Tryptophan metabolism diagram

Human microbiome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Graphic depicting the human skin microbiota, with relative prevalences of various classes of bacteria

The human microbiome is the aggregate of all microbiota that reside on or within human tissues and biofluids along with the corresponding anatomical sites in which they reside,[1] including the skin, mammary glands, seminal fluid, uterus, ovarian follicles, lung, saliva, oral mucosa, conjunctiva, biliary tract, and gastrointestinal tract. Types of human microbiota include bacteria, archaea, fungi, protists and viruses. Though micro-animals can also live on the human body, they are typically excluded from this definition. In the context of genomics, the term human microbiome is sometimes used to refer to the collective genomes of resident microorganisms;[2] however, the term human metagenome has the same meaning.[1]

Humans are colonized by many microorganisms, with approximately the same order of magnitude of non-human cells as human cells.[3] Some microorganisms that colonize humans are commensal, meaning they co-exist without harming humans; others have a mutualistic relationship with their human hosts.[2]: 700 [4] Conversely, some non-pathogenic microorganisms can harm human hosts via the metabolites they produce, like trimethylamine, which the human body converts to trimethylamine N-oxide via FMO3-mediated oxidation.[5][6] Certain microorganisms perform tasks that are known to be useful to the human host, but the role of most of them is not well understood. Those that are expected to be present, and that under normal circumstances do not cause disease, are sometimes deemed normal flora or normal microbiota.[2]

The Human Microbiome Project (HMP) took on the project of sequencing the genome of the human microbiota, focusing particularly on the microbiota that normally inhabit the skin, mouth, nose, digestive tract, and vagina.[2] It reached a milestone in 2012 when it published its initial results.[7]

Contents

- 1Terminology

- 2Relative numbers

- 3Study

- 3.1Shotgun sequencing

- 3.2Marker gene analysis

- 3.3Phylogenetic Analysis

- 4Types

- 4.1Bacteria

- 4.2Archaea

- 4.3Fungi

- 4.4Viruses

- 5Anatomical areas

- 5.1Skin

- 5.2Conjunctiva

- 5.3Gastrointestinal tract

- 5.4Urethra and bladder

- 5.5Vagina

- 5.6Placenta

- 5.7Uterus

- 5.8Oral cavity

- 5.9Nasal cavity

- 5.10Lung

- 5.11Biliary tract

- 6Disease and death

- 6.1Clostridioides difficile infection

- 6.2Cancer

- 6.3Inflammatory bowel disease

- 6.4Human immunodeficiency virus

- 6.5Death

- 7Environmental health

- 8Migration

- 9See also

- 10Bibliography

- 11References

- 12External links

Terminology[edit]

Life timeline

This box:

- view

- talk

- edit

−4500 —

–

—

–

−4000 —

–

—

–

−3500 —

–

—

–

−3000 —

–

—

–

−2500 —

–

—

–

−2000 —

–

—

–

−1500 —

–

—

–

−1000 —

–

—

–

−500 —

–

—

–

0 —

Water

Single-celled life

Photosynthesis

Eukaryotes

Multicellular life

P

l

a

n

t

s

Arthropods Molluscs

Flowers

Dinosaurs

Mammals

Birds

Primates

H

a

d

e

a

n

A

r

c

h

e

a

n

P

r

o

t

e

r

o

z

o

i

c

P

h

a

n

e

r

o

z

o

i

c

←

Earth formed

(4540 mya)

←

Earliest water

←

Earliest life

←

LHB meteorites

←

Earliest oxygen

←

Pongola glaciation*

←

Atmospheric oxygen

←

Huronian glaciation*

←

Sexual reproduction

←

Earliest multicellular life

←

Earliest fungi

←

Earliest plants

←

Earliest animals

←

Cryogenian ice age*

←

Ediacaran biota

←

Cambrian explosion

←

Andean glaciation*

←

Earliest tetrapods

←

Karoo ice age*

←

Earliest apes / humans

←

Quaternary ice age*

(million years ago)

*Ice Ages

Though widely known as flora or microflora, this is a misnomer in technical terms, since the word root flora pertains to plants, and biota refers to the total collection of organisms in a particular ecosystem. Recently, the more appropriate term microbiota is applied, though its use has not eclipsed the entrenched use and recognition of flora with regard to bacteria and other microorganisms. Both terms are being used in different literature.[4]

Relative numbers[edit]

This section needs more medical references for verification or relies too heavily on primary sources. Please review the contents of the section and add the appropriate references if you can. Unsourced or poorly sourced material may be challenged and removed.

Find sources: "Human microbiome" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (February 2020)

Rod of Asclepius2.svg

As of 2014, it was reported in popular media and in the scientific literature that there are about 10 times as many microbial cells in the human body as there are human cells; this figure was based on estimates that the human microbiome includes around 100 trillion bacterial cells and that an adult human typically has around 10 trillion human cells.[8] In 2014, the American Academy of Microbiology published a FAQ that emphasized that the number of microbial cells and the number of human cells are both estimates, and noted that recent research had arrived at a new estimate of the number of human cells – approximately 37.2 trillion, meaning that the ratio of microbial-to-human cells, if the original estimate of 100 trillion bacterial cells is correct, is closer to 3:1.[8][9] In 2016, another group published a new estimate of the ratio being roughly 1:1 (1.3:1, with "an uncertainty of 25% and a variation of 53% over the population of standard 70-kg [150 lb] males").[10][3]

A more recent estimate is a ratio of 1.3:1 bacterial cells for every human cell, whereas the number of phages and viruses outnumber bacterial cells by at least a order of magnitude more. The number of bacterial genes (assuming 1000 bacterial species in the gut with 2000 genes per species) is estimated to be 2,000,000 genes, 100 times the number of approximately 20,000 human genes.[11]

Study[edit]

Main article: Human Microbiome Project

Flowchart illustrating how the human microbiome is studied on the DNA level.

The problem of elucidating the human microbiome is essentially identifying the members of a microbial community, which includes bacteria, eukaryotes, and viruses.[12] This is done primarily using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-based studies, though ribonucleic acid (RNA), protein and metabolite based studies are also performed.[12][13] DNA-based microbiome studies typically can be categorized as either targeted amplicon studies or, more recently, shotgun metagenomic studies. The former focuses on specific known marker genes and is primarily informative taxonomically, while the latter is an entire metagenomic approach which can also be used to study the functional potential of the community.[12] One of the challenges that is present in human microbiome studies, but not in other metagenomic studies, is to avoid including the host DNA in the study.[14]

Aside from simply elucidating the composition of the human microbiome, one of the major questions involving the human microbiome is whether there is a "core", that is, whether there is a subset of the community that is shared among most humans.[15][16] If there is a core, then it would be possible to associate certain community compositions with disease states, which is one of the goals of the HMP. It is known that the human microbiome (such as the gut microbiota) is highly variable both within a single subject and among different individuals, a phenomenon which is also observed in mice.[4]

On 13 June 2012, a major milestone of the HMP was announced by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins.[7] The announcement was accompanied with a series of coordinated articles published in Nature[17][18] and several journals in the Public Library of Science (PLoS) on the same day. By mapping the normal microbial make-up of healthy humans using genome sequencing techniques, the researchers of the HMP have created a reference database and the boundaries of normal microbial variation in humans. From 242 healthy U.S. volunteers, more than 5,000 samples were collected from tissues from 15 (men) to 18 (women) body sites such as mouth, nose, skin, lower intestine (stool), and vagina. All the DNA, human and microbial, were analyzed with DNA sequencing machines. The microbial genome data were extracted by identifying the bacterial specific ribosomal RNA, 16S rRNA. The researchers calculated that more than 10,000 microbial species occupy the human ecosystem, and they have identified 81–99% of the genera.

Shotgun sequencing[edit]

It is frequently difficult to culture in laboratory communities of bacteria, archaea and viruses, therefore sequencing technologies can be exploited in metagenomics, too. Indeed, the complete knowledge of the functions and the characterization of specific microbial strains offer a great potentiality in therapeutic discovery and human health.[19]

Collection of samples and DNA extraction[edit]

The main point is to collect an amount microbial biomass that is sufficient to perform the sequencing and to minimize the sample contamination; for this reason, enrichment techniques can be used. In particular, the DNA extraction method must be good for every bacterial strain, not to have the genomes of the ones that are easy to lyse. Mechanical lysis is usually preferred rather than chemical lysis, and bead beating may result in DNA loss when preparing the library.[19]

Preparation of the library and sequencing[edit]

The most used platforms are Illumina, Ion Torrent, Oxford Nanopore MinION and Pacific Bioscience Sequel, although the Illumina platform is considered the most appealing option due to its wide availability, high output and accuracy. There are no indications regarding the correct amount of sample to use.[19]

Metagenome assembly[edit]

The de novo approach is exploited; however, it presents some difficulties to be overcome. The coverage depends on each genome abundance in its specific community; low-abundance genomes may undergo fragmentation if the sequencing depth is not sufficient enough to avoid the formation of gaps. Luckily, there are metagenome-specific assemblers to help, since, if hundreds of strains are present, the sequencing depth needs to be increased to its maximum.[19]

Contig binning[edit]

Neither from which genome every contig derives, nor the number of genomes present in the sample are known a priori; the aim of this step is to divide the contigs into species. The methods to perform such analysis can be either supervised (database with known sequences) or unsupervised (direct search for contig groups in the collected data). However, both methods require a kind of metric to define a score for the similarity between a specific contig and the group in which it must be put, and algorithms to convert the similarities into allocations in the groups.[19]

Analysis after the processing[edit]

The statistical analysis is essential to validate the obtained results (ANOVA can be used to size the differences between the groups); if it is paired with graphical tools, the outcome is easily visualized and understood.[19]

Once a metagenome is assembled, it is possible to infer the functional potential of the microbiome. The computational challenges for this type of analysis are greater than for single genomes, because usually metagenomes assemblers have poorer quality, and many recovered genes are non-complete or fragmented. After the gene identification step, the data can be used to carry out a functional annotation by means of multiple alignment of the target genes against orthologs databases.[20]

Marker gene analysis[edit]

It is a technique that exploits primers to target a specific genetic region and enables to determine the microbial phylogenies. The genetic region is characterized by a highly variable region which can confer detailed identification; it is delimited by conserved regions, which function as binding sites for primers used in PCR. The main gene used to characterize bacteria and archaea is 16S rRNA gene, while fungi identification is based on Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS). The technique is fast and not so expensive and enables to obtain a low-resolution classification of a microbial sample; it is optimal for samples that may be contaminated by host DNA. Primer affinity varies among all DNA sequences, which may result in biases during the amplification reaction; indeed, low-abundance samples are susceptible to overamplification errors, since the other contaminating microorganisms result to be over-represented in case of increasing the PCR cycles. Therefore, the optimization of primer selection can help to decrease such errors, although it requires complete knowledge of the microorganisms present in the sample, and their relative abundances.[21]

Marker gene analysis can be influenced by the primer choice; in this kind of analysis it's desirable to use a well-validated protocol (such as the one used in the Earth Microbiome Project). The first thing to do in a marker gene amplicon analysis is to remove sequencing errors; a lot of sequencing platforms are very reliable, but most of the apparent sequence diversity is still due to errors during the sequencing process. To reduce this phenomenon a first approach is to cluster sequences into Operational taxonomic unit (OTUs): this process consolidates similar sequences (a 97% similarity threshold is usually adopted) into a single feature that can be used in further analysis steps; this method however would discard SNPs because they would get clustered into a single OTU. Another approach is Oligotyping, which includes position-specific information from 16s rRNA sequencing to detect small nucleotide variations and from discriminating between closely related distinct taxa. These methods give as an output a table of DNA sequences and counts of the different sequences per sample rather than OTU.[21]

Another important step in the analysis is to assign a taxonomic name to microbial sequences in the data. This can be done using machine learning approaches that can reach an accuracy at genus-level of about 80%. Other popular analysis packages provide support for taxonomic classification using exact matches to reference databases and should provide greater specificity, but poor sensitivity. Unclassified microorganism should be further checked for organelle sequences.[21]

Phylogenetic Analysis[edit]

Many methods that exploit phylogenetic inference use the 16SRNA gene for Archea and Bacteria and the 18SRNA gene for Eukaryotes. Phylogenetic comparative methods (PCS) are based on the comparison of multiple traits among microorganisms; the principle is: the closely they are related, the higher number of traits they share. Usually PCS are coupled with phylogenetic generalized least square (PGLS) or other statistical analysis to get more significant results. Ancestral state reconstruction is used in microbiome studies to impute trait values for taxa whose traits are unknown. This is commonly performed with PICRUSt, which relies on available databases. Phylogenetic variables are chosen by researchers according to the type of study: through the selection of some variables with significant biological informations, it is possible to reduce the dimension of the data to analyse.[22]

Phylogenetic aware distance is usually performed with UniFrac or similar tools, such as Soresen's index or Rao's D, to quantify the differences between the different communities. All this methods are negatively affected by horizontal gene transmission (HGT), since it can generate errors and lead to the correlation of distant species. There are different ways to reduce the negative impact of HGT: the use of multiple genes or computational tools to assess the probability of putative HGT events.[22]

Types[edit]

Bacteria[edit]

Commensals vs pathogens mechanism. Mechanisms underlying the inflammation in COPD. Airway epithelium has complex structure: consists of at least seven diverse cell types interacting with each other by means of tight junctions. Moreover, epithelial calls can deliver the signals into the underlying tissues taking part in the mechanisms of innate and adaptive immune defence. The key transmitters of the signals are dendritic cells. Once pathogenic bacterium (e.g., S. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa) has activated particular pattern recognition receptors on/in epithelial cells, the proinflammatory signaling pathways are activated. This results mainly in IL-1, IL-6 and IL-8 production. These cytokines induce the chemotaxis to the site of infection in its target cells (e.g., neutrophils, dendritic cells and macrophages). On the other hand, representatives of standard microbiota cause only weak signaling preventing the inflammation. The mechanism of distinguishing between harmless and harmful bacteria on the molecular as well as on physiological levels is not completely understood.

Populations of microbes (such as bacteria and yeasts) inhabit the skin and mucosal surfaces in various parts of the body. Their role forms part of normal, healthy human physiology, however if microbe numbers grow beyond their typical ranges (often due to a compromised immune system) or if microbes populate (such as through poor hygiene or injury) areas of the body normally not colonized or sterile (such as the blood, or the lower respiratory tract, or the abdominal cavity), disease can result (causing, respectively, bacteremia/sepsis, pneumonia, and peritonitis).[medical citation needed]

The Human Microbiome Project found that individuals host thousands of bacterial types, different body sites having their own distinctive communities. Skin and vaginal sites showed smaller diversity than the mouth and gut, these showing the greatest richness. The bacterial makeup for a given site on a body varies from person to person, not only in type, but also in abundance. Bacteria of the same species found throughout the mouth are of multiple subtypes, preferring to inhabit distinctly different locations in the mouth. Even the enterotypes in the human gut, previously thought to be well understood, are from a broad spectrum of communities with blurred taxon boundaries.[23][24]

It is estimated that 500 to 1,000 species of bacteria live in the human gut but belong to just a few phyla: Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominate but there are also Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria and Cyanobacteria.[25]

A number of types of bacteria, such as Actinomyces viscosus and A. naeslundii, live in the mouth, where they are part of a sticky substance called plaque. If this is not removed by brushing, it hardens into calculus (also called tartar). The same bacteria also secrete acids that dissolve tooth enamel, causing tooth decay.

The vaginal microflora consist mostly of various lactobacillus species. It was long thought that the most common of these species was Lactobacillus acidophilus, but it has later been shown that L. iners is in fact most common, followed by L. crispatus. Other lactobacilli found in the vagina are L. jensenii, L. delbruekii and L. gasseri. Disturbance of the vaginal flora can lead to infections such as bacterial vaginosis or candidiasis ("yeast infection").

Archaea[edit]

Archaea are present in the human gut, but, in contrast to the enormous variety of bacteria in this organ, the numbers of archaeal species are much more limited.[26] The dominant group are the methanogens, particularly Methanobrevibacter smithii and Methanosphaera stadtmanae.[27] However, colonization by methanogens is variable, and only about 50% of humans have easily detectable populations of these organisms.[28]

As of 2007, no clear examples of archaeal pathogens were known,[29][30] although a relationship has been proposed between the presence of some methanogens and human periodontal disease.[31]

Fungi[edit]

See also: Mycobiota (human)

Fungi, in particular yeasts, are present in the human gut.[32][33][34][35] The best-studied of these are Candida species due to their ability to become pathogenic in immunocompromised and even in healthy hosts.[33][34][35] Yeasts are also present on the skin,[32] such as Malassezia species, where they consume oils secreted from the sebaceous glands.[36][37]

Viruses[edit]

See also: Human virome

Viruses, especially bacterial viruses (bacteriophages), colonize various body sites. These colonized sites include the skin,[38] gut,[39] lungs,[40] and oral cavity.[41] Virus communities have been associated with some diseases, and do not simply reflect the bacterial communities.[42][43][44]

Anatomical areas[edit]

Main article: List of human flora

Skin[edit]

Main article: Skin flora

A study of 20 skin sites on each of ten healthy humans found 205 identified genera in 19 bacterial phyla, with most sequences assigned to four phyla: Actinobacteria (51.8%), Firmicutes (24.4%), Proteobacteria (16.5%), and Bacteroidetes (6.3%).[45] A large number of fungal genera are present on healthy human skin, with some variability by region of the body; however, during pathological conditions, certain genera tend to dominate in the affected region.[32] For example, Malassezia is dominant in atopic dermatitis and Acremonium is dominant on dandruff-afflicted scalps.[32]

The skin acts as a barrier to deter the invasion of pathogenic microbes. The human skin contains microbes that reside either in or on the skin and can be residential or transient. Resident microorganism types vary in relation to skin type on the human body. A majority of microbes reside on superficial cells on the skin or prefer to associate with glands. These glands such as oil or sweat glands provide the microbes with water, amino acids, and fatty acids. In addition, resident bacteria that associated with oil glands are often Gram-positive and can be pathogenic.[2]

Conjunctiva[edit]

A small number of bacteria and fungi are normally present in the conjunctiva.[32][46] Classes of bacteria include Gram-positive cocci (e.g., Staphylococcus and Streptococcus) and Gram-negative rods and cocci (e.g., Haemophilus and Neisseria) are present.[46] Fungal genera include Candida, Aspergillus, and Penicillium.[32] The lachrymal glands continuously secrete, keeping the conjunctiva moist, while intermittent blinking lubricates the conjunctiva and washes away foreign material. Tears contain bactericides such as lysozyme, so that microorganisms have difficulty in surviving the lysozyme and settling on the epithelial surfaces.

Gastrointestinal tract[edit]

Tryptophan metabolism by human gastrointestinal microbiota (

)

Tryptophan

Clostridium

sporogenes

Lacto-

bacilli

Tryptophanase-

expressing

bacteria

IPA

I3A

Indole

Liver

Brain

IPA

I3A

Indole

Indoxyl

sulfate

AST-120

AhR

Intestinal

immune

cells

Intestinal

epithelium

PXR

Mucosal homeostasis:

↓TNF-α

↑Junction protein-

coding mRNAs

L cell

GLP-1

T J

Neuroprotectant:

↓Activation of glial cells and astrocytes

↓4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal levels

↓DNA damage

–Antioxidant

–Inhibits β-amyloid fibril formation

Maintains mucosal reactivity:

↑IL-22 production

Associated with vascular disease:

↑Oxidative stress

↑Smooth muscle cell proliferation

↑Aortic wall thickness and calcification

Associated with chronic kidney disease:

↑Renal dysfunction

–Uremic toxin

Kidneys

The image above contains clickable links

This diagram shows the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds (indole and certain other derivatives) from tryptophan by bacteria in the gut.[47] Indole is produced from tryptophan by bacteria that express tryptophanase.[47] Clostridium sporogenes metabolizes tryptophan into indole and subsequently 3-indolepropionic acid (IPA),[48] a highly potent neuroprotective antioxidant that scavenges hydroxyl radicals.[47][49][50] IPA binds to the pregnane X receptor (PXR) in intestinal cells, thereby facilitating mucosal homeostasis and barrier function.[47] Following absorption from the intestine and distribution to the brain, IPA confers a neuroprotective effect against cerebral ischemia and Alzheimer's disease.[47] Lactobacillus species metabolize tryptophan into indole-3-aldehyde (I3A) which acts on the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in intestinal immune cells, in turn increasing interleukin-22 (IL-22) production.[47] Indole itself triggers the secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in intestinal L cells and acts as a ligand for AhR.[47] Indole can also be metabolized by the liver into indoxyl sulfate, a compound that is toxic in high concentrations and associated with vascular disease and renal dysfunction.[47] AST-120 (activated charcoal), an intestinal sorbent that is taken by mouth, adsorbs indole, in turn decreasing the concentration of indoxyl sulfate in blood plasma.[47]

Main article: Gut flora

See also: Gut–brain axis

In humans, the composition of the gastrointestinal microbiome is established during birth.[51] Birth by Cesarean section or vaginal delivery also influences the gut's microbial composition. Babies born through the vaginal canal have non-pathogenic, beneficial gut microbiota similar to those found in the mother.[52] However, the gut microbiota of babies delivered by C-section harbors more pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus and it takes longer to develop non-pathogenic, beneficial gut microbiota.[53]

The relationship between some gut flora and humans is not merely commensal (a non-harmful coexistence), but rather a mutualistic relationship.[2] Some human gut microorganisms benefit the host by fermenting dietary fiber into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetic acid and butyric acid, which are then absorbed by the host.[4][54] Intestinal bacteria also play a role in synthesizing vitamin B and vitamin K as well as metabolizing bile acids, sterols, and xenobiotics.[2][54] The systemic importance of the SCFAs and other compounds they produce are like hormones and the gut flora itself appears to function like an endocrine organ,[54] and dysregulation of the gut flora has been correlated with a host of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.[4][55]

The composition of human gut flora changes over time, when the diet changes, and as overall health changes.[4][55] A systematic review of 15 human randomized controlled trials from July 2016 found that certain commercially available strains of probiotic bacteria from the Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus genera (B. longum, B. breve, B. infantis, L. helveticus, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, and L. casei), when taken by mouth in daily doses of 109–1010 colony forming units (CFU) for 1–2 months, possess treatment efficacy (i.e., improves behavioral outcomes) in certain central nervous system disorders – including anxiety, depression, autism spectrum disorder, and obsessive–compulsive disorder – and improves certain aspects of memory.[56] However, changes in the composition of gut microbiota has also been found to be correlated with harmful effects on health. In an article published by Musso et al., it was found that the gut microbiota of obese invidividuals had more Firmicutes and less Bacteroidetes than healthy individuals.[57] It's believed this change in microbe ratio may contribute to an increase in bacteria more efficient at extracting energy from food. Researchers used shotgun sequencing to compare microbiota of obese mice with lean mice. They found that obese mice genomes consisted of an abundance of genes encoding for enzymes capable of breaking down polysaccharides that are indigestible by the human body alone.[58]

Furthermore, a study done by Gordon et al., confirmed that it was the composition of the microbiota that causes obesity rather than the other way around. This was done by transplanting the gut microbiota from diet-induced obese(DIO) mice or lean control mice into lean germ-free mice that do not have a microbiome. They found that the mice transplanted with DIO mouse gut microbiota had significantly higher total body fat than the mice transplanted with lean mouse microbiota when fed with the same diet.[59]

A separate study, completed by Ridaura et al. in 2013, performed the first transplant of human fecal matter into germ-free mice. The human feces collected originated from adult female twins with markedly different body fat percentages. The researchers were able to essentially transfer the obesity phenotype and lean phenotype to mice, while both being on low-fat mouse feed. The mice with the feces derived from the obese twin increased total body and fat mass, while the mice with feces derived from the leaner twin did not develop obese-like traits or symptoms.[60]

Urethra and bladder[edit]

The genitourinary system appears to have a microbiota,[61][62] which is an unexpected finding in light of the long-standing use of standard clinical microbiological culture methods to detect bacteria in urine when people show signs of a urinary tract infection; it is common for these tests to show no bacteria present.[63] It appears that common culture methods do not detect many kinds of bacteria and other microorganisms that are normally present.[63] As of 2017, sequencing methods were used to identify these microorganisms to determine if there are differences in microbiota between people with urinary tract problems and those who are healthy.[61][62] To properly assess the microbiome of the bladder as opposed to the genitourinary system, the urine specimen should be collected directly from the bladder, which is often done with a catheter.[64]

Vagina[edit]

Main article: Vaginal flora

See also: List of microbiota species of the lower reproductive tract of women, List of bacterial vaginosis microbiota, and Vaginal microbiota in pregnancy

Vaginal microbiota refers to those species and genera that colonize the vagina. These organisms play an important role in protecting against infections and maintaining vaginal health.[65] The most abundant vaginal microorganisms found in premenopausal women are from the genus Lactobacillus, which suppress pathogens by producing hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid.[34][65][66] Bacterial species composition and ratios vary depending on the stage of the menstrual cycle.[67][68][needs update] Ethnicity also influences vaginal flora. The occurrence of hydrogen peroxide-producing lactobacilli is lower in African American women and vaginal pH is higher.[69] Other influential factors such as sexual intercourse and antibiotics have been linked to the loss of lactobacilli.[66] Moreover, studies have found that sexual intercourse with a condom does appear to change lactobacilli levels, and does increase the level of Escherichia coli within the vaginal flora.[66] Changes in the normal, healthy vaginal microbiota is an indication of infections,[70] such as candidiasis or bacterial vaginosis.[66] Candida albicans inhibits the growth of Lactobacillus species, while Lactobacillus species which produce hydrogen peroxide inhibit the growth and virulence of Candida albicans in both the vagina and the gut.[32][34][35]

Fungal genera that have been detected in the vagina include Candida, Pichia, Eurotium, Alternaria, Rhodotorula, and Cladosporium, among others.[32]

Placenta[edit]

Main article: Placental microbiome

Until recently the placenta was considered to be a sterile organ but commensal, nonpathogenic bacterial species and genera have been identified that reside in the placental tissue.[71][72][73] However, the existence of a microbiome in the placenta is controversial as criticized in several researches. So called "placental microbiome" is likely derived from contamination of regents because low-biomass samples are easily contaminated.[74][75][76]

Uterus[edit]

Main article: Uterine microbiome

Until recently, the upper reproductive tract of women was considered to be a sterile environment. A variety of microorganisms inhabit the uterus of healthy, asymptomatic women of reproductive age. The microbiome of the uterus differs significantly from that of the vagina and gastrointestinal tract.[77]

Oral cavity[edit]

Main article: Oral microbiology

The environment present in the human mouth allows the growth of characteristic microorganisms found there. It provides a source of water and nutrients, as well as a moderate temperature.[2] Resident microbes of the mouth adhere to the teeth and gums to resist mechanical flushing from the mouth to stomach where acid-sensitive microbes are destroyed by hydrochloric acid.[2][34]

Anaerobic bacteria in the oral cavity include: Actinomyces, Arachnia, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Eubacterium, Fusobacterium, Lactobacillus, Leptotrichia, Peptococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Propionibacterium, Selenomonas, Treponema, and Veillonella.[78][needs update] Genera of fungi that are frequently found in the mouth include Candida, Cladosporium, Aspergillus, Fusarium, Glomus, Alternaria, Penicillium, and Cryptococcus, among others.[32]

Bacteria accumulate on both the hard and soft oral tissues in biofilm allowing them to adhere and strive in the oral environment while protected from the environmental factors and antimicrobial agents.[79] Saliva plays a key biofilm homeostatic role allowing recolonization of bacteria for formation and controlling growth by detaching biofilm buildup.[80] It also provides a means of nutrients and temperature regulation. The location of the biofilm determines the type of exposed nutrients it receives.[81]

Oral bacteria have evolved mechanisms to sense their environment and evade or modify the host. However, a highly efficient innate host defense system constantly monitors the bacterial colonization and prevents bacterial invasion of local tissues. A dynamic equilibrium exists between dental plaque bacteria and the innate host defense system.[82]

This dynamic between host oral cavity and oral microbes plays a key role in health and disease as it provides entry into the body.[83] A healthy equilibrium presents a symbiotic relationship where oral microbes limit growth and adherence of pathogens while the host provides an environment for them to flourish.[83][79] Ecological changes such as change of immune status, shift of resident microbes and nutrient availability shift from a mutual to parasitic relationship resulting in the host being prone to oral and systemic disease.[79] Systemic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases has been correlated to poor oral health.[83] Of particular interest is the role of oral microorganisms in the two major dental diseases: dental caries and periodontal disease.[82] Pathogen colonization at the periodontium cause an excessive immune response resulting in a periodontal pocket- a deepened space between the tooth and gingiva.[79] This acts as a protected blood-rich reservoir with nutrients for anaerobic pathogens.[79] Systemic disease at various sites of the body can result from oral microbes entering the blood bypassing periodontal pockets and oral membranes.[83]

Persistent proper oral hygiene is the primary method for preventing oral and systemic disease.[83] It reduces the density of biofilm and overgrowth of potential pathogenic bacteria resulting in disease.[81] However, proper oral hygiene may not be enough as the oral microbiome, genetics, and changes to immune response play a factor in developing chronic infections.[81] Use of antibiotics could treat already spreading infection but ineffective against bacteria within biofilms.[81]

Nasal cavity[edit]

The healthy nasal microbiome is dominated by Corynebacterium, and Staphylococcus. The mucosal microbiome plays a critical role in modulating viral infection.[84]

Lung[edit]

Main article: Lung microbiome

Much like the oral cavity, the upper and lower respiratory system possess mechanical deterrents to remove microbes. Goblet cells produce mucous which traps microbes and moves them out of the respiratory system via continuously moving ciliated epithelial cells.[2] In addition, a bactericidal effect is generated by nasal mucus which contains the enzyme lysozyme.[2] The upper and lower respiratory tract appears to have its own set of microbiota.[85] Pulmonary bacterial microbiota belong to 9 major bacterial genera: Prevotella, Sphingomonas, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Fusobacterium, Megasphaera, Veillonella, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus. Some of the bacteria considered "normal biota" in the respiratory tract can cause serious disease especially in immunocompromised individuals; these include Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Staphylococcus aureus.[citation needed] Fungal genera that compose the pulmonary mycobiome include Candida, Malassezia, Neosartorya, Saccharomyces, and Aspergillus, among others.[32]

Unusual distributions of bacterial and fungal genera in the respiratory tract is observed in people with cystic fibrosis.[32][86] Their bacterial flora often contains antibiotic-resistant and slow-growing bacteria, and the frequency of these pathogens changes in relation to age.[86]

Biliary tract[edit]

Traditionally the biliary tract has been considered to be normally sterile, and the presence of microorganisms in bile is a marker of pathological process. This assumption was confirmed by failure in allocation of bacterial strains from the normal bile duct. Papers began emerging in 2013 showing that the normal biliary microbiota is a separate functional layer which protects a biliary tract from colonization by exogenous microorganisms.[87]

Disease and death[edit]

Human bodies rely on the innumerable bacterial genes as the source of essential nutrients.[88] Both metagenomic and epidemiological studies indicate vital roles for the human microbiome in preventing a wide range of diseases, from type 2 diabetes and obesity to inflammatory bowel disease, Parkinson's disease, and even mental health conditions like depression.[89] A symbiotic relationship between the gut microbiota and different bacteria may influence an individual's immune response.[90] Although in its infancy, microbiome-based treatment is also showing promise, most notably for treating drug-resistant C. difficile infection[91] and in diabetes treatment.[92]

Clostridioides difficile infection[edit]

An overwhelming presence of the bacteria, C. difficile, leads to an infection of the gastrointestinal tract, normally associated to dysbiosis with the microbiota believed to have been caused by the administration of antibiotics. Use of antibiotics eradicates the beneficial gut flora within the gastrointestinal tract, which normally prevents pathogenic bacteria from establishing dominance.[93] Traditional treatment for C. difficile infections includes an additional regime of antibiotics, however, efficacy rates average between 20-30%.[94] Recognizing the importance of healthy gut bacteria, researchers turned to a procedure known as fecal microbiota transplant, where patients experiencing gastrointestinal diseases, such as C. difficile infection, receive fecal content from a healthy individual in hopes of restoring a normal functioning intestinal microbiota.[95] Fecal microbiota transplant is approximately 85–90% effective in people with CDI for whom antibiotics have not worked or in whom the disease recurs following antibiotics.[96][97] Most people with CDI recover with one FMT treatment.[98][93][99]

Cancer[edit]

Although cancer is generally a disease of host genetics and environmental factors, microorganisms are implicated in some 20% of human cancers.[100] Particularly for potential factors in colon cancer, bacterial density is one million times higher than in the small intestine, and approximately 12-fold more cancers occur in the colon compared to the small intestine, possibly establishing a pathogenic role for microbiota in colon and rectal cancers.[101] Microbial density may be used as a prognostic tool in assessment of colorectal cancers.[101]

The microbiota may affect carcinogenesis in three broad ways: (i) altering the balance of tumor cell proliferation and death, (ii) regulating immune system function, and (iii) influencing metabolism of host-produced factors, foods and pharmaceuticals.[100] Tumors arising at boundary surfaces, such as the skin, oropharynx and respiratory, digestive and urogenital tracts, harbor a microbiota. Substantial microbe presence at a tumor site does not establish association or causal links. Instead, microbes may find tumor oxygen tension or nutrient profile supportive. Decreased populations of specific microbes or induced oxidative stress may also increase risks.[100][101] Of the around 1030 microbes on earth, ten are designated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as human carcinogens.[100] Microbes may secrete proteins or other factors directly drive cell proliferation in the host, or may up- or down-regulate the host immune system including driving acute or chronic inflammation in ways that contribute to carcinogenesis.[100]

Concerning the relationship of immune function and development of inflammation, mucosal surface barriers are subject to environmental risks and must rapidly repair to maintain homeostasis. Compromised host or microbiota resiliency also reduce resistance to malignancy, possibly inducing inflammation and cancer. Once barriers are breached, microbes can elicit proinflammatory or immunosuppressive programs through various pathways.[100] For example, cancer-associated microbes appear to activate NF-κΒ signaling within the tumor microenviroment. Other pattern recognition receptors, such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain–like receptor (NLR) family members NOD-2, NLRP3, NLRP6 and NLRP12, may play a role in mediating colorectal cancer.[100] Likewise Helicobacter pylori appears to increase the risk of gastric cancer, due to its driving a chronic inflammatory response in the stomach.[100][101]

Inflammatory bowel disease[edit]

Inflammatory bowel disease consists of two different diseases: ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and both of these diseases present with disruptions in the gut microbiota (also known as dysbiosis). This dysbiosis presents itself in the form of decreased microbial diversity in the gut,[102][103] and is correlated to defects in host genes that changes the innate immune response in individuals.[102]

Human immunodeficiency virus[edit]

The HIV disease progression influences the composition and function of the gut microbiota, with notable differences between HIV-negative, HIV-positive, and post-ART HIV-positive populations.[citation needed] HIV decreases the integrity of the gut epithelial barrier function by affecting tight junctions. This breakdown allows for translocation across the gut epithelium, which is thought to contribute to increases in inflammation seen in people with HIV.[104]

Vaginal microbiota plays a role in the infectivity of HIV, with an increased risk of infection and transmission when the woman has bacterial vaginosis, a condition characterized by an abnormal balance of vaginal bacteria.[105] The enhanced infectivity is seen with the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines and CCR5 + CD4+ cells in the vagina. However, a decrease in infectivity is seen with increased levels of vaginal Lactobacillus, which promotes an anti-inflammatory condition.[104]

Death[edit]

Main article: Necrobiome

With death, the microbiome of the living body collapses and a different composition of microorganisms named necrobiome establishes itself as an important active constituent of the complex physical decomposition process. Its predictable changes over time are thought to be useful to help determine the time of death.[106][107]

Environmental health[edit]

Studies in 2009 questioned whether the decline in biota (including microfauna) as a result of human intervention might impede human health, hospital safety procedures, food product design, and treatments of disease.[108]

Migration[edit]

Preliminary research indicates that immediate changes in the microbiota may occur when a person migrates from one country to another, such as when Thai immigrants settled in the United States[109] or when Latin Americans immigrated into the United States.[110] Losses of microbiota diversity were greater in obese individuals and children of immigrants.[109][110]

Jump to search

Jump to navigation