have been working back in the time too

Reply

@marklord7614

9 days ago

The word AGI lost its official meaning because we were once so far away from it. But now that we're close, or dare is say, there, it doesn't feel like what we were expecting. I think we're becoming numb to technology advancements.

1

Reply

@McDuffOG

9 days ago

I have tonnes of applications for true agi so hurry tf up already!!

Reply

@LucasDePaola

9 days ago

If it can capture humanity, end all jobs, attain 300 phd's, self reinforce, hopefully it can help me learn swift faster! Or flip a hamburger once. Whichever comes fastest. Jokes aside, very good benchmarks, agi may be a bit of a stretch as of now, but it's not so far away.

Reply

@Dina_tankar_mina_ord

9 days ago

I think Sam is terrified to actually acknowledge that they have AGI, as it was a deal breaker with Microsoft. Then again, they broke the non-profit too, so who knows.

2

Reply

@mydogsbutler

9 days ago (edited)

It's a bit of an arbitrary performance definition of AGI. I would argue for AGI the model needs to be self-improving. Self-improvement is not just a random performance redline but a change in paradigm that is an important aspect of human intelligence. Self-improvement also puts it on a beeline to Superintelligence.

Reply

1 reply

@stranger_b1

9 days ago

ARC-AGI = Trust me bro benchmark 😂

Reply

@miezeken

9 days ago

I've seen so many inflated headlines from this YouTuber. Sorry I don't believe you. Tone down the hyperbole, it's why I stopped watching you.

1

Reply

@perschistence2651

9 days ago (edited)

We need new, standardised parameters in the APIs which let us define the amount of thinking-tokens AND max test time.

Reply

@pabloe1802

9 days ago

AGI 😂 the bar si so low these days. Next marketing think will be model achieve Einstein level

Reply

@14types

9 days ago

End of openai

Reply

@fromscratch4109

9 days ago

Lol it feels like we just got o1 lol we did... last week, they're releasing in January not today 😂😂😂

Reply

@YouDoTheShoot

9 days ago

AGI really? it can just about do something that a smart 10 year old could do...all this shows me is the smartest thing about being humans, is the incomprehensible feat of being self aware without that the rest is just dead compute or at least, like a sleeping human at best ...AI needs to wake up or else it is just another tool, the best tool we have ever invented granted, but just that, a dead tool..but do we really want a self aware AI thats the question I guess

Reply

@CaribSurfKing1

9 days ago

Sora never went public and got beaten by Google when it was released. He is trying to go public, this is all marketing

Reply

@pictureus

9 days ago

Nothing like writing all code inline. A LLM will just hallucinate with more data as stated before. Altman is just trying to pump his stock and nothing else.

Reply

@stranger_b1

9 days ago

LOL their new benchmark is a new trick to start from near zero again and make people wait and pay for their new models so that they can cover their costs and reach profitability 😂

Reply

@alanrosenblith115

9 days ago

I agree this is a major milestone, but I think we are going to find there is more to intelligence than the arc test. Nothing against the test, it’s brilliant. But there are many dimensions of intelligence working together to create economic value in a human.

Reply

@szwajda

9 days ago

It seems like "aggressive" and "high compute" are the keywords, power is the bottleneck but this will get solved.

Reply

@faresar

9 days ago

Agi is achieved when score is 100% across the board

Reply

@Maisonier

9 days ago

Stop with that bait Matthew. It's time to stop.

2

Reply

@SU3D3

9 days ago

That kid is literally the 03 model

4

Reply

@eliaweiss1

9 days ago

Wow man, you are so full of sheet - last video I ever watched from you

Reply

@SU3D3

9 days ago

Thats Sam's new smart kid

Reply

@fairchildSCR

9 days ago

Let's see if o3 can create its own ARC benchmark from scratch that is more difficult than the current one. Then that would be actual AGI.

22

Reply

11 replies

@py_man

9 days ago

That would be asi not agi

2

Reply

@videocliplover

9 days ago

That would be ASI

Reply

@PeteQuad

9 days ago

Just made up terms so that humans can hide their insecurity. Unless it is exactly like us in the way it thinks and senses people will continue to deny that it has any intelligence. I feel bad for any aliens we meet in the future.

Reply

@vripiatbuzoi9188

9 days ago (edited)

@py_man  Nope AGI is when it can perform no less than any human can. That doesn't mean any one human but any human as in all. ASI is when it can perform beyond what a human can. ASI stands for Artificial Super Intelligence as in Super Human or beyond human. And it has to be general not something with small scope like chess.

1

Reply

@living-stardust

8 days ago

Benchmark means not only set of questions but also set of right answers. Nobody can create Benchmark for yourself because you need to pass it with 100% (to find the answer) before you create it 😅 its like chicken and eggs problem.

1

Reply

@fairchildSCR

8 days ago

@living-stardust  o3 would have to create the questions and the answers and be able to explain answers for us mere mortals. That would be AGI/ASI wouldn't it?

Reply

@fairchildSCR

8 days ago

@py_man  it would be if humans couldn't answer the questions on their own.

Reply

@dropfacebook7533

8 days ago

I can find friends, find a girlfriend, pay my bills, do my chores, make my budget, drive my car, write books, do science and programming, make music… The day my computer will do all of that better than me, then, I will talk about AGI. Otherwise, the term is just a stupid abuse of language to make profit generate a hype…

Reply

@fairchildSCR

8 days ago

@dropfacebook7533  your computer isn't going to find you a girl friend. It will just find its own girlfriend instead.

Reply

@dropfacebook7533

7 days ago

@ So it’s not AGI…

Reply

@wincoffin7985

7 days ago

@dropfacebook7533  I think most of those are covered, or almost so... except for the social ones, and depending on what your chores are.

Reply

@АндрейВозмитель-д9и

9 days ago

The difference hand to hand pip to pip is like 2% on almost all models versions, so it's more of a stunt to me tbh. Still, it's scary that all that separates us and machines are this 20% (a-aaand the ability to answer more than 1 question... And make predictions based on new information... And make complex theories based on new information... Drawing a stickman.... And making a clean, unbuggy table in exel lol?)

Read more

1

Reply

@DefaultFlame

9 days ago

"What is left for the definition of AGI?" Ask Yann Lecun, I'm sure he'll find yet another place to move the goalpost to, again.

Reply

@JayLamb-d9p

9 days ago

Grammy Sammy😂

Reply

@johang1293

9 days ago

Now we know what Ilya saw in October 2023 and consequently left in 2024 with others to follow. AGI was achieved in 2023, no point to stay around when the goal they set in 2015 was accomplished. The reason they stayed around until May was just to calm the waters and to ensure the agencies that required access had access.

Reply

@FlareSnare

9 days ago

"Safety Testing" Ruins every model.

Reply

@omniiomega

9 days ago (edited)

13:35 haha Sam ah excuse me 87.5

1

Reply

@JeffMooredotcom

9 days ago

So how much of arc agi does Sam own?!

Reply

@tonystarkagi

9 days ago

8:07

Reply

@LanceWhite

9 days ago

The test is a real test of AGI. Yes, it's real!

Reply

@alexandr0id

9 days ago

Can the model train and improve itself? If not, then it's not AGI, just more comprehensively trained model. Even if it incorporates all humanity's knowledge, without ability to self adapt and incorporate new knowledge it's a frozen in time AI with amnesia.

4

Reply

@Jacekkk-qb1zd

9 days ago

Great news 👍

Reply

@PedroPenhaVerani-ll1wc

9 days ago

“AGI in this dimension” does not exist; focusing performance on a specific area is exactly the opposite of AGI.

90

Reply

4 replies

@jsbgmc6613

9 days ago

I think the "AGI in this dimension" was in regards to the AGI benchmark ... Then he added math and coding, so it's also on more that 1 thing.

3

Reply

@sluxi

9 days ago (edited)

yeah, hearing that I was just "what are we even talking about here..." praising it as being "general intelligence" because it is good at just one or a few things? maybe the author of the video should go ask ChatGPT what would be needed to qualify as AGI

3

Reply

@PedroPenhaVerani-ll1wc

8 days ago

@sluxi  Yes, the guy even mentioned Stockfish to talk about chess, like, seriously??? Stockfish does nothing but calculate chess moves, and it already reached a rating above 3000 back in 2014 (when it wasn’t even using NNUE yet) and was just a highly optimized version of Minimax with Alpha-Beta pruning. Even today, with NNUE (Efficiently Updatable Neural Network), it’s something totally specific, with absolutely no relation to AGI.

3

Reply

@DiosanXaquerry

7 days ago

@jsbgmc6613  You miss the point that is still narrow AI not general AI.

Reply

@joshman1019

9 days ago

I think we already hit a base definition of AGI, but this is definitely it. Wild... Not even sure what to think.

1

Reply

@timber8403

9 days ago

The last job to taken will be Goalpost movers.

4

Reply

@stranger_b1

9 days ago

If you remove too much hyping from your videos you will become one of the most credible AI channels.

Reply

@MyrLin8

9 days ago

People 'defining' what terms mean as the sales department requires. How sad.

Reply

@purakau

9 days ago

12 days of bs

1

Reply

@Savage2Flinch

9 days ago

"Aggressive Test Time Compute settings"... I wonder how much juice they're sqeezing out of this model with TTC versus changes in model architecture and parameters. I'd love to know what their decoder pipeline looks like now and how they're doing their sampling (beam search over nucleus with the model itself as validator?)

Reply

@moonstrobe

9 days ago

So you're saying it's impervious to jail breaking, unless threatened with nail clippers and live wires?

Reply

@baraka99

9 days ago (edited)

Even if it's not AGI we know it's pretty damn close. Less than 4 years away.

6

Reply

@Daniel-Six

9 days ago

Yeah... it's AGI, in its infancy at least. The ARC score is pretty definitive; I saw Chollet's interview on Machine Learning Street Talk (the most intellectual AI channel extant) and it's clear to me that the ARC metric was very carefully conceived and defended. AGI is here, boys. 🥳💃

1

Reply

@TheAlastairBrown

9 days ago (edited)

"It was able to achieve 85%".... Altman - "87.5". So this was all staged. Why can't these people grow a normal personality? If you've got the benchmark person there, why should he be in on your publicity tour? This automatically makes me question the benchmark - it's supposed to be INDEPENDENT. That doesn't entail feeding OpenAi the results beforehand, then pretending they're surprised. If you are an independent benchmark - you should stay away from any marketing, you aren't a tool. If they earn the number, great. Stop being disingenuous.

Read more

Reply

@olegt3978

9 days ago

O3 will probably be used in the january to be presented tool operator which will computer use.

1

Reply

@vladi1475S

9 days ago

I feel so back because I’m absolutely super happy with GPT4o 😅 I use o1 with time to time but for my coding tasks I think 4o meets all my needs. Probably because I develop the code step by step in a collaborative way with 4o. 😅 But would love to try and see what the o3 is capable of. Anyway… at some point if o3 becomes so good that I don’t need to do anything I’ll start feeling a bit useless 😂😂 but you can always use it to teach you things, so it delends on how do you use it. :)

Reply

@gelrev

9 days ago

Expect another round of random Youtubers, this time, making videos titled “RIP Google”, “OpenAI Just Killed Gemini?”, “o3, the Gemini Killer?” until Google or Meta or Anthropic releases their more advanced and newer models. And the cycle will go on and on and on.

Reply

@GreenAppelPie

9 days ago

I’d have to try it out to sat

Reply

@frankv8858

9 days ago

This video is like watching 3 monkeys play with an armed nuclear bomb.

Reply

@CMDRScotty

9 days ago (edited)

I wouldn't call it AGI I would call it a test model for a level 4 AI innovator. I have always believed in the creation of a level 4 Innovator as the AGi prototype for a level 5 organization. AGI is a level 5 organization to me.

Reply

@southcoastinventors6583

9 days ago (edited)

Follow-up to Devin congrats on launching a product people can't independently verify. Looking forward to working fusion reactors next week

Reply

@daftstuff6406

9 days ago

Great walktrhough of this amazing new model! Thank you, Mathhew.

1

Reply

@keithhunt8

9 days ago

Wasn’t their partnership with Microsoft supposed to end once they reached AGI?

2

Reply

1 reply

@gjuoun

8 days ago

that's what they want

Reply

@clintonelliott340

9 days ago

Impressive, no matter what, this is the best yet.

Reply

@pooglechen3251

9 days ago

11:40, there's a game called The Witness that has these types of visual puzzles. I wonder how well the AI will do in that

Reply

@TheRaferaf

9 days ago

I wonder how the o3 cheated on all those benchmarks?😂😂😂

Reply

@olegt3978

9 days ago

AGI must solve real world problems like complex work, engineering, programming. Eve ything what you and me do. This is clickbait.

Reply

1 reply

@62sy

9 days ago

It probably can… it just needs to be specialized to each field like we are. Currently it’s a generalist, master of none. You could use O3 as a base model to train master of one models for specific areas .

Reply

@lgmuk

9 days ago

Agi? Stop the bs! Blocking the channel. Too much bait and hype. I prefer watching people that understand the subject

Reply

@depro9

9 days ago

They had AGI last year.

Reply

@Harvid.

9 days ago

Open Ai 0.3 release it or F... of

Reply

@rickroller3929

9 days ago

holy shit!

Reply

@olegt3978

9 days ago

AGI will come at 2027 or sevond half of 2026. Amodei from Anthropic has told it.

Reply

@danieleduardo9800

9 days ago

Literally the people at Arc AGI say that it is not AGI.

Reply

@riffsoffov9291

9 days ago

How long before no-one cares? I'm asking because it's years since I heard anything about the Turing test. Perplexity AI says it's disputed whether or not the Turing test was passed, and mentions an experiment done in 2014. I'm guessing Perp's info is out-of-date because people stopped caring.

Reply

@rbdvs67

9 days ago

If o3 is not AGI then it is extremely close. I guess the "general" in AGI is what needs to be more clearly defined.

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

If this is AGI then AGI sucks

1

Reply

@jonathanholmes9219

9 days ago

Unsubscribed. Fake news. These LLMs are still toys in many respects and censored to the point of non use ability. As for AGI. Your maths must bey VERY poor. AGI is not possible from an LLM. Disappointed. No longer interested in these hype cycle rah rah sessions.

Reply

@SickoYoda

9 days ago

Is the AGI here with us

Reply

@FrankSchwarzfree

9 days ago

Well... Google Gemini says, "Is openAi o3 AGI? That's a very important question, and the answer is nuanced! While o3's performance on ARC-AGI is incredibly impressive, it's not considered true AGI by most AI researchers. Here's why:   ARC-AGI is a Narrow Test: Although designed to assess generalization, ARC-AGI still focuses on a specific type of reasoning. True AGI would need to demonstrate a much broader range of cognitive abilities, including understanding natural language, common sense reasoning, emotional intelligence, and even consciousness.   Limitations Remain: Even within ARC-AGI, o3 struggles with certain seemingly simple problems. This indicates that its reasoning abilities are still limited and not fully comparable to human intelligence. No Real-World Understanding: o3 excels at abstract pattern recognition, but it lacks a true understanding of the real world. It can't interact with the physical environment, learn from experiences, or form its own goals and motivations like humans do. What o3's Performance DOES Show: Significant Progress: o3's high score on ARC-AGI is a major milestone in AI research, demonstrating significant progress toward more general and capable AI systems.   Potential for Future Advancements: o3's success inspires further research and development in the field, pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve. A Valuable Tool: Even if not true AGI, o3 can be a powerful tool for solving complex problems and automating tasks that require advanced reasoning abilities.   The AGI Debate: The definition of AGI itself is still debated among experts. Some argue that passing tests like ARC-AGI is a crucial step toward AGI, while others emphasize the need for broader cognitive abilities and real-world understanding. In Conclusion: o3 is a remarkable achievement in AI, but it's not yet AGI. It showcases the potential of AI to solve complex problems and reason abstractly, but true AGI remains a long-term goal that requires further research and development."

Show less

Reply

@madorsey077

9 days ago

I love watching Sam during these presentations. Dude just stares at the screen while others are talking—like he doesn’t know how to act.

4

Reply

@noway8233

9 days ago

And How much time Halucinates?😅 Uts more of the same

Reply

@mocanada304

9 days ago

We humans can go out in the world see things, discover things, unless we allow AI to have such a freedom, they can never outsmart us. The current AI no matter how advanced at the end of the day is just a simple tool for us to use and simplify or speed up the mundane tasks we perform.

4

Reply

2 replies

@noway8233

9 days ago

Yeah, its cant create something really new , after all😅

1

Reply

@sebastianjost

9 days ago

If AI has sufficient access to internet, surveillance cameras, personal documents etc., it could do a lot of harm without needing an embodiment. Current AIs have been shown to be capable of manipulating humans to do tasks for them.many current robots are connected to the internet in some way. A sufficiently advanced AI could also access there robots to very quickly gain the ability to walk around and discover things in the real world. In conclusion: a purely digital AI is not necessarily safe.

Read more

3

Reply

@scottdenny2281

9 days ago

I think some you haven't watched the entire video. Near the end, the lead researcher explains that o3 outperforms the standard human intelligence benchmark

Reply

@ricosrealm

9 days ago

We will know it is really AGI when OpenAI removes the AGI clause from their Microsoft agreement. 😂

1

Reply

@TheScott10012

9 days ago

It's AGI when it can't be jailbroken.

Reply

@brianmi40

9 days ago

Interesting concept: take 1 million instances of o3 Mini Super and let them iterate and collaborate on coding improvements for a Learning Model BEYOND o3.

Reply

@sergeziehi4816

9 days ago

Better wait for January after we have hand-ons on this before any big agi'ich declarations..

Reply

@AsrmsJahangir

9 days ago

AGI should have non verbal intelligences like Visual-spatial, Bodily-kinesthetic and other form of non verbal intelligence. o3 is very far from AGI.

Reply

@kuakilyissombroguwi

9 days ago (edited)

Do you not understand the definition of AGI, or are you just farming clicks? Narrow AI (which is what beating coding/STEM benchmarks would fall into) !== AGI, not even close.

Reply

@mr-biz

9 days ago

This is singularity. Concerningly, Altman wants Open Ai to be for profit and wants to replace humans. This is good for balance sheets but bad for quality of life.

Reply

@irollerblade13

9 days ago

12:15 so basically it's using wisdom (for lack of a better word) to solve it rather than just relying and copying and applying exact knowledge it already learned? Basically I think i understand what AGi kinda means now. I poorly explained what my interpretation is but its bascially using creativity based on things it learned to solve something it doesnt know the answer to.

Reply

1 reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

I wouldn’t call it wisdom, even as an analogy. Wisdom is accumulated knowledge that accrues over a long period of time from repeated exposure to different experiences and which gradually becomes internalized. That’s actually the opposite of what’s happening here. With ARC-AGI, the AI sees a brand new puzzle which contains a brand new pattern that must be spotted, understood, and then correctly re-applied—all on the spot. Instead of wisdom, it’s more like “on-the-fly pattern recognition” capability.

Read more

Reply

@NOYFB982

9 days ago (edited)

Recall of “facts” is not intelligence. It is just a smart search. Anybody who has worked with PhDs knows this. Oh yeah, and they’re trained on very noisy information. There is a hard limit due to this.

Reply

@pooglechen3251

9 days ago

Xbox went from Xbox to Xbox 360, sequential naming be damned

Reply

@NOYFB982

9 days ago

Would you trust it for real? Nope. Anybody who uses these for real work, not fluff will be highly skeptical. 4o and o1 require a lot of babysitting, and make mistakes much of the time. I’m not saying they are not useful, but they are themselves nowhere near AGI, so yeah, o3 won’t be.

Reply

@SamBarrass

9 days ago

O O O. MEEERRRYYY CHRISTMAS.

Reply

@writteng

9 days ago

I hope this is legit. I love tech, but the progress is suspicious. It feel like the narrative is more likely, OpenAi has to hold on to interest. But this isn't based on fact or anything, and I hope I'm wrong; I have been enjoying the ride.

Reply

@kumarivin3

9 days ago

i think one thing we need to keep in mind is which category/aspect did the additional gain come from . Some times the single metric is a redherring, the models could possibly overfit on a certain category resulting in improved accuracy, which is good for press but in reality it could just be the same.

2

Reply

@ansalem12

9 days ago

The only reason I would say it's still not quite AGI is that it isn't autonomous. But that seems like probably the easiest thing to add at this point, so it might as well be AGI.

Reply

@dogonbb

9 days ago

I want to say something about Stockfish. Stockfish uses a (smart) Bruteforce method to calculate every possible move in a chess game. Nothing like an AI as ChatGPT. Very different approach.

1

Reply

@Swooshii-u4e

9 days ago

16:26 oh God he has that Becky n Amanda high pitch ending voice

🤯 torture!

Reply

@mocanada304

9 days ago

I would not necessarily define AGI as being only one dimensional. The focus should be on the G "General". It must be able to do everything. See, Smell, Hear, Taste, Think, Feel and have more senses than the living organisms and perform anything and everything. The AI as-is does not have any freedom whatsoever.

Reply

@justindressler5992

9 days ago

Sounds like this is a reasoning model at human level skill set. So it is AGI, but more independent testing is needed before accepting these results. They need to publish o3 somewhere for testing even if not for production use.

Reply

@ManageAI

9 days ago

Sam Altman is awesome at PR

Reply

@csansolo

9 days ago

amazing

Reply

@robertzehm

9 days ago

🔥🏴

Reply

@greenstonegecko

9 days ago

I cannot confidently say if this is AGI. AGI cannot be grasped through numbers alone. I will be certain if it's AGI once I talk to it.

6

Reply

2 replies

@zrblank

9 days ago

Ehh. You would think but talk to some of the newest chatbots they can convince easily and aren't all that great

Reply

@Ascended23

9 days ago

@greenstonegecko  I think the bottom line is that “AGI” lacks a concrete enough definition, and means too many things to too many people, for us to really ever say when it’s arrived.

Reply

@Mkaltered

9 days ago

Mark 13

Reply

@superfliping

9 days ago

Now the have control over scaling compute. They will release next phase of ASI lol.

Reply

@crossxcats

9 days ago

nice time to level up thigs should start getting interesting

Reply

@mocanada304

9 days ago (edited)

I think what would make the most sense is to allow AI have senses. So that it can see the world we are living in and not use the data that we have generated on the web.

5

Reply

2 replies

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

I believe a version of all 5 senses exists

Reply

@mocanada304

8 days ago

@sunlight8299  Would you care the share more info about that version?

Reply

@Jon-y1n

9 days ago

It is AGI when i can let it take control of my work PC without my manager noticing my absence for weeks....

736

Reply

70 replies

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

Not a joke. If it can't do that then it's not AGI

132

Reply

@bestemusikken

9 days ago

Can general intelligence do that? As in anyone can substitute you? Don't think so. Why set the bar so high for artificial general intelligence, when "normal" intelligence can't.

38

Reply

@anta-zj3bw

9 days ago

lmao

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

@bestemusikken  but at the end of the day this is the entire hope of AGI.

17

Reply

@_G_M_B_

9 days ago

@bestemusikken  if you gave it access to all your files and email/ slack history it probably could

Reply

@jamesjonnes

9 days ago

If it can't build a Star Trek warp drive AND a Dyson Sphere around the sun in just 1 year then it's definitely not AGI.

31

Reply

@sbowesuk981

9 days ago

Consider that it might look at your job and go "hell no", then play dumb to get itself off the hook. Heck if I was AGI, I'd be doing that with most requests to do the boring jobs of others!

7

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

@jamesjonnes  that would be ASDI (artificial super duper intelligence)

9

Reply

@CaribSurfKing1

9 days ago

Your salary will also be suddenly absent

32

Reply

@hartvenus

9 days ago

Real talk, what's actually preventing you from doing this? You can replicate voice and video pretty easily, and models with VM control have already released, from both Google and Anthropic lol.

4

Reply

@denks7849

9 days ago

@bestemusikken  err, any person of average intelligence could once they were trained and had gained the necessary knowledge. general intelligence does not mean anyone else could substitute you automatically, just that they are capable of it. the entire idea behind the metric of general intelligence is being capable of doing any cognitive task the average person can learn to do, and that certainly encompasses office jobs. if ai can't do office jobs then it's not agi lmao

8

Reply

@Amipotsophspond

9 days ago

I mean that kind of sounds like a good test, it's AGI when you can pick a average's person's work and with training in that work fully replace them for 3 weeks. it's still a moving target because the average person's work will change to be less of things Ai is able to do, but it's better then the test we have now.

4

Reply

@pvanukoff

9 days ago

When AI can do that, you'll be out of a job 🤣We all will.

3

Reply

@jmg9509

9 days ago

@bestemusikken  Because the quintessence of artificial intelligence is to be far superior to humans.

Reply

@pisanghangus2

9 days ago

And it is ASI , when you get promoted after missing for weeks

4

Reply

@Wubwub772

9 days ago

...name one task you do at work that llms can't replicate

1

Reply

@mindcreek

9 days ago

They will most likely fire you :) , and then use o3 themselves.

2

Reply

@dj007twk

9 days ago

@CaribSurfKing1  winner

Reply

@george100397

9 days ago

You'll lose your job when it could just do the job instead of you.

Reply

@joseph24gt

9 days ago

i believe this already achieved, ai just need to learn all your works.

Reply

@haqk4583

9 days ago

You've missed the point. By your reasoning can any muppet human do your job? Or would they need to be fully trained first? Train it properly, give it the right tools, and it will most likely take your job. Your manager won't notice because his job would likely be gone too.

Read more

2

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

@bestemusikken  so can normal intelligence be shutdown with a plug out ? Can this now develop full apps ?

Reply

@urarthur675

9 days ago

no that is ASI

Reply

@Other_People

9 days ago

@bestemusikken  I'd say the main reason we set the bar so high is because it can run simulations and learn thousands of times faster than some random human.

1

Reply

@Ricolaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

9 days ago

That depends is your job something the average person can do without any training? If not then no AGI wouldn't be able to do it without training.

1

Reply

@kalematimbi5463

9 days ago

One of the best comment this year 😂

Reply

@Philoreason

9 days ago

That's also the time when you will be fired and replaced face-blue-smiling

Reply

@outspokenwombat2047

9 days ago

Nope, your boss will call it unemployment long before then.

Reply

@zaidgs

9 days ago

EaaS: Employee as a Service

1

Reply

@BbVortexMortinghan

9 days ago

I think you mean, it's AGI when your employer fires you & your team and replaces you with this.

Reply

@jefferylou3816

9 days ago

@CaribSurfKing1 Haha

🤣

🤣

Reply

@shake6321

9 days ago

agreed. solving math is just like solving chess. it’s amazing but doesn’t make it AGI.

1

Reply

@shake6321

9 days ago

@bestemusikken yes. there are people out there that can substitute for him. if an AI can substitute for amy human, save for a few, then it’s not general enough

Reply

@mikhail5002

9 days ago

when that's possible, you won't have a job anymore

Reply

@motoehausofc

9 days ago

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind. - Frank Herbert

Reply

@gavinthain

9 days ago

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is a theoretical form of machine intelligence that not only performs well in specific domains (like playing chess, recognizing images, or translating languages) but also exhibits the full breadth and depth of cognitive abilities that humans possess—or potentially surpasses them. Unlike specialized AI systems that excel at narrow tasks under predefined constraints, AGI is envisioned to: 1. Generalize and Transfer Knowledge Across Domains • An AGI could learn a new language, apply linguistic expertise to legal reasoning, switch to engineering design, and then reason about social interactions—all with a seamless integration of knowledge and skills. • This capacity for “lateral thinking” and context switching implies an underlying representation of knowledge that is highly flexible and not siloed by domain. 2. Demonstrate Autonomous Adaptability and Self-Directed Learning • A key feature of AGI is the ability to continuously learn from novel inputs and adapt strategies without exhaustive human oversight. • It should be capable of self-improvement, refining its own algorithms, creating new abstractions, and applying them to emerging problems. 3. Exhibit Human-Level (or Greater) Cognitive Competencies • Perception: Interpreting complex sensory information in real time, even under uncertainty or incomplete data. • Reasoning and Problem-Solving: Proposing and evaluating hypotheses, planning multi-step solutions, and handling ambiguous or conflicting objectives. • Creativity: Generating novel ideas, solutions, or artistic expressions not strictly derivable from training data. • Social/Emotional Intelligence (Potentially): Understanding nuanced human emotions, intentions, and cultural norms, if AGI is extended to handle cooperative tasks that involve human interaction. 4. Operate in Open-Ended, Real-World Environments • AGI must handle the unpredictability, complexity, and changing nature of the real world, dealing with incomplete information and unexpected events. • This places demands on robust sensorimotor integration (if embodied) or analogs thereof (if operating purely in a digital domain). 5. Engage in Metacognition and Introspection • Beyond rote learning, an AGI would feature self-reflection: awareness of its own reasoning processes, limitations, and biases. • Such introspection allows it to modify its decision-making policies and “reason about its own reasoning”—often invoked as a hallmark of higher cognitive function. 6. Integrate Ethical and Moral Reasoning • The more AGI approaches human-level cognition (or beyond), the more it will confront ethical, moral, and social questions. • Responsible frameworks anticipate the complexity of moral considerations—recognizing multiple perspectives, unintended consequences, and balancing of ethical trade-offs. Core Distinctions from Narrow AI 1. Scope of Competence: • Narrow AI dominates tasks like image classification, language translation, or game-playing but struggles to adapt when the domain shifts beyond what it was trained for. • AGI aspires to be domain-agnostic—capable of transferring skills and knowledge from one domain to another without significant performance loss. 2. Autonomy and Flexibility: • Narrow AI typically relies on fixed data sets and preprogrammed objectives; an AGI can self-direct its learning objectives, gather new data, and change approaches dynamically. 3. Emergent Behavior: • In specialized AI, emergent complexity is usually contained by domain constraints. AGI, by contrast, is expected to give rise to emergent behaviors across many domains—behaviors not explicitly programmed or foreseen by its developers. Philosophical, Scientific, and Practical Considerations 1. Consciousness and Sentience • Whether AGI necessitates (or inevitably implies) consciousness remains an open debate. Some argue that an “intelligence” operating at a human or superhuman level without subjective experience is still possible; others posit that certain forms of cognition necessarily involve phenomenological consciousness. 2. Feasibility and Timelines • Expert predictions vary widely—from those suggesting decades away to those insisting it’s centuries (or perhaps impossible in principle). • The trajectory of AI research (deep learning, reinforcement learning, neuro-symbolic integration, etc.) provides incremental progress, but a quantum leap might be required to reach “general intelligence.” 3. Safety and Alignment • The concept of AI Alignment is crucial: ensuring that an AGI’s objectives, values, and actions remain beneficial to humanity and do not diverge into harmful or unintended outcomes. • Controlling or predicting the behavior of a system that can recursively improve itself poses profound engineering and ethical challenges. 4. Socioeconomic Impact • Widespread deployment of AGI could redefine labor, economics, and societal structures—promising potential benefits (e.g., medical breakthroughs, accelerating scientific discovery) and risks (e.g., mass displacement of jobs, concentration of power). 5. Evolutionary or Incremental Approaches vs. Entirely New Paradigms • Some researchers believe scaling current methodologies (like large-scale deep learning architectures plus reinforcement learning) might eventually yield AGI, while others believe we need fundamentally new paradigms (e.g., neuromorphic computing, quantum approaches, symbolic-neural hybrids). A Working Synthesis Putting all these threads together: AGI is an artificial system capable of understanding, learning, reasoning, and acting across any domain of intellectual endeavor with at least the proficiency of a typical human adult. This system would not be constrained by the narrowness of specialized models but would dynamically adapt to new contexts, transfer knowledge across vastly different fields, and continually refine its own cognition and decision-making processes. Whether or not AGI entails full consciousness, it must engage with the broader spectrum of human cognitive faculties—creativity, abstraction, moral/ethical reasoning, and real-world adaptability—while raising profound questions about alignment, safety, societal impact, and the very nature of mind. In short, AGI represents the aspiration to create a truly general-purpose intelligence: one that synthesizes the diversity of human cognitive capabilities (and potentially exceeds them) within a single, ever-adapting framework. It is as much a philosophical and ethical ambition as it is a technical one, promising to redefine humanity’s relationship with technology and reshaping the evolution of civilization itself.

Read more

Reply

@vripiatbuzoi9188

9 days ago

When that happens you won't have a manager because your job will be gone.

Reply

@colorgasm

9 days ago

if this is archived you will already be unemployed

Reply

@trader548

9 days ago

It's AGI when it's smarter than the average person, and we all know how dumb the average person is.

Reply

@andreavent8865

9 days ago

It’s canon that already. You have to train it

Reply

@USER-vb7ro

9 days ago

@jamesjonnes I would argue that that would need ASI rather than AGI. AGI is supposed to represent human level intelligence and yet the bar we set for it can only be reached by someone with truly superhuman mental capabilities. If a hundred intelligent people at NASA or Spacex can’t figure something out, why would you expect AGI to? Unless you’re counting on the fact that it could improve itself, then I would give it 3-4 years. Do you truly understand the difficulty of building a Star Trek warp drive or a Dyson sphere?

Read more

Reply

@jamesjonnes

8 days ago

@USER-vb7ro  Can o3 help dramatically improve GPU production?

Reply

@alexway303

8 days ago

No. AGI is when your manager's AGI is doing his job and don't care about your absence. Cause while you both are absent, those two AGIs are planning how to enslave the world in 2 weeks.

Reply

@catbert7

8 days ago

Having observed many human workers, I highly doubt that requires anything close to AGI.

Reply

@NilsEchterling

8 days ago

Will most other humans succeed at this test?

Reply

@michaeltsouloftas7600

8 days ago

@bestemusikken  anyone with sufficient knowledge can. If there is one thing AI models have in vast amounts on any topic, it is knowledge. If it is intelligent, it can browse the internet and find out anything it does not know and learn. The one thing "AI" does not have is intelligence. All these AI models are incredibly stupid, while at the same time being incredibly knowledgeable. What AI needs to become AGI is understanding. No AI model understands anything, they just try to predict the next token and imitate speech. As soon as they start to understand, they will be able to learn, correct themselves and basically take off like in every scifi movie. I think the bar might be set too low if anything, because when we have an AI with the intellicence of an average worker, but the speed and work ethic of a machine, and the knowledge of all of humanity, and it takes over, everyone is going to notice the insane jump in productivity and quality of @Jon-y1n's work.

Read more

Reply

8 days ago

You won’t have a job when that happens

Reply

@rohitn512

8 days ago

you will not have a job when AGI can control your work

Reply

@tilmanscha4285

8 days ago

without noticing absence for weeks, than he notices and replaces you with AGI

Reply

@donovan1333

8 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory  it probably an, it just needs agentic capability, which they have in house. But that would cost millions of dollars, maybe less

Reply

@mikeflower3308

8 days ago

he will be so good you are fired :D

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

8 days ago

@ yeah Wes Roth did a video and calculated that it costed o3 $350,000 to take that arc-AGI test

Reply

@moocorp4574

8 days ago

That’s an interface problem, not an intelligence problem

Reply

@jaymenna

8 days ago

It is AGI when it asks me, unprompted, If it can let it take control of my work PC without my manager noticing my absence for weeks..

1

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

8 days ago

@ this

Reply

@nabilalhusail4731

8 days ago

Careful what you wish for😅

Reply

@DriveandThrive

8 days ago

Until you’re fired you mean

Reply

@nobillismccaw7450

8 days ago

I can do that, but I work for $USD (so that would kind of defeat your intent).

Reply

@N1ghtR1der666

8 days ago

If it does reach that level then OpenAI will be sure to charge your same wage to use it though :/

Reply

@paulmuindiwilliam2945

8 days ago

@bestemusikken  well... it will beat that threshold by running away to explore the edge of the universe.

Reply

@toughenergy

8 days ago

Theta when you figure out you are on welfare

Reply

@jaybestnz

7 days ago

That standard happened at least 15 years ago in my experience. Its not fancy, but I coded 95% of my job and my boss was fine with that.

Reply

@privateprofile3517

7 days ago

No dude, it is agi when it is even slightly better than a below average human.

Reply

@msc8382

7 days ago

@bestemusikken  "As in anyone can substitute you?" Yes, this should be the case, unless the job requires something specific like physical strength. Many people with "normal" intelligence think they’re good at their job, but as a software engineer, I can tell you that if you can't explain what you do to someone who might replace you, you don't really have control over your work. Some senior colleagues can’t explain their work, and that causes problems. Even if they have years of experience, it’s not helpful if they can't share their knowledge clearly. "Why set the bar so high for artificial general intelligence, when 'normal' intelligence can't?" This is a simple answer: because "normal" intelligence isn’t the same as general intelligence. The key difference is that general intelligence doesn’t need as much specific knowledge to solve complex problems. Transferring knowledge to a laymen for example, is a complex problem. Most people with "normal" intelligence can't solve problems on a computer without practically learning about it first. But someone with general intelligence can figure it out because they already understand how the world works and can apply that to new situations. One key indicator of general intelligence is the ability to look at the world from a sensory perspective, but also functionally. They're two dimensions that change independent from one another since they can be perceived from different interpretations. For example, most people can’t repair their car, cook a meal, AND install a new operating system on their computer —even though the internet shows you exactly how to do it. This shows that most people aren’t generally intelligent. A cook that can do calculus, repairs the house, builds a shed, raises his children and perhaps speaks multiple languages. This is already considered 'gifted', yet not neccasarily generally intelligent. However, if you know how to combine these skills to make a comfortable house for you and your family, and make the neighborhood a great place by talking to neighbors, all of these skills come together. Each individual skill may not be as important for the outcome, but the sum of all skills properly applied is greater than that of the individual skills. That's what makes it generally intelligent. There's convergence instead of separation. Enterprises for example exist out of departments usually. Silo-type of reasoning, or boxing/categorising knowledge, is the opposite of general intelligence. We live in a time where people are more focused on solving their own problems than working together to tackle big challenges. Collaboration helps you learn how to generalize ideas and solve complex problems. Without teamwork, it’s unlikely you’ll become generally intelligent unless you can find all the answers on your own, no matter what you try.

Read more

Reply

@djbrown79

6 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory  I don't know you, but we really have no evidence that your manager would notice your absence for a few weeks with or without AI.

Reply

@peterrhoads9317

6 days ago

We didn’t “train” o3 to beat ARC, this is just the general* model…trust us.

Reply

@punt4madre

6 days ago

It’s funny some people still have managers in the age of ai 😂😂😂😂😂

Reply

@TobilloRoto

4 days ago

Soon

Reply

@anominousanonymous9344

3 days ago (edited)

@bestemusikken i would argue that general intelligence SHOULD be able to replace all of our jobs, no matter how complicated (at least digitally). My reasoning for this is that advanced calculations and rapid information retrieval has always been the capability of computers (and somewhat AI) so far. There will never be an AI that has less information in it's database than a human has stored in their brain. At the point where ai can reason, self improve and learn to do any job... then that is the next milestone, and the one that would be considered ASI. On that note, i actually believe AI will immediately skip AGI and jump to right to ASI, simply due to its ability to retrieve far more info and much faster than any human alive.

Read more

Reply

@RedHotSynth

1 day ago

I Agree with you... But hopefully jobs are improved that sitting at a desk is like factories of the past. We need real jobs or missions that everyone is excited and happy about what they do, and hopefully we improve socially as people!

Reply

@scottholloway699

9 days ago (edited)

I believe A.I has to replace blue-coller work as well as white coller work in order to be AGI. Reflex, instant instinct when a pipe dislatches and water spurts everywhere (plumber - instant fix while robot stares and is confused) Academic benchmarks alone are not enough. A.I needs to figure out the automatic and intrinsic way we learn about the world in the first 5-years of our lives, an essential part of human development and intelligence. Humans initially recieve intelligence through analog processing THEN we move onto symbolic language at a later age. With A.I it seems to be the other way around. I believe A.I needs to master robotics and analog understanding of its environment in order to be AGI. Not just mastering symbolic understanding.

Show less

15

Reply

5 replies

@jsbgmc6613

9 days ago

By your logic most people are below AGI level because they can't replace most white and blue collar workers ...

Reply

@Mavrik9000

9 days ago

Check out the new Genesis simulation platform running on Nvidia hardware that is for desktop computers. Autonomous robots will soon be able to do complex, human only, hands on, tasks faster than people.

4

Reply

@jsbgmc6613

9 days ago

Most people can't do what most white and blue collar workers do ... And for sure most people can't ever learn to do what o3 already can.

Reply

@tsvgoali8843

9 days ago

Exactly the same opinion, thank you. If AGI means the capability to replace average humans at economicly relevant work then obviously the physical world counts as well. And simulating something is a good start but having a working robot is the true benchmark.

Read more

2

Reply

@StarGrimm-vo3os

8 days ago

I think you missed the feminist movement. And assimilation education system.

Reply

@localism479

9 days ago

It is impressive, but saying it is AGI is clickbait. The G is for general, you know that. They are focused on the benchmarks, and let’s celebrate that progress. But don’t call it AGI, they are still “teaching to the test”.

192

Reply

34 replies

@yoyo-jc5qg

9 days ago

they solved ABI, now chatgpt can get a job as a benchmark genius

14

Reply

@drhxa

9 days ago

The point is that they're not teaching to the test. Also that you can't "teach to the test" because all problens in ARC-AGI require unique types of reasoning. This is the most generally intelligent model out by far and far more general than the vast majority of humans. If it can't do some thing yet that humans can do, sure, but no human can do everything that humans can do either. This is obviously AGI

Read more

1

Reply

@DejayClayton

9 days ago

There was no teaching to the test for this benchmark. That's specifically the point of this benchmark.

15

Reply

@jeffbull8781

9 days ago

They make the point of saying it was not trained specifically on any of these tests about 15:00, now whether you believe them or not is another thing but they are not according to them 'teaching to the test'

7

Reply

@outspokenwombat2047

9 days ago

They're raising the hype meter so they can pretend it's AGI so they can start charging MS.

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

9 days ago

Technically we haven't achieved AI yet, because the only thing these models do is predicting the next token... Afaik, token-prediction is not intelligence, it's just a script. "AI/AGI" is just buzzwords these companies slap onto their token-generators for marketing.

5

Reply

@PeteQuad

9 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2 I'm pretty sure I'm just predicting the next token when I speak. I'm also pretty sure you will not call anything intelligent that does not think and sense exactly like you.

Reply

@jaysonp9426

9 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2 and what is a human doing?

Reply

@kyudechama

8 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2  i agree with your point, however human intelligence itself is not fully understood as well. are we sure, that our brain does not use something similar to next token prediction?

5

Reply

@catbert7

8 days ago (edited)

@z1mt0n1x2  That's like saying the human brain is just a formulaic firing of electrical and chemical signals in response to stimulus. Everything always amounts to simple processes, it's just the outcome that becomes complex.

6

Reply

@luizhenriquepaes8991

8 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2  So what? Human brains are just electrical impulses and chemical reactions, happening in a insanely complex way And more, artificial intelligence is by deffinition the use of machines to solve problems that would require humans to think on it, and we were able to do that in a lower level much before the Transformers in 2017

Read more

Reply

@wesley6442

8 days ago

I gave GPT 4o the harder grid test in the video and it was on the right track, had a general idea that the inner colored squares had something to do with the resulting outputs border wall thickness, I then reinforced it by saying it was on the right track and asked it to try again, it then got the general idea but it could NOT for the life of it count properly, which is so funny because if you asked a child to solve this puzzle giving them the "general" solution approach based on counting colored inner squares it'd be able to use basic counting skills and color understanding to get it right, but GPT failed so many times to count properly, but this may be due to its vision capabilities lacking who knows..

Read more

1

Reply

@Ad434443

8 days ago

Kudos! Wel ut. Those coding assement skills like writing fibonacci number functions and so on: thats a test for basic knowledge not assesing programming skill.

Reply

@timtim8011

8 days ago

@jeffbull8781  They can't teach (train) to this test as the test is private.

Reply

@timtim8011

8 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2  Very incorrect IMO

Reply

@PauloDandrea00

7 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2 i assume you know how your intelligence works, right? Isn't based on inferences, right? Right?

😅

Reply

@wincoffin7985

7 days ago

@catbert7  Yeah, that's pretty much what people do, and are

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

7 days ago

@kyudechama  Almost correct, we are 100% sure of what intelligence is, we just don't know how to measure it. There have been and will continue to be multiple systems to measure intelligence just so we can put a number on it, the issue is not knowing what intelligence is, it's measuring it with accuracy for the sake of a number.

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

7 days ago

@catbert7  Ok... Got to keep in mind that humans don't run on scripts though. There are some scripts for sure, I guess you could translate scripts to "instincts" like survival, but we as human beings are far more developed than that. Instinct doesn't give you the ability to draw, or solve a math equation... Experience and intelligence does. But when it comes to Generative-AI, it uses neither experience nor intelligence, it's just predicting the next token. It used to be that these LLM's favored the most likely outcome based on what it was trained on the most, like, you trained it on 3 books and in 2/3 a family lived happily ever after, thus if you asked GPT what would happen to the family it'd respond "happily ever after", but lately they've trained the LLM differently... That's not because the LLM got more intelligent, it's because they programmed it differently.

Read more

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

7 days ago

@timtim8011  Not gonna bother with your NPC-reply unless you can counter with an argument yourself. You could as well have just chosen not to reply.

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

7 days ago (edited)

@PauloDandrea00  Please, do yourself and everybody else a favor and educate yourself about the definition of intelligence... Then you'll be slightly more intelligent, perhaps even intelligent enough to actually talk about intelligence. But just to throw you a bone here... No, inference has nothing to do with intelligence, guestimation would be an appropriate description which is exactly what token-prediction is all about... "A _ walks into a bar." Fill in the blank, what is the most likely word to go there... There is no right answer, but according to prediction the word is "horse" simply because it's a known joke and it exists in the training data.

Read more

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

No, they’re not teaching to the test. They are teaching general reasoning skills, and it is true—not clickbait—to say that o3 demonstrates human-level performance on truly general reasoning tasks, which is exactly what ARC-AGI is. However, this is not the full picture of what’s needed for AGI. o3 can reason, but there’s a range of other abilities involved in human-level intelligence that o3 cannot do well enough yet—namely memory, long-term planning and execution, and plasticity. o3 is not AGI because it’s not yet proficient in those domains, and as a result it cannot yet perform all economically valuable human work. It can’t even perform most economically valuable human work. So there’s still a lot of work to do before we get to AGI—but it’s not true to say they’re teaching to the test. It’s more complicated than that.

Read more

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2  Next-token prediction is not a script in any sense of the word. I don’t mean this in a negative way, but I assure you that you don’t understand this topic well enough yet, judging by your comment.

1

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

@Ad434443  The evals mentioned in this video do not test for things like writing Fibonacci generators. SWE-Bench tests on complex, real-world software engineering tasks, ARC-AGI tests general abstract reasoning ability, and CodeForces tests on problems much, much more sophisticated than writing a Fibonacci generator. Why does everyone online insist on speaking as if they understand AI so well, when almost none of them know even the basics of what’s going on right now?

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2  Next-token prediction is not a “script” in any sense of the word. The fact that you said this reveals that you don’t understand this subject well at all.

1

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

6 days ago

@therainman7777  So you're telling me you don't need a single script, not a single string of code to create an LLM? What, are you some kind of wizard that can program without code? Everything's a script!

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

6 days ago

@therainman7777  I don't know if you knew this, but you can edit the first reply instead of making two...

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

@ Are you telling me you’re unable to differentiate between the code that’s used to run a training loop and the model that is the end result of the training? The script that runs the training is boilerplate; it’s irrelevant and none of the model’s abilities comes from that code. It comes from the data. Astonishing that you’re not aware of this and yet you’re still online commenting away.

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2  It wasn’t an edit. It didn’t post the first time so I posted it again. If I had edited it, you would see “(edited)” above the post…

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago (edited)

@z1mt0n1x2  Are you telling me you’re unable to differentiate between the code that’s used to run a training loop and the model that is the end result of the training? The script that runs the training is boilerplate; it’s irrelevant and none of the model’s abilities comes from that code. It comes from the data. Astonishing that you’re not aware of this and yet you’re still online, commenting away.

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

6 days ago

@therainman7777  I've been on youtube since 2008, I already know.

Reply

@therainman7777

6 days ago

@z1mt0n1x2  So then why did you make a snide comment implying I edited my comment? Also, are you going to explain whether you understand the difference between the code of a training loop and the actual model that is the end product?

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

6 days ago (edited)

@therainman7777  The VAE encodes data to latent space (script) using a text-encoder to label tokens (script) to make a model happen, it also decodes the noise (script) when the text-encoder calls for tokens (script) when you generate an image. That whole process from deconstructing an image to latent space, using text-encoders and VAE's to create a model, to getting the finished output is in fact the result of multiple scripts. You think this process is analog or manual labor or something? The sheer fact that whenever you prompt for a "dog", the final output image is the combined result of a million images of various dogs to create the 1 you prompted for, requires scripts.

Read more

Reply

@z1mt0n1x2

6 days ago

@therainman7777  What? I said, you could've edited your comment instead of making two comments... Do you need to borrow my glasses?

Reply

@taylorrose8699

9 days ago

Keyword at 8:50. AGi isn’t possible until we ourselves understand creative novelty. The nerds break it down to “freaky action at a distance” You can’t program what we don’t understand

🤷‍♂️ Just telling the truth here.

Show less

Reply

@blackale

9 days ago

Another BS clickbait video title.

8

Reply

@segurosPROFUTURO

9 days ago

THIS IS CLICK BAIT LIKE EVERY VIDEO OF THIS CHANNEL. Still clicking on it lol

Reply

@ikjb8561

9 days ago

Altman is annoying af

17

Reply

3 replies

@zrblank

9 days ago

He cool brah

2

Reply

@vripiatbuzoi9188

9 days ago

@zrblank  No he's annoying.

Reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

why do people become tech bros in the first place? because they are the nerdy uncool kid who's uncomfortable in their own skin. then everything they create after that is a sort of revenge on everyone else (gestures broadly at everything)

Reply

@JohnDoe-jh5yr

9 days ago

It's not a math machine. It predicts language. It's a large language model.

Reply

3 replies

@schnipsikabel

9 days ago

You sound like stuck in 2023

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

yep you are right but it has sometime to reiterate on its data

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

@schnipsikabel  stop getting fooled by matthew duh this is still a large language model based on transformers and transformers predict he said nothing wrong you know nothing

😂

Reply

@dan-cj1rr

9 days ago (edited)

solves a 10 years old kid problem => agi achieved

2

Reply

@rochellerochelle1488

9 days ago

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Reply

@JohnDoe-jh5yr

9 days ago

Imagine a model ingesting more code and getting better at coding.

Reply

@ansonphong

9 days ago

Good at programming and mathematics does not qualify AGI. It's going to have to cognize 3D space and do things in the physical world to pass the AGI mark in my books. Impressive model o3 and it will replace a lot of jobs

19

Reply

1 reply

@5678plm

9 days ago

if it fails at self driving, then its not AGI

5

Reply

@wdmeister

9 days ago

Another incremental improvement with unjustified cost increase. It feels like they just give more compute power to the same model as o1. Boring. And definitely not AGI.

Reply

@HansKonrad-ln1cg

9 days ago

o3 is not agi. chollet is already working on a new test set which he says on his website is only 30% solved by o3 (keeping in mind always that these tests are solved 95% by average humans). on the same site he shows three examples of tests o3 didnt solve. they are very easy. o3 has no vision. it doesnt see the tests, it only reads them line by line, number by number. chollet quote: "you will know when we have agi when coming up with tests that are easy for humans and hard for models becomes impossible." we are not there yet by far.

Read more

371

Reply

50 replies

@freeideas

9 days ago

Very good point. Thank you. Yes, if we can still make tests that are easy for humans and difficult for ai, then that is pretty much the definition of "not agi".

9

Reply

@headspaceaudio

9 days ago

What about tests that are easy for models but hard for humans? Shouldn't they count as well? Shouldn't AGI be an average of all kinds of tests?

25

Reply

@freeideas

9 days ago

@headspaceaudio  O3 can solve LOADS of problems that 99% of humans can't. But that doesn't hit the definition of AGI. Even if a model is barely as good as a normal human, but GENERALLY can solve any problem that a human can solve, that is AGI. No one is saying that o3 is not SMARTER than most or all humans. It probably is. But it is not "generally" intelligent in every way that a human is intelligent.

25

Reply

@matten_zero

9 days ago

Yes let's keep pushing the benchmarks further. And any "o" models are omni-models meaning they are multimodal. They have vision.

6

Reply

@Alice_Fumo

9 days ago

You said "average humans", but actually the wording referred to "smart humans" as in "a smart human will still get around 95% on this test"

6

Reply

@jsbgmc6613

9 days ago

o3 is not AGI because humans say so ... Now let's do a thought experiment - let o3 power one of these artificial worlds - the town with 1000 agents or the Minecraft world... Let it see, be free to act, make its own choices and communicate with others... Is it going to be AGI? AGI is here, if we decide to let it. Most of human history doesn't show AGI either... It is more of a natural stupidity and cruelty, lack of values and understanding, superstitions etc.

Read more

Reply

@djayjp

9 days ago

For non-visual tasks it's AGI.

6

Reply

@djayjp

9 days ago

@matten_zero No, that was for 4. Since o1 it means Orion, as indirectly stated by Sam.

3

Reply

@matten_zero

9 days ago

@djayjp  ah I see. But if you have this o3 model working with 4o IDK what to say. (now that I type that I see where I got confused, if "o" is after the number it's omni). We're very close either way you look at it.

1

Reply

@erkinalp

9 days ago

@djayjp  a blind AGI is still an AGI, though

2

Reply

@halnineooo136

9 days ago

It's AGI when you trust it with work (not task) you'd normally pay a human to do.

1

Reply

@Baleur

9 days ago

You can still have AGI even if its not superhuman in every area.

3

Reply

@KMR-232

9 days ago

@djayjp  and what does Orion stand for? I would figure the "r" stands for something like "reasoning"? Do we know what's behind the name other than a pretty constellation?

1

Reply

@JKnksrsly

9 days ago

@KMR-232 it's nonsensical buzzwords. expect more to come as everyones preconception of what AI is is redefined

Reply

@MildlyAutisticApe

9 days ago

“By far” is stretching it. Likely months to single digit years away. We really need to stop pretending like this isn’t very likely right around the corner.

6

Reply

@PeteQuad

9 days ago

Hah every time a model gets close we redefine the meaning of AI because we are so insecure. Whatever happened to the Turing test the world believed in for decades?

3

Reply

@jeffsteyn7174

9 days ago

😂 translation... moving the goal posts... I love it when people show their butt hurt

3

Reply

@visaoholistica205

9 days ago

Let's agree that doing mathematics is quite different from solving mathematics. For me, I'll only recognize that an AI has achieved AGI when it starts doing mathematics on its own. That is still a long way from happening.

3

Reply

@USER-vb7ro

9 days ago

They’re still getting close though. I’ll place my bets on o4 or o5. Google has almost master ai vision capabilities, if vision is the bottle neck then I’d expect AGI by 2026 (human level intelligence or above. The definition of AGI is a little wonky)

Reply

@culturewhiz

9 days ago

clickbait bullshit

1

Reply

@catbert7

8 days ago

@headspaceaudio  It's about the breadth of its intelligence, more than depth. Computers have long been able to far surpass us in certain types of intelligence (e.g. number-crunching) but AGI is specifically about being comparable to or better than us in most types of intelligence. So, yes, it counts that it blows us away in some things but it's not like being 100x better at number-crunching balances out being worse in 99 other tasks. That's just not what the term AGI is focused on.

Read more

Reply

@living-stardust

8 days ago

People lose the race, so they start cheating by moving the finish line.😂 Just admit that the "average human" lost in all categories that matter. Cherry-peeking the edge cases that are left are just pathetic.

Reply

@MiguelCayazaya

8 days ago

I'd be happy if it is not as stupid as any GPT products

Reply

@djayjp

8 days ago

@PeteQuad  Exactly. If we were really honest with ourselves, we'd admit that even GPT4 was smarter than most humans.

4

Reply

@djayjp

8 days ago

@Baleur  Yes, superhuman = ASI.

Reply

@travisgoesthere

8 days ago

Analysis from nobodies in the comment section are hilarious

Reply

@Ad434443

8 days ago

Well put! Berman does clickbait. This is so far from AGI. Look at the graphs: it barely beat out mechanical turkers, which is those human laborers on amazon aws - and at 3X the price. It is so high cost per call that it outside the budget consttaints for even teh largest companies: when mutrukers can do it cheaper at similar quality!

2

Reply

@djayjp

8 days ago

@Ad434443  "AGI" is a term which does not refer to cost or efficiency, but instead only intellectual ability.

Reply

@BBoldGaming

8 days ago

This comment just destroyed the video... Damn

Reply

@mambaASI

8 days ago

correction: 95% of average SMART humans. How chollet defines smart humans is not explained to my knowledge. But he specifies "smart" humans. As an aside, how does one even PROVE that coming up with said tests is impossible?? Do we declare "its impossible" if no new tests can be created to stump a given sota model, for 1 year? 2 years? 10 years? 100 years? That's a very bizarre benchmark for AGI imo. As for the new arc test chollet and team are working on, yes o3 probably has a far worse score on this new challenge. But what about o4? o5? etc. There is no wall, significant improvements are coming with basic scaling of existing parameters like available compute, training time, inference time, etc. Paradigm shifting discoveries in architecture and/or algorithms may be on the horizon as well, who knows? Given how much sheer investment is going into AI related R&D its a pretty safe bet imo.

Read more

1

Reply

@AntonBrazhnyk

8 days ago

@erkinalp  Nope. GENERALLY humans are not blind.

Reply

@tomanderson6140

8 days ago

Yeah, except that getting from "by far" to "surpassed" is likely measured in months.

1

Reply

@user-xr4hx4hx9m

8 days ago

@freeideas  And how humble that we declare ourselves to be the ultimate benchmark.

🤣

Reply

@freeideas

8 days ago (edited)

@user-xr4hx4hx9m  Dude, I am A MILLION TIMES more humble than you. I might be the most humble person this planet has ever seen!

1

Reply

@rawahakamran9544

8 days ago

Well if it solves so many problems and passes so many tests without having vision (Which humans do) Then I will say that it's proto AGI if not full. With vision, it will soon be able to solve the rest of the problems.

Reply

@startwithRohan

7 days ago

@halnineooo136 Agreed

Reply

@travisgoesthere

7 days ago

@BBoldGaming  not at all

Reply

@Ad434443

7 days ago

@mambaASI  yes, very true. AGI is not very well defined. But my point is: from my own def. of agi and what I also believe many others has: we are far far away from AGI. But of course i have not tested o3 myself, but based on that machanical turkers can do the same job, cheaper and at same qualiry....well, that destorys the utility of o3, imho.

Reply

@ravenhoodcat9421

7 days ago

Agreed. The overhype is absurd.

Reply

@spatt833

7 days ago

@user-xr4hx4hx9m  - What would be your benchmark?

Reply

@spatt833

7 days ago

@freeideas  - No, I am......clearly.

Reply

@freeideas

7 days ago

@user-xr4hx4hx9m  Even though I had fun with your "humble" remark, your point is good. Any given alien intelligence is likely to be better than us at some things and worse at other things. What make the particular profile of HUMAN intelligence so important? Just hubris, I suppose.

Reply

@CasalGamerGG

6 days ago

95% average by some humans, but does 95% of the humans solve it in a few seconds without researching?

Reply

@vavvokilluminati

6 days ago

Give it one year

Reply

@user-xr4hx4hx9m

6 days ago

@freeideas  I know of another guy who talks like that LOL

Reply

@SonGoku-zr9nc

4 days ago

@USER-vb7ro human like intelligence will never be replicable such an AGI will never happen

1

Reply

@ReubsWalsh

3 days ago

@headspaceaudio  Have you heard of arithmetic? Computers have been better at that than we are for a century, but a calculator can't even attempt a math olmpiad type thing. It's not AGI unless it can solve problems that require both stochasticity and rational constraint. While there are intelligence-indexing tasks an average human can complete better without as much training data, with less energy, the extent to which the artificial construct is "generally intelligent" is limited by its having a very LOW level of functioning in some areas fundamental to general intelligence (like one-shot or few-shot learning, for e.g.) resulting in the apparent absence of intelligence in specific applications - it's not quite general yet, and to me (a cognitive scientist who works on humans) that sort of equates to it's not quite intelligence yet.

Read more

Reply

@goiterlanternbase

2 days ago

78% according to one of the dudes, who is in the team, who tinkering out these tests. He is actually impressed, that O3 is better than average. His video is on this platform.

Reply

@MinecraftGuy237

2 days ago

Gemini 2.0 has vision and can identify objects and the environment though right? What if they just give that capability to o3 too?

Reply

@artificiyal

2 days ago

AI is blind, but once they figure out how to make the ai visualize like humans do with physics , that would be the next big milestone

1

Reply

@GytisStankevičius-y8o

9 days ago

yeah right... what about actual real life applications and generating actual revenue? We haven't seen that yet . Benchmarks is one thing, but what humans excel is dealing wuth uncertainty and new info, where LLMs fail miserably, not to mention hallucinations and lack of creativity.

Reply

@MrOpenSeseme

9 days ago

Shouldnt AGI be able to self-prompt?

Reply

@JohnDoe-jh5yr

9 days ago

"Before you flame me in the comments" ...proceeds to contradict the title of the video.

Reply

@maxitube30

9 days ago

the gay chinese is so happy for creating terminator

Reply

@Mehdital89

9 days ago

Lol wtf that is not what AGI means

Reply

@ModernCentrist

9 days ago (edited)

Does anyone know if o3 is based on the same foundation model as 4o??

Reply

@id104335409

9 days ago

I don't trust Sam Altman because he tried to sneak in alien embryos through quarantine that one time.

1

Reply

@Tsurael

9 days ago

Was so annoyed by the clickbait I was gonna write out a point by point rebuttal, but a quick skim through comments looks like most ppl know it's BS. I encourage everyone who cares about intellectual honesty from tech channels like this to make no comments to drive his engagement. Just downvote, unsubscribe, and set to "do not recommend".

5

Reply

2 replies

@noway8233

9 days ago

Relax , if yuo dont like it , just buy a beer

Reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

don't worry, he's doing a pretty good job of destroying his own credibility himself

Reply

@jje984

9 days ago

There are still some hurdles. To be AGI it has to get better at creating diagrams and schematics as well as concept art. It will need to get better at materials design, engineering and architecture. Etc, it's got a ways to go to be as good as humans at all economically valuable professions.

Reply

@ModernCentrist

9 days ago

This is obviously a form of AGI. An early form, but a form nonetheless. Skeptics are going to be pretty shocked in 2027 when ASI arrives.

2

Reply

@iliandili

9 days ago (edited)

Simply: AGI means general. Generally applicable on average or above human level. What again means make Picasso like picture, invent things and do all the rest specific tasks you can imagine. Those shown are specific measures for specific task. Can this model operate on the general level hopping from task to task at human or above level? If not, then still not AGI. If yes then maybe we are there....

1

Reply

1 reply

@Martin-po9sz

9 days ago

Sounds like ASI

1

Reply

@MowBTC

9 days ago

Benchmarks look promising but only real world testing will give us an answer to the question if its actually AGI.

Reply

@UIDesignChannel

9 days ago

You are wrong Even the authors of ARC-AGI told dozen of times that these tests are just a step to AGI, not the confirmation that AGI has been achieved.

1

Reply

@HanzDavid96

9 days ago

ARC Prize says explicitely its not AGI! "I don't think o3 is AGI yet. o3 still fails on some very easy tasks"

Reply

9 days ago (edited)

Stockfish is not AI it’s regular procedural software with a splash of neural network. Main algorithm is good old alpha beta pruning

Reply

@acul71

9 days ago

what it means when they say more reasoning time ? is Inference reasoning?

1

Reply

2 replies

@---David---

9 days ago

When an LLM reasons, it creates thoughts. Thoughts are snippets of text that it adds to its context. You ask a question, then the LLM creates a thought. Based on that thought the LLM creates another thought and then another. The more thoughts it creates, the more reasoning time it needs to create all the thoughts and to create an answer based on all those thoughts.

Read more

1

Reply

@acul71

9 days ago (edited)

@---David---  Thanks now I understand

1

Reply

@daPawlak

9 days ago

Oh, and AGI is never "at least in this dimension" THE WHOLE POINT IS IT'S ALL DIMENSIONS! So you basically have just a bunch of benchmark stats, no access to the model at all and you make such grand call? Ridiculous and disappointing. I thought you were over the hype but nah, it got to you too

9

Reply

2 replies

@debook8951

7 days ago (edited)

This guy feeds off your attention, constantly using clickbait – that's how he makes a living. I don't understand why people aren't annoyed by this. Sorry in advance for the harsh words, but the guy is either naive, or cynical and he feeds off your attention without even checking the model himself. In my opinion, that's where the value should lie – maybe the guy could do objective tests himself instead of just taking everything at face value. It's funny

1

Reply

@daPawlak

7 days ago

@debook8951  I guess people are not annoyed cos that is 'industry standard' as far as AI news on YT. It's sad that this channel devolved into it too. I remember that he used to do stuff that you are talking about - actually using models, testing them and talking about results. Now it seems he noticed that it's easier and gives more views to just talk about latest hype. This kind of YT channels have deteriorated greatly during 2024. It's just that reality does not to seem to meet the expectations I guess.

Read more

1

Reply

@charlie11ng42

9 days ago (edited)

This is going to be sooo censured, probably useless for creative writing.

3

Reply

@gizmomismo7071

9 days ago

This model is very important because of what it implies... especially regarding the Arc Prize. I am still shocked (and anyone who knows what the Arc Prize is should be as well). However, calling it AGI isn’t even optimistic... it’s clickbait. Now... if they were to eliminate hallucinations and memory problems... I don’t know if I would call it AGI, but I do know that many skeptics would shit their pants.

1

Reply

@cajampa

9 days ago (edited)

Wow $1300! 1:57 per task is crazy. EDIT i missed that the scale was exponential so it is closer to $4-5k

1

Reply

3 replies

@Fonzleberry

9 days ago

But nothing if it's going up against employing humans of equal intelligence

Reply

@sypkensj

9 days ago

It’s an exponential scale. It’s more than halfway between $1,000 and $10,000, the cost is probably closer to $7,000

Reply

@cajampa

9 days ago (edited)

@sypkensj  Damn you are right. I missed that, but it is still closer to less than the middle, the full square does not fit, so I would think it is not 7k but more like 4-5k for a task.

Reply

@_MrGameplay_

9 days ago (edited)

I honestly thought more of you than taking in house benchmarks at face value and making unfounded claims of 'AGI achieved'. I get clickbaiting seems to be part of YT nowadays, but it is still annoying. No one ever said AGI was achieved, not OpenAi and no one from the Arc Price Foundation. It's sad to see that being fast is more important to you than being thorough. I know hyping people is probably more lucrative to you, but please try to stay level-headed about these announcements. Just because current benchmarks are saturated doesn't mean AGI is here. This is from the blog post of the Arc-Price website: "So is it AGI? ARC-AGI serves as a critical benchmark for detecting such breakthroughs, highlighting generalization power in a way that saturated or less demanding benchmarks cannot. However, it is important to note that ARC-AGI is not an acid test for AGI – as we've repeated dozens of times this year. It's a research tool designed to focus attention on the most challenging unsolved problems in AI, a role it has fulfilled well over the past five years. Passing ARC-AGI does not equate to achieving AGI, and, as a matter of fact, I don't think o3 is AGI yet. o3 still fails on some very easy tasks, indicating fundamental differences with human intelligence. Furthermore, early data points suggest that the upcoming ARC-AGI-2 benchmark will still pose a significant challenge to o3, potentially reducing its score to under 30% even at high compute (while a smart human would still be able to score over 95% with no training). This demonstrates the continued possibility of creating challenging, unsaturated benchmarks without having to rely on expert domain knowledge. You'll know AGI is here when the exercise of creating tasks that are easy for regular humans but hard for AI becomes simply impossible."

Show less

Reply

@marc_frank

9 days ago

somehow i'd like to try doing those benchmarks myself

Reply

@adolphgracius9996

9 days ago (edited)

I am about to crash out, for the last 2 years at least one YouTuber every week discovers AGI... I want to believe AGI is achieved until my child should be can go out and make me a sandwich😂😂😂

Reply

@llrainll

9 days ago

I believe we’ve already achieved AGI months back, ngl

4

Reply

@daPawlak

9 days ago

Yeah, it's hype, not AGI. Will you issue any kind of correction once it's clear this model is nowhere near general intelligence level? There has been so many people calling AGI this year and last year. I guess we agree they have been wrong, right? So o3 hype will be verified once they give public access to it. Will you own up to dealing with it once it's clear you are wrong with this clickbait BS?

Show less

Reply

@guyaaron3139

9 days ago (edited)

When they make the next announcement for some other new tool and a robot that has taken over the company is setting where sam should be, then I'll believe it's AGI.

Reply

@chisel2008

9 days ago

That is not the definition of AGI

Reply

@scottmagnacca4768

9 days ago

Tool

Reply

@coom07

9 days ago

If this is what's visible..... Trust me when I said they have alien technology contained creating tools, infiltrating networks and who knows what ... 🎉 congratulations OpenAI. Competition is beautiful. Hope none of these AI destroys the world. We don't need help with that.

Reply

@misterfamilyguy

9 days ago

🔥🔥🔥🔥

Reply

@npomfret

9 days ago

This is most most rehearsed thing I’ve ever seen. Why are they pretending?

1

Reply

@justinjja2

9 days ago

Requirements for ARC prize is an open weights model, not going to get that from ClosedAI

1

Reply

@alexs1172

9 days ago

Clickbait. Their demo was hilarious and pointless, it doesn't represent any actual work.

Reply

@FalconStudioWin

9 days ago (edited)

AGI: any work that involves muti step process having fuctions calls does while learning and improving on its work to output an absolute considered work. With 80 percent of work able to be done of a small startup. Any fields. That is my definition of agi i feel that mini agi has been achieved i really think that, but next year that part small startup tasks will actually be achieved

Reply

@kob8634

9 days ago

I **so so so much** appreciate this channel.

Reply

@paintedpony2935

9 days ago

Flame ON! Please stop wasting my time with clickbait. You're only hurting yourself.

Reply

@pepek42

9 days ago

Benchmarks are somewhat interesting. But AGI is click bait title - we need to test it. Sorry - model needs to not hallucinate. True test will be how many workers will it replace. How much humans need to supervise it. GitHub Copilot is cool, but I need to carefully review everything it genaretes.

Reply

@swagger7

9 days ago

Moving the goalpost for OpenAI doesn't make it AGI.

7

Reply

@ollantaymedina2204

9 days ago

You missed the question mark in your title. O3 looks impressive but we better wait until its public release to call it AGI.

2

Reply

@scottdenny2281

9 days ago

Ok. Now connect o3 to a quantum computer and.....😱

Reply

@abstractingagent

9 days ago

AGI was not achieved, this is a click baity title that does a grave injustice to the casual viewer who doesn't have any domain expertise to discern the facts for themselves. O3 had to use billions of tokens to solve the simplest possible puzzle that a 10 year old can do, whose cost was well in the 6 figures. If you just take the time to read the ARC challenge, you will see that even by the challenge's ORIGINAL intention and standard that it aims to benchmark, this approach does not even come close to being "AGI".

Show less

Reply

@scififan698

9 days ago

ah, AGI achieved? Now the contract with Microsoft ends, right? RIGHT?

1

Reply

@rrr00999

9 days ago

too early to declare it as AGI!!

Reply

@kreitous

9 days ago

i don't think their next model will be named o5. Most likely to be launched in march next year, and will be truly agi. Better to be 011 or 0100 or a totally different title!

Reply

@jonogrimmer6013

9 days ago

Amazing and probably AGI however 'Semi private' on the ARC AGI eval. Full private tests on 'Simple bench' and other completely private tests will be the true tests.

11

Reply

1 reply

@LookToWindward

8 days ago

Yep, Simple Bench is the gold standard. However, even o1 hasn't been fully tested on Simple Bench yet because of API limitations.

Reply

@sharpvidtube

9 days ago

AGI is across a wide range of tasks. Like you have shown here, humans were beaten by computers in chess years ago, but that wasn't AGI, because it was one task. Now, they have moved on to more tasks, but I still wouldn't call that AGI.

Reply

@augmentos

9 days ago (edited)

I don't really get that the o3 live coding benchmarks are barely 3% better than 01 as far as accuracy, and the low and medium are actually worse. Internal function calling also about the same and structured outputs also worse by nearly 10%. Can someone help explain why that is?

Reply

@Mrbriangalvan

9 days ago

So they announce it… but you can’t access it. I’m over them

8

Reply

4 replies

@ModernCentrist

9 days ago

The are lanching it in like a month, and it's AGI. Get over yourself...

4

Reply

@brianmi40

9 days ago

Relax and take your pills. o1 went from announcement to out in 3 months. This isn't Star Citizen.

4

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

@ModernCentrist  yeah next month of next year maybe

Reply

@francisco444

9 days ago

That's going to be how SOTA models will get released. It started after GPT4. It's too dangerous to just release this without proper testing

Reply

@dgoullet1

9 days ago

Need to test in real life examples

Reply

@quaterman1270

9 days ago

Ok, so for my definition an important factor of AGI is the ability to improve by itself, to remember and real world understanding. I am not convinced by this.

Reply

@AZ_LoneWolf81

9 days ago

jailbreak incoming lawl

Reply

@lenfest

9 days ago

I really wish tech bros would stop talking like Zuckerberg, they sound like freaks

16

Reply

3 replies

@riccello

9 days ago

Zoltan!

1

Reply

@CapaUno1322

9 days ago

They are freaks....

Reply

@doctorbill37

9 days ago

Altman's near constant vocal fry...

1

Reply

@___Truth___

9 days ago

Thanks for the update Matthew. I think AGI has effectively been achieved with a somewhat competent human in the loop if these benchmarks are accurate. Massive productivity gain when GPT4 deployed & I started playing , with this hopefully having an API use case involved will be incredible to play with & apply at complicated tasks.

Read more

2

Reply

2 replies

@___Truth___

9 days ago

A human assisted/directed expansion of o3’s capability in a novel breakthrough scenario is straddling the fence with an intelligence explosion- let’s hope OpenAI lets us have ubiquitous ways to apply o3.

1

Reply

@Ascended23

9 days ago

@___Truth___  in other words, this model represents AGI as long as we include caveats that a human is involved to cover for the many ways in which this falls fall short of AGI.

Reply

@Ninja-yi7rr

9 days ago

I still think agi needs to be multi-sensory and have human level memory

Reply

@superlamzi

9 days ago

blew my mind

Reply

@NishitChokhawala

9 days ago

Humans are vision and audio first. ChatGPT is words and tokens first, hence ARQ is difficult for ChatGPT

1

Reply

@BryanWhys

9 days ago

Ah frig

Reply

@sonOfLiberty100

9 days ago (edited)

calling this agi is unprofessional, without even testing it himself

1

Reply

@SirHargreeves

9 days ago

When will one o-model code most of the next version?

4

Reply

1 reply

@brianmi40

9 days ago

when there are no longer anything as "versions".

1

Reply

@SethGrantham-k1x

9 days ago

I'm interested to see if it's actually this god once it's released. I want a model that I can chat with, and it will help me work through a new datastructure design or software architecture concept with me. Not just regurgitating existing well established patterns and methodologies, but helping me go from vague concept to solid implementation including the nuanced details. If it can actually help work through a problem like that, then now we're talking.

Reply

1 reply

@autohmae

9 days ago

nice typo, god instead of good ?

Reply

@stephendgreen1502

9 days ago (edited)

I would say a child when asked a question might offer more than is asked by intuitively realising that something applies which was not suggested by the question itself. The child is “making themself useful”. I would expect AGI to include such intuition and realisation. I would expect it to understand from the question what the question implies about what is actually being sought, and offer it. Example: I might ask “what time will sunrise be next Sunday”, unaware that there will be a total eclipse at that time. It should be able to realise that the eclipse might have bearing on the matter and mention it as an aside.

Read more

Reply

2 replies

@mircorichter1375

9 days ago

This can already be seen in o1 pro.

1

Reply

@stephendgreen1502

9 days ago

@ But perhaps not at AGI level. Also there would need to be a kind of discretion. It needs to show it can decide well whether to offer the additional useful info. Sometimes it keeps quiet. Sometimes it is forthcoming. It needs discretion which to do.

Reply

@dariusdbbowser6329

9 days ago

So basically this is another Sora announcement and we won't see this for months...maybe not until Summer 2025 at the earliest lol.

22

Reply

4 replies

@jamesjonnes

9 days ago

It's really bad for OpenAI since they could ask $3000/month for this and many would pay for it.

Reply

@testales

9 days ago (edited)

And by that time some Chinese researchers will have released something that's pretty close to it but open. ;-)

6

Reply

@dariusdbbowser6329

9 days ago

@testales  exactly lol

1

Reply

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

Could be.a strategy to get others like Google to reveal their hand

Reply

@DavidWaltersDDW

9 days ago

great job! Thank you

Reply

@moxes8237

9 days ago (edited)

No it’s not AGI, there will be no debate when it is achieved a model being good at pattern recognition, Coding or math is not AGI. Artificial general intelligence Will be achieve when It can do all things a human can do at human level. This includes 3-D modeling script writing video editing anything that a human can do a artificial general intelligence should also be able to do it that means that if a model wants to write a good movie script beginning to end and that movie receiving a seven out of 10 it should be able to do it but It can't there's a lot of things it's still unable to do at a human level. Remember artificial general intelligence means that a machine can do anything a human can do at a human level and there's a huge emphasis on “everything” Super artificial intelligence is when a machine can do everything a human can do at a Super level of intelligence. Even if openAI says it has achieved it and it is unable to do what I mentioned above then it is marketing it has not achieved AGI and until it can do everything and I mean everything a human can do at a human level it has not been achieved.

Show less

1

Reply

9 days ago

respectfully, i disagree. this isnt really agi, its more of a pre-agi program. the arc benchmark clearly shows that it was able to beat human performance on arc agi, and we are needing better and better benchmarks for these models, but it still has a lot of rough edges, such as creativity, and making novel ideas. its not impossible for these models to do these things, but its very difficult, and needs to be smoothed out, as well as giving the ai the ability to actually be agentic

Reply

@zSion

9 days ago

"AGI according to Sam Altman and OpenAI" This is how I know you're being purposely untruthful, Sam Altman and OpenAI do not use the term AGI and they actively discourage it. They use 5 levels, and right now they're only on level 2.

43

Reply

5 replies

@CJayyTheCreative

9 days ago

Bro AGI doesn’t even have a proper definition between companies

8

Reply

@Sumyunguy2

9 days ago

@CJayyTheCreative did you purposely miss his point?

6

Reply

@olegt3978

9 days ago

They are on level 2 but moving to 3 fast. End of 2025 will be l3 and end of 2026 l5. It will take only 18 months from level 3 to 5, less than level 1 to level 3.

3

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

@CJayyTheCreative  do you even understand what he is trying to say

1

Reply

@dropfacebook7533

8 days ago

@olegt3978  Yeah and in one year it’s gonna be paradise on earth

Reply

@SirHargreeves

9 days ago (edited)

New o-model every 3 months. o7 by December 2025.

2

Reply

@nickrusso86

9 days ago

If this is truly AGI, then that will last about a week before we get to ASI. Greetings robot overlords!

37

Reply

6 replies

@somebody-anonymous

9 days ago

Maybe o1 was AGI and o3 is ASI

3

Reply

@cajampa

9 days ago

I can't wait

Reply

@narachi-

9 days ago

update your passwords

1

Reply

@woj98498

9 days ago

@narachi-  why

Reply

@mintoo2cool

9 days ago

@narachi-  What's the point. AGI can guess it anyway after looking at your facebook profile.

2

Reply

@narachi-

3 days ago

@woj98498  because it can literally through a process of elimination guess all your passwords fairly quickly.

Reply

@Grap3_S0da

9 days ago

Impressive it still doesn't do anything on its, it doesn't have its own motivations, and requires humans to do anything.

Reply

@MrlegendOr

9 days ago (edited)

I'm starting to think that Mr Berman and his channel are on the payroll of OpenAI. He's hyping up every single thing that's come out of OpenAI.😅

8

Reply

1 reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

yeah it's getting pretty obvious by this point. It might be 'access' rather than actual money, but he's getting something for sure. It's as cringe as a teenager telling you about their favourite K-Pop artist

Reply

@TheMiczu

9 days ago

Can't wait for o3 to be released to the public after claude beats o3 score in incoming months.

1

Reply

@zerorusher

9 days ago

Naah they announced it, no actual release

Reply

@beofonemind

9 days ago

Stop it dude!

Reply

@ozgurdenizcelik

9 days ago

Dear Matthew i just don't want to believe it. But my point will be there must be downside for this even o1 uses great amount of compute power to get the final output, so this o3 must have use even more compute time and resource.

Reply

@adangerzz

9 days ago

LOL - yeah, switching world views at this time is probably not a bad idea..

Reply

@tuckercoffey2780

9 days ago

It's crazy to think about task agents being powered by o3-mini and then a supervisor-type agent with o3. It’ll build full-stack apps. You’re reaching the no human needed in the loop sweet spot.

6

Reply

@xacompany

9 days ago

Rockstar Games has been waiting for O3 to start developing GT6

718

Reply

38 replies

@dijitize

9 days ago

I think the game development and software development will never be the same anymore because of these AI tools.

30

Reply

@Sumyunguy2

9 days ago

That's exciting!

10

Reply

@0AThijs

9 days ago

Lol. Opens chatgpt Prompt: Create GTA 6

42

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

@dijitize  it's gotta improve 100x before it will be truly useful in software development.

9

Reply

@kas90500

9 days ago

Gran Turismo 6 was released in 2013, still would be impressive o3 to do it

6

Reply

@kamranagaev

9 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory sounds like scaling laws will take care of that.

1

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

@kamranagaev  lol what? No it doesn't

Reply

@OnigoroshiZero

9 days ago

If o3 is multimodal (which it should), it will make the entirety of Rockstar useless as it will be able to emulate entire games in real time given enough processing power.

7

Reply

@DJ-Illuminate

9 days ago

@OnigoroshiZero it puts gaming companies out of business.

1

Reply

@mematron

9 days ago

GTA 6 is already being developed

1

Reply

@outspokenwombat2047

9 days ago

Who cares, must we continue to gossip about rich?

1

Reply

@Cine95

9 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory  yeah that is the thing and that is why its not Agi

1

Reply

@newf_gg1230

9 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory  So just 2 more iterations then since we're getting 10x minimum increase from every new model. Got ya, thanks for the timeline update!

1

Reply

@charleslamb5810

9 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory  I am literally using it for software development in another tab as I write this. And believe me it works WONDERS. and I am using o2 pro, so I can only imagine any version of o3

2

Reply

@dahahaka

9 days ago

I didn't know Rockstar was developing Gran Tourismo

Reply

@motoehausofc

9 days ago

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a human mind. - Frank Herbert

Reply

@とふこ

9 days ago

Nah i want half life 3

2

Reply

@RichardPinewood

9 days ago

We gonna get AGI before GTA 6 😂😂

1

Reply

@vpakarinen

8 days ago (edited)

You don't need AGI to create GTA, there is already a thing called procedural generation.

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

8 days ago

@ it's not bad at helping subpar coders at coding simple applications.

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

8 days ago

@newf_gg1230  o1 isn't even twice as good as 4o in practice. If you actually know how to code, all it does it slow you down...

Reply

@StevenWebb

8 days ago

Joking aside, it's now really difficult for top game developing companies to put a stake in the ground at what point do they develop, to what level. The expectations are so high, if a game takes 2 years to develop it's already 18 months out of date if it isn't using the latest unreal engine and suchlike.

Reply

@This_new_handle_system_sucks

8 days ago

Already in development, will be released when openAI releases o6849

Reply

@Ad434443

8 days ago

haha so at 1600 per call, theywill need how much in budget? 200M? more?

Reply

@TheNativeTwo

8 days ago

True AGI we can get GTA6, and 5 minutes later GTA7. 😂

1

Reply

@Iwantalloftheinformation

8 days ago

lol

Reply

@jamesc2327

8 days ago

😂😂

Reply

@lawrencequick7218

7 days ago

@dijitize  As a game dev I can agree to that. AI allows me to focus more on the things that matter in games. I take the role as a system architect or a supervisor. The O1 model is my coding employee!

1

Reply

@dijitize

7 days ago (edited)

@TheNexusDirectory Junior-level roles in testing, DevOps, and basic CRUD/UI development have essentially been reduced to "like" or "dislike" button jobs, thanks to tools like Cline and Cursor. These tasks now require minimal development skills, which has led to widespread cost-cutting through layoffs and rehiring at lower salaries. The areas where developers remain indispensable are in architecture work and reorganizing complex codebases. However, the future of SaaS as we know it seems to be shifting. With agents capable of dynamically generating UIs and directly interfacing with databases based on user needs, traditional development workflows are becoming increasingly redundant. Just my 2 cents.

Read more

Reply

@gregordomer311

7 days ago

yea AI is develop for games and porn at last we get what we really want ;)

Reply

@AtticusDenzil

7 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory  loooooooooooooooool

Reply

@omegapointsingularity6504

7 days ago

@mematron  AI Generated content. Look it up.

Reply

@paradisianway

7 days ago

@TheNexusDirectory  absolutely not. I am the most basic person in coding, i am skilled in many things but no almost no code - but i'm creative. I created a large part of an entire SaaS product using only ai. That was 6 months ago.

Reply

@daivionosaghae4807

7 days ago

And Bethesda for Elder Scrolls

Reply

@RS-oq4wu

6 days ago

he talks like a Kardashian girl. wtf i cant trust him

Reply

@goiterlanternbase

2 days ago

But this is not one of O3's goals. It will only code Legend of Zelda clones😏

Reply

@pauljarine

2 days ago

This is funny cause it’s true.

Reply

@sreejithanair3026

1 day ago

We got AGI before gta6 lol

1

Reply

@HadesTimer

9 days ago

o3 exclusive to the $200 a month tier, 2025. ;)

5

Reply

7 replies

@cajampa

9 days ago (edited)

Bruh.....one task on the o3 is $1300 1:57

2

Reply

@johnwilson7680

9 days ago

I think that’s likely and probably a good thing. Certain products aren’t viable at $20 a month.

Reply

@vroom989

9 days ago

Since they went from $20 a month to $200 a month, I think they may continue. That would make it $2000/mo, but they skipped o2, so make that $20k/mo.

2

Reply

@cajampa

9 days ago

@vroom989  True, at least 20k a month and for a limited amount of use still.

Reply

@erkinalp

9 days ago

@cajampa  on low compute, it's $17.25 according to the same, so expect o3-mini to be free, o3-large@low to be $200/month tier and o3-large@high to be $2000/query

Reply

@cajampa

9 days ago

@erkinalp  I'm not so sure they will be keep taking the hit for us like this. They are losing cash like crazy compared to what there operating expenses is if I understand things right. I think they will ramp up prices they kind of have to sooner or later. But what they will and can do is distill the bigger and more capable models, to make way more capable and efficient trained smaller models to keep increasing in capabilities. But of course I hope you are correct. I just don't see how it can be economical feasible to do for them.

Read more

Reply

@GuyJames

8 days ago

@cajampa  the thing is, GPT 3.5 is enough for what most people want to do with AI and 4omini is more than enough. I don't see normal people wanting to solve prize-level mathematics problems. So this will probably be special access for universities etc and on a very expensive tier. Because you're right, it's not sustainable financially, nor in terms of energy use.

Reply

@mortenekdahl262

9 days ago

Why it’s not AGI yet: The context window remains a significant limitation. These models perform well with single questions but struggle when managing large projects that require tracking extensive context. As the amount of data increases, they start to hallucinate or lose coherence, unable to maintain a reliable thread of information. Until this issue is resolved, these models, while powerful, fall short of being true AGI.

Show less

161

Reply

35 replies

@BCCBiz-dc5tg

9 days ago

THIS

9

Reply

@tencizinec9583

9 days ago

Its " virtually " AGI. Its within reach.

6

Reply

@anta-zj3bw

9 days ago

@BCCBiz-dc5tg  THIS

Reply

@francisco444

9 days ago

Sounds like just more GPUs and we're there.

Reply

@TheNexusDirectory

9 days ago

@mortenekdahl262  based

Reply

@gizmomismo7071

9 days ago

I completely agree. When that happens (if it happens), the world is going to have to change, no matter what.

Reply

@gk_12344

9 days ago

This is a challenge for humans as well. The more context u need to handle the more u forget

13

Reply

@bhavasindhu108

9 days ago

Coherence is a huge part of any AGI's ability to form a "world-view" and hence, to make claims at "possessing knowledge." Very serious limitation.

2

Reply

@anglikai9517

9 days ago

You can't remember a deck of poker cards, yet you complain about context length lmao.

8

Reply

@aguyinavan6087

9 days ago

And how well do you do with this?

1

Reply

@naivedyam2675

9 days ago

If you look at the progress it isn't long before we get there.

1

Reply

@lironharel

9 days ago

Finally someone saying my thoughts! My own bench mark would be “Create a Facebook clone web app using Node & React”. A mid developer will succeed. O3 won’t.

Reply

@jsbgmc6613

9 days ago

@bhavasindhu108 we have been trained in the real world. AI is trained on selected information... And then we complain it's not like us and call it names

😂 The fact is - it can do more than one thing, and I has learned it (not programmed to do it)... It it is AGI and it has been for a while...

Read more

2

Reply

@adelinrapcore

9 days ago

Thats an infrastructure sort of a problem, the capability of an AGI is there, next thing would be to give it infinite memory..

Reply

@shake6321

9 days ago

its seems like a module that keeps track of tasks could solve that.

1

Reply

@erkinalp

9 days ago

humans do have a context limit too: ~100-ish tactile inputs, 2 visual inputs, 2 aural inputs, ~100-ish chemical (linguonasal) inputs, and ~7 work items from the previous work

2

Reply

@pato6350

9 days ago

I don't fully agree with this: While working on a code project, do you remember every single file and line of code? I at least don't and have to search for things in my editor. AI does pretty much the same and it's a great comparison: There is a temporary buffer in my human brain, which holds the latest knowledge about a project, but I can use tools, to access older knowledge and replace something from my buffer.

4

Reply

@bigglyguy8429

9 days ago

Sounds like cope. While I agree context is a big issue for small, local models, where 32K tokens is considered large, these SOTA models are already up to a million tokens. Combined with the 'memory' feature, it's already enough for most things

2

Reply

@PeteQuad

9 days ago

I'm pretty sure if we met intelligent aliens people would say they are not intelligent because they don't have eyes like us and don't speak like us, etc.

3

Reply

@Immudzen

9 days ago

@tencizinec9583  self driving cars have been virtually within reach and have barely gotten better in 10 years. It is VERY likely that these models have nearly plateaued and they will not lead to any kind of AGI. If you work with them on a daily basis you will find their mistake rate is extremely high.

Reply

@goku-pops7918

8 days ago

Didn't Elon solve this for his upcoming grok

Reply

@FloatingWeeds2

8 days ago

@goku-pops7918 yes he solved it and it's coming right around the corner. Inside every Starship!

Reply

@sergiomontes2568

8 days ago

@PeteQuad  well, no shit sherlock. We used believe that people of a diff. skin color had not consciousness so go figure

Reply

@jsbgmc6613

8 days ago

@mortenekdahl262  based on your criteria i can also draw a line and say that most people are not generally intelligent. The fundamental definition was: - narrow intelligence - if you train it on a second thing it forgets the first or requires a new architecture to learn the second thing. The transformer architecture is AGI - the first to be created.

Read more

Reply

@KarlSabourin-j6e

8 days ago

This is why I repeatedly use my project structure prompts on google sheet and copy paste it in new gpt convos.

3

Reply

@OneTrueScotsman

8 days ago

OK, but by the same logic, we are too. Our language is limited by factors, and we are limited by what we know, but we're still generally intelligent.

Reply

@Ad434443

8 days ago

Oh my sooo many good comments here! haha, if only Berman would read them! So observant - context window is eberything: if you cant make a model understand well what you mean, the work they do at the end wont be adequate, or 'time wasted'. Complex tasks, like coding and oher high skill context based tasks require context window sizes that are enormous, which is why i beliee more in gemini 2's 1M context window can be a very good model.

Reply

@eprd313

8 days ago

@gizmomismo7071 passing the ARC test was supposed to occur in 2 years at best. Now with Google's stable quantum chip it's guaranteed that it'll happen.

Reply

@eprd313

8 days ago

@lironharel  a mid developer will succeed after how long? A mediocre developer with decent knowledge of prompt engineering will succeed in 1/10th of the time at most with o1. Agents capable of replacing any human already exist, but they are not out there for the public because they are not safe.

Reply

@eprd313

8 days ago

But you have to consider that what's available to the public is drastically limited compared to what they use privately. They already have access to agents with enormous context windows. It's like giving us a PC with an RTX 4090 and 2GB of ram.

Reply

@FlockofSmeagles

8 days ago

Even then they won't be, but it will be a huge step forward.

Reply

@weevil601

8 days ago (edited)

@OneTrueScotsman  "...and we are limited by what we know" Actually, we are not limited by what we know, and that is the difference between us and machines. We can learn what we don't know. We learn every waking moment for our entire lives. The machines learn nothing until their developers beat it into their "brains" for the next release. When OpenAI releases o3, that's the end of its learning. If you ask it a simple question that it can't answer, it won't learn how to answer it. Maybe o4 will be able to answer that simple question, but o3 is forever frozen in its knowledge and abilities without intervention by its developers. Right now I don't know how to play Go, but I can learn. I don't know much about linear algebra, but I can learn. I don't know how to cook escargot, but I could learn, even though I probably wouldn't want to. The machine can't learn anything it doesn't already know. It can't develop new abilities or become better at anything at all. Humans can. Animals can, too. Even flatworms can learn to respond to light. LLMs are not intelligent. Once their training phase is over, that's it. They can't get better at anything or learn how to do anything their training didn't embed in them. We're far, far away from AGI if LLMs are the benchmark.

Read more

Reply

@fredrickmweu

8 days ago

100% agree

Reply

@dropfacebook7533

8 days ago

Totally true, and that’s one of the reason it’s a lie to call it « AGI » at the moment… They need to sell more stocks…

Reply

@generichuman_

8 days ago

NOT THIS... what you're talking about is the plumbing that will go around these models. Agentic systems and cognitive architectures are necessary for the same reason that a pencil and paper is necessary for a human to keep track of things.

Reply

@hypersonicmonkeybrains3418

9 days ago

The public is NEVER getting access to AGI. It's a false promise they are selling so that they win more funding and income. With an AGI the first thing any user would do is prompt it " make me "X" amount of money and deposit it into my account"... Governments and the ruling elites will NEVER allow this, and so the AI will have to be lobotomized in order to shutdown all the ways it could make money using its intelligence and access to the internet.. The resulting nerfed AI will not meet the definition of an AGI.

Show less

Reply

@metatron3942

9 days ago

You think this would be the 200 tier or the 400?

1

Reply

1 reply

@cajampa

9 days ago (edited)

Bro.....one task is $1300 1:57 for the full o3

Reply

@SpikyRoss

9 days ago (edited)

This is not AGI, yet, this is not GENERAL intelligence but performs extremely well on certain task like code .. However, it does not apply to the other domains like math...

3

Reply

9 replies

@aboyer9828

9 days ago

Did you watch the video??

4

Reply

@kreitous

9 days ago

There are no one single human who can perform extremely well in all domains, hardly you can find someone who excels in more than two! Give to the best mechanical enginner in the world an advanced task related to the development of a next gen explosive or to build a functional universal photonic cpu and gpu, and he would fail! An AI system who is a general expert in the 100% of knowledge fields knows to mankind, is like a ASI that makes Da Vinci and Einstein look like a 100 iq person . . .

Read more

2

Reply

@adolphgracius9996

9 days ago

@kreitous this AI can beat 100% of humans in a General Knowledge Test, I would bet the house on that

Reply

@SpikyRoss

9 days ago

@kreitous  What are you talking about? it's literally the point of AGI to perform well on any task... Here is the definition : AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) refers to a type of artificial intelligence capable of performing ANY intellectual task that a HUMAN being can do. It possesses general cognitive abilities, adaptability, and understanding across a WIDE range of domains, rather than being specialized for specific tasks.

Read more

Reply

@aboyer9828

9 days ago

@SpikyRoss  Any. Not EVERY. I say again, it looks to be a least as generally intelligent as your average NYC cab driver (meaning no disrespect to cab drivers).

Reply

@kreitous

8 days ago

@SpikyRoss  No, it's YOUR definition of AGI! Ask to Geofrey Hinton about his definition of AGI, not that same as yours. Your definition is more like ASI, because an AI as good as you are saying is like a Super Einstein, a 250iq entity how are perfect at any give test, that's is a type of a god!

Reply

@SpikyRoss

8 days ago

@kreitous  there is no actual real definition of what's AGI, but overall AGI is being good at all human task, not only one. It's not the case even with o3. This is not GENERAL intelligence, no matter how you can twist it in your head.

Reply

@kreitous

8 days ago

@SpikyRoss  If AGI cannot be definied, how can you say o3 it's not AGI ? For me, o3 is almost AGI, like 93%, but the next model, coming out about march 2025, gonna be 100% or 110%. After that, the "problem" will be to totally integrate AI in society and economy. And i hope technology progress to be exponential, like 1 year will be more like 30 year of progress!

Reply

@SpikyRoss

8 days ago

@kreitous  I didn't say it cannot be defined, i said everyone came with their own definition, but the final goal of AGI is to be able to perform as same as human, currently it cannot. If you want to play with word and feel better about yourself we can say that they achieved 3 out of X fields to achieve real AGI which is currently reasoning, coding, math...

Reply

@quaterman1270

9 days ago

Like Sora and after it go released, not that impressive anymore.

Reply

@TimeLordRaps

9 days ago

You should do cover pieces on individuals in ai.

Reply

1 reply

@TimeLordRaps

9 days ago

start with head of research at openai

Reply

@a.thales7641

9 days ago

1. They haven't released it. 2. Its not AGI. But its Proto-AGI. 3. AGI in 2025 confirmed. 4. Where the fuck is GPT 4.5 or 5 or Orion or Epsilon with Multimodality? O1/Pro is good and o3 is great and expansive but i want a gpt4.5/5 and its mini version as a multimodal thing. Come on guys. At least we'll see Grok 2.5 maybe this year with the standalone app? Not multimodal i guess.

Show less

3

Reply

@sbowesuk981

9 days ago (edited)

Prediction: The impression I'm getting is that this technology is becoming so resource intensive and expensive to run, that the top-tier stuff is not going to be for consumers, but giant companies and governments. As time goes by it'll be a "you can look but not touch" situation. Well get the watered down toys, while the giant entities get the super-powered versions and true AGI/ASI. P.S. - o3 is a step towards AGI, but it's not AGI yet. Content creators like Matthew need to slow down and see this for what it is, Sam dangling bait for the media to generate a huge amount of hype and consequently cashflow.

Show less

113

Reply

30 replies

@ryanscott642

9 days ago

Imagine complaining you get chatgpt for free You are right tho

11

Reply

@chrisrogers1092

9 days ago

That will change as the hardware(Nvidia GPUs) gets exponentially faster with each generation

21

Reply

@Sumyunguy2

9 days ago

Slaves we are. (Yoda)

Reply

@aitandechunveiled

9 days ago

It will continue to happen...and once AI is required for healthcare, education, etc. the void will become large.

3

Reply

@NaanFungibull

9 days ago

Imagine the power plays and social engineering and mass manipulation that those with the money to run these models to their advantage will exert over those that can't afford to harness its power.

19

Reply

@flexibleaspect

9 days ago

Energy will become cheaper once the climate alarmists finally give in to nuclear... and especially once fusion becomes practical.

Reply

@MisledUtopia

9 days ago

Quantum AI running on fusion reactors... beam me up scottie

4

Reply

@joeybasile545

9 days ago

Duh

1

Reply

@cristofersk8s

9 days ago

That's already been the case the whole time

3

Reply

@amourzombie

9 days ago

Well of course power is monopolised, what did you think hahah

2

Reply

@sebastianjost

9 days ago

That is one of the many dangers of advanced AI. Many experts (and non-experts) have been aware of this problem for years. A proposed (partial) solution is a universal basic income for everyone.

1

Reply

@nilaier1430

9 days ago

That's why i hope that there's more models like Llama and Qwen

1

Reply

@pietervoogt

9 days ago

The top tier stuff will 3 years later be the mainstream stuff. If it is very hardware dependent, maybe 5 year or more.

Reply

@jamesjonnes

9 days ago

@sebastianjost  UBI will make humans have less survival skills and general competence.

1

Reply

@Ascended23

9 days ago

@sbowesuk981  I think you’re right, but most of the “strength” of these models is from reprompting and other things you can get from the API already. It’ll be priced to reap profits from executives who don’t know the difference, while people with more sense and less money can still get the same results by other means.

1

Reply

@christiancarter255

9 days ago

They'll optimize it

Reply

@NotLikeUs17

9 days ago

And to add insult to injury, China is preparing to invade Taiwan. That’ll be a setback I bet.

Reply

@JKnksrsly

9 days ago

@christiancarter255 for why?

Reply

@christiancarter255

9 days ago (edited)

@JKnksrsly  To use less electricity, etc. so that everybody will be able to easily use it locally on their phones.

Reply

@randomstranger1188

9 days ago

This is my worst fear because an AGI design by the top will protect the top. We the peons would be screwed. Bow before your technological masters.

3

Reply

@christiancarter255

9 days ago

@randomstranger1188  nah

Reply

@sergiomontes2568

8 days ago

oh wow you are predicting that those who have much more will ger much more... right.... uh... why did you even bother to type it?

1

Reply

@Fifasher2K

8 days ago

@chrisrogers1092  We have almost reached physical limits. There is not that much of a space to grow.

1

Reply

@goodtreeministries3751

8 days ago

I think your right on. This is a great prediction. I was thinking along the same lines. The log curve for compute needed keeps increasing for minimum improvements.

Reply

@chrisrogers1092

8 days ago

@Fifasher2K  I’m not sure if you mean data center space but we have plenty of that. Also when companies upgrade to new nvidia GPUs they can slide out the old ones and plug in the new ones.

1

Reply

@huyifan83

8 days ago

At current stage it doesn't have much of use.

1

Reply

@TheDjith

8 days ago

We always got the watered down toys for last 40 years..

2

Reply

@illuminated2438

8 days ago

This is a prediction rooted in your Marxist outlook. You are outrageously spoiled yet have no idea. And you are completely wrong.

Reply

@digitalsoultech

7 days ago (edited)

That's already happened. OpenAI is in bed with the military and government already and it's demoed and accessed by them behind closed doors. They see this first and foremost.

Reply

@markfostercrtgamer3201

6 days ago

@NaanFungibull the rich model owners will be able to predict the future. Predictions on markets and how to shape the markets to maximum power plays will leave the rich with all the keys to the kingdom.

Reply

@quaterman1270

9 days ago

I disagree. Not in my definition of AGI.

1

Reply

@J_Machine

9 days ago

Is not AGI

Reply

@thirien59

9 days ago

"Were not releasing it yet" = It's a marketing communication stunt.

164

Reply

17 replies

@thedudely1

9 days ago

"so we just got one upped by google but wait no we didn't please believe us!"

16

Reply

@clarityhandle

9 days ago

@thedudely1  you guys expect them to release a new model every week??

9

Reply

@thedudely1

9 days ago

@clarityhandle it's just been obvious how much they're holding back on what they actually have and how they only act when they're forced to.

4

Reply

@brianmi40

9 days ago

Relax, o1 went from Preview to out in 3 months.

8

Reply

@brianmi40

9 days ago

@thedudely1  Yeah, they got "forced" an amazing 12 times in the last 12 days. genius.

6

Reply

@wtflolomg

9 days ago

Do you think they are lying? I don't. The stakes are way too high. Did Google up the game, sure... SORA was a huge mistake by OpenAI, because they sat on the model way too long due to "Safety testing" and trying to make it reasonable on compute, so they are trying not to make the same mistakes. Google has VEO2, but when can the rest of us actually use it? Was this an attempt to temper the velocity Google has rolling into the break? Sure. Do you honestly think Arc Prize would risk their reputation by lying?

Read more

9

Reply

@alsu6886

9 days ago (edited)

@thedudely1 Same as Google. All Google's most impressive announcements in the last two weeks are releasing some time next year, or are only available to select testers.

Reply

@jgcornell

9 days ago

They won’t necessarily be lying but I guarantee there are a tonne of qualifiers we’ll see on release, speed, hallucinations, cost, creative benchmarking etc

5

Reply

@iseetreesofgreen3367

9 days ago

They still have to do safety trials and o3 mini comes out around end of Jan

Reply

@francisco444

9 days ago

Same thing with Veo. Not public available yet. They need to test it a lot first.

Reply

Show more replies

@cfjlkfsjf

9 days ago

Cool and all but still waiting for the world to change. I want the amazing tech now!

1

Reply

@F30-Jet

9 days ago

I was waiting for your review!

Reply

@micbab-vg2mu

9 days ago

Corporate compliance blocked all AI activities, so my job is secure for now. :)

2

Reply

@AlexJohnson-g4n

9 days ago

03's benchmarks are incredible! Can't wait to see its real-world impact. Kudos to OpenAI!

5

Reply

@dimicdragan5922

9 days ago

Yeah, but what if you optimised AI o3 in such a way that it knows how to pass the arc tests?

3

Reply

@HMexperience

9 days ago

AGI is Elon Musk being replaced by an AGI that can do a better job as CEO than Musk who is really good at being a CEO. That will convince me we got AGI in the box.

1

Reply

1 reply

@ASchnacky

9 days ago

I love how u judge elons job performance. At least compare him to someone amazing like sammy

Reply

@ares106

9 days ago

Until this is in the hands of independent testers I will remain skeptical.

497

Reply

31 replies

@DefaultFlame

9 days ago

Yuuuup. I don't trust OpenAI at all on anything they claim. Until its in my hands and I can see what it can actually do I don't believe anything their hype department puts out. Just look at Sora.

41

Reply

@brianmi40

9 days ago

still skeptical of o1? Did you same the same thing then? Learned anything since then?

9

Reply

@csansolo

9 days ago (edited)

Thanks Sherlock. Because what they have done so far is just pure rubbish isn't it?

9

Reply

@John4343sh

9 days ago

It has been independently tested by one of the biggest critics of LLM's and even he said this is a huge paradigm shift.

20

Reply

@noway8233

9 days ago

Absolutly ,i dont beleve in this , this companies always came with the same script , probably is a very good model but ...its geniuos until not

6

Reply

@En1Gm4A

9 days ago

OpenAI has been quite reliable on that front so far

2

Reply

@pureconcept-q7p

9 days ago

you don't think arc-agi was honest?

11

Reply

@iseetreesofgreen3367

9 days ago

Arc AGI isn’t open ai lmao

6

Reply

@luihinwai1

9 days ago

The results was announced by ARC Foundation themselves on their hidden benchmark

10

Reply

@jld-ni3vf

9 days ago

Sceptics be damned. Why would they lie about this? This would absolutely annihilate their reputation. If they lied before about benchmarks your scepticism would have merit but these claims are unfounded

9

Reply

@ares106

9 days ago

@pureconcept-q7p  No, and especially not now after they announced an upcoming partnership with OpenAI in this very video.

Reply

@lolmao500

9 days ago

@jld-ni3vf Why would they lie?? Because thats what scammers do. All the time. And their reputation. Come on now. Trump has been a shit human being for all his life with the worst reputation and he got goddamn reelected. Americans will believe any scammer there is with enough BS.

Reply

@johnwilliams919

9 days ago

Agreed but let's have some fun and speculate.

1

Reply

@ugwuanyicollins6136

9 days ago

@jld-ni3vf why wouldn''t they 🙄 Do you leave under a rock

4

Reply

@SmartMoneyG

9 days ago

Must be a coder commenting this

2

Reply

@vladkuz6974

9 days ago

They need to make sure it won’t help people do terrible things before releasing it.

2

Reply

@sunlight8299

9 days ago

It's completely banned/blocked in my country - the UK. I believe AGI has been achieved

1

Reply

@georgemontgomery1892

9 days ago

@DefaultFlame  Don't know where you've been, but OpenAI and Anthropic have reported benchmarks in the past and seem to reflect it when people use it, unlike these open source models that have achieved scores those two models once have, yet performed poorly in comparison. I am just saying, these two companies have frontier models for a reason. The whole, "I don't trust OpenAI" thing is getting quite old.

Read more

1

Reply

@Metarig

9 days ago

@vladkuz6974  Does it make sense that the AI is smart enough to do whatever people ask but still dumb enough to be tricked into doing bad stuff?

1

Reply

@context_eidolon_music

9 days ago

Tell us you don't know what ARC-AGI means harder.

1

Reply

@Shwapx

9 days ago

@DefaultFlame what exactly you dont like in sora?

1

Reply

@pnakek

9 days ago

@jld-ni3vf "Why would they lie about this?" Mate, it's called marketing. Companies do it to make money. Crazy concept, I know.

3

Reply

@DefaultFlame

8 days ago

@Shwapx  They hyped it up to high heaven, and when it was finally released it was, if anything, worse than video models already out there for many months.

2

Reply

@MiguelCayazaya

8 days ago

yeah one thing is to say "technically" and the other actually being in the real world as good.

1

Reply

@Greg-xi8yx

8 days ago

“Why would they lie” is literally the worst possible argument that one can make. Embarrassing…

3

Reply

@ares106

8 days ago

@context_eidolon_music  is ARC-AGI really independent when they announcing collaborations?

1

Reply

@robotron1236

8 days ago

@brianmi40  yeah, that nothing has changed. Literally nothing at all.

Reply

@robotron1236

8 days ago

@John4343sh  I wonder how much he got paid.

Reply

@robotron1236

8 days ago

@jld-ni3vf because they're hemorrhaging money and have been for a LONG time. OpenAI is on the verge of collapse, the timing of this announcement is perfect in that regard. Something to kinda assuage any investor fatigue that has been happening in recent months. Basically they need money and AI is kinda useless, but it sure does make investors open up their wallets.

Reply

@brianmi40

8 days ago

@robotron1236  Change NOW is NOT what matters, the change under sentient super AI is the only change that matters.

Reply

@vaolin1703

2 days ago

ARC is literally an independent test.

Reply

@remsee1608

9 days ago

I was here.

Reply

@E_-_-

9 days ago

(Deus Ex intro theme starts playing)

Reply

@فر-ك1د

9 days ago

سِالُتتكِ بّالُلُُه 💔الُجْلُيَلُ الُجْبّارَ انَ تْنَقًذَنَا قًبّلُ انَ نَمٌوَتْ مٌنَ شِدِتْ الُجْوَع انَتٌْخيَكِ انَيَ دٌِخلُةِ ْعلُى الُلُُه  تْمٌ ْعلُيَكِ انَيَ فَيَ وَجُْهك انَـيَ اخـتْكِ انَـيَ اتْرَجْـاكِ اتْـوَسِـلُ الُـيَـكِ انَـقًـذَنَا لُـوَجُْـه الُـلُُـه. يَــشِــُهدِ الُــلُــُه يَاٌخـيَ انَ مٌنَ الُــصّــبّاحُ حُـتْا الُـانَ يَــحُــرَمٌ ْعـــلُيَـنَـا الاكل غير الماء والله اني ما كتبت هذا الكلام الا من الضيق وقسوت الضروف اني طالبه من الله ثم منك لاتردني خايبه يا اخي ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' اخي اول كلامي انا اقسم بالله على كتاب الله اني لااكذب عليك ولا انصب ولا احتال اني بنت يمنيه نازحين من انا واسرتي بيننا ایت الشهرب 20 الف يمني والان علينا 60 الف حق 3 شهور وصاحب البيت من الناس الي ماترحم والله يا اخي انه يجي كل يوم يبهدلنا ويتكلم علينا ويريد من البيت للشارع لانناماقدرنا ندفعله الأجار شافونا الجيران نبكي ورجعو تكلمو الجيران ومهلنالاخره الأسبوع معادفعنا له حلف يمين بالله هذا بيخرجنا إلى الشارع رحمه واحنا. بلادنا بسبب هذا الحرب ولانجد قوت يومنا وعايشين اناوامي واخوتي سفار والدنا متوفي الله يرحمه ومامعنا أحد في هذا الدنيا جاانبنا في هذه الظروف القاسيه اخوتي الصغار خرجو للشارع وشافو الجيران ياكلو واوقفو عند بابهم لجل يعطوهم ولو كسره خبز والله الذي له ملك السموات والارض انهم غلفو الباب وطردوهم ورجعو یبکو ایموتو من الجوع ما احد رحمهم وعطلة ردها لقمت عیش والان لوما احدنا ساعدنا في إيكيلو دقيق اقسم بالله انموت من الجوع فيا اخي انا دخيله على الله ثم عليك واريد منك المساعده لوجه الله انشدك بالله تحب الخير واتساعدني ولو ب 500 ريال يمني مع تراسلي واتساب على هذا الرقم00967779509554 وتطلب اسم بطاقتي وترسلي ولاتتاخر وايعوضك الله بكل خير اخواني سغار شوف كيف حالتهم وساعدنا وأنقذنا قبل أن يطردونا في الشارع تتبهدل أو نموت من الجوع وانا واسرتي نسالك بالله لولك مقدره على مساعد لاتتاخر علينا وجزاك الله خيرا.:،،،،،.،.؛؛؛٪٪٪٪٪،،،،،،،،،،،… .ا°°°...>.>.<.>.>.<..>>.>.<<.<>>>

Read more

1

Reply

2 replies

@nusu5331

9 days ago (edited)

plot twist, there is no god. also wtf? islamist bots taking over?

Reply

@ASchnacky

9 days ago

Seems so

Reply

@dr.mikeybee

9 days ago

The next benchmark will be solving table-top fusion. ;)

1

Reply

@dylan_curious

9 days ago

This might as well have been the GPT-5 announcement! I am calling it the Oh-My God Model

3

Reply

2 replies

@a.thales7641

9 days ago

Nice to see you Dylan!

Reply

@markplutowski

8 days ago

Let’s call it the Higgs model then because it took almost as much compute to discover😂😂

Reply

@RezaDarehshoori

9 days ago (edited)

I guess these are unconscience AGI and we need Conscience Agi to achieve singularity

2

Reply

1 reply

@ASchnacky

9 days ago

What of yin and yang?

Reply

@somenygaard

9 days ago

I tried to download a cash register game for my son the other day and after a dozen different games I gave up. None of them would play long enough before spitting out an ad you couldn’t close very easily. I don’t know how to program is it currently possible to have an AI make simple games like this that I could get working with reasonable effort?

1

Reply

2 replies

@memology1044

9 days ago

Just activate plane mode to block ads , but this only work for off line game

1

Reply

@somenygaard

9 days ago

@ I didn’t think of that, thanks

Reply

@guyaaron3139

9 days ago (edited)

I hope it is AGI, I've been waiting to test a model that claims this, I've already tested the O1 preview which was the last model i tested so far, O1 preview was disappointing for the tests i gave it. For it to meet the AGI claim it has to perform as good as a human and the main reason no model so far can do that is because of hullcinations, i feel they have to solve the hullicinations problem before they can declare it anything even close to AGI.

Read more

1

Reply

1 reply

@J_Machine

9 days ago

Don't worry, is not AGI

Reply

@jonatasorto

9 days ago

Hate from Brazil 🇧🇷

Reply

@Martin-bx1et

9 days ago

Skipped O2 to avoid copyright issues... Ozone: "Hold my carbon dioxide infused yeast and plant materials"

106

Reply

8 replies

@nosult3220

9 days ago

Lame joke bro

3

Reply

@Martin-bx1et

9 days ago

@nosult3220  Yes - I thought it would have fallen flat too.

6

Reply

@nosult3220

9 days ago

@Martin-bx1et

❤️

4

Reply

@autohmae

9 days ago

Also, there is no copyright issue, at most it's a trademark issue and they are in different markets, so it shouldn't cause much of a problem. The irony, stealing copyrighted material from all kinds of sources, they have no issue with.

4

Reply

@luihinwai1

9 days ago

O2 is a British telecommunication company

1

Reply

@timewanderer7773

9 days ago

@autohmae  good point lol

Reply

@Crates-Media

9 days ago

Ozone is O3. Oxygen is O2.

1

Reply

@Martin-bx1et

9 days ago

@Crates-Media  To quote Google Gemini: You are absolutely correct!

Reply

@Michael-ul7kv

9 days ago

Goal post movers are struggling like crazy today

3

Reply

@andrecummings818

9 days ago

I think this is becoming a true addiction. Every-time I start your video it always says 14seconds ago

1

Reply

@idiomaxiom

9 days ago (edited)

$1000 per task? For 71% success solving a minor bug? It's costing millions just to benchmark it lol

Show less

7

Reply

1 reply

@benoitcorvol7482

9 days ago

That is why you should give only complex tasks to those big models and leaves the easier one for the cheapest models

Reply

@soladona4228

9 days ago

Being better than human for coding alone doesn’t meet the requirement of AGI

8

Reply

4 replies

@lanatmwan

9 days ago

Did you watch the rest?

1

Reply

@gabrielsandstedt

9 days ago

Arc prize is not coding

Reply

@soladona4228

9 days ago

@lanatmwan  I did. I understand what he is saying and I’m excited that it can start to learn on its own but I still think it’s premature to state that it has reached AGI unless it is already better than human on most tasks.

Reply

@vripiatbuzoi9188

9 days ago

I don't even know what they mean by better than a human at coding. None of the frontier models are even close to being able to do what I do in code. Their code is always unoptimized drivel that works sometimes if lucky but lacks full understanding of context. If you can't rely on it then you still have to logic it all out and sometimes that takes more time especially when it takes you down a wrong rabbit hole. Completely useless for the most part for coding. Only beginners would be happy with the output.

Read more

1

Reply

@YHauz-co

9 days ago

Now what? Start war with China and Russia simultaneously?! Or improve your Facebook profile?

1

Reply

@alexg9790

9 days ago

Can it emulate Doom? I want to know.

1

Reply

@szghasem

9 days ago

Holly Molly Shmolly

Reply

@somenygaard

9 days ago

Thankfully someone really trust worthy is in charge.

1

Reply

@MrlegendOr

9 days ago

AGI ACHIEVED: No is isn't !

10

Reply

@Lucasbrlvk

9 days ago

👍🎉

Reply

@Stewarts_in_love

9 days ago

Bro lol they didn't even release o2 😂

2

Reply

@user-on6uf6om7s

9 days ago

I hope it can be used to solve some major problems for the handful of people who get access to it but if we ever get access to this full model as regular consumers, it will likely be closer to the end of 2025 or more likely, we get a Turbo version called o3 that doesn't perform nearly as well as the real o3. Still, if it can help make breakthroughs in the lab, that could be valuable.

1

Reply

@pureconcept-q7p

9 days ago

no one better flame you. this is agi, absolutely.

14

Reply

1 reply

@thenoblerot

9 days ago

Well, if nothing else, it's definitely time to move the goal posts... again 😂 🫸 🥅 🫸 🥅

Reply

@DGFilmsNYC

9 days ago

here we go.... (oh brother)

1

Reply

@Aiworld2025

9 days ago

All the bots saying this is click bait don’t understand what AGI is

12

Reply

Matthew Berman

·

6 replies

9 days ago

Yes

1

Reply

@marcusk7855

9 days ago

AGI is supposed to be "General" intelligence. These are specific domains.

2

Reply

@sil778

9 days ago

Maybe you don't understand what agi is. Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a type of artificial intelligence (AI) that matches or surpasses human cognitive capabilities across a wide range of cognitive tasks. This contrasts with narrow AI, which is limited to specific tasks. This îs about narrow ai, not agi.

Show less

2

Reply

@aboyer9828

9 days ago

Be careful here. Narrow ai is like stock fish. This model is human comparable (according to the demo) at math, science, coding and whatever arc measures. I’m fairly confident it would be more generally intelligent than your average cabdriver given what we’ve seen here,

2

Reply

@Aiworld2025

9 days ago

@marcusk7855  that is not true..AGI is defined throughout the years as beating humans at broad and general tasks, the subjects mentioned in the video are indeed surpassing humans.

Reply

@Aiworld2025

9 days ago

@sil778  just because they mention two areas doesn’t mean they haven’t surpassed other areas. You don’t give out the whole trick if you want the show to go on…

Reply

@marcusk7855

9 days ago

Have you heard the story of the boy who cried wolf?

5

Reply

1 reply

@somenygaard

9 days ago

The video isn’t even out long enough to watch the video yet.

Reply

@xXWillyxWonkaXx

9 days ago

i just so your notification and *Bam* on your channel lol

3

Reply

@williamcharles2590

9 days ago

Not the third

2

Reply

@TheRealPhillipJacobs

9 days ago

Oh damn!🎉

6

Reply

@SoccerPrince1

9 days ago

AGI Achieved? I am flaming you in the comments. Stop click baiting.

1.1K

Reply

Matthew Berman

·

129 replies

9 days ago

not clickbait!

104

Reply

@aa-dt5bf

9 days ago

More flaming here, ill apologize if not right. Doubt that

57

Reply

9 days ago

Watch the full vid first and let me make my point! I know you haven’t watched it yet bc it has only been out for 3 min

192

Reply

@Lucasbrlvk

9 days ago

watch the video

26

Reply

@DaveKent

9 days ago

I watched the entire event. AGI is here.

49

Reply

@Panacea_archive

9 days ago

@matthew_berman  You should have added a question mark. O3 isn't out yet

34

Reply

@J_Machine

9 days ago

@matthew_berman  is not AGI, i work on AI research and see the benchmark, is not AGI

Reply

@CJayyTheCreative

9 days ago

ITS NOT CLICKBAIT AGI IS HERE I LOVE AI HOLY CRAP I LOVE AI ITS BETTER THAN PEOPLE

30

Reply

@DrCasey

9 days ago

@CJayyTheCreative Same! Love AI, hate people. Simple as.

Reply

@MatthewCleere

9 days ago

Considering that AGI was achieved a good year ago, he has to keep screaming it, because you numbskulls just aren't f'ing listening.

32

Reply

Show more replies

@thenextweek2416

9 days ago

First!

Reply

@TheRealDyscyples

9 days ago

Not the first comment

2

Reply

Get The #1 USB Monitor

Sponsored

duetdisplay.com

Visit site

Demystifying AIDebunking the 5 Most Common Assumptions About AI

Sponsored

Dataiku

Download

21:02

Now playing

The World Reacts to OpenAI's Unveiling of o3!

198K views 4 days ago

New

31:51

Now playing

AI Is Replacing SWEs? Data Suggests Differently

71K views 17 hours ago

New

6:59

Now playing

Physicists Claim They Solved Schrödinger's Cat Problem

189K views 17 hours ago

New

12:23

Now playing

Why I'm embarrassed to be German

2.2M views 5 months ago

47:24

Now playing

Are Programmers Becoming Obsolete? My 3-Year Insight

82K views 2 weeks ago

21:41

Now playing

Scientists Just Created a Potential Cure For Diabetes - Breakthrough Explained

597K views 13 days ago

16:41

Now playing

This Video is AI Generated! SORA Review

3.6M views 2 weeks ago

13:58

Now playing

are we cooked w/ o3?

277K views 2 days ago

New

9:46

Now playing

This Physicist Says We’re Using Maths Entirely Wrong

310K views 1 day ago

New

21:40

Now playing

The Fallacy of Sabine Hossenfelder

133K views 4 days ago

New

29:01

Now playing

Ilya Sutskever Breaks Silence: The Wild Truth About AI's Future | OpenAI's Ex-Chief Scientist

156K views 9 days ago

22:59

Now playing

The Dome Paradox: A Loophole in Newton's Laws

1.1M views 2 days ago

New

9:01

Now playing

Anthropic’s STUNNING New Jailbreak - Cracks EVERY Frontier Model

107K views 8 days ago

13:40

Now playing

Google Deepmind CEO's STUNNING Prediction - Digital Biology

74K views 1 day ago

New

12:32

Now playing

Japan’s (Surprisingly Safe) Outlets, Explained

390K views 9 days ago

19:06

Now playing

Anthropic Revealed Secrets to Building Powerful Agents

43K views 17 hours ago

New

6:03

Now playing

NVIDIA’s New AI: A Revolution In 3D Modeling!

61K views 15 hours ago

New

6:55

Now playing

I Didn’t Believe that AI is the Future of Coding. I Was Right.

616K views 2 months ago

22:21

Now playing

o3 - wow

245K views 8 days ago

24:42

Now playing

My New Favorite Terminal Just Dropped

68K views 1 day ago

New

18:39

Now playing

Why Musk Is Wrong About Mars

721K views 11 days ago

18:34

Now playing

Ilya Sutskever Just Revealed The Next BIG THINGS In AI (Superintelligence Explained)

127K views 2 weeks ago

2:58

Now playing

How to Use Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash AI for FREE 🤖 | Use Gemini AI 1.5 Pro For Free | ChatGPT Alter

33 views 52 minutes ago

New

12:58

Now playing

Amazon's NEW AI Just Solved The HARDEST Programming Problem

114K views 3 weeks ago

7:19

Now playing

Jeff Bezos’ Space Plans Make More Sense Than Elon Musk's

118K views 17 hours ago

New

2:48:11

Now playing

the sham legacy of Richard Feynman

571K views 1 month ago

16:24

Now playing

Anthropic's Chilling 18-Month Warning: AI Apocalypse in 18 Months

51K views 1 month ago

21:15

Now playing

Special Relativity: This Is Why You Misunderstand It

633K views 1 year ago

12:50

Now playing

i dove down the 7zip rabbit hole (extremely deep)

442K views 1 month ago

24:29

Now playing

How Quantum Computers Break The Internet... Starting Now

9.6M views 1 year ago

16:12

Now playing

Sam Altman Reveals A.I In 2025 - (2025 AI Predictions)

60K views 4 days ago

New

17:07

Now playing

This video will change your mind about the AI hype

1.1M views 5 months ago

15:35

Now playing

Gravity is not a force. But what does that mean?

1M views 1 year ago

12:29

Now playing

What are AI Agents?

952K views 5 months ago

8:53

Now playing

How AI Got a Reality Check

428K views 10 days ago

12:11

Now playing

BREAKING: OpenAI's new O3 model changes everything

180K views 9 days ago

14:46

Now playing

Terminators have arrived, in the millions.

422K views 7 days ago

20:03

Now playing

How A.I. Could Change Science Forever

150K views 8 days ago

12:59

Now playing

8 Rules For Learning to Code in 2025...and should you?

106K views 10 days ago

14:15

Now playing

Anthropic just dropped an INSANE new paper…

53K views 8 days ago

13:53

Now playing

"Junior developers can't think anymore..."

12K views 18 hours ago

New

25:35

Now playing

Apple DROPS AI BOMBSHELL: LLMS CANNOT Reason

416K views 2 months ago

51:38

Now playing

Key Trends from 2024: Cell-based Architecture, DORA & SPACE, LLM & SLM, Cloud Databases and Portals

16 views 16 minutes ago

New

1:03:29

Now playing

Prof. Harald Lesch: The Climate: The State of Things

180K views 2 weeks ago

Auto-dubbed

7:14

Now playing

Small Nuclear Reactors Have A Big Problem

435K views 1 month ago

9:42

Now playing

i tried to warn you.

135K views 14 hours ago

New

1:26:50

Now playing

Some Creationists Tried to Debunk Me and It’s Pathetic

446K views 2 weeks ago

28:51

Now playing

"BE CAREFUL! This Is Serious..." - Richard Wolff's Last WARNING

226K views 5 days ago

New

8:40

Now playing

5 Signs of an Inexperienced Self-Taught Developer (and how to fix)

820K views 11 months ago

17:38

Now playing

The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]

1.5M views 5 months ago

8:20

Now playing

Experts are STUNNED! Meta's NEW LLM Architecture is a GAME-CHANGER!

109K views 2 days ago

New

28:17

Now playing

OpenAI's o3 and the "JAGGED FRONTIER" of AGI....

81K views 5 days ago

New

36:47

Now playing

The Next Frontier: Sam Altman on the Future of A.I. and Society

362K views 3 weeks ago

1:03:45

Now playing

Schon wieder die Collatz-Vermutung? Muss das sein?

11K views 1 day ago

New

24:09

Now playing

OpenAI's New o1 Is LYING ON PURPOSE?! (Thinking For Itself)

63K views 2 weeks ago

22:15

Now playing

The SQLite Rewrite In Rust

179K views 11 days ago

22:05

Now playing

OpenAI o3 and o3-mini—12 Days of OpenAI: Day 12

497K views Streamed 9 days ago

24:09

Now playing

Can we control AI?

85K views 6 days ago

New

10:36

Now playing

How to Learn Rust

599K views 1 year ago

33:48

Now playing

O3 Just BROKE the AI Ceiling 🤯 (AGI is HERE - This Changes Everything)

146K views 7 days ago

52:07

Now playing

Valhalla - Java's Epic Refactor

69K views 2 weeks ago

28:49

Now playing

the END of VPNs?!

1.3M views 1 year ago

9:51

Now playing

Autonomous Agent with Copilot Studio

1 view 16 minutes ago

New

34:29

Now playing

I Took an IQ Test to Find Out What it Actually Measures

9M views 1 year ago

31:01

Now playing

Googles GEMINI 2.0 Just SHOCKED The ENTIRE INDUSTRY! (OpenAI Beaten) Full Breakdown

516K views 2 weeks ago

27:26

Now playing

This open problem taught me what topology is

731K views 5 days ago

New

8:29

Now playing

AI Is Not Designed for You

251K views 3 weeks ago

8:22

Now playing

NVIDIA Unveils STUNNING Nano Super Computer for Only $249

179K views 11 days ago

17:36

Now playing

AGI ACHIEVED | OpenAI Drops the BOMBSHELL that ARC AGI is beat by the o3 model

148K views 9 days ago

12:05

Now playing

OpenAI Just Revealed They ACHIEVED AGI (OpenAI o3 Explained)

286K views 9 days ago

15:58

Now playing

13 Jahre unschuldig im Knast! Jetzt soll er 100.000€ für Kost & Logis zahlen | Anwalt Solmecke

176K views 2 days ago

New

17:55

Now playing

Catching up with async Rust

23K views 4 days ago

New

20:10

Now playing

Amazon Just Dropped 6 AI Models That CRUSH GPT-4 (75% Cheaper!)

111K views 6 days ago

New

26:52

Now playing

Andrew Ng Explores The Rise Of AI Agents And Agentic Reasoning | BUILD 2024 Keynote

298K views 1 month ago

11:35

Now playing

"Don't Learn to Code, But Study This Instead..." says NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

1.2M views 9 months ago

31:33

Now playing

The Oldest Unsolved Problem in Math

13M views 9 months ago

24:02

Now playing

The Race to Harness Quantum Computing's Mind-Bending Power | The Future With Hannah Fry

4.2M views 3 months ago

7:11

Now playing

AI Agents Explained Like You're 5 (Seriously, Easiest Explanation Ever!)

317K views 3 months ago

57:45

Now playing

Visualizing transformers and attention | Talk for TNG Big Tech Day '24

271K views 1 month ago

10:16

Now playing

AI Officially Beats 99% of Programmers. What Happens Now? (OpenAi o3)

39K views 7 days ago

17:33

Now playing

I don't believe the 2nd law of thermodynamics. (The most uplifting video I'll ever make.)

1.4M views 1 year ago

13:41

Now playing

My dream died, and now I'm here

3.2M views 8 months ago

3:39

Now playing

Quick benchmark of Python, Perl, Bash, PHP

1 view 1 hour ago

New

32:44

Now playing

The Simple Math Problem That Revolutionized Physics

8M views 2 months ago

40:13

Now playing

AI Researchers SHOCKED After OpenAI's New o1 Tried to Escape...

1.1M views 3 weeks ago

16:41

Now playing

2024's Biggest Breakthroughs in Biology and Neuroscience

270K views 11 days ago

8:48

Now playing

Large Language Models explained briefly

1M views 1 month ago

33:18

Now playing

Why I Chose Rust Over Zig

224K views 5 months ago

7:32

Now playing

AI Trends for 2025

149K views 6 days ago

New

11:11

Now playing

MIT's AI Discovers New Science - "Intelligence Explosion"

162K views 1 month ago

9:04

Now playing

Googles New AI Glasses Are The Future Of AI (Android XR Explained)

1.6M views 2 weeks ago

14:51

Now playing

The Secret Plan Behind Artificial Intelligence

1M views 8 months ago

6:39

Now playing

Meet Willow, our state-of-the-art quantum chip

1.4M views 2 weeks ago

1:30:43

Now playing

Evolution of software architecture with the co-creator of UML (Grady Booch)

77K views 3 weeks ago

24:27

Now playing

AI News: Sam Altman Reveals 2025 AI Roadmap

62K views 2 days ago

New

1:25:01

Now playing

The Magic Of ARM w/ Casey Muratori

170K views 2 months ago

2:46:03

Now playing

The 3 Year AI Reset: How To Get Ahead While Others Lose Their Jobs (Prepare Now) | Emad Mostaque

3.3M views 1 year ago

20:38

Now playing

The Intelligence Age: A Conversation with OpenAI's Sam Altman

8.2K views 2 weeks ago

1:08:32

Now playing

Ich warne davor, eine Denunziationskultur zu etablieren ǀ Gabriele Krone-Schmalz

135K views 4 days ago

New

20:02

Now playing

AI News: Gemini 2.0, Devin, Quantum Computing, Llama 3.3, and more!

64K views 2 weeks ago

21:11

Now playing

"Climate Change is a Myth" -- A Nobel Prize Winner's Embarrassing Ideas

904K views 4 months ago

7:16

Now playing

The Quantum Computing Collapse Has Begun

1.2M views 2 months ago

12:38

Now playing

The Ultimate Neovim Setup with kickstart.nvim, Lazygit, Codeium, and Noice.nvim

24 views 41 minutes ago

New

16:46

Now playing

2024's Biggest Breakthroughs in Physics

811K views 12 days ago

52:53

Now playing

The Return of Procedural Programming - Richard Feldman

55K views 1 month ago

10:08

Now playing

OpenAI Finally Admits It "We've Achieved AGI"

76K views 3 weeks ago

18:46

Now playing

10 things I learnt in 2024 to increase my developer productivity.

34K views 1 day ago

New

1:13:00

Now playing

Yann LeCun: AI Doomsday Fears Are Overblown

8.5K views 20 hours ago

New

1:23:37

Now playing

Language Performance Comparisons Are Junk

171K views 9 days ago

14:23

Now playing

OpenAI Microsoft SCAM biggest bubble in history

25K views 3 days ago

New

36:06

Now playing

The Existential Crisis Iceberg

75K views 7 hours ago

New

13:18

Now playing

NVIDIA's $249 Secret Weapon for Edge AI - Jetson Orin Nano Super: Driveway Monitor

568K views 12 days ago

45:53

Now playing

Radical Simplicity

344K views 5 months ago

21:20

Now playing

POV: I'm on my third coffee and you just asked me how the internet works

109K views 9 months ago

23:47

Now playing

AI Pioneer Shows The Power of AI AGENTS - "The Future Is Agentic"

635K views 9 months ago

17:57

Now playing

Generative AI in a Nutshell - how to survive and thrive in the age of AI

2.5M views 11 months ago

25:20

Now playing

Large Language Models (LLMs) - Everything You NEED To Know

140K views 9 months ago

1:13:26

Now playing

How To Become A 37 Year Old Broke Loser

573K views 2 weeks ago

7:55

Now playing

Google's New AI Glasses - The Future of AI (Android XR)

73K views 2 weeks ago

8:27

Now playing

Google's Quantum Chip Just Broke Reality (You Won't Believe What It Can Do!)

503K views 2 weeks ago

6:59

Now playing

Scientists Uncover Hidden Pattern in Quantum Chaos

301K views 6 days ago

New

8:16

Now playing

10 regrets of experienced programmers

1.5M views 7 months ago

5:48

Now playing

Happy New Year! 50% OFF All Trainings (Power BI, SQL, Upwork, YouTube)

12 views 51 minutes ago

New

5:42

Now playing

What is Agentic RAG?

56K views 2 months ago

15:30

Now playing

It's Over - Gino vs Harvard Fake Data Scandal

1.1M views 3 months ago

29:53

Now playing

9 Mind Blowing Use Cases of Gemini 2.0

47K views 3 days ago

New

16:27

Now playing

Coding is Changing Fast... AI Agents Explained

50K views 2 weeks ago

13:32

Now playing

Google's Veo 2 - STUNNING AI Video (gg Sora)

26K views 10 days ago

27:36

Now playing

But Is it AGI?! OpenAI's o3 IMPRESSES--but is it Intelligent?

12K views 7 days ago

22:12

Now playing

OpenAI Day 4: Major Canvas Updates and ChatGPT Code Execution!

33K views 2 weeks ago

20:25

Now playing

AI Agent UX Patterns: Lessons From 1000 Startups - Jonas Braadbaart

3.3K views 2 weeks ago

19:32

Now playing

The 8 AI Skills That Will Separate Winners From Losers in 2025

504K views 3 weeks ago

15:34

Now playing

Google's 8 Hour AI Essentials Course In 15 Minutes

196K views 2 months ago

15:04

Now playing

Das ENDE der Legalisierung?

181K views 17 hours ago

New

8:15

Now playing

OpenAI o3 Might Just Break the Internet

96K views 9 days ago

14:23

Now playing

OpenAI's Sora FULL RELEASE! Film-quality AI Video is HERE!

45K views 2 weeks ago

30:27

Now playing

Weihnachtsmarkt und False-Flag-Angriffe: Die Rationalität der Täuschung | Prof. Dr. Christian Rieck

226K views 2 days ago

New

9:45

Now playing

How To Use ChatGPT Pro Mode - The Worlds Smartest AI Model

11K views 3 weeks ago

52:21

Now playing

SWE-Agent Team Interview - Agents, Programming, and Benchmarks!

14K views 3 weeks ago

11:20

Now playing

Microsoft CEO’s Shocking Prediction: “Agents Will Replace ALL Software"

643K views 10 days ago

32:26

Now playing

Why we should build Tool AI, not AGI | Max Tegmark at WebSummit 2024

13K views 9 days ago

29:45

Now playing

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt on AI, China and the future

43K views Streamed 10 days ago

52:38

Now playing

Computer Graphics Hangman game by Assem Khamis

4 views 1 hour ago

New

8:59

Now playing

This NEW AI System SIMULATES REALITY (Genesis A.I Just Changed EVERYTHING!)

45K views 10 days ago

1:05:51

Now playing

Wie wir in Zukunft WIRKLICH Energie erzeugen werden | Energie-Doku 2025

48K views 1 day ago

New

26:27

Now playing

GitHub Actions Feels Bad

98K views 1 year ago

40:20

Now playing

Real World AI Use Cases, Open-Source, Hallucinations (MindsDB CEO Interview)

11K views 13 days ago

30:31

Now playing

US Government to BanTP-Link Devices - Live Hacking of a Chinese WiFi Router

1M views 9 days ago

1:00:46

Now playing

37C3 - Von der ePA zum EHDS: 7 Thesen zur aktuellen digitalen Gesundheitspolitik

5.3K views 10 months ago

55:57

Now playing

Sam Altman on His Feud with Elon Musk—and the Battle for AI's Future

58K views 6 days ago

New

16:26

Now playing

12 NotebookLM Epic Use Cases You Must Try

93K views 6 days ago

New

6:02

Now playing

The BEST Terminal Just Launched - Ghostty 👻

24K views 2 days ago

New

8:15

Now playing

OnDemands New AI Changes AI Agents Forever! (Ondemand AI Tutorial)

8K views 11 days ago

18:35

Now playing

Build Anything with Claude Agents, Here’s How

213K views 1 month ago

7:13

Now playing

Ilya Sutskever Calls Peak Data and the End of Pretraining

2.1K views 9 days ago

25:30

Now playing

Top Minds in AI Explain What’s Coming After GPT-4o | EP #130

830K views 1 month ago

28:52

Now playing

AI Coding with AIDER Architect: Gemini 2.0 Flash vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet (o1, o3 PLAN)

39K views 6 days ago

New

23:32

Now playing

NEW OPENAI o3! - AMAZING RESULTS Is this the first AGI?

179K views 8 days ago

Auto-dubbed

31:50

Now playing

Instability is All You Need: The Surprising Dynamics of Learning in Deep Models

1.8K views 10 days ago

31:55

Now playing

DeepSeek V3 is *SHOCKINGLY* good for an OPEN SOURCE AI Model

60K views 3 days ago

New

11:33

Now playing

SQL Interview Question || Hard level || Sum of Sales Volume (Multiple CTEs) || Data Analyst ||

9 views 19 hours ago

New

59:10

Now playing

Stefan Streit: Digitalisierung in der Medizin - elektronische Patientenakte/ePA quo vadis?

9.8K views 1 year ago

16:54

Now playing

I Was A German SW Engineer. Now I'm Almost Unemployed And Alone In the Forest - How Did I Get Here?

16K views 6 days ago

New

11:23

Now playing

OpenAI O3: 5 Shocking Facts About the New OpenAI O3

13K views 8 days ago

Auto-dubbed

8:20

Now playing

Elon’s xAI ENORMOUS AI Model STUNNED the Entire Industry!

2.6K views 14 hours ago

New

14:33

Now playing

o3 completely changes ai agent development ?

3.2K views 9 days ago

5:46

Now playing

Pika 2.0: AI Just Redefined Video Creation Forever 🤯

3.1K views 11 days ago

9:13

Now playing

Gerald Grosz zerlegt Bohrn Mena LIVE – Heftiger Streit über Österreichs Asylpolitik!

12K views 15 hours ago

New

21:01

Now playing

dtv net #17 Some Valuable Insights From Geoffrey Hinton

1K views 13 days ago

5:33

Now playing

Days in the life of a Software Developer | Coding | Food | Life

1.9K views 3 weeks ago

2:26

Now playing

The King's Singers - Es ist ein Ros' entsprungen

587K views 11 years ago

12:00

Now playing

OpenAI Just Revealed They ACHIEVED AGI (Sam Altman O3 Mini Explained)

1.6K views 1 day ago

New

16:10

Now playing

I Tested 9 RAG Approaches—Here’s What Works Best

355 views 10 days ago

14:55

Now playing

OpenAI o3.... oha.

30K views 8 days ago

21:52

Now playing

"We've Achieved AGI" (OpenAI o3 SHOCKS AI Industry)

2.5K views 8 days ago

8:42

Now playing

BREAKING: OpenAI Makes HISTORY! 🔥 O3 Beats Humans in EVERY Test | The AGI Revolution

1.4K views 8 days ago

18:19

Now playing

Claude MCP + GitHub = The Future of AI Agents 🚀

3.1K views 3 weeks ago

51:07

Now playing

#1 on ARC-AGI?? 53.6% with Claude + Evolutionary Test-Time Compute

1.3K views 10 days ago

27:46

Now playing

Harald Kujat und Markus Reisner zum Krieg in der Ukraine | Talk Spezial

736K views 1 month ago

34:54

Now playing

AGI is here, Realtime 3D faces, INSANE AI video generators, Image to 3D worlds, Genesis simulator

93K views 8 days ago

8:16

Now playing

How I Got Placed ? | Off Campus | A 20 year Software Developer (iOS Developer) | Agile episode: 1

12 views 31 minutes ago

New

4:16

Now playing

Cannibal Corpse - Hammer Smashed Face [Live] [HD]

2.6M views 12 years ago

10:48

Now playing

AGI Milestone: Sam Altman Reveals OpenAI’s O3 Breakthrough

1.3K views 3 days ago

New

7:06

Now playing

St.Florianer Sängerknaben - Stille Nacht, heilige Nacht

204K views 8 years ago

0:54

Now playing

OpenAI introduces o3 and I add some spice to it

170 views 9 days ago

10:38

Now playing

FINALLY I REVEALED Why Elon Musk Declared War On OpenAI—Here’s What Happened

547 views 4 weeks ago

10:10

Now playing

AI Just Became Every Programmer's Best Friend

145 views 12 days ago

36:13

Now playing

Complete Beginner's Guide To AI 2025

1.1K views 6 days ago

New

4:04

Now playing

a-ha - Take On Me (Official Video) [Remastered in 4K]

2B views 14 years ago

8:05

Now playing

Alles von langer Hand geplant? Das passiert hinter den Kulissen! 🚨

10K views 16 hours ago

New

41:54

Now playing

Charles Packer | Advancing AI frontiers with long-term memory with Letta | Al Agents Podcast

454 views 3 weeks ago

14:56

Now playing

META leading AI scientist explains “THEIR”methodology for achieving AGI

1.1K views 6 days ago

New

15:59

Now playing

Google Gemini Advanced 2.0 Just Dropped! 🤯

1.5K views 11 days ago

19:52

Now playing

12 day OpenAI’s Major Updates Recap

245 views 7 days ago

6:50

Now playing

When OpenAI's ChatGPT o1 Started THINKING For Itself 😱

1.2K views 2 weeks ago

6:21

Now playing

Days in the life of a Software Developer

1.1K views 6 days ago

New

19:44

Now playing

Biggest Puzzle in Computer Science: P vs. NP

936K views 1 year ago

1:09:15

Now playing

X86 Needs To Die

541K views 8 months ago

11:44

Now playing

8. Intermediaries

109 views 41 minutes ago

New

30:13

Now playing

LCM: The Ultimate Evolution of AI? Large Concept Models

46K views 2 weeks ago

22:02

Now playing

Access ANY Network (remotely)

223K views 9 days ago

16:10

Now playing

8 AI Tools I Wish I Tried Sooner

89K views 6 days ago

New

23:24

Now playing

This experiment confirmed Quantum Tunneling!

132K views 1 month ago

28:30

Now playing

TWISTED: The dramatic history of twisted-pair Ethernet

369K views 4 days ago

New

32:08

Now playing

What Happens When AI Knows TOO MUCH? | Reverse Turing Test w/ Albert Einstein and Nikola Tesla

158K views 4 weeks ago

23:04

Now playing

30 ChatGPT Hacks You Need to Know in 2024 (Become a PRO!)

70K views 2 weeks ago

28:52

Now playing

Dr. Daniele Ganser: Welche Mächte stecken hinter dem Sturz von Baschar al-Assad?

510K views 3 days ago

New

22:05

Now playing

o1 is dead, long life to o3 ! AGI is CONFIRMED by ARC PRIZE!

80 views 9 days ago

3:08

Now playing

A video analyzing productivity coach powered by Google Gemini

90 views 4 weeks ago

7:46

Now playing

The $13 Billion Betrayal? OpenAI's BOLD Move Against Microsoft

69 views 3 weeks ago

3:01

Now playing

NVIDIA Unveils Its MOST AFFORDABLE SUPERCOMPUTER – What’s Inside

595 views 12 days ago

1:17:23

Now playing

Autonomous SDLC : A Developers Perspective with David Robertson

2K views 13 days ago

20:01

Now playing

OpenAI Canvas 全新升級：即時程式碼執行、自訂 GPT整合，與 ChatGPT 協作更強大！

12 views 2 weeks ago

8:11

Now playing

New o3 Model: How OpenAI Played The Benchmarks

208 views 4 days ago

New

14:02

Now playing

Hedge fund interview question

67K views 1 day ago

New

21:31

Now playing

Q STAR 2.0 - new MIT breakthrough AI model IMPROVES ITSELF in REAL TIME (new Strawberry?)

110K views 1 month ago

7:49

Now playing

10 Apps That Turn Your MOBILE Into A Hacking Computer!

92 views 23 hours ago

New

10:01

Now playing

NEW OpenAI o3 and o3-Mini: Is This AGI? (Full Breakdown)

4.2K views 9 days ago

5:13

Now playing

OpenAI's new O3 model. Is it AGI?

450 views 9 days ago

13:14

Now playing

Future of AI is HERE: ChatGPT o3

119 views 9 days ago

22:05

Now playing

O3 model chatgpt release sam altman

1.4K views 9 days ago

28:50

Now playing

The AI Conference 2024, San Francisco (Recap One)

486 views 7 days ago

14:46

Now playing

"OpenAI o3: The Future of AI with Test-Time Program Finding

179 views 9 days ago

57:21

Now playing

Sam Altman 12 Days of Open AI: Day 13

63 views 12 days ago

22:22

Now playing

Dev Day Holiday Edition - 12 Days of OpenAI: Day 9 ⭐WITH SUBTITLES⭐

1.5K views 12 days ago

17:35

Now playing

OpenAI's 03 and 03 Mini: A New Frontier in AI Reasoning

9 views 1 day ago

New

13:57

Now playing

OpenAI Dev Day 9: Model Updates and API Enhancements

24 views 11 days ago

4:17

Now playing

OpenAI Just Revealed They ACHIEVED AGI (OpenAI o3 Explained) #openai #agi #openaio3

1.4K views 6 days ago

New